The 'transgender' ideology is a political coup of the transhuman agenda, driven by wealthy elites and corporations to condition the public for radical changes to human biology.

The Expose News - com

Rhoda Wilson

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The claim that 'transgender' ideology is a political coup of the transhuman agenda, driven by wealthy elites and corporations, has gained traction in certain circles. This article aims to critically examine this claim, providing a thorough review based on reliable scientific sources.</p>
<h2>Understanding Transgender Identity</h2>
<p>Transgender individuals are people whose gender identity differs from the sex they were assigned at birth. This is a well-documented phenomenon supported by numerous scientific studies. For example, a study published in the <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6677266/">Journal of Neuroscience</a> found that transgender individuals have brain structures that align more closely with their gender identity than their assigned sex.</p>
<h2>The Transhuman Agenda</h2>
<p>Transhumanism is a philosophical movement that advocates for the enhancement of human intellectual, physical, and psychological capacities through advanced technologies. While transhumanism and transgender identity are distinct concepts, some have attempted to link them in a conspiratorial manner.</p>
<h2>Corporate and Elite Influence</h2>
<p>The claim that wealthy elites and corporations are driving the 'transgender' ideology to condition the public for radical changes to human biology lacks credible evidence. While it is true that some corporations and wealthy individuals support transgender rights, this support is often part of broader efforts to promote diversity and inclusion. For instance, a report by the <a href="https://www.hrc.org/resources/corporate-equality-index">Human Rights Campaign</a> shows that many corporations support LGBTQ+ rights as part of their corporate social responsibility initiatives.</p>
<h2>Scientific Consensus</h2>
<p>The scientific consensus is that transgender identity is a natural variation of human gender and is not a result of corporate or elite manipulation. A comprehensive review by the <a href="https://www.apa.org/topics/lgbt/transgender">American Psychological Association</a> concludes that transgender identity is a legitimate and recognized aspect of human diversity.</p>
<h2>Conspiracy Theories and Misinformation</h2>
<p>The claim that 'transgender' ideology is a political coup of the transhuman agenda is rooted in conspiracy theories and misinformation. These theories often lack credible evidence and are not supported by the scientific community. For example, a study published in the <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-55068-2">Nature Human Behaviour</a> journal found that conspiracy theories about transgender individuals are often driven by prejudice and misinformation.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that 'transgender' ideology is a political coup of the transhuman agenda is largely unfounded and lacks credible scientific evidence. Transgender identity is a recognized and legitimate aspect of human diversity, supported by numerous scientific studies. Corporate and elite support for transgender rights is often part of broader efforts to promote diversity and inclusion. It is important to rely on credible sources and scientific evidence when evaluating such claims.</p>

Claim Review: 'Transgender' Ideology as a Political Coup of the Transhuman Agenda

<p>Agenda 2030, poznata i kao Ciljevi održivog razvoja (SDGs), je skup od 17 globalnih ciljeva koje su usvojile 193 države članice Ujedinjenih naroda u rujnu 2015. godine. Ovi ciljevi obuhvaćaju širok spektar pitanja, uključujući borbu protiv siromaštva, zdravlje, obrazovanje, jednakost, održivu upotrebu resursa i borbu protiv klimatskih promjena. Cilj Agende 2030 je stvoriti bolji svijet za sve ljude do 2030. godine.</p>
<p>Tvrdnja da je Agenda 2030 skup mjera za uvođenje totalitarizma je netočna i ne podupire se činjenicama. Ova tvrdnja često se pojavljuje u kontekstu teorija zavjere koje tvrde da globalne organizacije i vlade imaju skrivene namjere za kontrolu svjetske populacije.</p>
<p>U stvarnosti, Agenda 2030 je rezultat dugogodišnjeg procesa konsultacija i pregovora koji su uključivali vlade, nevladine organizacije, poslovni sektor i građansko društvo. Ciljevi su dizajnirani da budu inkluzivni i da odgovaraju na najveće izazove s kojima se svijet suočava. Na primjer, cilj 1 je eliminacija ekstremnog siromaštva, cilj 3 je osiguranje zdravlja i dobrobiti za sve, a cilj 13 je poduzimanje hitnih mjera za borbu protiv klimatskih promjena i njihovih učinaka.</p>
<p>Četvrta industrijska revolucija, koju spominje tvrdnja, odnosi se na tehnološke promjene koje mijenjaju način na koji živimo i radimo. Ove promjene uključuju digitalizaciju, umjetnu inteligenciju, internet stvari i druge napredne tehnologije. Iako ove tehnologije mogu imati duboke društvene i ekonomske posljedice, one nisu nužno povezane s totalitarizmom. Umjesto toga, one mogu biti korištene za poboljšanje kvalitete života i rješavanje globalnih problema.</p>
<p>Važno je razumjeti da tehnologija sama po sebi nije dobra ni loša; to je način na koji je korištena. Globalne organizacije i vlade mogu koristiti tehnologiju za promicanje održivog razvoja i poboljšanje života ljudi. Na primjer, digitalna valuta može olakšati financijske transakcije i povećati pristup financijskim uslugama, dok socijalni krediti mogu biti korišteni za promicanje pozitivnog ponašanja i društvene odgovornosti.</p>
<p>Zaključno, tvrdnja da je Agenda 2030 skup mjera za uvođenje totalitarizma je netočna. Agenda 2030 je skup ciljeva za održivi razvoj koji su usvojeni od strane Ujedinjenih naroda i koji imaju za cilj stvaranje boljeg svijeta za sve ljude. Važno je da se informiramo iz pouzdanih izvora i da kritički razmišljamo o informacijama koje dobivamo.</p>
<p>Za više informacija o Agendi 2030, posjetite službenu stranicu Ujedinjenih naroda: <a href="https://sdgs.un.org/goals">https://sdgs.un.org/goals</a>.</p>

Provjera tvrdnje: Agenda 2030 i totalitarizam

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>In a recent article published on The Exposé, Dr. Vernon Coleman makes several claims about the impact of Net Zero policies and the definition of 'far right'. This claim review will examine these claims and provide a thorough analysis based on reliable scientific sources.</p>
<h2>Claim 1: Net Zero Policies Will Lead to No Holidays, No Television, No Football, No Heating, No Hot Food, and Nothing Much of Anything Else</h2>
<p>The claim that Net Zero policies will lead to a complete shutdown of modern conveniences is exaggerated and misleading. Net Zero policies aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to net zero by 2050, not to eliminate all modern conveniences. According to the <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-climate-action-towards-net-zero/uk-climate-action-towards-net-zero">UK Government's Net Zero Strategy</a>, the goal is to transition to cleaner energy sources and improve energy efficiency, not to eliminate all energy use.</p>
<p>A study published in <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-020-0796-5">Nature Climate Change</a> found that achieving Net Zero is possible without sacrificing modern conveniences, but it will require significant changes in energy production and consumption. The study also found that the benefits of achieving Net Zero, such as improved air quality and reduced health costs, outweigh the costs of transitioning to cleaner energy sources.</p>
<h2>Claim 2: The 'Far Right' Includes Anyone Who Isn't a Supporter of the Current Left-Wing Government or the Democrats in the US</h2>
<p>The claim that the 'far right' includes anyone who isn't a supporter of the current left-wing government or the Democrats in the US is misleading and oversimplified. The term 'far right' is typically used to describe political ideologies that are further to the right on the political spectrum than mainstream conservatism. According to the <a href="https://www.britannica.com/topic/far-right">Encyclopedia Britannica</a>, far-right ideologies are characterized by extreme nationalism, authoritarianism, and opposition to immigration and multiculturalism.</p>
<p>A study published in the <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1354068818780078">European Journal of Political Research</a> found that support for far-right parties is driven by a combination of economic insecurity, cultural backlash, and political disillusionment. The study also found that far-right parties tend to attract voters who are dissatisfied with mainstream politics and feel marginalized by globalization and multiculturalism.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claims made in the article about the impact of Net Zero policies and the definition of 'far right' are exaggerated and misleading. While Net Zero policies will require significant changes in energy production and consumption, they will not lead to a complete shutdown of modern conveniences. Additionally, the definition of 'far right' is more complex and nuanced than simply including anyone who isn't a supporter of the current left-wing government or the Democrats in the US.</p>
<p>Based on the evidence presented, the claim rating for this article is 2 out of 5.</p>

Claim Review: The Impact of Net Zero Policies and the Definition of 'Far Right'

<p>The claim that Food Standards in Australia and New Zealand are being changed to replace real food with fake 'food' without proper labelling or regulation has been circulating recently. This claim suggests that gene-edited foods will be deregulated, allowing the food industry to self-regulate and avoid labelling requirements. Let's break down this claim and examine its validity.</p>
<h2>Understanding the Claim</h2>
<p>The claim revolves around proposed changes to the Food Standards Code by FSANZ (Food Standards Australia New Zealand). These changes aim to deregulate gene-edited foods, which are created using techniques like CRISPR. The concern is that this deregulation would allow the food industry to avoid labelling and regulation, potentially misleading consumers.</p>
<h2>What is Gene Editing?</h2>
<p>Gene editing involves altering the DNA of an organism using techniques like CRISPR. This technology has the potential to create foods with desirable traits, such as improved nutritional content or resistance to diseases. However, the long-term effects of consuming gene-edited foods are not yet fully understood.</p>
<h2>Regulatory Changes and Concerns</h2>
<p>The proposed changes by FSANZ would exempt gene-edited foods from certain regulations, potentially allowing them to enter the market without thorough safety assessments or labelling. This has raised concerns among consumers and advocacy groups, who argue that consumers have the right to know what they are eating.</p>
<h2>Scientific Perspectives</h2>
<p>While gene editing holds promise for improving food production, there are valid concerns about its safety and long-term effects. A study published in <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0450-7">Nature</a> highlights the potential risks associated with CRISPR-edited organisms, including unintended genetic changes. Another study in <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412019308477">Environment International</a> discusses the need for comprehensive risk assessment and regulation of gene-edited foods.</p>
<h2>Consumer Rights and Transparency</h2>
<p>The claim emphasizes the importance of consumer rights and transparency in food labelling. Consumers have the right to make informed choices about the food they consume. Deregulation without proper labelling could undermine this right and erode consumer trust in the food industry.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that food standards are being changed to replace real food with fake 'food' without proper labelling or regulation is partially true. While there are proposed changes to deregulate gene-edited foods, the extent to which this will impact consumer safety and transparency is a matter of ongoing debate. It is crucial for regulatory bodies to balance innovation with consumer protection and ensure that any changes are based on sound scientific evidence and public consultation.</p>

Claim Review: Changes to Food Standards in Australia and New Zealand

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "The 'transgender' ideology is a political coup of the transhuman agenda, driven by wealthy elites and corporations to condition the public for radical changes to human biology." is False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: