Trump Tells Breitbart He’ll Solve Ukraine-Russia War ‘Before I Get to the White House, After I’m President-Elect’

Matthew Boyle

Breitbart

Claim Review: Trump's Assertion to Solve Ukraine-Russia War Before Inauguration

In an exclusive interview with Breitbart News, former President Donald Trump claimed that he would solve the Ukraine-Russia war before his inauguration if elected. This claim has raised eyebrows and sparked debate among political analysts and the general public. This article aims to review the claim and provide a thorough analysis based on available evidence and expert opinions.
The Claim: Trump stated that he intends to negotiate peace between Russia and Ukraine as President-elect before he is sworn in as the next president of the United States. He believes that his personal relationships with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky will enable him to achieve this goal.
Analysis:
1. Feasibility of Negotiations: Negotiating peace between two warring nations is a complex and time-consuming process. It involves multiple stakeholders, intricate diplomatic maneuvers, and often requires the involvement of international organizations. The idea that a single individual, even a President-elect, could resolve such a conflict in a short period is highly speculative. Historical examples, such as the negotiations that ended the Bosnian War, demonstrate that peace agreements can take years to materialize.
2. Personal Relationships: Trump's claim that his personal relationships with Putin and Zelensky will facilitate peace negotiations is questionable. While personal diplomacy can play a role, it is not the sole determinant of successful negotiations. The conflict in Ukraine involves deep-seated geopolitical, historical, and economic factors that go beyond personal relationships. For instance, the Minsk agreements, which aimed to resolve the conflict in Eastern Ukraine, involved extensive diplomatic efforts by multiple countries and international organizations.
3. Timeline: The timeframe between the election and inauguration is approximately two and a half months. This is an extremely short period to achieve a comprehensive peace agreement, especially considering the complexity of the Ukraine-Russia conflict. Even if Trump were to initiate negotiations, it is unlikely that a sustainable peace agreement could be reached within this timeframe.
4. Expert Opinions: Political analysts and experts in international relations have expressed skepticism about Trump's claim. They point out that the Ukraine-Russia conflict is deeply entrenched and involves multiple layers of complexity that cannot be resolved through quick negotiations. For example, a study by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace highlights the multifaceted nature of the conflict and the need for a comprehensive approach that addresses both short-term and long-term issues.
Conclusion:
Based on the available evidence and expert opinions, Trump's claim that he will solve the Ukraine-Russia war before his inauguration is highly speculative and lacks concrete evidence. While personal diplomacy can play a role in conflict resolution, the complexity of the Ukraine-Russia conflict and the short timeframe make it unlikely that a sustainable peace agreement could be achieved within the proposed timeline. Therefore, this claim should be approached with caution and a healthy dose of skepticism.
References:
- Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: <a href="https://carnegieendowment.org/2021/03/18/ukraine-conflict-complex-and-multifaceted-pub-84112">Ukraine Conflict: Complex and Multifaceted</a>
- United Nations: <a href="https://www.un.org/peacekeeping/en/peacekeeping-operations">Peacekeeping Operations</a>
- Council on Foreign Relations: <a href="https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/ukraine-crisis">Ukraine Crisis</a>

President-elect Donald Trump and Elon Musk have jointly disrupted a bipartisan spending bill, plunging Washington into chaos and risking a government shutdown. The bill, aimed at keeping the government funded until early in Trump's second term, included nearly $100 billion in aid for various national disasters and economic support for farmers, among other provisions.
Elon Musk, who has been appointed to co-chair Trump's new Department of Government Efficiency, led the charge against the bill, describing it as full of 'pork' spending. Musk's social media posts generated significant backlash, leading Trump and Vice President-elect JD Vance to issue a statement demanding a streamlined spending bill without Democratic priorities. They also called for Congress to raise the government's borrowing ceiling while Joe Biden is still in office, adding to the complexity of the situation.
The sudden opposition to the bill has put House Speaker Mike Johnson's position in jeopardy and raised questions about Trump's ability to govern effectively in his second term. The impasse highlights the tension between Trump's promise to cut federal programs and the need for bipartisan cooperation to pass legislation.
The crisis has also underscored the growing political influence of Elon Musk, whose calls for primary challenges against supporters of the bill have resonated with Republican lawmakers and voters. The situation has left Washington in a state of uncertainty, with no clear path forward as the holiday season approaches.
References:
<ul>
 <li>Collinson, S. (2024, December 19). Trump and Musk unleash a new kind of chaos on Washington. CNN. <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/19/politics/trump-musk-washington-chaos/index.html">Link</a></li>
 <li>Megerian, C. (2024, December 19). Trump brings chaos back to Washington by attempting to kill bipartisan budget deal with Musk's help. Yahoo. <a href="https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-brings-chaos-back-washington-attempting-kill-bipartisan-budget-deal-musks-help-144600946.html">Link</a></li>
</ul>

Trump and Musk's Intervention Plunges Washington into Chaos Over Government Funding

In a recent interview with MSNBC, Peter Hotez, a prominent vaccine advocate, claimed that multiple new viruses, including H5N1 (bird flu), will emerge starting January 21, the day after President-elect Donald Trump takes office. This claim has sparked considerable concern and speculation. Let's examine the evidence and context surrounding this claim.
<h2>Understanding the Claim</h2>
Hotez stated that there is 'big picture stuff coming down the pike starting on January 21st,' including the H5N1 virus, which he claims is already present in wild birds and poultry in the Western United States. He also mentioned the potential for a new coronavirus and other mosquito-transmitted viruses like dengue, Zika, and yellow fever.
<h2>Scientific Context</h2>
H5N1, commonly known as bird flu, has been a concern for public health officials for years. According to the <a href="https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/influenza-(avian-and-other-zoonotic)">World Health Organization</a>, H5N1 has caused sporadic human infections, primarily through contact with infected poultry. However, sustained human-to-human transmission has not been documented.
The claim about a new coronavirus emerging is also notable. Coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19), have been known to jump from animals to humans. However, the emergence of a new coronavirus is not predictable with certainty, and such events are typically sporadic and unpredictable.
<h2>Evaluating the Evidence</h2>
Hotez's claim lacks specific evidence to support the exact timing of these viral emergences. The idea that multiple new viruses will suddenly appear right after Trump's inauguration is speculative and does not align with the typical patterns of viral emergence.
The <a href="https://www.cdc.gov/bird-flu/spotlights/h5n1-response-11152024.html#:~:text=CDC%20also%20continues%20to%20monitor,conjunctivitis%2C%20or%20influenza%20virus%20activity">Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)</a> &nbsp;monitors the spread of H5N1 and other influenza viruses. While the presence of H5N1 in wild birds and poultry is a concern, there is no concrete evidence to suggest that it will suddenly become a major threat to humans on a specific date.
Regarding the claim about a new coronavirus, a study published in <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2012-7">Nature</a> discusses the potential for coronaviruses to jump from animals to humans, but it does not provide a timeline for such events. The emergence of new viruses is influenced by a complex interplay of ecological, environmental, and human factors.
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
Peter Hotez's claim that multiple new viruses will emerge right after Trump's inauguration is speculative and lacks concrete evidence. While the threats posed by H5N1 and potential new coronaviruses are real, the specific timing of their emergence cannot be predicted with certainty. Therefore, the claim is rated 2 out of 5, leaning towards false.

Fact-Check: Will Multiple New Viruses Emerge Just After Trump Takes Office?

In a recent speech to the NAACP, President Biden called for an immediate ban on AR-15s and similar rifles, citing their use in the attempted assassination of Donald Trump and claiming that 'more children in America die of gunshot wounds than any other reason.'
While the call for stricter gun control laws is a political stance and subject to debate, the claim about child deaths is unverified and cannot be proven. &nbsp;According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the leading causes of child deaths include accidents, congenital anomalies, and various health issues.
Guns or bullets are not listed as the leading killer of children, contradicting Biden's claim. The source of this claim is unknown, and it first appeared in anti-gun speeches on June 2, 2022. &nbsp;It is important to note that the call for an AR-15 ban is a political stance and subject to ongoing debate.
The Federal Assault Weapons Ban of 1994, which prohibited certain semi-automatic firearms with large-capacity magazines, expired in 2004, and Democrats have been advocating for another 'assault weapons' ban to replace it. However, the claim about child deaths being primarily caused by gunshot wounds is unverified and should not be used to support political arguments.

Biden Calls for AR-15 Ban After Assassination Attempt on Trump: A Claim Review

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "Trump Tells Breitbart He’ll Solve Ukraine-Russia War ‘Before I Get to the White House, After I’m President-Elect’" is Mostly False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: