Repeated inoculation with mRNA Covid vaccinations reduce the functionality of the immune systems of old people.

Infowars - com

<h1>Claim Review: Repeated COVID-19 mRNA Vaccinations and Immune System Functionality in Older Adults</h1>
<p>Infowars claims that a study published in September indicated that repeated inoculation with mRNA Covid vaccinations reduce the functionality of the immune systems of old people. The study in question, titled 'Repeated COVID-19 mRNA vaccination results in IgG4 class switching and decreased NK cell activation by S1-specific antibodies in older adults,' was published in Immunity &amp; Ageing. The study found that older adults produce antibodies with reduced functional capacity upon repeated COVID-19 mRNA vaccination, similar to younger individuals.</p>
<p>The specific mechanism of immune system reduction is increased levels of IgG4, a subclass of immunoglobulin which can result in a reduction of immune system function. The researchers analyzed patients aged 65 to 83-years-old for one month after their fifth Covid injection and compared their immune system effects with a younger group aged 18 to 47-years-old for one month after their third Covid injection. The researchers assessed the development of SARS-CoV-2 spike S1-specific IgG subclass levels in the older adults vs the younger adults.</p>
<p>The study concluded that older adults, like younger individuals, are inclined to develop IgG4 responses upon repeated COVID-19 mRNA vaccination and that increased IgG4 levels associate with a relative reduction in Fc-mediated effector functionality. However, the study does not conclusively prove that this leads to a significant reduction in overall immune system functionality. The study's authors emphasize the need for additional research to better understand the mechanisms underlying these responses and their potential implications for vaccine effectiveness.</p>
<p>It is important to note that the study does not suggest that the vaccines are ineffective or that older adults should not receive them. Instead, it highlights the complex nature of the immune response to vaccination and the need for continued research to optimize vaccination strategies.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that repeated COVID-19 mRNA vaccinations reduce the functionality of the immune systems of older adults is not fully supported by the study. While the study shows an increase in IgG4 levels, which are associated with reduced Fc-mediated effector functionality, it does not conclusively prove that this leads to a significant reduction in overall immune system functionality. Further research is needed to understand the implications of these findings on vaccine effectiveness.</p>
<p>For more information, you can read the study <a href="https://immunityageing.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12979-024-00263-y">here</a>.</p>

Claim Review: Repeated COVID-19 mRNA Vaccinations and Immune System Functionality in Older Adults

<p>The claim that hospitals treated far more people for Covid shot side effects than unvaccinated patients for Covid infections has been circulating, based on a journal article published in October 2024. However, a thorough examination of the study and its findings reveals several issues that cast doubt on the validity of this claim.</p>
<p>The journal article in question reported that 5.69% of respondents were hospitalized due to vaccination adverse events, compared to 1.49% hospitalized due to Covid infection. While these numbers may seem alarming at first glance, it is crucial to consider the context and limitations of the study.</p>
<p>Firstly, the study primarily focused on gender differences in Covid-related outcomes and endocrine systems, not on comparing hospitalization rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. The data on hospitalizations was a secondary finding and not the main objective of the research.</p>
<p>Secondly, the study relied on self-reported data from a global survey, which can introduce biases and inaccuracies. Self-reported data is not as reliable as clinical data collected in a controlled setting. Participants may misinterpret or misreport their experiences, leading to skewed results.</p>
<p>Thirdly, the study did not provide detailed information on the severity of the adverse events leading to hospitalization. It is possible that some of the reported hospitalizations were for minor or temporary side effects that did not pose a significant health risk.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the study did not account for the overall number of vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals in the population. Without this context, it is impossible to determine whether the hospitalization rates are representative of the broader population.</p>
<p>It is also important to note that numerous peer-reviewed studies have shown the safety and efficacy of Covid-19 vaccines. For example, a study published in <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2107058">The New England Journal of Medicine</a> &nbsp;found that the mRNA vaccines were highly effective in preventing Covid-19 infections and severe outcomes.</p>
<p>Another study published in <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanrhe/article/PIIS2665-9913(22)00001-7/fulltext">The Lancet</a> &nbsp;concluded that the benefits of Covid-19 vaccines far outweigh the risks, with adverse events being rare and generally mild.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that hospitals treated more people for Covid shot side effects than unvaccinated patients for Covid infections is not supported by reliable scientific evidence. The study cited has significant limitations and does not provide conclusive data to support this claim. It is essential to rely on peer-reviewed research and expert analysis when evaluating claims about public health issues.</p>

Claim Review: Hospitals Treated More People for Covid Shot Side Effects than Unvaccinated Patients for Covid Infections

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>A recent case study published in Schizophrenia Research has gained attention on social media, detailing an 18-year-old woman who developed psychosis after receiving the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. This article aims to review the claim and provide a thorough analysis of the available evidence.</p>
<h2>The Case Study</h2>
<p>The case study, published in January 2022, describes an 18-year-old female student who was admitted to the hospital for 'irrelevant talk and bizarre behavior.' The patient had no history of physical illness or substance use and was reportedly healthy both physically and mentally before vaccination. The researchers attributed her post-vaccination psychosis to possible autoimmune encephalitis, a condition where the immune system attacks the brain, causing it to swell.</p>
<h2>Neurological Side Effects of COVID-19 Vaccines</h2>
<p>The case study notes that while there have been numerous reports of neurological side effects from COVID-19 vaccines, these typically manifest as physical ailments such as headaches, seizures, paralysis, Bell's palsy, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS). Psychotic behavior, as exhibited by the woman in the case study, is less commonly reported.</p>
<p>A study published in the <a href='https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8000985/'>Journal of Medical Case Reports</a> also documented cases of new-onset psychosis following mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines. However, it is crucial to understand that these cases are rare and do not establish a causal relationship.</p>
<h2>Understanding Correlation vs. Causation</h2>
<p>While the case study presents a temporal correlation between the vaccination and the onset of psychosis, it does not prove causation. Correlation does not imply causation, and numerous factors could contribute to the development of psychosis. Further research is needed to determine if there is a direct link between the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine and psychosis.</p>
<h2>Other Vaccines and Psychosis</h2>
<p>The researchers also noted that other non-COVID-19 vaccinations have been documented to trigger psychosis. Cases of post-vaccination psychosis have been linked to vaccines for rabies, yellow fever, smallpox, typhus, and influenza. This suggests that psychosis may be a rare but potential side effect of various vaccines, not just the COVID-19 vaccines.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that a woman developed psychosis after receiving the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine is based on a documented case study. However, while the temporal correlation is noted, there is insufficient evidence to establish a definitive causal link. Further research is necessary to understand the potential relationship between COVID-19 vaccines and psychosis. It is essential to approach such claims with caution and rely on peer-reviewed scientific studies for accurate information.</p>

Claim Review: Woman Developed Psychosis After AstraZeneca COVID-19 Vaccine

<p>The claim that COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer and have led to a significant increase in cancer cases among young people has been circulating widely. This article aims to review the available evidence and provide a thorough analysis of this claim.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The claim suggests that COVID-19 vaccines are directly responsible for an increase in cancer cases, particularly among young people. It cites various sources, including reports from the American Cancer Society, Pfizer's safety reports, and statements from oncologists and pathologists.</p>
<h2>Analysis of the Claim</h2>
<p>To evaluate this claim, it is essential to examine the evidence presented and compare it with reliable scientific sources.</p>
<h3>Increase in Cancer Cases</h3>
<p>The claim mentions a significant increase in fourteen different types of cancers across 44 countries, particularly among young people, by October 2022. However, it is crucial to note that the increase in cancer cases could be attributed to various factors, including delayed screenings and treatments due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The American Cancer Society reported that cancer mortality in young people had doubled compared to pre-2020 levels, but this does not necessarily imply a direct causal link to COVID-19 vaccines.</p>
<h3>Pfizer's Safety Report</h3>
<p>The claim references Pfizer's 2022 safety report on COVID-19 vaccines, which documented thousands of cancer cases following vaccinations. However, it is important to understand that correlation does not imply causation. The presence of cancer cases in vaccinated individuals does not prove that the vaccines caused the cancers. Further investigation is needed to establish a causal relationship.</p>
<h3>Statements from Oncologists and Pathologists</h3>
<p>The claim includes statements from oncologists and pathologists who have observed aggressive cancer relapses and unprecedented cases of stage four cancers in young adults. While these observations are concerning, they do not provide conclusive evidence that COVID-19 vaccines are the cause. Other factors, such as environmental exposures, lifestyle changes, and genetic predispositions, could also contribute to these observations.</p>
<h3>Mechanism of mRNA Vaccines</h3>
<p>The claim discusses the mechanism of mRNA vaccines and the resulting spike protein production by people's bodies after vaccination. It suggests that the spike protein may have carcinogenic effects. However, scientific studies have shown that the spike protein produced by mRNA vaccines is rapidly degraded and does not persist in the body long enough to cause significant harm. Additionally, the spike protein is not known to have direct carcinogenic properties.</p>
<h3>Immune Suppression and Cancer</h3>
<p>The claim mentions that COVID-19 vaccines may cause immune suppression, which impairs the body's ability to fight cancer. While it is true that some vaccines can temporarily affect the immune system, there is no evidence to suggest that COVID-19 vaccines specifically cause long-term immune suppression that leads to cancer. The immune system is complex and adaptable, and temporary changes do not necessarily result in increased cancer risk.</p>
<h3>Ivermectin as a Potential Treatment</h3>
<p>The claim suggests that ivermectin may be a potential treatment for COVID-19 and cancer. While ivermectin has shown some effectiveness against certain viruses and parasites, its role in treating cancer is not well-established. Further research is needed to determine the efficacy and safety of ivermectin as a cancer treatment.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer and have led to a significant increase in cancer cases among young people is not supported by reliable scientific evidence. While there have been reports of increased cancer cases, these are likely due to other factors such as delayed screenings and treatments during the pandemic. The claim that vaccines are directly responsible for this increase is misleading and lacks credible scientific backing.</p>
<p>It is crucial to rely on peer-reviewed scientific studies and expert opinions when evaluating claims about health and medicine. Misinformation can lead to unnecessary fear and mistrust, which can have serious consequences for public health. Always consult reliable sources and seek advice from healthcare professionals for accurate information.</p>

Claim Review: COVID-19 Vaccines and Cancer

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "Repeated inoculation with mRNA Covid vaccinations reduce the functionality of the immune systems of old people." is Half True

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: