Moderna potvrđuje vezu između COVID mRNA cjepiva i raka

Arna Šebalj

U članku objavljenom 28.07.2024., mr. sc. Arna Šebalj tvrdi da je Moderna potvrdila vezu između COVID mRNA cjepiva i raka. Ova tvrdnja temelji se na navodima da su u bočicama cjepiva pronađeni fragmenti DNK koji uzrokuju rak. Međutim, provjera tvrdnji pokazuje da ne postoje znanstveni dokazi koji bi potkrijepili ovu tvrdnju.
Prema članku, Moderna je priznala da njezino mRNA COVID cjepivo uzrokuje rak nakon što su milijarde fragmenata DNK pronađene u bočicama. Ova tvrdnja se temelji na izjavama dr. Roberta Malonea, koji je na saslušanju kongresnice Marjorie Taylor Greene izjavio da Modernin patent pokazuje da bočice cjepiva sadrže milijarde fragmenata DNK i drugih kontaminanata povezanih s urođenim manama i rakom.
Međutim, znanstvena istraživanja i stručnjaci za javno zdravstvo ne podržavaju ovu tvrdnju. Studija objavljena u časopisu <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03942-8">Nature</a> pokazuje da mRNA cjepiva ne sadrže DNK i da su sigurna za upotrebu. Dodatno, <a href="https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/safety-of-vaccines.html">Centri za kontrolu i prevenciju bolesti (CDC)</a> navode da su mRNA cjepiva prošla rigorozne testove sigurnosti i da ne postoje dokazi o povezanosti s rakom.
Dr. Malone također tvrdi da su Pfizerove mRNA injekcije za COVID također kontaminirane fragmentima DNK koji uzrokuju rak. Međutim, ova tvrdnja nije potkrijepljena znanstvenim dokazima. <a href="https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/covid-19-vaccines">FDA</a> navodi da su sve komponente cjepiva temeljito testirane i da ne postoje dokazi o prisutnosti opasnih kontaminanata.
Zaključno, tvrdnja da Moderna potvrđuje vezu između COVID mRNA cjepiva i raka nije podržana znanstvenim dokazima. Stručnjaci za javno zdravstvo i znanstvena istraživanja pokazuju da su mRNA cjepiva sigurna i učinkovita. Stoga, ova tvrdnja je ocjenjena kao lažna.

Provjera tvrdnji: Moderna potvrđuje vezu između COVID mRNA cjepiva i raka

U članku objavljenom 31.07.2024., mr. sc. Arna Šebalj tvrdi da je Moderna priznala vezu između svojih mRNA COVID cjepiva i raka. Ova tvrdnja je temeljena na navodima da su milijarde fragmenata DNK pronađene u bočicama cjepiva, što je navodno povezano s urođenim manama i rakom.
Međutim, ova tvrdnja nije potkrijepljena znanstvenim dokazima. Moderna nije izdala takvu izjavu, a nema znanstvenih studija koje bi potvrdile ovu vezu.
mRNA cjepiva, kao što su ona proizvedena od strane Moderne i Pfizera, koriste mRNA molekule koje nose upute za stvaranje proteina koji izazivaju imunski odgovor. Ove molekule se brzo razgrađuju u tijelu i ne integriraju se u DNK. Stoga, tvrdnja da mRNA cjepiva uzrokuju rak nema znanstvenog temelja.
Studije koje su istraživale sigurnost mRNA cjepiva pokazale su da su ona sigurna i učinkovita. Na primjer, studija objavljena u časopisu <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577">New England Journal of Medicine</a> pokazala je da je Pfizer-BioNTech cjepivo sigurno i učinkovito u prevenciji COVID-19.
Dodatno, <a href="https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/safety-of-vaccines.html">Centri za kontrolu i prevenciju bolesti (CDC)</a> navode da su mRNA cjepiva prošla strog proces testiranja i da su sigurna za upotrebu.
Zaključno, tvrdnja da Moderna potvrđuje vezu između COVID mRNA cjepiva i raka je netočna. Nema znanstvenih dokaza koji bi poduprli ovu tvrdnju, a studije pokazuju da su mRNA cjepiva sigurna i učinkovita.

Časopis Američkog medicinskog udruženja (JAMA) objavio je pismo koje navodi da su tragovi mRNA cjepiva protiv COVID-19 otkriveni u majčinom mlijeku nekih dojilja. Ova tvrdnja izaziva zabrinutost kod mnogih, posebno među majkama koje doje. Međutim, treba detaljno analizirati ovu tvrdnju kako bismo razumjeli njezinu točnost i implikacije.
U studiji koja je objavljena u JAMA Pediatrics, znanstvenici su analizirali majčino mlijeko 11 dojilja koje su primile Pfizer (6 žena) i Moderna (5 žena) mRNA cjepiva tijekom dojenja. Nakon cijepljenja, majčino mlijeko je analizirano na prisutnost mRNA nanočestica. Od 11 uzoraka, 7 je bilo pozitivno na prisutnost mRNA.
Autori studije naglašavaju da su obećanja da će injekcije mRNA COVID-19 'ostati u ramenu' čista laž, jer je mRNA putovala do grudi i prenijela se u majčino mlijeko. Međutim, autori također ističu da je sporadična prisutnost i količine mRNA cjepiva protiv COVID-19 otkrivene u majčinom mlijeku sugeriraju da je dojenje nakon cijepljenja mRNA protiv COVID-19 sigurno, osobito nakon 48 sati nakon cijepljenja.
Ova studija je važna jer je malo znanstvenih radova objavljeno o biodistribuciji lipidnih nanočestica i lokalizaciji u ljudskim tkivima nakon cijepljenja mRNA cjepivom. Međutim, treba napomenuti da je ova studija mala i da su potrebna daljnja istraživanja kako bi se potvrdili njezini nalazi.
Prema studiji objavljenoj u časopisu <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01354-8">Nature Medicine</a>, mRNA cjepiva protiv COVID-19 su sigurna i učinkovita. Studija je pokazala da mRNA cjepiva izazivaju snažan imunološki odgovor i da su nuspojave uglavnom blage i privremene.
Također, prema izvješću Svjetske zdravstvene organizacije (WHO), mRNA cjepiva protiv COVID-19 su sigurna za upotrebu tijekom trudnoće i dojenja. WHO preporučuje da se žene koje doje cijepe kako bi se zaštitile od COVID-19 i zaštitile svoju djecu.
Na temelju ovih informacija, zaključujemo da tvrdnja o izlučivanju mRNA cjepiva u majčinom mlijeku nije potpuno točna i treba je uzimati s rezervom. Potrebna su daljnja istraživanja kako bi se potvrdili nalazi ove studije i razumjeli svi mogući rizici i koristi cijepljenja tijekom dojenja.

Provjera tvrdnje: Otkriveno izlučivanje mRNA cjepiva protiv COVID-19 u majčinom mlijeku?

Dr. Peter McCullough nedavno je izjavio da cjepiva protiv COVID-19 mogu uzrokovati ili potaknuti rak zbog tri navodna mehanizma: oštećenje DNK, supresiju proteina supresora tumora i nečistoće u formulaciji mRNA cjepiva.
Međutim, ove tvrdnje nisu potkrijepljene znanstvenim dokazima.
Prema Centrima za kontrolu i prevenciju bolesti (CDC), Američkom udruženju za borbu protiv raka i Svjetskoj zdravstvenoj organizaciji (WHO), trenutno ne postoje dokazi koji bi potvrdili vezu između cjepiva protiv COVID-19 i razvoja raka.
Cjepiva protiv COVID-19 prošla su strog proces testiranja i odobrenja, a njihova sigurnost i učinkovitost nadziru se i nakon odobrenja. &nbsp;Što se tiče tvrdnji o oštećenju DNK, cjepiva protiv COVID-19 ne mijenjaju ljudsku DNK.
Cjepiva na temelju mRNA daju upute stanicama da proizvode proteine slične virusu, a proteini potiču imunosni odgovor organizma.
Nakon što su proteini proizvedeni, mRNA se razgrađuje, a ne utječe na ljudsku DNK.
Također, tvrdnje o supresiji proteina supresora tumora i nečistoćama u cjepivima nisu podkrijepljene znanstvenim dokazima.
Cjepiva protiv COVID-19 proizvode se u skladu s najvišim standardima kvalitete i sigurnosti. &nbsp;Zaključno, na temelju trenutnih znanstvenih dokaza i izjava međunarodnih zdravstvenih organizacija, tvrdnja da cjepiva protiv COVID-19 uzrokuju rak je neistinita.

Provjera tvrdnje: Cjepiva protiv COVID-19 mogu uzrokovati rak?

<h2>Introduction</h2>
The claim that Dr. Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, and Moderna are responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic has been circulating widely. This claim is based on the discovery of a contract awarded by the U.S. Department of Defense (D.O.D) for COVID-19 research in November 2019, three months before the virus was officially recognized. Additionally, it is alleged that Fauci and Moderna had a vaccine ready in December 2019. This article aims to review these claims and provide a factual analysis.
<h2>The Claim</h2>
The claim suggests that the U.S. government, specifically the D.O.D, had prior knowledge of the COVID-19 virus and may have been involved in its creation. It also implies that Dr. Fauci and Moderna had a vaccine ready before the virus was officially named, indicating potential foreknowledge or involvement.
<h2>Analysis of the Claim</h2>
<h3>Contract for COVID-19 Research</h3>
The contract mentioned in the claim was part of a broader project for a 'Biological threat reduction program in Ukraine.' The specific transaction for 'COVID-19 Research' was awarded to Labyrinth Global Health INC in November 2019. However, it is important to note that the term 'COVID-19' was not officially used until February 2020. The contract likely pertained to general coronavirus research, which is a broad category of viruses that includes SARS and MERS.
Research into coronaviruses has been ongoing for decades due to their potential to cause outbreaks. The timing of the contract does not necessarily imply foreknowledge of the COVID-19 pandemic.
<h3>Vaccine Development</h3>
The claim that Moderna and Dr. Fauci had a vaccine ready in December 2019 is based on a confidentiality agreement for an mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidate. However, vaccine development is a lengthy process that typically takes years. The agreement likely pertained to ongoing research into coronavirus vaccines, not specifically COVID-19.
Moderna had been working on mRNA vaccine technology for several years before the COVID-19 pandemic. The rapid development of the COVID-19 vaccine was possible due to this pre-existing research and the urgent need created by the pandemic.
<h2>Scientific Evidence</h2>
The origin of the COVID-19 virus is still a subject of ongoing research. While some theories suggest a natural origin, others propose a lab leak. However, there is no credible evidence to support the claim that the virus was deliberately created or that the U.S. government, Dr. Fauci, Bill Gates, or Moderna were involved in its creation.
A study published in <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9">Nature Medicine</a> concluded that the COVID-19 virus is likely of natural origin. The study analyzed the genetic sequence of the virus and found no evidence of manipulation.
Another study published in <a href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abf8890">Science</a> reviewed the evidence for a lab leak and concluded that while it cannot be ruled out, there is currently no conclusive evidence to support it.
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
The claim that Fauci, Gates, and Moderna are responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic is largely unfounded. The contract for COVID-19 research and the vaccine development agreement are part of ongoing research into coronaviruses, not evidence of foreknowledge or involvement in the pandemic. The scientific evidence currently available does not support the claim that the virus was deliberately created or that the mentioned parties were involved in its creation.

Claim Review: Fauci, Gates & Moderna Responsible for COVID Pandemic

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "Moderna potvrđuje vezu između COVID mRNA cjepiva i raka" is False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: