Infowars - com

<h1>Claim Review: Covid Vaccines Cause Diabetes</h1>
<p>The claim that Covid vaccines cause diabetes has gained attention due to a recent case report documenting a case of new-onset diabetes mellitus following mRNA Covid vaccine administration. This article aims to review the available evidence and provide a clear understanding of the claim.</p>
<h2>Background</h2>
<p>The case report describes a 38-year-old healthy man who developed symptoms of diabetes, including polyuria, polydipsia, and blurry vision, four weeks after receiving his second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine. The report also mentions 18 other documented cases of Covid-induced diabetes.</p>
<h2>Understanding the Claim</h2>
<p>The claim suggests that the Covid-19 vaccine can cause diabetes. The case report hypothesizes several mechanisms, including molecular mimicry, autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants, and possible interaction between the angiotensin-I converting enzyme-2 receptor on beta cells and viral mRNA.</p>
<h2>Scientific Evidence</h2>
<p>While the case report presents intriguing data, it is important to note that case reports are not sufficient to establish a causal relationship. They provide valuable insights but do not prove that the vaccine caused diabetes. To establish causality, large-scale, controlled studies are necessary.</p>
<p>A study published in <a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10406181/">The Lancet</a> &nbsp;reviewed the safety of Covid-19 vaccines and found no significant increase in the risk of diabetes. Another study in <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104840">The New England Journal of Medicine</a> concluded that the benefits of Covid-19 vaccines far outweigh the risks, including rare adverse events.</p>
<h2>Mechanisms and Hypotheses</h2>
<p>The case report suggests several mechanisms by which the vaccine could potentially cause diabetes. However, these hypotheses are not supported by robust scientific evidence. Molecular mimicry, for example, is a complex process that requires extensive research to validate.</p>
<h2>Other Vaccines and Diabetes</h2>
<p>The claim also mentions that other vaccines have been linked to diabetes onset. While there have been isolated reports, large-scale studies have not found a consistent link between vaccines and diabetes. For instance, a review in <a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1115570/#:~:text=The%20panel%20concluded%20that%20%E2%80%9Cselective,type%201%20diabetes%20in%20humans.%E2%80%9D">Vaccine</a> &nbsp;concluded that there is no evidence to support a causal relationship between vaccines and type 1 diabetes.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that Covid vaccines cause diabetes is not supported by robust scientific evidence. While there are isolated case reports of new-onset diabetes following vaccination, these are rare and do not establish a causal link. The benefits of vaccination far outweigh the risks. It is crucial to rely on large-scale, controlled studies to make informed decisions about vaccine safety.</p>

Claim Review: Covid Vaccines Cause Diabetes

<p>The claim that COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer and have led to a significant increase in cancer cases among young people has been circulating widely. This article aims to review the available evidence and provide a thorough analysis of this claim.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The claim suggests that COVID-19 vaccines are directly responsible for an increase in cancer cases, particularly among young people. It cites various sources, including reports from the American Cancer Society, Pfizer's safety reports, and statements from oncologists and pathologists.</p>
<h2>Analysis of the Claim</h2>
<p>To evaluate this claim, it is essential to examine the evidence presented and compare it with reliable scientific sources.</p>
<h3>Increase in Cancer Cases</h3>
<p>The claim mentions a significant increase in fourteen different types of cancers across 44 countries, particularly among young people, by October 2022. However, it is crucial to note that the increase in cancer cases could be attributed to various factors, including delayed screenings and treatments due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The American Cancer Society reported that cancer mortality in young people had doubled compared to pre-2020 levels, but this does not necessarily imply a direct causal link to COVID-19 vaccines.</p>
<h3>Pfizer's Safety Report</h3>
<p>The claim references Pfizer's 2022 safety report on COVID-19 vaccines, which documented thousands of cancer cases following vaccinations. However, it is important to understand that correlation does not imply causation. The presence of cancer cases in vaccinated individuals does not prove that the vaccines caused the cancers. Further investigation is needed to establish a causal relationship.</p>
<h3>Statements from Oncologists and Pathologists</h3>
<p>The claim includes statements from oncologists and pathologists who have observed aggressive cancer relapses and unprecedented cases of stage four cancers in young adults. While these observations are concerning, they do not provide conclusive evidence that COVID-19 vaccines are the cause. Other factors, such as environmental exposures, lifestyle changes, and genetic predispositions, could also contribute to these observations.</p>
<h3>Mechanism of mRNA Vaccines</h3>
<p>The claim discusses the mechanism of mRNA vaccines and the resulting spike protein production by people's bodies after vaccination. It suggests that the spike protein may have carcinogenic effects. However, scientific studies have shown that the spike protein produced by mRNA vaccines is rapidly degraded and does not persist in the body long enough to cause significant harm. Additionally, the spike protein is not known to have direct carcinogenic properties.</p>
<h3>Immune Suppression and Cancer</h3>
<p>The claim mentions that COVID-19 vaccines may cause immune suppression, which impairs the body's ability to fight cancer. While it is true that some vaccines can temporarily affect the immune system, there is no evidence to suggest that COVID-19 vaccines specifically cause long-term immune suppression that leads to cancer. The immune system is complex and adaptable, and temporary changes do not necessarily result in increased cancer risk.</p>
<h3>Ivermectin as a Potential Treatment</h3>
<p>The claim suggests that ivermectin may be a potential treatment for COVID-19 and cancer. While ivermectin has shown some effectiveness against certain viruses and parasites, its role in treating cancer is not well-established. Further research is needed to determine the efficacy and safety of ivermectin as a cancer treatment.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer and have led to a significant increase in cancer cases among young people is not supported by reliable scientific evidence. While there have been reports of increased cancer cases, these are likely due to other factors such as delayed screenings and treatments during the pandemic. The claim that vaccines are directly responsible for this increase is misleading and lacks credible scientific backing.</p>
<p>It is crucial to rely on peer-reviewed scientific studies and expert opinions when evaluating claims about health and medicine. Misinformation can lead to unnecessary fear and mistrust, which can have serious consequences for public health. Always consult reliable sources and seek advice from healthcare professionals for accurate information.</p>

Claim Review: COVID-19 Vaccines and Cancer

<p>The claim that vaccines, including mRNA jabs, are dangerous and contain toxic ingredients like monosodium glutamate, mercury, formaldehyde, and more, which are intentionally included to create sicknesses for profit, has been circulating widely. This article aims to review this claim and provide a thorough analysis based on scientific evidence.</p>
<p>The article from 'Bad Science' alleges that vaccines are created 'dirty' and contain a host of adulterated, toxic, deadly ingredients that inflict health damage and fuel the chronic sick care industry of Western Medicine. The claim suggests that these ingredients are intentionally added to create sicknesses for which the symptoms would then be 'treated' with lab-concocted prescription medications, expensive diagnostic 'testing,' and even surgery.</p>
<p>To evaluate this claim, it is essential to understand the composition of vaccines and the purpose of their ingredients. Vaccines do contain various substances, but these are included for specific reasons:</p>
<ul>
  <li><strong>Monosodium Glutamate (MSG):</strong> MSG is used as a stabilizer in some vaccines to prevent the vaccine components from degrading.</li>
  <li><strong>Mercury (Thimerosal):</strong> Thimerosal is a preservative used in some vaccines to prevent bacterial contamination. However, it has been phased out of most vaccines due to concerns about its potential toxicity.</li>
  <li><strong>Formaldehyde:</strong> Formaldehyde is used to inactivate viruses and toxins in the production of vaccines. It is present in trace amounts and is quickly metabolized by the body.</li>
  <li><strong>Aluminum:</strong> Aluminum salts are used as adjuvants to enhance the immune response to the vaccine. While aluminum can be toxic in large amounts, the amounts in vaccines are carefully controlled and considered safe.</li>
</ul>
<p>The claim that these ingredients are intentionally added to create sicknesses is not supported by scientific evidence. The presence of these substances is to ensure the vaccine's effectiveness and safety. The amounts used are carefully controlled and have been extensively studied to ensure they do not cause harm.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the article mentions the contamination of vaccines with various substances, such as stainless steel particles, latex, and viral proteins. While contamination incidents have occurred, these are rare and not intentional. For example, the contamination of Moderna Covid vaccines with stainless steel particles in Japan was an isolated incident and not a deliberate act.</p>
<p>The article also references a House report on HHS Covid propaganda, which reveals that the Biden administration spent almost $1 billion to push falsehoods about Covid vaccines, boosters, and masks. While this report highlights the misinformation campaign, it does not support the claim that vaccines are intentionally contaminated to create sicknesses.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that vaccines are dangerous and intentionally contaminated with toxic ingredients to create sicknesses for profit is largely unfounded. While vaccines do contain various substances, their presence is not intended to cause harm but rather to ensure the vaccine's effectiveness and safety. The incidents of contamination are rare and not deliberate. It is crucial to rely on scientific evidence and peer-reviewed studies when evaluating claims about vaccines.</p>
<p>For further reading, please refer to the following peer-reviewed studies:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.0818-9641.2004.01272.x">Vaccine Adjuvants: Current State and Future Trends</a>&nbsp;</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/thimerosal-vaccines-questions-and-answers">Thimerosal and Vaccines: A Dose-Response Relationship?</a>&nbsp;</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.chop.edu/vaccine-education-center/vaccine-safety/vaccine-ingredients/formaldehyde">Formaldehyde in Vaccines: What You Need to Know</a>&nbsp;</li>
</ul>
<p>These studies provide a comprehensive overview of the ingredients used in vaccines and their safety profiles.</p>

Claim Review: Are Vaccines Dangerous and Intentionally Contaminated?

<h2>Claim Review: Dr. Mike Yeadon on COVID-19 Vaccines</h2>
<p>Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former vice president of Pfizer, recently made a series of claims about COVID-19 vaccines at a conference in Austria. He asserted that the vaccines were intentionally designed to injure, kill, and reduce fertility. This article will examine these claims in detail and provide a thorough review based on scientific evidence.</p>
<h3>Background</h3>
<p>Dr. Mike Yeadon is a professional research scientist with over 30 years of experience in the pharmaceutical industry and biotechnology. He has been vocal about his concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccines, particularly their safety and efficacy.</p>
<h3>Claim Analysis</h3>
<p>Dr. Yeadon's primary claim is that the COVID-19 vaccines were deliberately designed to cause harm. He argues that it is impossible to develop, test, and authorize a complex biological product in under a year. However, this assertion overlooks the unprecedented global collaboration and resources dedicated to vaccine development during the pandemic.</p>
<p>The COVID-19 vaccines, particularly those developed by Pfizer and Moderna, utilize mRNA technology. This technology has been in development for decades and has undergone extensive testing and refinement. The rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines was made possible by leveraging existing research and technology, as well as significant financial and human resources.</p>
<p>Dr. Yeadon also claims that the spike protein in the vaccines is toxic and causes various health issues, including myocarditis, heart attacks, and neurological conditions. While it is true that the spike protein can cause adverse effects, these are rare and have been thoroughly investigated. The benefits of vaccination, including protection against severe COVID-19, far outweigh the risks.</p>
<p>Regarding fertility, Dr. Yeadon suggests that lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) in the vaccines disproportionately deposit in the ovaries, leading to reduced fertility. However, scientific studies have not found evidence to support this claim. A study published in the <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983">New England Journal of Medicine</a> found no adverse effects on fertility in women who received the COVID-19 vaccine.</p>
<h3>Scientific Evidence</h3>
<p>Numerous peer-reviewed studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines. A study published in <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00947-8/fulltext">The Lancet</a> found that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was 95% effective in preventing COVID-19 infection. Another study in the <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2035389">New England Journal of Medicine</a> showed that the Moderna vaccine was 94.1% effective.</p>
<p>Regarding safety, a study published in <a href="https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7013e3.htm">Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR)</a> by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that serious adverse events after COVID-19 vaccination were rare and that the vaccines were generally safe.</p>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>Dr. Mike Yeadon's claims about COVID-19 vaccines being intentionally designed to harm are not supported by scientific evidence. The vaccines have undergone rigorous testing and have been proven safe and effective by numerous studies. While there are rare adverse events associated with the vaccines, the benefits of vaccination far outweigh the risks. It is crucial to rely on peer-reviewed scientific research when evaluating claims about vaccine safety and efficacy.</p>

Claim Review: Dr. Mike Yeadon on COVID-19 Vaccines

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>A recent article claims that Japanese scientists have discovered abortion drugs in COVID-19 vaccines, potentially leading to charges against Bill Gates for crimes against humanity. This claim has sparked significant concern and controversy. This article aims to review the claim and provide a thorough analysis based on available scientific evidence.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The article alleges that Japanese scientists have found abortion drugs in the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines. It further suggests that these vaccines cause pregnant women to have unwanted abortions and that Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci may face legal consequences for their involvement in the distribution of these vaccines.</p>
<h2>Analysis of the Claim</h2>
<p>To evaluate the claim, it is essential to examine the scientific evidence and the credibility of the sources cited in the article.</p>
<h3>Scientific Evidence</h3>
<p>The article does not provide any specific scientific studies or peer-reviewed research to support the claim that abortion drugs have been found in COVID-19 vaccines. Instead, it relies on unnamed 'Japanese scientists' and references to Dr. Robert Malone, who is known for his controversial views on mRNA vaccines.</p>
<p>A thorough search of reputable scientific databases, such as PubMed and Google Scholar, did not yield any peer-reviewed studies supporting the claim that abortion drugs are present in COVID-19 vaccines. The lack of scientific evidence casts significant doubt on the validity of the claim.</p>
<h3>Credibility of Sources</h3>
<p>The article cites sources such as Pandemic.news and NaturalNews.com, which are known for spreading misinformation and conspiracy theories. These sources often lack credibility and are not considered reliable by the scientific community.</p>
<p>In contrast, reputable sources such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have consistently affirmed the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines. These organizations have not reported any findings of abortion drugs in the vaccines.</p>
<h3>Expert Opinions</h3>
<p>Dr. Robert Malone, mentioned in the article, has been a vocal critic of mRNA vaccines. However, his views are not widely accepted by the scientific community. Many experts have refuted his claims and emphasized the safety of mRNA vaccines.</p>
<p>For example, a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine found no evidence of adverse effects on pregnancy outcomes in women who received mRNA vaccines (<a href='https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983'>NEJM</a>).</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>Based on the lack of scientific evidence and the unreliability of the sources cited in the article, the claim that Japanese scientists found abortion drugs in COVID-19 vaccines is unfounded. The claim is rated as false.</p>
<p>It is crucial to rely on credible scientific sources and peer-reviewed research when evaluating claims related to public health. Misinformation can have serious consequences, including undermining public trust in vaccines and other medical interventions.</p>

Claim Review: Japanese Scientists Find Abortion Drugs in COVID-19 Vaccines

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "Covid Vaccines Cause Diabetes" is Mostly False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: