The United Nations has ambitions to become a world government with its own military power.

The Expose News - com

<p>The recent claim that the United Nations (UN) has ambitions to become a world government with its own military power has sparked considerable debate. This claim was made in an article published by The Exposé on September 10, 2024, which cited a hidden camera recording of Jorge Paoletti, a legal affairs official in the UN Treaty Section.</p>
<p>Paoletti was recorded stating that the UN aspires to be a globalist world government and that it should have its own military power. However, it is crucial to examine this claim critically and consider the broader context of the UN's mission and structure.</p>
<p>The United Nations was established in 1945 with the primary goal of maintaining international peace and security, promoting social progress, fostering better living standards, and encouraging economic development. The UN Charter explicitly states that the organization is based on the sovereign equality of all its member states. This means that the UN operates through the cooperation and consensus of its member countries, rather than as a sovereign entity with its own military.</p>
<p>While the UN does have peacekeeping forces, these are composed of troops contributed by member states on a voluntary basis. The UN does not have a standing army of its own. The purpose of UN peacekeeping missions is to help countries torn by conflict create the conditions for lasting peace. These missions are authorized by the UN Security Council and operate under strict guidelines.</p>
<p>The claim that the UN aims to become a world government is not supported by the organization's official statements or actions. The UN's focus is on strengthening global governance and cooperation, not on becoming a sovereign entity. The Pact for the Future, mentioned in the article, is a non-binding agreement that encourages member states to work together on global challenges such as climate change, poverty, and inequality.</p>
<p>It is also important to note that the UN spokesperson, Stéphane Dujarric, dismissed Paoletti's remarks as not representing the official position of the UN. Dujarric emphasized that Paoletti was a junior staffer and was not speaking on behalf of the organization.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that the United Nations has ambitions to become a world government with its own military power is largely unfounded. While the UN seeks to strengthen global governance and cooperation, it does not aim to become a sovereign entity with its own army. The UN's mission and structure are based on the principles of international cooperation and the sovereign equality of its member states.</p>
<p>For further reading on the UN's mission and structure, you can refer to the official UN website: <a href="https://www.un.org/en/">UN Official Website</a>. Additionally, you can find more information on UN peacekeeping missions here: <a href="https://peacekeeping.un.org/en">UN Peacekeeping</a>.</p>

Claim Review: UN Aspires to Become a World Government with Military Power

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The claim that the U.S. military, specifically through DARPA, knew since 2016 that Ivermectin was the best product to use in the event of a pandemic has been circulating in various forms. This article aims to review this claim and provide a thorough analysis based on available scientific evidence and reliable sources.</p>
<h2>Background</h2>
<p>Ivermectin is an antiparasitic medication that has been used for decades to treat various parasitic infections. During the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been significant interest in its potential as a treatment for COVID-19. However, the scientific community has been divided on its efficacy and safety for this purpose.</p>
<h2>Analysis of the Claim</h2>
<p>The claim suggests that DARPA, the research arm of the U.S. military, had identified Ivermectin as the best product for a pandemic as early as 2016. This claim is attributed to Dr. Christopher Shoemaker, an emergency and general hospital medicine doctor in Canada.</p>
<p>To evaluate this claim, it is essential to examine the available scientific literature and statements from reputable organizations.</p>
<h3>Scientific Evidence</h3>
<p>A study published in the journal <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41429-020-0336-z">Antiviral Research</a> in April 2020 suggested that Ivermectin could inhibit the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. However, subsequent studies and meta-analyses have yielded mixed results. A systematic review and meta-analysis published in the <a href="https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD015017.pub2/full">Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews</a> concluded that the evidence for Ivermectin's efficacy in treating COVID-19 is uncertain.</p>
<h3>Statements from Reputable Organizations</h3>
<p>The World Health Organization (WHO) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have both issued statements cautioning against the use of Ivermectin for COVID-19 outside of clinical trials. The FDA has explicitly warned against using Ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID-19, citing a lack of sufficient evidence and potential safety concerns.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that the U.S. military knew Ivermectin was the best product for a pandemic since 2016 is largely unsubstantiated. While there is some preliminary evidence suggesting Ivermectin's potential antiviral properties, the scientific consensus remains uncertain. Reputable organizations such as the WHO and FDA have cautioned against its use for COVID-19 due to insufficient evidence and potential safety concerns. Therefore, this claim should be approached with skepticism.</p>
<p>It is crucial to rely on peer-reviewed scientific studies and statements from reputable organizations when evaluating claims related to medical treatments, especially during a global health crisis.</p>

Claim Review: U.S. Military Knew Ivermectin Was Best for Pandemics Since 2016

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The claim that the Rockefeller Foundation is responsible for the destruction of global agriculture and is now pushing for a radical change in the food system under the guise of sustainability has been circulating in various media outlets. This claim review will examine the evidence and provide a thorough analysis of the situation.</p>
<h2>The Role of the Rockefeller Foundation in Agriculture</h2>
<p>The Rockefeller Foundation has indeed played a significant role in shaping modern agriculture. In the 1950s, the foundation funded the development of vertical integration, leading to the creation of agribusiness. This model prioritized corporate interests over those of farmers, contributing to the decline of family farms.</p>
<p>The foundation also supported the Green Revolution in Mexico and India in the 1960s, which introduced high-yielding varieties of seeds, synthetic fertilizers, and pesticides. While this increased agricultural productivity, it also led to environmental degradation and the displacement of traditional farming practices.</p>
<h2>The Push for Sustainability</h2>
<p>The Rockefeller Foundation's recent report, 'True Cost of Food: Measuring What Matters to Transform the US Food System', advocates for a radical change in the food system to make it more sustainable. The report argues that the current system has hidden costs, such as environmental degradation and health impacts, that need to be addressed.</p>
<p>However, the report has been criticized for its vague language and the lack of farmer representation in its creation. Some have interpreted this as an attempt to blame farmers for the problems in the food system, rather than the corporate interests that have driven its development.</p>
<h2>The Role of Other Actors</h2>
<p>It is important to note that the Rockefeller Foundation is not the only actor involved in the push for sustainability in agriculture. The World Economic Forum, the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation, and the United Nations have all been involved in initiatives aimed at transforming the food system.</p>
<p>For example, the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA), a project funded by the Rockefeller and Gates Foundations, has been criticized for promoting GMO seeds and pesticides at the expense of traditional farming practices. However, the failure of AGRA cannot be attributed solely to the Rockefeller Foundation.</p>
<h2>The Complexity of the Food System</h2>
<p>The food system is complex and influenced by a multitude of factors, including economic policies, trade agreements, and consumer demand. Blaming a single actor, such as the Rockefeller Foundation, for its problems is an oversimplification.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the push for sustainability is not inherently malicious. While there are valid concerns about the implementation of certain policies, the goal of creating a more sustainable and equitable food system is a worthy one.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that the Rockefeller Foundation is responsible for the destruction of global agriculture and is now pushing for a radical change in the food system under the guise of sustainability is exaggerated and misleading. While the foundation has played a significant role in shaping modern agriculture, the blame for its negative impacts is shared among multiple actors. The push for sustainability, while potentially problematic in its implementation, is not inherently malicious.</p>
<h2>References</h2>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5795250/">The Green Revolution and its impact on agriculture, food production and security</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030691921830154X">The role of the Rockefeller Foundation in the Green Revolution</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/01/the-great-reset-food-systems-summit/">The Great Reset and the Food Systems Summit</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/jul/30/bill-gates-agra-africa-green-revolution">Bill Gates and the push for a new Green Revolution in Africa</a></li>
</ul>

Claim Review: The Rockefeller Foundation and the Destruction of Global Agriculture

<p>In today’s interconnected world, wireless internet access has become ubiquitous, found in nearly every coffee shop, office, and home. However, the claim that Wi-Fi signals are not benign and can influence brainwaves, leading to hypnotic effects and social engineering, requires a thorough examination.</p>
<p>The content suggests that radio-frequency (RF) radiation from Wi-Fi can interfere with brain waves, particularly extremely low frequency (ELF) waves, which can make a person unknowingly enter a suggestive state of mind. This claim is attributed to Keith Cutter, a critic of modern wireless technology.</p>
<p>To evaluate this claim, it is essential to understand the scientific basis behind the effects of RF and ELF waves on the human brain. Wi-Fi operates using radio-frequency electromagnetic fields, transmitting data via pulse-modulated RF radiation. While it is true that Wi-Fi devices emit low levels of RF radiation, the cumulative impact of this exposure over time is a subject of ongoing research.</p>
<p>The content highlights the effect of ELF waves, which range from approximately 3 to 30 Hz, overlapping with the natural oscillation frequencies of the human brain. The brain’s electrical activity is divided into different frequency bands, each associated with different states of consciousness and mental function. The concern is that the 10Hz ELF pulses emitted by Wi-Fi beacons can induce brainwave entrainment, synchronizing brainwaves to an external frequency.</p>
<p>Brainwave entrainment refers to the synchronization of brainwaves to an external frequency. When the brain is exposed to a consistent external stimulus at a particular frequency, such as the 10Hz signal emitted by Wi-Fi, it can shift its own natural brainwave patterns to match. At 10Hz, the brain enters a more relaxed state, akin to alpha waves, which corresponds to reduced cortical activity.</p>
<p>However, the claim that prolonged exposure to the 10Hz ELF signal can create a “suggestible state,” making the brain more susceptible to external influences, is not supported by scientific evidence. While brainwave entrainment is a recognized phenomenon, its potential for mind control or social engineering is speculative and lacks empirical support.</p>
<p>Another concern raised is the potential for Wi-Fi to have a “memory effect” on body tissues, leading to long-term physical changes or health conditions. This claim is also not supported by reliable scientific studies. The concept of “trauma memory” in the body is a psychological concept, and its application to electromagnetic radiation is not backed by evidence.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that Wi-Fi can influence brainwaves and has potential for hypnotic effects and social engineering is largely unsupported by scientific evidence. While there are legitimate concerns about the effects of electromagnetic radiation, the specific claims made in the content are not backed by reliable studies.</p>
<p>References:</p>
<p>1. <a href="https://www.who.int/india/health-topics/electromagnetic-fields">Electromagnetic fields and public health: mobile phones</a> - World Health Organization</p>
<p>2. <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504984/">Health effects of electromagnetic fields: EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses</a> - Belpomme D, Hardell L, Belyaev I, Burgio E, Carpenter DO</p>
<p>3. <a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10198548/">Brainwave entrainment: a review and quantitative analysis</a> &nbsp;- Huang TL, Charyton C</p>

Claim Review: Wi-Fi Can Influence Brainwaves and Has Potential for Hypnotic Effects and Social Engineering

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "The United Nations has ambitions to become a world government with its own military power." is Mostly False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: