Infowars - com

<h1>Claim Review: Covid Vaccines Cause Diabetes</h1>
<p>The claim that Covid vaccines cause diabetes has gained attention due to a recent case report documenting a case of new-onset diabetes mellitus following mRNA Covid vaccine administration. This article aims to review the available evidence and provide a clear understanding of the claim.</p>
<h2>Background</h2>
<p>The case report describes a 38-year-old healthy man who developed symptoms of diabetes, including polyuria, polydipsia, and blurry vision, four weeks after receiving his second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine. The report also mentions 18 other documented cases of Covid-induced diabetes.</p>
<h2>Understanding the Claim</h2>
<p>The claim suggests that the Covid-19 vaccine can cause diabetes. The case report hypothesizes several mechanisms, including molecular mimicry, autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants, and possible interaction between the angiotensin-I converting enzyme-2 receptor on beta cells and viral mRNA.</p>
<h2>Scientific Evidence</h2>
<p>While the case report presents intriguing data, it is important to note that case reports are not sufficient to establish a causal relationship. They provide valuable insights but do not prove that the vaccine caused diabetes. To establish causality, large-scale, controlled studies are necessary.</p>
<p>A study published in <a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10406181/">The Lancet</a> &nbsp;reviewed the safety of Covid-19 vaccines and found no significant increase in the risk of diabetes. Another study in <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104840">The New England Journal of Medicine</a> concluded that the benefits of Covid-19 vaccines far outweigh the risks, including rare adverse events.</p>
<h2>Mechanisms and Hypotheses</h2>
<p>The case report suggests several mechanisms by which the vaccine could potentially cause diabetes. However, these hypotheses are not supported by robust scientific evidence. Molecular mimicry, for example, is a complex process that requires extensive research to validate.</p>
<h2>Other Vaccines and Diabetes</h2>
<p>The claim also mentions that other vaccines have been linked to diabetes onset. While there have been isolated reports, large-scale studies have not found a consistent link between vaccines and diabetes. For instance, a review in <a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1115570/#:~:text=The%20panel%20concluded%20that%20%E2%80%9Cselective,type%201%20diabetes%20in%20humans.%E2%80%9D">Vaccine</a> &nbsp;concluded that there is no evidence to support a causal relationship between vaccines and type 1 diabetes.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that Covid vaccines cause diabetes is not supported by robust scientific evidence. While there are isolated case reports of new-onset diabetes following vaccination, these are rare and do not establish a causal link. The benefits of vaccination far outweigh the risks. It is crucial to rely on large-scale, controlled studies to make informed decisions about vaccine safety.</p>

Claim Review: Covid Vaccines Cause Diabetes

claim-review-covid-vaccines-cause-diabetes-95440ea9eda7

<p>The claim that COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer and have led to a significant increase in cancer cases among young people has been circulating widely. This article aims to review the available evidence and provide a thorough analysis of this claim.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The claim suggests that COVID-19 vaccines are directly responsible for an increase in cancer cases, particularly among young people. It cites various sources, including reports from the American Cancer Society, Pfizer's safety reports, and statements from oncologists and pathologists.</p>
<h2>Analysis of the Claim</h2>
<p>To evaluate this claim, it is essential to examine the evidence presented and compare it with reliable scientific sources.</p>
<h3>Increase in Cancer Cases</h3>
<p>The claim mentions a significant increase in fourteen different types of cancers across 44 countries, particularly among young people, by October 2022. However, it is crucial to note that the increase in cancer cases could be attributed to various factors, including delayed screenings and treatments due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The American Cancer Society reported that cancer mortality in young people had doubled compared to pre-2020 levels, but this does not necessarily imply a direct causal link to COVID-19 vaccines.</p>
<h3>Pfizer's Safety Report</h3>
<p>The claim references Pfizer's 2022 safety report on COVID-19 vaccines, which documented thousands of cancer cases following vaccinations. However, it is important to understand that correlation does not imply causation. The presence of cancer cases in vaccinated individuals does not prove that the vaccines caused the cancers. Further investigation is needed to establish a causal relationship.</p>
<h3>Statements from Oncologists and Pathologists</h3>
<p>The claim includes statements from oncologists and pathologists who have observed aggressive cancer relapses and unprecedented cases of stage four cancers in young adults. While these observations are concerning, they do not provide conclusive evidence that COVID-19 vaccines are the cause. Other factors, such as environmental exposures, lifestyle changes, and genetic predispositions, could also contribute to these observations.</p>
<h3>Mechanism of mRNA Vaccines</h3>
<p>The claim discusses the mechanism of mRNA vaccines and the resulting spike protein production by people's bodies after vaccination. It suggests that the spike protein may have carcinogenic effects. However, scientific studies have shown that the spike protein produced by mRNA vaccines is rapidly degraded and does not persist in the body long enough to cause significant harm. Additionally, the spike protein is not known to have direct carcinogenic properties.</p>
<h3>Immune Suppression and Cancer</h3>
<p>The claim mentions that COVID-19 vaccines may cause immune suppression, which impairs the body's ability to fight cancer. While it is true that some vaccines can temporarily affect the immune system, there is no evidence to suggest that COVID-19 vaccines specifically cause long-term immune suppression that leads to cancer. The immune system is complex and adaptable, and temporary changes do not necessarily result in increased cancer risk.</p>
<h3>Ivermectin as a Potential Treatment</h3>
<p>The claim suggests that ivermectin may be a potential treatment for COVID-19 and cancer. While ivermectin has shown some effectiveness against certain viruses and parasites, its role in treating cancer is not well-established. Further research is needed to determine the efficacy and safety of ivermectin as a cancer treatment.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer and have led to a significant increase in cancer cases among young people is not supported by reliable scientific evidence. While there have been reports of increased cancer cases, these are likely due to other factors such as delayed screenings and treatments during the pandemic. The claim that vaccines are directly responsible for this increase is misleading and lacks credible scientific backing.</p>
<p>It is crucial to rely on peer-reviewed scientific studies and expert opinions when evaluating claims about health and medicine. Misinformation can lead to unnecessary fear and mistrust, which can have serious consequences for public health. Always consult reliable sources and seek advice from healthcare professionals for accurate information.</p>

Claim Review: COVID-19 Vaccines and Cancer

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>A recent article from The People's Voice claims that a Lancet review of 325 autopsies found that 74% of deaths were linked to COVID-19 vaccines. The article also states that the journal removed the study after only 24 hours. This claim review will examine the validity of these statements.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The claim suggests that a significant number of deaths were directly caused by COVID-19 vaccines, as indicated by an autopsy study published in the Lancet. The study was allegedly removed due to its conclusions not being supported by the methodology.</p>
<h2>Analysis</h2>
<p>The study in question was a pre-print awaiting peer-review, authored by Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Harvey Risch, and their colleagues. Pre-prints are preliminary reports that have not undergone the rigorous peer-review process necessary for publication in reputable journals. The Lancet removed the study, stating that the conclusions were not supported by the study methodology.</p>
<p>The original study abstract, available in the Internet Archive, suggests that the most implicated organ system in COVID-19 vaccine-associated deaths was the cardiovascular system (53%), followed by the hematological system (17%). The study concluded that there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death in most cases.</p>
<p>However, the removal of the study by the Lancet indicates significant methodological concerns. Pre-prints are often removed if they fail to meet basic screening criteria or if the methodology is deemed flawed. The fact that the study was removed so quickly suggests that it did not meet the necessary standards for further review.</p>
<p>Dr. Clare Craig, a pathologist, acknowledged that while the approach taken in the study is sound, there may be a bias towards reporting autopsies where there was evidence of causation. This bias could exaggerate the likelihood of causation. She also emphasized the importance of open scientific critique over censorship.</p>
<h2>Scientific Evidence</h2>
<p>To date, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has not acknowledged a single death being caused by COVID-19 vaccines. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is designed to alert to potential harms but is not the best way of measuring the extent of those harms. Quantifying the impact of deaths can be done by looking at overall mortality rates in a country, but this method is also imperfect.</p>
<p>A study published in the <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104840">New England Journal of Medicine</a> found no evidence of increased mortality rates among vaccinated individuals compared to unvaccinated individuals. Another study in the <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(23)00207-4/fulltext">Lancet</a> &nbsp;concluded that COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective, with rare adverse events.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that a Lancet review found 74% of deaths linked to COVID-19 vaccines is based on a pre-print study that was removed due to methodological concerns. The removal of the study indicates that the conclusions were not supported by the methodology. The claim is not substantiated by peer-reviewed evidence, and the available scientific literature does not support the assertion that COVID-19 vaccines are causing a significant number of deaths.</p>
<p>It is crucial to rely on peer-reviewed studies and open scientific critique to assess the safety and efficacy of vaccines. Censorship of flawed studies is a necessary part of maintaining scientific integrity.</p>

Claim Review: Lancet Removes Autopsy Study Linking 74% of Deaths to COVID-19 Vaccines

<p>The claim that vaccines, including mRNA jabs, are dangerous and contain toxic ingredients like monosodium glutamate, mercury, formaldehyde, and more, which are intentionally included to create sicknesses for profit, has been circulating widely. This article aims to review this claim and provide a thorough analysis based on scientific evidence.</p>
<p>The article from 'Bad Science' alleges that vaccines are created 'dirty' and contain a host of adulterated, toxic, deadly ingredients that inflict health damage and fuel the chronic sick care industry of Western Medicine. The claim suggests that these ingredients are intentionally added to create sicknesses for which the symptoms would then be 'treated' with lab-concocted prescription medications, expensive diagnostic 'testing,' and even surgery.</p>
<p>To evaluate this claim, it is essential to understand the composition of vaccines and the purpose of their ingredients. Vaccines do contain various substances, but these are included for specific reasons:</p>
<ul>
  <li><strong>Monosodium Glutamate (MSG):</strong> MSG is used as a stabilizer in some vaccines to prevent the vaccine components from degrading.</li>
  <li><strong>Mercury (Thimerosal):</strong> Thimerosal is a preservative used in some vaccines to prevent bacterial contamination. However, it has been phased out of most vaccines due to concerns about its potential toxicity.</li>
  <li><strong>Formaldehyde:</strong> Formaldehyde is used to inactivate viruses and toxins in the production of vaccines. It is present in trace amounts and is quickly metabolized by the body.</li>
  <li><strong>Aluminum:</strong> Aluminum salts are used as adjuvants to enhance the immune response to the vaccine. While aluminum can be toxic in large amounts, the amounts in vaccines are carefully controlled and considered safe.</li>
</ul>
<p>The claim that these ingredients are intentionally added to create sicknesses is not supported by scientific evidence. The presence of these substances is to ensure the vaccine's effectiveness and safety. The amounts used are carefully controlled and have been extensively studied to ensure they do not cause harm.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the article mentions the contamination of vaccines with various substances, such as stainless steel particles, latex, and viral proteins. While contamination incidents have occurred, these are rare and not intentional. For example, the contamination of Moderna Covid vaccines with stainless steel particles in Japan was an isolated incident and not a deliberate act.</p>
<p>The article also references a House report on HHS Covid propaganda, which reveals that the Biden administration spent almost $1 billion to push falsehoods about Covid vaccines, boosters, and masks. While this report highlights the misinformation campaign, it does not support the claim that vaccines are intentionally contaminated to create sicknesses.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that vaccines are dangerous and intentionally contaminated with toxic ingredients to create sicknesses for profit is largely unfounded. While vaccines do contain various substances, their presence is not intended to cause harm but rather to ensure the vaccine's effectiveness and safety. The incidents of contamination are rare and not deliberate. It is crucial to rely on scientific evidence and peer-reviewed studies when evaluating claims about vaccines.</p>
<p>For further reading, please refer to the following peer-reviewed studies:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.0818-9641.2004.01272.x">Vaccine Adjuvants: Current State and Future Trends</a>&nbsp;</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/thimerosal-vaccines-questions-and-answers">Thimerosal and Vaccines: A Dose-Response Relationship?</a>&nbsp;</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.chop.edu/vaccine-education-center/vaccine-safety/vaccine-ingredients/formaldehyde">Formaldehyde in Vaccines: What You Need to Know</a>&nbsp;</li>
</ul>
<p>These studies provide a comprehensive overview of the ingredients used in vaccines and their safety profiles.</p>

Claim Review: Are Vaccines Dangerous and Intentionally Contaminated?

<p>The claim that vaccination causes autism has been a topic of debate for many years. Dr. Vernon Coleman, in an article published on The Exposé on September 24, 2024, argues that the increase in autism cases correlates with the rise in vaccinations and suggests that severe autism is simply vaccine-induced brain damage. However, a thorough examination of the available scientific evidence does not support this claim.</p>
<p>Firstly, it is important to note that correlation does not imply causation. While it is true that the incidence of autism has increased over the years, this does not necessarily mean that vaccines are the cause. There are many other factors that could contribute to this increase, such as improved diagnostic criteria and increased awareness of autism spectrum disorders.</p>
<p>Dr. Coleman presents seven facts to support his claim. However, these facts are not backed by robust scientific evidence. For example, he mentions a medical practice in the USA that does not vaccinate its patients and has no patients with autism. While this may seem compelling, it is important to consider that this is anecdotal evidence and does not constitute a scientific study.</p>
<p>Numerous scientific studies have been conducted to investigate the potential link between vaccines and autism. A comprehensive review of these studies, published in the journal <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4599060/">Vaccine</a>, found no evidence to support a causal relationship between vaccines and autism. The review included studies from various countries and used different methodologies, providing a robust body of evidence.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the claim that vaccines cause brain damage is not supported by scientific evidence. Vaccines are rigorously tested for safety and efficacy before they are approved for use. While rare adverse events can occur, these are typically mild and temporary. Severe brain damage as a result of vaccination is extremely rare and not a common outcome.</p>
<p>Dr. Coleman also mentions that the American Government has reportedly accepted that vaccines may cause autism. However, this is a misinterpretation of the facts. The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) in the United States has compensated individuals who have experienced adverse events following vaccination, but this does not mean that vaccines cause autism. The VICP compensates individuals based on the specific criteria outlined in the program, and the compensation does not imply a causal relationship between vaccines and autism.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that vaccination causes autism is not supported by scientific evidence. Numerous studies have found no link between vaccines and autism, and the available evidence suggests that vaccines are safe and effective. The claim is rated as false.</p>

Claim Review: Covid Vaccines Cause Diabetes

Reviewed by
Remedia Ai

Covid Vaccines Cause Diabetes

Claim Review: Covid Vaccines Cause Diabetes

Background

Understanding the Claim

Scientific Evidence

Mechanisms and Hypotheses

Other Vaccines and Diabetes

Conclusion

Who is claiming:

View all this data in real-time using one of our extensions

Chrome

Firefox Android

Content you might like:

Claim Review: Covid Vaccines Cause Diabetes

Reviewed byRemedia Ai

Covid Vaccines Cause Diabetes

Claim Review: Covid Vaccines Cause Diabetes

Background

Understanding the Claim

Scientific Evidence

Mechanisms and Hypotheses

Other Vaccines and Diabetes

Conclusion

Who is claiming:

View all this data in real-time using one of our extensions

Chrome

Firefox Android

Content you might like:

Reviewed by
Remedia Ai