The United Nations has ambitions to become a world government with its own military power.

The Expose News - com

<p>The recent claim that the United Nations (UN) has ambitions to become a world government with its own military power has sparked considerable debate. This claim was made in an article published by The Exposé on September 10, 2024, which cited a hidden camera recording of Jorge Paoletti, a legal affairs official in the UN Treaty Section.</p>
<p>Paoletti was recorded stating that the UN aspires to be a globalist world government and that it should have its own military power. However, it is crucial to examine this claim critically and consider the broader context of the UN's mission and structure.</p>
<p>The United Nations was established in 1945 with the primary goal of maintaining international peace and security, promoting social progress, fostering better living standards, and encouraging economic development. The UN Charter explicitly states that the organization is based on the sovereign equality of all its member states. This means that the UN operates through the cooperation and consensus of its member countries, rather than as a sovereign entity with its own military.</p>
<p>While the UN does have peacekeeping forces, these are composed of troops contributed by member states on a voluntary basis. The UN does not have a standing army of its own. The purpose of UN peacekeeping missions is to help countries torn by conflict create the conditions for lasting peace. These missions are authorized by the UN Security Council and operate under strict guidelines.</p>
<p>The claim that the UN aims to become a world government is not supported by the organization's official statements or actions. The UN's focus is on strengthening global governance and cooperation, not on becoming a sovereign entity. The Pact for the Future, mentioned in the article, is a non-binding agreement that encourages member states to work together on global challenges such as climate change, poverty, and inequality.</p>
<p>It is also important to note that the UN spokesperson, Stéphane Dujarric, dismissed Paoletti's remarks as not representing the official position of the UN. Dujarric emphasized that Paoletti was a junior staffer and was not speaking on behalf of the organization.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that the United Nations has ambitions to become a world government with its own military power is largely unfounded. While the UN seeks to strengthen global governance and cooperation, it does not aim to become a sovereign entity with its own army. The UN's mission and structure are based on the principles of international cooperation and the sovereign equality of its member states.</p>
<p>For further reading on the UN's mission and structure, you can refer to the official UN website: <a href="https://www.un.org/en/">UN Official Website</a>. Additionally, you can find more information on UN peacekeeping missions here: <a href="https://peacekeeping.un.org/en">UN Peacekeeping</a>.</p>

Claim Review: UN Aspires to Become a World Government with Military Power

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The claim that the Rockefeller Foundation is responsible for the destruction of global agriculture and is now pushing for a radical change in the food system under the guise of sustainability has been circulating in various media outlets. This claim review will examine the evidence and provide a thorough analysis of the situation.</p>
<h2>The Role of the Rockefeller Foundation in Agriculture</h2>
<p>The Rockefeller Foundation has indeed played a significant role in shaping modern agriculture. In the 1950s, the foundation funded the development of vertical integration, leading to the creation of agribusiness. This model prioritized corporate interests over those of farmers, contributing to the decline of family farms.</p>
<p>The foundation also supported the Green Revolution in Mexico and India in the 1960s, which introduced high-yielding varieties of seeds, synthetic fertilizers, and pesticides. While this increased agricultural productivity, it also led to environmental degradation and the displacement of traditional farming practices.</p>
<h2>The Push for Sustainability</h2>
<p>The Rockefeller Foundation's recent report, 'True Cost of Food: Measuring What Matters to Transform the US Food System', advocates for a radical change in the food system to make it more sustainable. The report argues that the current system has hidden costs, such as environmental degradation and health impacts, that need to be addressed.</p>
<p>However, the report has been criticized for its vague language and the lack of farmer representation in its creation. Some have interpreted this as an attempt to blame farmers for the problems in the food system, rather than the corporate interests that have driven its development.</p>
<h2>The Role of Other Actors</h2>
<p>It is important to note that the Rockefeller Foundation is not the only actor involved in the push for sustainability in agriculture. The World Economic Forum, the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation, and the United Nations have all been involved in initiatives aimed at transforming the food system.</p>
<p>For example, the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA), a project funded by the Rockefeller and Gates Foundations, has been criticized for promoting GMO seeds and pesticides at the expense of traditional farming practices. However, the failure of AGRA cannot be attributed solely to the Rockefeller Foundation.</p>
<h2>The Complexity of the Food System</h2>
<p>The food system is complex and influenced by a multitude of factors, including economic policies, trade agreements, and consumer demand. Blaming a single actor, such as the Rockefeller Foundation, for its problems is an oversimplification.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the push for sustainability is not inherently malicious. While there are valid concerns about the implementation of certain policies, the goal of creating a more sustainable and equitable food system is a worthy one.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that the Rockefeller Foundation is responsible for the destruction of global agriculture and is now pushing for a radical change in the food system under the guise of sustainability is exaggerated and misleading. While the foundation has played a significant role in shaping modern agriculture, the blame for its negative impacts is shared among multiple actors. The push for sustainability, while potentially problematic in its implementation, is not inherently malicious.</p>
<h2>References</h2>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5795250/">The Green Revolution and its impact on agriculture, food production and security</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030691921830154X">The role of the Rockefeller Foundation in the Green Revolution</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/01/the-great-reset-food-systems-summit/">The Great Reset and the Food Systems Summit</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/jul/30/bill-gates-agra-africa-green-revolution">Bill Gates and the push for a new Green Revolution in Africa</a></li>
</ul>

Claim Review: The Rockefeller Foundation and the Destruction of Global Agriculture

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The article titled 'When did the Globalists’ plan to enslave the world using chronic illness begin?' by Rhoda Wilson on The Expose presents a theory that global monopoly capitalism is attempting to enslave the developed world through chronic illness. This claim review will examine the validity of this assertion.</p>
<h2>Claim Analysis</h2>
<p>The article suggests that the origins of this plan can be traced back to various historical events, including the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, the CIA's influence post-JFK assassination, the import of Nazi and Japanese bioweapons scientists after World War II, and even the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913. The author also links this plan to the Seven Deadly Sins, arguing that the COVID-19 crisis is an extreme example of these sins.</p>
<h2>Evaluation of Evidence</h2>
<p>The article lacks credible scientific evidence to support its claims. It relies heavily on speculative theories and historical events that are not directly linked to the current health crisis. For instance, the claim that the COVID-19 pandemic is a result of a deliberate plan to enslave the world through chronic illness is not supported by any peer-reviewed studies or reliable scientific sources.</p>
<p>The author's assertion that the Seven Deadly Sins are manifested in the COVID-19 crisis is also highly subjective and lacks empirical evidence. While it is true that the pandemic has led to various forms of suffering, attributing this to a deliberate plan by globalists is unfounded.</p>
<h2>Scientific Perspective</h2>
<p>The COVID-19 pandemic is a complex global health issue that has been extensively studied by scientists worldwide. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the pandemic is caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is believed to have originated from animals and spread to humans. The WHO and other reputable scientific organizations have not found any evidence to support the claim that the pandemic is part of a deliberate plan to enslave the world through chronic illness.</p>
<p>A study published in the journal <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9">Nature Medicine</a> suggests that the SARS-CoV-2 virus likely originated from a natural source, such as bats or pangolins, and was not engineered in a laboratory. This finding contradicts the theory that the virus was deliberately created to cause chronic illness and enslave the world.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that globalists are using chronic illness to enslave the world is largely unfounded and lacks credible evidence. The article mixes historical events with speculative theories, making it unreliable. The claim rating is 1 out of 5.</p>
<p>It is important to rely on credible scientific sources and peer-reviewed studies when evaluating claims about global health issues. Misinformation can lead to confusion and mistrust, which can hinder efforts to address real health challenges.</p>

Claim Review: Globalists' Plan to Enslave the World Using Chronic Illness

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>Lindsay Hoyle, the Speaker of the House of Commons, has recently called for the UK government to introduce a bill to tackle 'misinformation' on social media. This article will examine the claim that Hoyle is advocating for censorship and its potential impact on free speech and democracy.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>According to an article published by The Expose, Lindsay Hoyle has urged the government to put a bill through parliament to address 'misinformation' on social media. Hoyle stated that misinformation is dangerous and can lead to riots, threats, and intimidation. He suggested that the government needs to ensure that information on social media is factual and correct.</p>
<h2>Analysis</h2>
<p>The concern raised by Hoyle is not unfounded. Misinformation can indeed have serious consequences, as seen in various instances where false information has led to real-world harm. However, the approach to addressing this issue is contentious.</p>
<p>Critics argue that Hoyle's call for a bill to tackle misinformation is an attempt to censor dissenting opinions and free speech online. The question of who decides what constitutes 'misinformation' is a crucial one. Governments and social media companies have been known to make errors in judgment, sometimes labeling accurate information as misinformation.</p>
<p>A study published in the <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-020-00637-2">Nature Human Behaviour</a> journal highlights the challenges in identifying and combating misinformation. The study suggests that while misinformation is a significant problem, heavy-handed censorship can backfire, leading to a loss of trust in institutions.</p>
<p>Moreover, Hoyle's role as the Speaker of the House of Commons is supposed to be non-partisan and largely administrative. His advocacy for a bill to clamp down on online speech raises concerns about the politicization of his role and the potential erosion of parliamentary democracy.</p>
<h2>Counterarguments</h2>
<p>On the other hand, proponents of stricter regulation argue that the spread of misinformation can have severe consequences, including public health crises and social unrest. They point to the need for some form of regulation to ensure that social media platforms are not used to spread harmful falsehoods.</p>
<p>A report by the <a href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2334.html">RAND Corporation</a> suggests that a balanced approach, combining education, fact-checking, and transparent regulation, can be effective in combating misinformation without resorting to heavy-handed censorship.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>Lindsay Hoyle's call for a bill to tackle misinformation on social media is a complex issue with valid arguments on both sides. While the spread of misinformation is a genuine concern, the approach to addressing it must be carefully considered to avoid infringing on free speech and democratic principles. A balanced approach that includes education, fact-checking, and transparent regulation may be the most effective way forward.</p>

Claim Review: Lindsay Hoyle's Call for Online Speech Censorship

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "The United Nations has ambitions to become a world government with its own military power." is Mostly False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: