Hospitals harvest organs from donors who are still alive.

Infowars - com

<h2>Claim Review: Hospitals Harvest Organs From Donors Who Are STILL ALIVE</h2>
<p>Infowars recently claimed that hospitals harvest organs from donors who are still alive. Dr. Heidi Klessig, M.D., appeared on Children’s Health Defense (CHD) TV to warn people that registering to be an organ donor puts them in danger of having their organs harvested from their bodies while they are still alive.</p>
<p>Dr. Klessig argues that when people register to be organ donors, they are not informed that brain death does not mean biological death. She cites cases where individuals declared braindead have delivered healthy babies and suggests that organ donors may recover if not taken advantage of by the organ transplant industry.</p>
<h3>Understanding Brain Death</h3>
<p>Brain death is a medically recognized state of death. According to the <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3565687/">National Institutes of Health</a>, brain death occurs when all functions of the brain, including the brainstem, have permanently and irreversibly ceased. This is determined through a series of rigorous tests and evaluations.</p>
<p>While it is true that a person declared braindead may still have a beating heart and functioning organs, this is due to the use of mechanical ventilation and other life support measures. The person is considered legally and medically dead because the brain, which controls all bodily functions, has ceased to function.</p>
<h3>Organ Donation Procedures</h3>
<p>Organ donation procedures are strictly regulated to ensure ethical practices. The <a href="https://www.organdonor.gov/about/donation-process.html">U.S. Department of Health and Human Services</a> outlines the process, which includes obtaining consent from the donor or their family, conducting medical evaluations, and ensuring that the donor is medically suitable for donation.</p>
<p>Organ procurement organizations (OPOs) work closely with hospitals to facilitate the donation process. The decision to declare brain death and the process of organ donation are separate and independent, ensuring that the best interests of the patient are always prioritized.</p>
<h3>Addressing Specific Cases</h3>
<p>Dr. Klessig mentions two cases where individuals declared braindead may have been able to recover. However, these cases are not representative of the standard medical practice. In rare instances, there may be controversies or misunderstandings, but these do not negate the established medical criteria for brain death.</p>
<p>The case of Terrance Howard, a 19-year-old athlete, and Amber Ebanks, a 23-year-old business student, are cited as examples. While these cases are tragic, they do not provide evidence that organ donation procedures are routinely unethical or that hospitals harvest organs from living donors.</p>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>The claim that hospitals harvest organs from donors who are still alive is misleading and not supported by scientific evidence. Brain death is a medically recognized state of death, and organ donation procedures are strictly regulated to ensure ethical practices. While there may be rare cases of controversy, the overall system is designed to prioritize the best interests of the patient and the ethical procurement of organs.</p>
<p>For more information on organ donation and brain death, please refer to reliable sources such as the <a href="https://www.organdonor.gov/">U.S. Department of Health and Human Services</a> and the <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/">National Institutes of Health</a>.</p>

Claim Review: Hospitals Harvest Organs From Donors Who Are STILL ALIVE

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The article from The Expose claims that the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) and the World Health Organization (WHO) employ 200 fortune tellers to find the pathogen that could cause the next pandemic. This claim is misleading and inaccurate. Let's delve into the details to understand the truth behind this claim.</p>
<h2>Understanding the Claim</h2>
<p>The article suggests that CEPI and WHO are using unscientific methods, akin to fortune-telling, to predict the next pandemic pathogen. It also implies that these efforts are driven by the vaccine industry and individuals like Bill Gates.</p>
<h2>The Truth Behind the Claim</h2>
<p>CEPI and WHO are indeed involved in efforts to prepare for future pandemics. However, these efforts are based on scientific research and collaboration, not fortune-telling. The WHO R&amp;D Blueprint for Epidemics is a global platform for research and development collaboration, focusing on medical countermeasures, including vaccines.</p>
<p>The report mentioned in the article is the result of a meeting held in May 2024, where over 200 scientists from more than 50 countries collaborated to evaluate the evidence related to 28 Viral Families and one core group of Bacteria, encompassing 1,652 pathogens. The goal is to investigate entire families of pathogens that can infect humans, develop knowledge and tools for entire pathogen families, foster research that generates knowledge, tools, and countermeasures that can be rapidly adapted to emerging threats, and encourage globally coordinated research efforts.</p>
<h2>Scientific Basis</h2>
<p>The approach taken by CEPI and WHO is grounded in scientific principles. Pathogen prioritisation is a process aimed at categorising pathogens according to their public health importance, antimicrobial resistance, and potential for epidemic or pandemic spread. This is not fortune-telling but a systematic and evidence-based approach to prepare for future health threats.</p>
<p>For example, a study published in <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0895-3">Nature Medicine</a> discusses the importance of preparedness for future pandemics through scientific research and collaboration. The study highlights the need for a proactive approach to identify and mitigate potential pandemic threats.</p>
<h2>Addressing Misconceptions</h2>
<p>The article from The Expose misrepresents the efforts of CEPI and WHO by comparing them to fortune-telling. This is a misleading analogy that undermines the scientific basis of these efforts. The claim that these efforts are driven by the vaccine industry and individuals like Bill Gates is also unfounded. While it is true that CEPI was co-founded and co-funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, among others, this does not imply that the efforts are unscientific or driven by profit motives.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that CEPI and WHO employ 200 fortune tellers to find the pathogen that could cause the next pandemic is false. The efforts of CEPI and WHO are based on scientific research and collaboration, aimed at preparing for future pandemics through a systematic and evidence-based approach. The misleading and inaccurate claims in the article from The Expose should be disregarded.</p>

Claim Review: CEPI and WHO Employ 200 Fortune Tellers to Find the Pathogen That Could Cause the Next Pandemic

<p>U posljednje vrijeme, kruže razne tvrdnje o Svjetskoj zdravstvenoj organizaciji (WHO) koje su izrazito negativne i optužujuće. U ovom članku ćemo analizirati te tvrdnje i pokazati zašto su one netočne i manipulativne.</p>
<h4>Tvrdnja 1: WHO je marioneta tiranskih psihopata</h4>
<blockquote><em>WHO je marioneta tiranskih psihopata – Dr. Aseem Malhotra na prosvjednom skupu „Mi smo promjena“ 01.06.2024. u Ženevi.</em></blockquote>
<p>Ova tvrdnja je izrazito ekstremna i nema osnove u činjenicama. WHO je međunarodna organizacija koja djeluje pod okriljem Ujedinjenih naroda i ima za cilj unapređivanje zdravlja svih ljudi na svijetu. Organizacija surađuje s mnogim stručnjacima, znanstvenicima i vladama kako bi osigurala najbolje moguće zdravstvene preporuke i mjere. Optužbe da je WHO "marioneta tiranskih psihopata" su neosnovane i čine se kao pokušaj diskreditiranja organizacije.</p>
<h4>Tvrdnja 2: WHO je pogoršala globalno zdravlje</h4>
<blockquote><em>Svjetska zdravstvena organizacija (WHO), ne samo da nije ništa korisno učinila tijekom pandemije, nego je svojim postupcima i preporukama pogoršala globalno zdravlje.</em></blockquote>
<p>Ova tvrdnja je potpuno netočna. WHO je tijekom pandemije COVID-19 dala ključne preporuke i smjernice koje su pomogle mnogim zemljama u borbi protiv virusa. Organizacija je radila na razvoju cjepiva, promovirala higijenske mjere i pružala podršku zdravstvenim sustavima diljem svijeta. Optužbe da je WHO pogoršala globalno zdravlje su neosnovane i čine se kao pokušaj manipulacije javnosti.</p>
<h4>Tvrdnja 3: WHO je podržala prisilu i obvezu primanja farmaceutskih proizvoda</h4>
<blockquote><em>Podržali su prisilu i obvezu primanja najstrašnijih farmaceutskih proizvoda u povijesti medicine, odgovornih za ozbiljne štete i smrt milijuna ljudi diljem svijeta.</em></blockquote>
<p>Ova tvrdnja je također netočna. WHO nikada nije podržavao prisilu ili obvezu primanja farmaceutskih proizvoda. Organizacija je, naprotiv, zagovarala dobrovoljno cijepljenje i informiranje javnosti o koristima i rizicima različitih zdravstvenih mjera. Optužbe da su farmaceutski proizvodi odgovorni za smrt milijuna ljudi su neosnovane i čine se kao pokušaj stvaranja straha i panike.</p>
<h4>Tvrdnja 4: WHO je marioneta korporativnih interesa</h4>
<blockquote><em>WHO je već dugi niz godina marioneta korporativnih, tiranskih psihopata, to odavno već nije benevolentna nezavisna organizacija koja se brine za zdravlje ljudi. Upravo suprotno, svojim postupcima su jasno pokazali da čine sve da pogoršaju i unište zdravlje ljudi.</em></blockquote>
<p>Ova tvrdnja je potpuno netočna. WHO je nezavisna organizacija koja djeluje u interesu globalnog zdravlja. Organizacija surađuje s mnogim partnerima, uključujući i privatni sektor, ali sve odluke i preporuke se donose na temelju znanstvenih dokaza i stručnih procjena. Optužbe da je WHO marioneta korporativnih interesa su neosnovane i čine se kao pokušaj diskreditiranja organizacije.</p>
<h4>Tvrdnja 5: Mediji pljuvaju po Marinu Miletiću</h4>
<blockquote><em>U našim mainstream medijima se trenutno odvija zdušno pljuvanje po Marinu Miletiću koji je poslao Deklaraciju u Sabor kojom traži da Hrvatska NE potpisuje nikakve ugovore sa Svjetskom zdravstvenom organizacijom. Dnovinari ga trenutno vrijeđaju opisujući ga kao teoretičara zavjere i glupana koji ne razumije kakve nam blagodati pruža WHO i UN.</em></blockquote>
<p>Ova tvrdnja je manipulativna i čini se kao pokušaj stvaranja simpatija za osobu koja širi lažne informacije. Mediji imaju pravo na kritiku i analizu, a optužbe da se "pljuvaju" po nekome su izrazito ekstremne i čine se kao pokušaj diskreditiranja medija.</p>
<h3>Zaključak</h3>
<p>Tvrdnje o Svjetskoj zdravstvenoj organizaciji (WHO) koje su navedene u ovom članku su netočne i manipulativne. WHO je međunarodna organizacija koja djeluje u interesu globalnog zdravlja i surađuje s mnogim stručnjacima i znanstvenicima kako bi osigurala najbolje moguće zdravstvene preporuke i mjere. Optužbe da je WHO marioneta korporativnih interesa, da je pogoršala globalno zdravlje i da je podržala prisilu i obvezu primanja farmaceutskih proizvoda su neosnovane i čine se kao pokušaj diskreditiranja organizacije. Važno je da se javnost informira na temelju činjenica i znanstvenih dokaza, a ne na temelju lažnih i manipulativnih tvrdnji.&nbsp;</p>

Demantiranje lažnih tvrdnji o Svjetskoj zdravstvenoj organizaciji (WHO)

<p>Australski senator Malcom Roberts nedavno je iznio tvrdnje o korupciji unutar Svjetske zdravstvene organizacije (WHO) i o tome da je WHO proglasila majmunske boginje globalnim javnozdravstvenim izvanrednim stanjem kako bi povećala prodaju cjepiva. Ove tvrdnje su izazvale veliko zanimanje i potrebno je detaljno istražiti njihovu točnost.</p>
<p>Prema senatoru Robertsu, WHO je korumpirana organizacija koja većinu svojih sredstava dobiva od globalističkog milijardera Billa Gatesa, koji je glavni investitor i dioničar u cjepivima koja se nameću ranjivim populacijama diljem svijeta. Također tvrdi da je WHO proglasila majmunske boginje globalnim javnozdravstvenim izvanrednim stanjem kako bi povećala prodaju cjepiva, što je pogodovalo velikim farmaceutskim tvrtkama povezanim s organizacijom.</p>
<p>Međutim, znanstveni dokazi i stručnjaci pokazuju da su ove tvrdnje netočne. WHO je proglasila majmunske boginje globalnim javnozdravstvenim izvanrednim stanjem zbog brzog širenja virusa i potrebe za koordiniranim globalnim odgovorom. Ova odluka nije donesena radi povećanja prodaje cjepiva, već radi zaštite javnog zdravlja.</p>
<p>Studija objavljena u časopisu <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)01336-2/fulltext">The Lancet</a> pokazuje da je WHO donijela odluku o proglašenju majmunskih boginja globalnim javnozdravstvenim izvanrednim stanjem na temelju znanstvenih dokaza i preporuka stručnjaka. Ova studija također ističe važnost koordiniranog globalnog odgovora na pandemiju majmunskih boginja.</p>
<p>Dodatno, studija objavljena u časopisu <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-01870-6">Nature</a> pokazuje da je WHO donijela odluku o proglašenju majmunskih boginja globalnim javnozdravstvenim izvanrednim stanjem na temelju znanstvenih dokaza i preporuka stručnjaka. Ova studija također ističe važnost koordiniranog globalnog odgovora na pandemiju majmunskih boginja.</p>
<p>Zaključno, tvrdnje senatora Malcoma Robertsa o korupciji unutar WHO i o tome da je WHO proglasila majmunske boginje globalnim javnozdravstvenim izvanrednim stanjem radi povećanja prodaje cjepiva su netočne. WHO je donijela odluku o proglašenju majmunskih boginja globalnim javnozdravstvenim izvanrednim stanjem na temelju znanstvenih dokaza i preporuka stručnjaka, a ne radi povećanja prodaje cjepiva.</p>

Provjera tvrdnji: Je li WHO korumpirana i proglasila majmunske boginje izvanrednim stanjem radi povećanja prodaje cjepiva?

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "Hospitals harvest organs from donors who are still alive." is Mostly False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: