Explosion of childhood cancers correlates with the increase in vaccination schedules for children from the 1990s

The Expose News - com

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The claim that childhood vaccines are linked to increased cancer rates in children has been circulating in various forms. This article aims to review the evidence behind this claim and provide a thorough analysis.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The claim suggests that the increase in childhood cancers correlates with the rise in vaccination schedules since the 1990s. It further posits that vaccine toxins disrupt cellular metabolism, potentially leading to cancer.</p>
<h2>Scientific Background</h2>
<p>To understand the claim, it is essential to delve into the scientific background of vaccines and cancer.</p>
<h3>Vaccine Ingredients</h3>
<p>Vaccines contain various ingredients, including adjuvants and preservatives, which are designed to enhance the immune response and prevent bacterial contamination. Some of these ingredients, such as formaldehyde and aluminum, are known to be toxic when injected into the body.</p>
<h3>Mitochondrial Dysfunction</h3>
<p>The claim suggests that vaccine toxins can cause mitochondrial dysfunction, leading to a shift from oxygen respiration to glucose fermentation, which is a hallmark of cancer cells. This theory is based on the work of Otto Warburg, who discovered that cancer cells use glucose fermentation for energy.</p>
<h2>Evidence Review</h2>
<h3>Formaldehyde</h3>
<p>Formaldehyde is a known carcinogen, but its presence in vaccines is minimal and tightly regulated. The amount of formaldehyde in vaccines is significantly lower than the levels found in the environment and is not considered a significant risk factor for cancer.</p>
<h3>Thimerosal</h3>
<p>Thimerosal, a mercury-containing preservative, has been largely removed from childhood vaccines due to concerns about its neurotoxicity. However, the link between thimerosal and cancer is not well-established. Studies have shown that the levels of mercury in vaccines are not sufficient to cause cancer.</p>
<h3>Aluminum</h3>
<p>Aluminum is used as an adjuvant in many vaccines. While aluminum is a known neurotoxin, the amounts used in vaccines are carefully controlled and have not been linked to cancer. A study published in <a href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2017.00283/full">Frontiers in Oncology</a> discusses how mitochondrial dysfunction can lead to cancer, but it does not specifically implicate vaccines.</p>
<h2>Correlation vs. Causation</h2>
<p>The claim relies heavily on the correlation between increased vaccination schedules and rising cancer rates. However, correlation does not imply causation. Many factors can contribute to the rise in childhood cancers, including environmental toxins, genetic predisposition, and lifestyle factors.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>While some vaccine ingredients are toxic and can potentially cause mitochondrial dysfunction, the evidence linking vaccines to increased cancer rates in children is not conclusive. The claim that vaccine toxins are responsible for the surging rate of childhood cancer is not well-supported by scientific research. Therefore, the claim is rated 2 out of 5.</p>

Claim Review: The Link Between Childhood Vaccines and Increased Cancer Rates in Children

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The claim that vaccination is a synonym for genocide has been circulating, suggesting that the increased number of vaccines given to children today is making them sicker than any other generation. This article aims to review this claim and provide a thorough analysis based on scientific evidence.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The claim suggests that the increase in the number of vaccines given to children in the United States, from around 5 in 1986 to around 32 today, is responsible for the rise in childhood illnesses. The claim further implies that vaccines are not effective in preventing diseases and that cleaner water, better food, and improved sanitation are the real reasons for the decline in infectious diseases.</p>
<h2>Scientific Evidence</h2>
<p>To evaluate this claim, it is essential to look at the scientific evidence regarding the safety and effectiveness of vaccines.</p>
<h3>Vaccine Safety</h3>
<p>Vaccines undergo rigorous testing and monitoring to ensure their safety. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) closely monitor vaccine safety. Studies have shown that vaccines are generally safe and that serious adverse events are rare. For example, a study published in the journal <em>Pediatrics</em> found that the risk of serious adverse events following vaccination is extremely low (<a href="https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/132/1/e243">source</a>).</p>
<h3>Vaccine Effectiveness</h3>
<p>Vaccines have been proven to be highly effective in preventing diseases. For instance, the measles vaccine has led to a significant reduction in measles cases worldwide. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), measles vaccination has prevented an estimated 23.2 million deaths between 2000 and 2018 (<a href="https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/measles">source</a>).</p>
<h3>Impact of Improved Sanitation</h3>
<p>While it is true that improved sanitation, cleaner water, and better nutrition have contributed to the decline in infectious diseases, vaccines have played a crucial role in this process. Vaccines have been instrumental in eradicating diseases like smallpox and significantly reducing the incidence of others like polio and measles.</p>
<h2>Addressing the Claim</h2>
<p>The claim that vaccination is a synonym for genocide is not supported by scientific evidence. Vaccines have been proven to be safe and effective in preventing diseases. The increase in the number of vaccines given to children is not responsible for the rise in childhood illnesses. Instead, vaccines have contributed to the significant reduction in infectious diseases and have saved millions of lives.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that vaccination is a synonym for genocide is false. Vaccines are safe and effective, and they play a crucial role in preventing diseases. It is essential to rely on scientific evidence when evaluating claims about vaccines and to be cautious of misinformation that can undermine public health efforts.</p>

Claim Review: Is Vaccination a Synonym for Genocide?

<p>The claim that a secret CDC report confirms Dr. Anthony Fauci lied and hundreds of thousands of children died due to COVID vaccination is false. This claim is based on an article published by The Exposé, which is known for spreading misinformation and conspiracy theories.</p>
<p>Firstly, there is no evidence of a secret CDC report claiming that hundreds of thousands of children died due to COVID vaccination. The CDC regularly publishes data on COVID-19 vaccinations and any adverse events, and there is no such report on their website or any other official platform.</p>
<p>Secondly, the claim that Dr. Anthony Fauci lied about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines is also false. Dr. Fauci has consistently emphasized the importance of vaccines in protecting against COVID-19, and his statements are backed by scientific evidence. The COVID-19 vaccines have been thoroughly tested and found to be safe and effective in clinical trials and real-world studies.</p>
<p>The article also claims that excess deaths among children and young adults increased after the roll-out of COVID-19 vaccines. However, this is not supported by official data. According to the CDC, COVID-19 was one of the leading causes of death among children and young adults in the US in 2021, and the vast majority of these deaths occurred among unvaccinated individuals.</p>
<p>The article also cites data from the UK's Office for National Statistics (ONS) to claim that vaccinated individuals are more likely to die than unvaccinated individuals. However, this is a misinterpretation of the data. The ONS data shows that the mortality rate among vaccinated individuals is lower than that among unvaccinated individuals for all age groups, including children and young adults.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the article claims that the mainstream media is covering up the truth about COVID-19 vaccines. However, this is not true. The mainstream media has extensively covered the COVID-19 pandemic and the development and roll-out of COVID-19 vaccines, and has reported on any adverse events associated with the vaccines.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that a secret CDC report confirms Dr. Anthony Fauci lied and hundreds of thousands of children died due to COVID vaccination is false. There is no evidence of such a report, and official data does not support these allegations. The COVID-19 vaccines have been thoroughly tested and found to be safe and effective, and the benefits of vaccination far outweigh the risks.</p>
<p>For more information on the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines, please see the following resources:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/safety-of-vaccines.html">CDC: Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/the-benefits-of-covid-19-vaccination-outweigh-the-risks">WHO: The benefits of COVID-19 vaccination outweigh the risks</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02039-9">Nature: COVID vaccines: what the numbers say about risks and benefits</a></li>
</ul>

Claim Review: Secret CDC Report on COVID Vaccine Deaths in Children

<p>The claim that the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) report confirms fluoride exposure is associated with lower IQ in children has been circulating widely. This claim is based on a report by the National Toxicology Program (NTP), which was delayed and finally released in August 2024. The report presents a comprehensive evaluation of the scientific evidence associating fluoride exposure with cognitive and neurodevelopmental health effects.</p>
<p>The NTP report found that 72 studies examined the association between fluoride exposure and IQ in children, with 64 showing an inverse relationship. This means that higher fluoride exposure was linked to lower IQ scores. Even at lower concentrations, fluoride exposure was associated with lower IQ. However, the report includes several caveats that are important to consider.</p>
<p>Firstly, the report mentions 'higher estimated fluoride exposures,' which are at drinking water fluoride concentrations that exceed the World Health Organization Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality of 1.5 mg/L of fluoride. The NTP scientists call for more studies to fully understand the potential for lower fluoride exposure to affect children's IQ. These caveats have been used by some media outlets to downplay the significance of the report's conclusions.</p>
<p>Despite these caveats, the NTP scientists make it clear that their conclusions apply to the US population. They state that because people receive fluoride from multiple sources (not just drinking water), individuals living in areas with optimally fluoridated water can have total fluoride exposures higher than the concentration of their drinking water. Additionally, there are people living in the United States who live in areas with naturally occurring fluoride in drinking water that is higher than 1.5 mg/L.</p>
<p>The release of the NTP report coincides with an ongoing legal battle between the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Fluoride Action Network (FAN). The lawsuit began following the EPA's 2016 decision to deny the plaintiff's petition under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). FAN is attempting to prove that fluoride is a neurotoxin and should be regulated or banned under the TSCA.</p>
<p>Emails released as part of the lawsuit reveal that various elements of the US government appear to have been involved in a concerted effort to block the release of the NTP draft report. The emails show that NTP scientists believed their work was completed and set a date for May 2022 for publication. However, leadership at the top levels of the Department of Health and Human Services intervened to stop the report from being released.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that the US Department of Health and Human Services report confirms fluoride exposure is associated with lower IQ in children is partially true. While the report does suggest a link, it also includes caveats that need to be considered. The report calls for more studies to fully understand the potential for lower fluoride exposure to affect children's IQ. Additionally, the report's release has been surrounded by controversy, with evidence suggesting that government officials attempted to block its publication.</p>
<p>For more information, you can refer to the following studies:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6478697/">Fluoride exposure and neurodevelopmental outcomes in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2748634">Association Between Maternal Fluoride Exposure During Pregnancy and IQ Scores in Offspring in Canada</a></li>
</ul>
<p>These studies provide a more detailed analysis of the association between fluoride exposure and neurodevelopmental outcomes in children.</p>

Claim Review: US Department of Health and Human Services Report on Fluoride and IQ

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "Explosion of childhood cancers correlates with the increase in vaccination schedules for children from the 1990s" is Mostly False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: