UK pensioners will be frozen and starved to death by Starmer’s left-wing Government. The standard pension is £169.50 a week and NOT £221.20 a week as the Government claims.

The Expose News - com

<h2>Claim Review: UK Pensioners Will Be Frozen and Starved to Death by Starmer’s Government</h2>

<p>The article by Rhoda Wilson on The Exposé claims that UK pensioners will be frozen and starved to death by Starmer’s left-wing Government. The article asserts that the standard pension is £169.50 a week and not £221.20 a week as the Government claims. This discrepancy is presented as evidence that the Government is lying about the money paid to British pensioners.</p>

<h3>Analysis of the Claim</h3>

<p>The article makes several assertions that need to be examined:</p>

<ul>
    <li>The standard pension is £169.50 a week, not £221.20 a week.</li>
    <li>The Government is lying about the pension amounts.</li>
    <li>Pensioners will freeze and starve to death due to the Government's actions.</li>
</ul>

<h3>Factual Background</h3>

<p>The UK pension system is complex and has undergone changes over the years. The new State Pension, introduced in 2016, is £221.20 a week for those who qualify. However, many pensioners, especially those who retired before April 2016, receive the basic State Pension, which is lower. The basic State Pension for the 2023-2024 tax year is £156.20 a week, not £169.50 as claimed in the article.</p>

<p>The article also mentions the removal of the heating allowance, which is a separate issue but contributes to the overall financial strain on pensioners. The Government's decision to remove the heating allowance has been criticized, but it is not accurate to say that this decision alone will lead to widespread deaths among pensioners.</p>

<h3>Expert Opinions and Studies</h3>

<p>According to the <a href='https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/state-pension-rates'>UK Government's official website</a>, the new State Pension is indeed £221.20 a week. The basic State Pension is £156.20 a week, which is lower than the amount claimed in the article.</p>

<p>A study by the <a href='https://www.ageuk.org.uk/'>Age UK</a> highlights the financial struggles faced by pensioners but does not support the claim that they will freeze and starve to death en masse due to Government policies.</p>

<h3>Conclusion</h3>

<p>The claim that UK pensioners will be frozen and starved to death by Starmer’s left-wing Government is largely unfounded. While there are discrepancies in pension amounts and legitimate concerns about the financial well-being of pensioners, the article exaggerates the situation and makes unsupported claims about the Government's intentions and the impact of their policies.</p>

<p>The claim rating for this article is 2 out of 5, indicating that the claim is mostly false but contains some elements of truth regarding the discrepancies in pension amounts.</p>


Claim Review: UK Pensioners Will Be Frozen and Starved to Death by Starmer’s Government

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>In a recent article published on The Exposé, Dr. Vernon Coleman makes several claims about the impact of Net Zero policies and the definition of 'far right'. This claim review will examine these claims and provide a thorough analysis based on reliable scientific sources.</p>
<h2>Claim 1: Net Zero Policies Will Lead to No Holidays, No Television, No Football, No Heating, No Hot Food, and Nothing Much of Anything Else</h2>
<p>The claim that Net Zero policies will lead to a complete shutdown of modern conveniences is exaggerated and misleading. Net Zero policies aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to net zero by 2050, not to eliminate all modern conveniences. According to the <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-climate-action-towards-net-zero/uk-climate-action-towards-net-zero">UK Government's Net Zero Strategy</a>, the goal is to transition to cleaner energy sources and improve energy efficiency, not to eliminate all energy use.</p>
<p>A study published in <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-020-0796-5">Nature Climate Change</a> found that achieving Net Zero is possible without sacrificing modern conveniences, but it will require significant changes in energy production and consumption. The study also found that the benefits of achieving Net Zero, such as improved air quality and reduced health costs, outweigh the costs of transitioning to cleaner energy sources.</p>
<h2>Claim 2: The 'Far Right' Includes Anyone Who Isn't a Supporter of the Current Left-Wing Government or the Democrats in the US</h2>
<p>The claim that the 'far right' includes anyone who isn't a supporter of the current left-wing government or the Democrats in the US is misleading and oversimplified. The term 'far right' is typically used to describe political ideologies that are further to the right on the political spectrum than mainstream conservatism. According to the <a href="https://www.britannica.com/topic/far-right">Encyclopedia Britannica</a>, far-right ideologies are characterized by extreme nationalism, authoritarianism, and opposition to immigration and multiculturalism.</p>
<p>A study published in the <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1354068818780078">European Journal of Political Research</a> found that support for far-right parties is driven by a combination of economic insecurity, cultural backlash, and political disillusionment. The study also found that far-right parties tend to attract voters who are dissatisfied with mainstream politics and feel marginalized by globalization and multiculturalism.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claims made in the article about the impact of Net Zero policies and the definition of 'far right' are exaggerated and misleading. While Net Zero policies will require significant changes in energy production and consumption, they will not lead to a complete shutdown of modern conveniences. Additionally, the definition of 'far right' is more complex and nuanced than simply including anyone who isn't a supporter of the current left-wing government or the Democrats in the US.</p>
<p>Based on the evidence presented, the claim rating for this article is 2 out of 5.</p>

Claim Review: The Impact of Net Zero Policies and the Definition of 'Far Right'

<p>The claim that the UK government used Midazolam to prematurely end the lives of thousands of elderly people and falsely reported them as COVID-19 deaths has been circulating widely. This claim is based on several pieces of information, including the purchase of a large quantity of Midazolam, the use of Midazolam in care homes, and the correlation between Midazolam prescriptions and COVID-19 deaths.</p>
<p>Midazolam is a sedative drug commonly used in palliative care and for sedation before medical procedures. It is also associated with respiratory depression and respiratory arrest, especially when used for sedation in noncritical care settings. The claim suggests that the UK government purchased a two-year supply of Midazolam in March 2020 and that this drug was used to prematurely end the lives of elderly people in care homes, with their deaths being falsely reported as COVID-19 deaths.</p>
<p>However, there are several issues with this claim. Firstly, while it is true that the UK government purchased a large quantity of Midazolam in March 2020, this was done as part of national efforts to respond to the coronavirus outbreak and to reduce the likelihood of future shortages. The purchase of Midazolam was not unique to the UK, and many other countries also increased their stocks of sedatives and other drugs in response to the pandemic.</p>
<p>Secondly, while there was an increase in the number of prescriptions for Midazolam in April 2020, this does not necessarily mean that the drug was used to prematurely end the lives of elderly people. Midazolam is a commonly used drug in palliative care, and the increase in prescriptions may have been due to the increase in the number of people requiring end-of-life care during the pandemic.</p>
<p>Thirdly, the claim that the deaths of elderly people were falsely reported as COVID-19 deaths is not supported by any concrete evidence. While it is true that there were a large number of excess deaths in care homes during the pandemic, this does not necessarily mean that these deaths were caused by Midazolam or that they were falsely reported as COVID-19 deaths.</p>
<p>In conclusion, while there are some concerning correlations between the use of Midazolam and COVID-19 deaths, there is no concrete evidence to support the claim that the UK government used Midazolam to prematurely end the lives of thousands of elderly people and falsely reported them as COVID-19 deaths. This claim is largely unfounded and should be treated with caution.</p>

Claim Review: Midazolam and COVID-19 Deaths in the UK

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The claim that the Canadian government contract with Pfizer acknowledged the unknown long-term efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines has been circulating widely. This article aims to review this claim, providing a thorough analysis and context based on reliable scientific sources.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The claim states that the contract between the Canadian government and Pfizer, dated October 26, 2020, includes a section acknowledging that the long-term effects, efficacy, and adverse effects of the vaccine were not known at the time of signing. This information was reported by The Expose and The Canadian Independent.</p>
<h2>Analysis</h2>
<p>The contract indeed contains a section (5.5) under 'Purchaser Acknowledgement' that states: 'Purchaser further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known.' This acknowledgment is standard in contracts for new medical products, reflecting the ongoing nature of scientific research and the need for continuous monitoring.</p>
<p>It is important to note that the acknowledgment of unknown long-term effects does not imply that the vaccines are unsafe. Vaccines undergo rigorous testing and approval processes by regulatory bodies such as Health Canada and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). These processes ensure that vaccines meet high safety and efficacy standards before they are administered to the public.</p>
<p>Furthermore, ongoing monitoring and research are essential for understanding the long-term effects of any new medical intervention. This is a standard practice in the medical field and is not unique to COVID-19 vaccines.</p>
<h2>Scientific Evidence</h2>
<p>Several peer-reviewed studies and reports from reliable scientific sources support the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines. For example, a study published in <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2101765">The New England Journal of Medicine</a> found that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was highly effective in preventing symptomatic COVID-19 infections. Another study published in <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00947-8/fulltext">The Lancet</a> reported similar findings for the Moderna vaccine.</p>
<p>These studies, along with ongoing surveillance by health authorities, provide evidence that COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective in the short term. Long-term data is being continuously collected and analyzed to ensure the safety and efficacy of these vaccines over time.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that the Canadian government contract with Pfizer acknowledged the unknown long-term efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines is accurate. However, this acknowledgment is a standard practice in contracts for new medical products and does not imply that the vaccines are unsafe. Ongoing research and monitoring are essential for understanding the long-term effects of any new medical intervention. The available scientific evidence supports the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in the short term, and long-term data is being continuously collected and analyzed.</p>

Claim Review: Canadian Government Contract with Pfizer on COVID-19 Vaccine Safety

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "UK pensioners will be frozen and starved to death by Starmer’s left-wing Government. The standard pension is £169.50 a week and NOT £221.20 a week as the Government claims." is Mostly False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: