Dr. Vernon Coleman believes autism is caused by vaccination. He presents seven facts to support this claim, arguing that the increase in autism cases correlates with the rise in vaccinations and suggests that severe autism is simply vaccine-induced brain damage.

The Expose News - com

<p>The claim that vaccination causes autism has been a topic of debate for many years. Dr. Vernon Coleman, in an article published on The Exposé on September 24, 2024, argues that the increase in autism cases correlates with the rise in vaccinations and suggests that severe autism is simply vaccine-induced brain damage. However, a thorough examination of the available scientific evidence does not support this claim.</p>
<p>Firstly, it is important to note that correlation does not imply causation. While it is true that the incidence of autism has increased over the years, this does not necessarily mean that vaccines are the cause. There are many other factors that could contribute to this increase, such as improved diagnostic criteria and increased awareness of autism spectrum disorders.</p>
<p>Dr. Coleman presents seven facts to support his claim. However, these facts are not backed by robust scientific evidence. For example, he mentions a medical practice in the USA that does not vaccinate its patients and has no patients with autism. While this may seem compelling, it is important to consider that this is anecdotal evidence and does not constitute a scientific study.</p>
<p>Numerous scientific studies have been conducted to investigate the potential link between vaccines and autism. A comprehensive review of these studies, published in the journal <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4599060/">Vaccine</a>, found no evidence to support a causal relationship between vaccines and autism. The review included studies from various countries and used different methodologies, providing a robust body of evidence.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the claim that vaccines cause brain damage is not supported by scientific evidence. Vaccines are rigorously tested for safety and efficacy before they are approved for use. While rare adverse events can occur, these are typically mild and temporary. Severe brain damage as a result of vaccination is extremely rare and not a common outcome.</p>
<p>Dr. Coleman also mentions that the American Government has reportedly accepted that vaccines may cause autism. However, this is a misinterpretation of the facts. The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) in the United States has compensated individuals who have experienced adverse events following vaccination, but this does not mean that vaccines cause autism. The VICP compensates individuals based on the specific criteria outlined in the program, and the compensation does not imply a causal relationship between vaccines and autism.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that vaccination causes autism is not supported by scientific evidence. Numerous studies have found no link between vaccines and autism, and the available evidence suggests that vaccines are safe and effective. The claim is rated as false.</p>

Claim Review: Does Vaccination Cause Autism?

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The claim that vaccination is a synonym for genocide has been circulating, suggesting that the increased number of vaccines given to children today is making them sicker than any other generation. This article aims to review this claim and provide a thorough analysis based on scientific evidence.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The claim suggests that the increase in the number of vaccines given to children in the United States, from around 5 in 1986 to around 32 today, is responsible for the rise in childhood illnesses. The claim further implies that vaccines are not effective in preventing diseases and that cleaner water, better food, and improved sanitation are the real reasons for the decline in infectious diseases.</p>
<h2>Scientific Evidence</h2>
<p>To evaluate this claim, it is essential to look at the scientific evidence regarding the safety and effectiveness of vaccines.</p>
<h3>Vaccine Safety</h3>
<p>Vaccines undergo rigorous testing and monitoring to ensure their safety. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) closely monitor vaccine safety. Studies have shown that vaccines are generally safe and that serious adverse events are rare. For example, a study published in the journal <em>Pediatrics</em> found that the risk of serious adverse events following vaccination is extremely low (<a href="https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/132/1/e243">source</a>).</p>
<h3>Vaccine Effectiveness</h3>
<p>Vaccines have been proven to be highly effective in preventing diseases. For instance, the measles vaccine has led to a significant reduction in measles cases worldwide. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), measles vaccination has prevented an estimated 23.2 million deaths between 2000 and 2018 (<a href="https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/measles">source</a>).</p>
<h3>Impact of Improved Sanitation</h3>
<p>While it is true that improved sanitation, cleaner water, and better nutrition have contributed to the decline in infectious diseases, vaccines have played a crucial role in this process. Vaccines have been instrumental in eradicating diseases like smallpox and significantly reducing the incidence of others like polio and measles.</p>
<h2>Addressing the Claim</h2>
<p>The claim that vaccination is a synonym for genocide is not supported by scientific evidence. Vaccines have been proven to be safe and effective in preventing diseases. The increase in the number of vaccines given to children is not responsible for the rise in childhood illnesses. Instead, vaccines have contributed to the significant reduction in infectious diseases and have saved millions of lives.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that vaccination is a synonym for genocide is false. Vaccines are safe and effective, and they play a crucial role in preventing diseases. It is essential to rely on scientific evidence when evaluating claims about vaccines and to be cautious of misinformation that can undermine public health efforts.</p>

Claim Review: Is Vaccination a Synonym for Genocide?

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The claim that childhood vaccines are linked to increased cancer rates in children has been circulating in various forms. This article aims to review the evidence behind this claim and provide a thorough analysis.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The claim suggests that the increase in childhood cancers correlates with the rise in vaccination schedules since the 1990s. It further posits that vaccine toxins disrupt cellular metabolism, potentially leading to cancer.</p>
<h2>Scientific Background</h2>
<p>To understand the claim, it is essential to delve into the scientific background of vaccines and cancer.</p>
<h3>Vaccine Ingredients</h3>
<p>Vaccines contain various ingredients, including adjuvants and preservatives, which are designed to enhance the immune response and prevent bacterial contamination. Some of these ingredients, such as formaldehyde and aluminum, are known to be toxic when injected into the body.</p>
<h3>Mitochondrial Dysfunction</h3>
<p>The claim suggests that vaccine toxins can cause mitochondrial dysfunction, leading to a shift from oxygen respiration to glucose fermentation, which is a hallmark of cancer cells. This theory is based on the work of Otto Warburg, who discovered that cancer cells use glucose fermentation for energy.</p>
<h2>Evidence Review</h2>
<h3>Formaldehyde</h3>
<p>Formaldehyde is a known carcinogen, but its presence in vaccines is minimal and tightly regulated. The amount of formaldehyde in vaccines is significantly lower than the levels found in the environment and is not considered a significant risk factor for cancer.</p>
<h3>Thimerosal</h3>
<p>Thimerosal, a mercury-containing preservative, has been largely removed from childhood vaccines due to concerns about its neurotoxicity. However, the link between thimerosal and cancer is not well-established. Studies have shown that the levels of mercury in vaccines are not sufficient to cause cancer.</p>
<h3>Aluminum</h3>
<p>Aluminum is used as an adjuvant in many vaccines. While aluminum is a known neurotoxin, the amounts used in vaccines are carefully controlled and have not been linked to cancer. A study published in <a href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2017.00283/full">Frontiers in Oncology</a> discusses how mitochondrial dysfunction can lead to cancer, but it does not specifically implicate vaccines.</p>
<h2>Correlation vs. Causation</h2>
<p>The claim relies heavily on the correlation between increased vaccination schedules and rising cancer rates. However, correlation does not imply causation. Many factors can contribute to the rise in childhood cancers, including environmental toxins, genetic predisposition, and lifestyle factors.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>While some vaccine ingredients are toxic and can potentially cause mitochondrial dysfunction, the evidence linking vaccines to increased cancer rates in children is not conclusive. The claim that vaccine toxins are responsible for the surging rate of childhood cancer is not well-supported by scientific research. Therefore, the claim is rated 2 out of 5.</p>

Claim Review: The Link Between Childhood Vaccines and Increased Cancer Rates in Children

<p>In an interview, <a href="https://remedia.social/claim-author/andrew-wakefield-b9ae5748e147">Andrew Wakefield</a> &nbsp;made several claims about vaccines and autism. One notable claim was that 'more than half the adult population of the world are anti-vaxxers.' This claim warrants a thorough examination to determine its validity.</p>
<p>Vaccine hesitancy is a complex issue that varies widely across different regions and populations. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines vaccine hesitancy as the 'reluctance or refusal to vaccinate despite the availability of vaccines.' While vaccine hesitancy is a concern, it does not represent the majority of the global population.</p>
<p>According to a study published in the journal <em>The Lancet</em>, vaccine confidence varies significantly across countries. The study, titled 'The State of Vaccine Confidence 2016: Global Insights Through a 67-Country Survey,' found that while some countries have high levels of vaccine hesitancy, others have very low levels. The study can be found <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(16)31540-2/fulltext">here</a>.</p>
<p>A more recent survey conducted by the Wellcome Global Monitor in 2018 found that globally, 79% of people agree that vaccines are safe, and 84% agree that vaccines are effective. This survey included responses from over 140,000 people across 144 countries. The results of the survey can be found <a href="https://wellcome.org/reports/wellcome-global-monitor/2018">here</a>.</p>
<p>In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccine acceptance has been a critical issue. A global survey conducted by the Imperial College London found that while vaccine hesitancy exists, it is not the majority view. The survey, which included responses from over 13,000 people across 14 countries, found that the majority of respondents were willing to get vaccinated against COVID-19. The survey results can be found <a href="https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/218476/global-survey-reveals-high-levels-covid-19/">here</a>.</p>
<p>It is important to note that vaccine hesitancy is influenced by a variety of factors, including misinformation, cultural beliefs, and personal experiences. Addressing vaccine hesitancy requires a nuanced approach that involves education, communication, and building trust in healthcare systems.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that more than half the adult population of the world are anti-vaxxers is not supported by available data. While vaccine hesitancy is a real and important issue, it does not represent the majority of the global population. Surveys and studies consistently show that the majority of people around the world support vaccination and recognize its importance in protecting public health.<br>
</p>
<blockquote><br>
The transcript:<br>
I went to the CDC back in 2000 and they said, look, Dr. Wakefield, you know, it's, it's everybody gets the MMR. Only a few children have autism. So how do you equate it? Well, that's how medicine works. A lot of people smoke, only a few develop lung cancer, but the point is it's pattern of exposure. I said, look, we believe, for example, that age of exposure is important.</blockquote>
<blockquote>We know this because with the natural infection, the younger you get measles, the greater the risk of infection. of a more severe reaction. If you get it under one, for example, does the same pertain to the vaccine. If you get the vaccine younger, are you at greater risk? And they went away to their credit and they tested that hypothesis and they found that it was exactly, and they spent the next 14 years destroying the documents, putting them in a dumpster and covering up and publishing a paper that exonerated the vaccine until one of the whistleblowers, William Thompson, head scientist in that study came forward and said, I can't live with this any longer.</blockquote>
<blockquote>I kept the, the documents here. They are, it showed fraud, most appalling violation of medical and scientific ethics on behalf of the CDC. So people say now, oh, there's no evidence. Vaccines cause autism. Absolutely. There is. And when you have to commit to that level of fraud, any level of fraud, but that level of fraud, not only in the context of this vaccine, but Pfizer in the context of the, of the COVID vaccine, everybody else, you're on a losing, run right from the start.</blockquote>
<blockquote>You are going to lose because you can only sustain that lie for so long and then someone somewhere is going to come forward, some brave person and say, actually, no, it was completely the opposite. And public confidence is shattered. It will never be regained. So now we are in a majority of people who are saying no to the 4th, 5th, 6th booster for COVID.</blockquote>
<blockquote>And by definition in media terms, those are anti vaxxers. More than half the adult population of the world are anti vaxxers. So, I think that, as I say, this will turn out to be the greatest mistake they ever made. And I think that we are winning, uncomfortable as that may be, we are winning.</blockquote>

Claim Review: Are Half the Adult Population Anti-Vaxxers?

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "Dr. Vernon Coleman believes autism is caused by vaccination. He presents seven facts to support this claim, arguing that the increase in autism cases correlates with the rise in vaccinations and suggests that severe autism is simply vaccine-induced brain damage." is False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: