More than half the adult population of the world are anti-vaxxers.

Cijepljenje - info

Andrew Wakefield

In an interview, <a href="https://remedia.social/claim-author/andrew-wakefield-b9ae5748e147">Andrew Wakefield</a> &nbsp;made several claims about vaccines and autism. One notable claim was that 'more than half the adult population of the world are anti-vaxxers.' This claim warrants a thorough examination to determine its validity.
Vaccine hesitancy is a complex issue that varies widely across different regions and populations. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines vaccine hesitancy as the 'reluctance or refusal to vaccinate despite the availability of vaccines.' While vaccine hesitancy is a concern, it does not represent the majority of the global population.
According to a study published in the journal The Lancet, vaccine confidence varies significantly across countries. The study, titled 'The State of Vaccine Confidence 2016: Global Insights Through a 67-Country Survey,' found that while some countries have high levels of vaccine hesitancy, others have very low levels. The study can be found <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(16)31540-2/fulltext">here</a>.
A more recent survey conducted by the Wellcome Global Monitor in 2018 found that globally, 79% of people agree that vaccines are safe, and 84% agree that vaccines are effective. This survey included responses from over 140,000 people across 144 countries. The results of the survey can be found <a href="https://wellcome.org/reports/wellcome-global-monitor/2018">here</a>.
In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccine acceptance has been a critical issue. A global survey conducted by the Imperial College London found that while vaccine hesitancy exists, it is not the majority view. The survey, which included responses from over 13,000 people across 14 countries, found that the majority of respondents were willing to get vaccinated against COVID-19. The survey results can be found <a href="https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/218476/global-survey-reveals-high-levels-covid-19/">here</a>.
It is important to note that vaccine hesitancy is influenced by a variety of factors, including misinformation, cultural beliefs, and personal experiences. Addressing vaccine hesitancy requires a nuanced approach that involves education, communication, and building trust in healthcare systems.
In conclusion, the claim that more than half the adult population of the world are anti-vaxxers is not supported by available data. While vaccine hesitancy is a real and important issue, it does not represent the majority of the global population. Surveys and studies consistently show that the majority of people around the world support vaccination and recognize its importance in protecting public health. 

<blockquote> 
The transcript: 
I went to the CDC back in 2000 and they said, look, Dr. Wakefield, you know, it's, it's everybody gets the MMR. Only a few children have autism. So how do you equate it? Well, that's how medicine works. A lot of people smoke, only a few develop lung cancer, but the point is it's pattern of exposure. I said, look, we believe, for example, that age of exposure is important.</blockquote>
<blockquote>We know this because with the natural infection, the younger you get measles, the greater the risk of infection. of a more severe reaction. If you get it under one, for example, does the same pertain to the vaccine. If you get the vaccine younger, are you at greater risk? And they went away to their credit and they tested that hypothesis and they found that it was exactly, and they spent the next 14 years destroying the documents, putting them in a dumpster and covering up and publishing a paper that exonerated the vaccine until one of the whistleblowers, William Thompson, head scientist in that study came forward and said, I can't live with this any longer.</blockquote>
<blockquote>I kept the, the documents here. They are, it showed fraud, most appalling violation of medical and scientific ethics on behalf of the CDC. So people say now, oh, there's no evidence. Vaccines cause autism. Absolutely. There is. And when you have to commit to that level of fraud, any level of fraud, but that level of fraud, not only in the context of this vaccine, but Pfizer in the context of the, of the COVID vaccine, everybody else, you're on a losing, run right from the start.</blockquote>
<blockquote>You are going to lose because you can only sustain that lie for so long and then someone somewhere is going to come forward, some brave person and say, actually, no, it was completely the opposite. And public confidence is shattered. It will never be regained. So now we are in a majority of people who are saying no to the 4th, 5th, 6th booster for COVID.</blockquote>
<blockquote>And by definition in media terms, those are anti vaxxers. More than half the adult population of the world are anti vaxxers. So, I think that, as I say, this will turn out to be the greatest mistake they ever made. And I think that we are winning, uncomfortable as that may be, we are winning.</blockquote>

Claim Review: Are Half the Adult Population Anti-Vaxxers?

<h2>Introduction</h2>
A recent article from The Expose claims that Public Health Scotland has revealed that Covid-19 is no more deadly than seasonal flu. This claim is based on a study that reported an infection fatality rate (IFR) of 0.08% for Covid-19 in Scotland, which is within the range of the IFR for seasonal flu (0.03% to 0.1%). However, a closer examination of the data and scientific literature reveals significant misinterpretations and misinformation.
<h2>Understanding Infection Fatality Rates</h2>
The infection fatality rate (IFR) is a measure of the proportion of deaths among all infected individuals, including those who are asymptomatic or have mild symptoms. The IFR for Covid-19 has been a subject of intense study and debate throughout the pandemic.
A systematic review and meta-analysis published in the <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)32545-9/fulltext">Lancet</a> estimated the global IFR of Covid-19 to be around 0.68%, which is significantly higher than the IFR of seasonal flu.
<h2>The Winter Covid-19 Infection Study</h2>
The article from The Expose references the Winter Covid-19 Infection Study (WCIS), which reported an IFR of 0.0762% for Scotland. However, it is essential to note that this study has not been peer-reviewed and its methodology and findings should be interpreted with caution.
Moreover, the WCIS study focused on a specific time period (November 2023 to March 2024) and a specific population (participants in England and Scotland). The IFR can vary significantly depending on the population studied, the prevalence of comorbidities, and the availability of healthcare resources.
<h2>Covid-19 vs. Seasonal Flu</h2>
While the IFR is an important metric, it is not the only factor to consider when comparing the severity of Covid-19 and seasonal flu. Other factors include:
<ul>
 <li>Transmissibility: Covid-19 is more contagious than seasonal flu, with a higher basic reproduction number (R0). This means that Covid-19 can spread more rapidly and widely than seasonal flu.</li>
 <li>Hospitalizations: Covid-19 has resulted in a much higher number of hospitalizations and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions than seasonal flu. This has placed a significant burden on healthcare systems worldwide.</li>
 <li>Long-term effects: Many people who have recovered from Covid-19 continue to experience long-term symptoms, a condition known as 'long Covid.' The long-term effects of Covid-19 are still not fully understood, but they appear to be more severe and persistent than those of seasonal flu.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
The claim that Covid-19 is no more deadly than seasonal flu is false. While the IFR of Covid-19 in Scotland was reported to be within the range of seasonal flu in a specific study, this finding is not representative of the global IFR of Covid-19, which is significantly higher. Furthermore, Covid-19 is more transmissible, results in more hospitalizations, and has more severe long-term effects than seasonal flu.
It is crucial to rely on peer-reviewed scientific literature and official public health guidance when evaluating claims about the severity of Covid-19. Misinformation can have serious consequences for public health and safety.

Claim Review: Is Covid No More Deadly Than Seasonal Flu?

In a recent speech to the NAACP, President Biden called for an immediate ban on AR-15s and similar rifles, citing their use in the attempted assassination of Donald Trump and claiming that 'more children in America die of gunshot wounds than any other reason.'
While the call for stricter gun control laws is a political stance and subject to debate, the claim about child deaths is unverified and cannot be proven. &nbsp;According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the leading causes of child deaths include accidents, congenital anomalies, and various health issues.
Guns or bullets are not listed as the leading killer of children, contradicting Biden's claim. The source of this claim is unknown, and it first appeared in anti-gun speeches on June 2, 2022. &nbsp;It is important to note that the call for an AR-15 ban is a political stance and subject to ongoing debate.
The Federal Assault Weapons Ban of 1994, which prohibited certain semi-automatic firearms with large-capacity magazines, expired in 2004, and Democrats have been advocating for another 'assault weapons' ban to replace it. However, the claim about child deaths being primarily caused by gunshot wounds is unverified and should not be used to support political arguments.

Biden Calls for AR-15 Ban After Assassination Attempt on Trump: A Claim Review

The recent claim that the United Nations (UN) has ambitions to become a world government with its own military power has sparked considerable debate. This claim was made in an article published by The Exposé on September 10, 2024, which cited a hidden camera recording of Jorge Paoletti, a legal affairs official in the UN Treaty Section.
Paoletti was recorded stating that the UN aspires to be a globalist world government and that it should have its own military power. However, it is crucial to examine this claim critically and consider the broader context of the UN's mission and structure.
The United Nations was established in 1945 with the primary goal of maintaining international peace and security, promoting social progress, fostering better living standards, and encouraging economic development. The UN Charter explicitly states that the organization is based on the sovereign equality of all its member states. This means that the UN operates through the cooperation and consensus of its member countries, rather than as a sovereign entity with its own military.
While the UN does have peacekeeping forces, these are composed of troops contributed by member states on a voluntary basis. The UN does not have a standing army of its own. The purpose of UN peacekeeping missions is to help countries torn by conflict create the conditions for lasting peace. These missions are authorized by the UN Security Council and operate under strict guidelines.
The claim that the UN aims to become a world government is not supported by the organization's official statements or actions. The UN's focus is on strengthening global governance and cooperation, not on becoming a sovereign entity. The Pact for the Future, mentioned in the article, is a non-binding agreement that encourages member states to work together on global challenges such as climate change, poverty, and inequality.
It is also important to note that the UN spokesperson, Stéphane Dujarric, dismissed Paoletti's remarks as not representing the official position of the UN. Dujarric emphasized that Paoletti was a junior staffer and was not speaking on behalf of the organization.
In conclusion, the claim that the United Nations has ambitions to become a world government with its own military power is largely unfounded. While the UN seeks to strengthen global governance and cooperation, it does not aim to become a sovereign entity with its own army. The UN's mission and structure are based on the principles of international cooperation and the sovereign equality of its member states.
For further reading on the UN's mission and structure, you can refer to the official UN website: <a href="https://www.un.org/en/">UN Official Website</a>. Additionally, you can find more information on UN peacekeeping missions here: <a href="https://peacekeeping.un.org/en">UN Peacekeeping</a>.

Claim Review: UN Aspires to Become a World Government with Military Power

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "More than half the adult population of the world are anti-vaxxers." is False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: