La revue Néosanté propose une vision alternative et indépendante de la santé, basée sur le décodage biologique des maladies et les moyens naturels de les prévenir ou d’en guérir

https://neosante.eu/

Analyse de la Revue Néosanté : Une Nouvelle Vision de la Santé ?

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>La revue Néosanté se présente comme une source d'information indépendante et sans publicité, offrant des articles sur le décodage biologique des maladies et les moyens naturels de les prévenir ou d’en guérir. Mais qu'en est-il réellement de ces affirmations ?</p>
<h2>Le Décodage Biologique des Maladies</h2>
<p>La revue Néosanté met en avant le concept de décodage biologique des maladies, une théorie qui prétend que les maladies ont un sens biologique et peuvent être décodées pour comprendre leur origine et les traiter de manière naturelle. Cette théorie est souvent associée à des figures controversées comme Ryke Geerd Hamer, dont les travaux ont été largement critiqués par la communauté scientifique.</p>
<p>Une étude publiée dans le <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4315890/">Journal of Clinical Oncology</a> a montré que les théories de Hamer n'ont aucune base scientifique et peuvent même être dangereuses pour les patients.</p>
<h2>Les Moyens Naturels de Prévention et de Guérison</h2>
<p>Néosanté promeut également l'utilisation de moyens naturels pour prévenir et guérir les maladies. Bien que certaines pratiques naturelles puissent avoir des effets bénéfiques, il est important de noter que de nombreuses affirmations sur les bienfaits des traitements naturels ne sont pas soutenues par des preuves scientifiques solides.</p>
<p>Par exemple, une revue systématique publiée dans le <a href="https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD004396.pub2/full">Cochrane Library</a> a conclu que les preuves sur l'efficacité des traitements naturels pour certaines maladies sont limitées et souvent de faible qualité.</p>
<h2>L'Indépendance et la Qualité de l'Information</h2>
<p>Néosanté se vante d'être une revue indépendante sans publicité, ce qui pourrait laisser penser que l'information qu'elle fournit est impartiale et de haute qualité. Cependant, l'indépendance ne garantit pas nécessairement la fiabilité de l'information.</p>
<p>Il est crucial de vérifier les sources et les preuves scientifiques derrière les affirmations faites dans la revue. Une analyse critique des articles de Néosanté révèle souvent des affirmations non prouvées et des théories controversées.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>En conclusion, bien que la revue Néosanté prétende offrir une vision alternative et indépendante de la santé, il est important de faire preuve de prudence et de scepticisme. Les théories de décodage biologique des maladies et les moyens naturels de prévention et de guérison doivent être évalués à la lumière des preuves scientifiques disponibles. Les lecteurs doivent être vigilants et vérifier les sources avant de prendre des décisions basées sur les informations fournies par Néosanté.</p>

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>A recent article from The People's Voice claims that Big Pharma is against Vitamin D because it 'threatens the disease model' and suggests that increased vitamin D levels could have kept COVID-19 in check. This claim was made during an interview with Dr. Pierre Kory on Tucker Carlson's show. This article aims to review this claim and provide a thorough analysis based on scientific evidence.</p>
<h2>The Role of Vitamin D in Immune Function</h2>
<p>Vitamin D is known to play a crucial role in immune function. Studies have shown that vitamin D deficiency is associated with an increased risk of respiratory infections. A meta-analysis published in the British Medical Journal found that vitamin D supplementation reduced the risk of acute respiratory infections (<a href="https://www.bmj.com/content/356/bmj.i6583">BMJ, 2017</a>).</p>
<h2>Vitamin D and COVID-19</h2>
<p>Several studies have explored the relationship between vitamin D levels and COVID-19 outcomes. A study published in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism found that vitamin D deficiency was associated with a higher risk of severe COVID-19 (<a href="https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/108/10/e1106/7116659">JCEM, 2020</a> ). However, the evidence is not conclusive, and more research is needed to establish a causal relationship.</p>
<h2>The Economic Incentives of Big Pharma</h2>
<p>The claim that Big Pharma is against Vitamin D because it threatens their business model is speculative and lacks concrete evidence. Pharmaceutical companies have a financial interest in developing and marketing drugs, but this does not necessarily mean they are opposed to vitamin supplements. Many pharmaceutical companies also produce and sell vitamin supplements.</p>
<h2>The Complexity of COVID-19 Management</h2>
<p>The assertion that increased vitamin D levels could have kept COVID-19 in check oversimplifies the complexities of the pandemic. While vitamin D may play a role in immune function, it is just one of many factors that influence COVID-19 outcomes. Other factors include age, underlying health conditions, vaccination status, and public health measures such as social distancing and mask-wearing.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that Big Pharma is against Vitamin D because it threatens their business model and that increased vitamin D levels could have controlled COVID-19 is largely unfounded. While vitamin D plays a role in immune function, the evidence regarding its impact on COVID-19 is not conclusive. The management of COVID-19 is complex and multifaceted, and vitamin D is just one piece of the puzzle. More research is needed to fully understand the role of vitamin D in COVID-19.</p>

Claim Review: Big Pharma's Stance on Vitamin D and COVID-19

<p>U posljednje vrijeme, mnogo se govori o učincima suplementacije vitaminom D. Članak na CRODEX.NET tvrdi da suplementacija vitaminom D nema gotovo nikakve pozitivne učinke. Da li je to istina?</p>
<p>Vitamin D je važan za naše zdravlje, a njegov nedostatak povezan je s raznim bolestima. Međutim, pitanje je da li suplementacija vitaminom D zaista pomaže u smanjenju rizika od tih bolesti.</p>
<p>Prema članku, velika meta-analiza je pokazala da suplementacija vitaminom D ima iznimno male, ili nikakve pozitivne učinke. No, što kažu znanstvena istraživanja?</p>
<p>Jedna od najvećih meta-analiza na ovu temu, objavljena u časopisu <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/landia/article/PIIS2213-8587(18)30265-1/fulltext">The Lancet Diabetes &amp; Endocrinology</a>, zaključila je da suplementacija vitaminom D ne smanjuje rizik od kardiovaskularnih bolesti, karcinoma ili smrtnosti. Međutim, druge studije pokazuju da vitamin D može imati koristi u specifičnim populacijama, kao što su starije osobe ili osobe s nedostatkom vitamina D.</p>
<p>Na primjer, studija objavljena u časopisu <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1809944">New England Journal of Medicine</a> pokazala je da suplementacija vitaminom D može smanjiti rizik od akutnih respiratornih infekcija, posebno kod osoba s niskim razinama vitamina D.</p>
<p>Također, važno je napomenuti da vitamin D može imati ulogu u jačanju imunog sustava i kostiju. Studija objavljena u časopisu <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3356951/">Journal of Clinical Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism</a> pokazala je da vitamin D može poboljšati gustoću kostiju i smanjiti rizik od fraktura kod starijih osoba.</p>
<p>Zaključno, iako suplementacija vitaminom D možda ne pruža univerzalne koristi za sve, ona može imati specifične učinke u određenim populacijama. Važno je da se odluka o suplementaciji temelji na individualnim potrebama i preporukama stručnjaka.</p>

Istina o suplementaciji vitaminom D: Što kažu znanstvena istraživanja?

<p>Tvrdnja da je John D. Rockefeller oteo američko zdravstvo i preuzeo kontrolu nad Američkim liječničkim udruženjem (AMA), te da je osnovao farmaceutsku industriju koja je razlog zašto su medicinske pogreške trenutačno treći vodeći uzrok smrti u Americi, je težak i kompleksan priča koja zahtijeva pažljivo istraživanje.</p>
<p>John D. Rockefeller je bio utjecajna osoba u američkoj povijesti, ali njegova uloga u farmaceutskoj industriji i zdravstvu nije onakva kakvom se prikazuje u ovom članku. Rockefeller je bio poznat po svojoj ulozi u naftnoj industriji, a njegova obitelj je kasnije bila aktivna u filantropiji, uključujući i područje zdravstva. Međutim, tvrdnja da je Rockefeller oteo američko zdravstvo i preuzeo kontrolu nad AMA nema čvrstu povijesnu podlogu.</p>
<p>Farmaceutska industrija je razvijena kroz dugi proces znanstvenog istraživanja i razvoja, a ne kao rezultat zavjere jedne osobe ili obitelji. Medicinske pogreške su složen problem koji uključuje mnoge faktore, uključujući ljudske pogreške, sistemske probleme i kompleksnost medicinske prakse. Tvrdnja da su medicinske pogreške treći vodeći uzrok smrti u Americi je temeljena na istraživanjima koja pokazuju da su medicinske pogreške značajan problem, ali to nije rezultat zavjere farmaceutske industrije.</p>
<p>Studija objavljena u časopisu <a href="https://www.bmj.com/content/353/bmj.i2139">BMJ</a> pokazuje da su medicinske pogreške značajan problem, ali ne pripisuje to farmaceutskoj industriji ili Rockefellerovoj obitelji. Druga studija objavljena u časopisu <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC502744/">JAMA</a> također pokazuje da su medicinske pogreške složen problem koji zahtijeva sustavne rješenje.</p>
<p>Zaključak je da tvrdnja o Rockefellerovoj ulozi u farmaceutskoj industriji i medicinskim pogreškama nema čvrstu znanstvenu podlogu. Važno je kritički razmišljati i provjeravati informacije iz različitih izvora kako bismo došli do točnih i objektivnih zaključaka.</p>

Provjera tvrdnje: John D. Rockefeller i farmaceutska industrija

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "La revue Néosanté propose une vision alternative et indépendante de la santé, basée sur le décodage biologique des maladies et les moyens naturels de les prévenir ou d’en guérir" is Mostly False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: