Ultraviolet blood irradiation (UVBI) treats a wide range of conditions; it somehow reactivates the body’s innate ability to regulate and heal itself.

The Expose News - com

<p>The claim that ultraviolet blood irradiation (UVBI) treats a wide range of conditions and reactivates the body’s innate ability to heal itself has been circulating in various articles and publications. This claim review aims to evaluate the scientific evidence behind this assertion.</p>
<h2>Historical Context of UVBI</h2>
<p>Ultraviolet blood irradiation (UVBI) emerged in the 1930s as a treatment for various medical conditions. Initially, hospitals across America adopted UVBI, reporting successful outcomes for conditions such as infections, autoimmunity, cardiovascular disease, and pregnancy issues. However, the American Medical Association (AMA) published a flawed study that discredited UVBI, leading to its decline in the US. Despite this, Russia and Germany continued to research and use UVBI, finding it effective for various medical conditions.</p>
<h2>Scientific Evidence</h2>
<p>Several studies have explored the potential benefits of UVBI. A 20-year study of 29,518 Swedish women found that those who avoided sunlight were 130% more likely to die and had a higher risk of developing significant medical conditions, including cancer (<a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4051701/">Lindqvist et al., 2014</a>). This study highlights the importance of sunlight, including its ultraviolet component, for overall health.</p>
<p>UVBI has been shown to have various physiologic effects, such as improving blood circulation, reducing inflammation, and enhancing immune function. These effects may explain why UVBI is effective against both infections and autoimmune conditions. However, the exact mechanisms by which UVBI reactivates the body’s innate ability to heal itself are not fully understood.</p>
<h2>Current Use and Controversies</h2>
<p>In America, UVBI is primarily used by integrative practitioners to treat complex illnesses that do not respond to other therapies, such as Lyme disease, chronic fatigue syndrome, and chronic migraines. However, the use of UVBI remains controversial due to the lack of large-scale, randomized controlled trials and the historical suppression of this therapy by the medical establishment.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>While there is some scientific evidence supporting the use of UVBI for various medical conditions, the claim that it reactivates the body’s innate ability to heal itself requires further validation. The historical context and current use of UVBI suggest that it may have therapeutic potential, but more research is needed to fully understand its mechanisms and efficacy. It is essential to approach this claim with caution and consult healthcare professionals for evidence-based medical advice.</p>

Claim Review: Ultraviolet Blood Irradiation as a Miracle Cure

<p>Ultraljubičasto zračenje krvi (UVBI) je tretman koji je u 1930-im godinama bio revolucionaran i prihvaćen u mnogim bolnicama diljem Amerike. Tvrdnja je da je UVBI pokazao izvanrednu učinkovitost protiv širokog spektra stanja, uključujući infekcije, autoimune bolesti, kardiovaskularne bolesti i probleme s trudnoćom. Međutim, Američka liječnička udruga (AMA) je objavila manjkavu studiju koja je diskreditirala UVBI, što je dovelo do njegovog pada u SAD-u.</p>
<p>Prema tvrdnji, UVBI je nastavio biti prepoznat i istraživan u Rusiji i Njemačkoj, gdje su desetljeća istraživanja dokazala njegovu korisnost za različita izazovna medicinska stanja. Tvrdnja također navodi da je sunčeva svjetlost, posebno njena ultraljubičasta (UV) komponenta, ključni nutrijent koji mnogima od nas nedostaje i da je prirodno svjetlo rijetko dostupno u zatvorenom prostoru.</p>
<p>Studija objavljena u <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4052383/">Journal of Internal Medicine</a> otkrila je da su žene koje su izbjegavale sunčevu svjetlost imale 130% veću vjerojatnost da će umrijeti od onih koje su redovito bile izložene sunčevoj svjetlosti. Ova studija podupire tvrdnju da je sunčeva svjetlost važna za zdravlje.</p>
<p>Povijest UVBI-a pokazuje da je ova terapija bila uspješna u liječenju raznih stanja, uključujući sepsu, upalu pluća, nefritis, astmu, dječju paralizu, botulizam, reumatsku groznicu i virusni hepatitis. Tvrdnja također navodi da je UVBI bio vrlo učinkovit protiv teških infekcija gdje antibiotici nisu uspjeli.</p>
<p>Međutim, tvrdnja također navodi da je AMA pokušala monopolizirati tržište i diskreditirati UVBI kroz pristranu studiju. Ovo je dovelo do toga da su bolnice napustile UVBI u korist antibiotika. UVBI je, međutim, pronašao novi život u inozemstvu, gdje je nudio ekonomičniji način bavljenja medicinom.</p>
<p>Fiziološki učinci UVBI-a uključuju brzu normalizaciju krvotoka, što pomaže objasniti zašto je UVBI vrlo učinkovit protiv infekcija i autoimunih stanja. Ovi učinci također pomažu objasniti kako UV može uzrokovati brzu stabilizaciju pacijenata na rubu smrti.</p>
<p>UVBI istraživači su identificirali više od 200 članaka u časopisima o upotrebi UVBI i LBI objavljenih između 1934. i 2020. godine. U gotovo svim slučajevima zabilježena je stopa uspjeha od 80% do 100% s UVBI-jem. Ove studije dosljedno pokazuju potpunu odsutnost nuspojava UVBI-a.</p>
<p>Zaključak je da UVBI na neki način sposoban reaktivirati urođenu sposobnost tijela da se regulira i izliječi. Terapeutska učinkovitost UVBI-a ide ruku pod ruku s tolikim dobrobitima koje proizlaze iz dovoljnog izlaganja prirodnom svjetlu.</p>

Provjera tvrdnje: Ultraljubičasto zračenje krvi (UVBI) kao revolucionarni tretman

<p>In today’s interconnected world, wireless internet access has become ubiquitous, found in nearly every coffee shop, office, and home. However, the claim that Wi-Fi signals are not benign and can influence brainwaves, leading to hypnotic effects and social engineering, requires a thorough examination.</p>
<p>The content suggests that radio-frequency (RF) radiation from Wi-Fi can interfere with brain waves, particularly extremely low frequency (ELF) waves, which can make a person unknowingly enter a suggestive state of mind. This claim is attributed to Keith Cutter, a critic of modern wireless technology.</p>
<p>To evaluate this claim, it is essential to understand the scientific basis behind the effects of RF and ELF waves on the human brain. Wi-Fi operates using radio-frequency electromagnetic fields, transmitting data via pulse-modulated RF radiation. While it is true that Wi-Fi devices emit low levels of RF radiation, the cumulative impact of this exposure over time is a subject of ongoing research.</p>
<p>The content highlights the effect of ELF waves, which range from approximately 3 to 30 Hz, overlapping with the natural oscillation frequencies of the human brain. The brain’s electrical activity is divided into different frequency bands, each associated with different states of consciousness and mental function. The concern is that the 10Hz ELF pulses emitted by Wi-Fi beacons can induce brainwave entrainment, synchronizing brainwaves to an external frequency.</p>
<p>Brainwave entrainment refers to the synchronization of brainwaves to an external frequency. When the brain is exposed to a consistent external stimulus at a particular frequency, such as the 10Hz signal emitted by Wi-Fi, it can shift its own natural brainwave patterns to match. At 10Hz, the brain enters a more relaxed state, akin to alpha waves, which corresponds to reduced cortical activity.</p>
<p>However, the claim that prolonged exposure to the 10Hz ELF signal can create a “suggestible state,” making the brain more susceptible to external influences, is not supported by scientific evidence. While brainwave entrainment is a recognized phenomenon, its potential for mind control or social engineering is speculative and lacks empirical support.</p>
<p>Another concern raised is the potential for Wi-Fi to have a “memory effect” on body tissues, leading to long-term physical changes or health conditions. This claim is also not supported by reliable scientific studies. The concept of “trauma memory” in the body is a psychological concept, and its application to electromagnetic radiation is not backed by evidence.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that Wi-Fi can influence brainwaves and has potential for hypnotic effects and social engineering is largely unsupported by scientific evidence. While there are legitimate concerns about the effects of electromagnetic radiation, the specific claims made in the content are not backed by reliable studies.</p>
<p>References:</p>
<p>1. <a href="https://www.who.int/india/health-topics/electromagnetic-fields">Electromagnetic fields and public health: mobile phones</a> - World Health Organization</p>
<p>2. <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504984/">Health effects of electromagnetic fields: EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses</a> - Belpomme D, Hardell L, Belyaev I, Burgio E, Carpenter DO</p>
<p>3. <a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10198548/">Brainwave entrainment: a review and quantitative analysis</a> &nbsp;- Huang TL, Charyton C</p>

Claim Review: Wi-Fi Can Influence Brainwaves and Has Potential for Hypnotic Effects and Social Engineering

<h2>Claim Review: Aluminum in Vaccines and Autism</h2>
<p>The claim that aluminum in vaccines causes autism has gained traction in certain circles, particularly among those who are skeptical of vaccines. This claim is often supported by anecdotal evidence and personal testimonials rather than robust scientific research. However, it is crucial to examine the scientific evidence to determine the validity of this claim.</p>
<h3>Understanding Aluminum Adjuvants</h3>
<p>Aluminum compounds, such as aluminum hydroxide and aluminum phosphate, are commonly used as adjuvants in vaccines. Adjuvants are substances added to vaccines to enhance the immune response, making the vaccine more effective. Aluminum adjuvants have been used in vaccines for decades and are considered safe by regulatory bodies such as the FDA and CDC.</p>
<h3>Scientific Evidence on Aluminum and Autism</h3>
<p>Several studies have investigated the potential link between aluminum adjuvants and autism. A study by Dr. Chris Exley of Keele University found high levels of aluminum in the brain tissue of individuals with autism. However, this study has been criticized for its methodology and lack of control groups. Other studies have not found a consistent link between aluminum exposure and autism.</p>
<p>A comprehensive review by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) in 2012 concluded that the evidence does not support a causal relationship between vaccines and autism. The IOM reviewed numerous studies and found no consistent evidence linking vaccines, including those containing aluminum adjuvants, to autism.</p>
<h3>Neurotoxicity of Aluminum</h3>
<p>While some studies suggest that aluminum adjuvants may have neurotoxic effects, the majority of research indicates that the levels of aluminum in vaccines are safe. Aluminum is a common element in the environment, and humans are exposed to it through various sources, including food, water, and air. The body has mechanisms to eliminate aluminum, and the levels in vaccines are well below the toxic threshold.</p>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>The claim that aluminum in vaccines causes autism is not supported by the current body of scientific evidence. While some studies suggest potential neurotoxic effects of aluminum adjuvants, the majority of research indicates that vaccines are safe and effective. The link between aluminum and autism remains unproven and speculative. It is important to rely on robust scientific evidence when making decisions about vaccines and public health.</p>
<h3>References</h3>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X17308763?ref=pdf_download&amp;fr=RR-2&amp;rr=8d27ece3eb5605e1">Aluminium in brain tissue in autism</a>&nbsp;</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13164/adverse-effects-of-vaccines-evidence-and-causality">Adverse Effects of Vaccines: Evidence and Causality</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.cdc.gov/vaccine-safety/about/autism.html?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/autism.html">Vaccines and Autism</a>&nbsp;</li>
</ul>

Claim Review: Aluminum in Vaccines and Autism

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "Ultraviolet blood irradiation (UVBI) treats a wide range of conditions; it somehow reactivates the body’s innate ability to regulate and heal itself." is Half True

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: