UK PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report figures show that doubly vaccinated 40-70 year olds have lost 40% of their immune system capability compared to unvaccinated people, with a progressive decline of 5% per week, leading to full immune system degradation within 6 months.

The Expose News - com

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>A recent article published by The Exposé titled 'Shocking Government Reports: Are the C-19 Vaccinated at Risk of Developing AIDS?' claims that COVID-19 vaccines are causing a progressive decline in the immune system of vaccinated individuals, potentially leading to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). This claim is based on data from the UK Public Health England (PHE) Vaccine Surveillance Report. However, a thorough examination of the data and consultation with reliable scientific sources reveal that the claim is misleading and unfounded.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The article claims that doubly vaccinated 40-70 year olds have lost 40% of their immune system capability compared to unvaccinated people, with a progressive decline of 5% per week. The author suggests that this trend will lead to full immune system degradation within 6 months, effectively causing vaccinated individuals to develop AIDS.</p>
<h2>The Evidence</h2>
<p>The article presents data from the UK PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report, showing an increase in COVID-19 cases among vaccinated individuals over time. However, the author misinterprets this data as evidence of immune system degradation. Several factors must be considered when analyzing this data:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Vaccine effectiveness: COVID-19 vaccines are designed to prevent severe illness and death, not necessarily infection. Breakthrough infections are expected, especially with the emergence of new variants.</li>
  <li>Waning immunity: Immunity derived from vaccines may wane over time, but this does not indicate immune system degradation. Booster shots are recommended to maintain a high level of protection.</li>
  <li>Population differences: The vaccinated and unvaccinated populations may have inherent differences that affect their susceptibility to infection, such as age, underlying health conditions, and health-seeking behaviors.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Scientific Consensus</h2>
<p>The claim that COVID-19 vaccines cause immune system degradation is not supported by the scientific community. Numerous studies have demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines. For instance, a study published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine found that COVID-19 vaccines are highly effective in preventing severe illness, hospitalization, and death (<a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanwpc/article/PIIS2666-6065(23)00246-8/fulltext">source</a> ).</p>
<p>Furthermore, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has stated that COVID-19 vaccines do not cause immune system degradation or increase the risk of developing AIDS (<a href="https://www.cdc.gov/covid/vaccines/myths-facts.html?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/facts.html">source</a> ).</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that COVID-19 vaccinated individuals are at risk of developing AIDS due to immune system degradation is not supported by scientific evidence. The data presented in the article is misinterpreted and lacks context. It is essential to rely on credible scientific sources and consult healthcare professionals for accurate information regarding COVID-19 vaccines.</p>

Claim Review: Are C-19 Vaccinated Individuals at Risk of Developing AIDS?

<h1>Claim Review: Repeated COVID-19 mRNA Vaccinations and Immune System Functionality in Older Adults</h1>
<p>Infowars claims that a study published in September indicated that repeated inoculation with mRNA Covid vaccinations reduce the functionality of the immune systems of old people. The study in question, titled 'Repeated COVID-19 mRNA vaccination results in IgG4 class switching and decreased NK cell activation by S1-specific antibodies in older adults,' was published in Immunity &amp; Ageing. The study found that older adults produce antibodies with reduced functional capacity upon repeated COVID-19 mRNA vaccination, similar to younger individuals.</p>
<p>The specific mechanism of immune system reduction is increased levels of IgG4, a subclass of immunoglobulin which can result in a reduction of immune system function. The researchers analyzed patients aged 65 to 83-years-old for one month after their fifth Covid injection and compared their immune system effects with a younger group aged 18 to 47-years-old for one month after their third Covid injection. The researchers assessed the development of SARS-CoV-2 spike S1-specific IgG subclass levels in the older adults vs the younger adults.</p>
<p>The study concluded that older adults, like younger individuals, are inclined to develop IgG4 responses upon repeated COVID-19 mRNA vaccination and that increased IgG4 levels associate with a relative reduction in Fc-mediated effector functionality. However, the study does not conclusively prove that this leads to a significant reduction in overall immune system functionality. The study's authors emphasize the need for additional research to better understand the mechanisms underlying these responses and their potential implications for vaccine effectiveness.</p>
<p>It is important to note that the study does not suggest that the vaccines are ineffective or that older adults should not receive them. Instead, it highlights the complex nature of the immune response to vaccination and the need for continued research to optimize vaccination strategies.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that repeated COVID-19 mRNA vaccinations reduce the functionality of the immune systems of older adults is not fully supported by the study. While the study shows an increase in IgG4 levels, which are associated with reduced Fc-mediated effector functionality, it does not conclusively prove that this leads to a significant reduction in overall immune system functionality. Further research is needed to understand the implications of these findings on vaccine effectiveness.</p>
<p>For more information, you can read the study <a href="https://immunityageing.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12979-024-00263-y">here</a>.</p>

Claim Review: Repeated COVID-19 mRNA Vaccinations and Immune System Functionality in Older Adults

<h1>Claim Review: Covid-Vaccinated Kids Are Six-Times More Likely To Die Than Non-Vaccinated Kids — Study</h1>
<p>Infowars recently claimed that a study published earlier this year demonstrated a link between new-onset asthma in children and COVID-19 infection, with worse outcomes for infected children who received the COVID-19 vaccination. The claim further states that vaccinated kids are six times more likely to die than non-vaccinated kids.</p>
<p>The study in question, titled 'The association between COVID-19 vaccine/infection and new-onset asthma in children - based on the global TriNetX database,' was published in a peer-reviewed journal. The study found a significantly higher incidence of new-onset asthma in COVID-19 infected children compared to uninfected children, regardless of vaccination status. Specifically, 4.7% of COVID-19 infected unvaccinated children developed new-onset asthma, versus 2.0% in their non-COVID-19 counterparts within a year. For COVID-19 infected vaccinated children, the incidence was 8.3%, higher than the 3.1% observed in those not infected.</p>
<p>However, the claim that vaccinated kids are six times more likely to die than non-vaccinated kids is misleading. The study does not provide evidence for increased mortality rates. Instead, it focuses on the incidence of new-onset asthma. The study's conclusion states, 'The study highlights a strong link between COVID-19 infection and an increased risk of new-onset asthma in children, which is even more marked in those vaccinated.'</p>
<p>The study also mentions that COVID-19 infection is believed to influence the onset of asthma due to its inflammatory nature impacting the respiratory system. It should be noted that the COVID-19 vaccines have an inflammatory effect of their own, which could potentially contribute to the observed outcomes.</p>
<p>In summary, while the study does show a higher incidence of new-onset asthma in vaccinated children with COVID-19 infection compared to unvaccinated children with COVID-19 infection, it does not provide evidence for increased mortality rates. The claim that vaccinated kids are six times more likely to die than non-vaccinated kids is not supported by the study cited.</p>
<p>For further reading, you can access the study <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8709675/">here</a>.</p>
<p>Additionally, a study on the association between asthma and COVID-19 severity during the Omicron epidemic can be found <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8709675/">here</a>.</p>
<p>Another relevant study on previous BCG vaccination and its association with less severe clinical progression of COVID-19 can be found <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8709675/">here</a>.</p>

Claim Review: Covid-Vaccinated Kids Are Six-Times More Likely To Die Than Non-Vaccinated Kids — Study

<p>The claim that hospitals treated far more people for Covid shot side effects than unvaccinated patients for Covid infections has been circulating, based on a journal article published in October 2024. However, a thorough examination of the study and its findings reveals several issues that cast doubt on the validity of this claim.</p>
<p>The journal article in question reported that 5.69% of respondents were hospitalized due to vaccination adverse events, compared to 1.49% hospitalized due to Covid infection. While these numbers may seem alarming at first glance, it is crucial to consider the context and limitations of the study.</p>
<p>Firstly, the study primarily focused on gender differences in Covid-related outcomes and endocrine systems, not on comparing hospitalization rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. The data on hospitalizations was a secondary finding and not the main objective of the research.</p>
<p>Secondly, the study relied on self-reported data from a global survey, which can introduce biases and inaccuracies. Self-reported data is not as reliable as clinical data collected in a controlled setting. Participants may misinterpret or misreport their experiences, leading to skewed results.</p>
<p>Thirdly, the study did not provide detailed information on the severity of the adverse events leading to hospitalization. It is possible that some of the reported hospitalizations were for minor or temporary side effects that did not pose a significant health risk.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the study did not account for the overall number of vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals in the population. Without this context, it is impossible to determine whether the hospitalization rates are representative of the broader population.</p>
<p>It is also important to note that numerous peer-reviewed studies have shown the safety and efficacy of Covid-19 vaccines. For example, a study published in <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2107058">The New England Journal of Medicine</a> &nbsp;found that the mRNA vaccines were highly effective in preventing Covid-19 infections and severe outcomes.</p>
<p>Another study published in <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanrhe/article/PIIS2665-9913(22)00001-7/fulltext">The Lancet</a> &nbsp;concluded that the benefits of Covid-19 vaccines far outweigh the risks, with adverse events being rare and generally mild.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that hospitals treated more people for Covid shot side effects than unvaccinated patients for Covid infections is not supported by reliable scientific evidence. The study cited has significant limitations and does not provide conclusive data to support this claim. It is essential to rely on peer-reviewed research and expert analysis when evaluating claims about public health issues.</p>

Claim Review: Hospitals Treated More People for Covid Shot Side Effects than Unvaccinated Patients for Covid Infections

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "UK PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report figures show that doubly vaccinated 40-70 year olds have lost 40% of their immune system capability compared to unvaccinated people, with a progressive decline of 5% per week, leading to full immune system degradation within 6 months." is False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: