The World Economic Forum (WEF) admitted that COVID-19 was a 'test' of our obedience to a rapidly forming new world order.

The Gateway Pundit - com

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>A recent article published on The Gateway Pundit claims that the World Economic Forum (WEF) admitted COVID-19 was a 'test' of our obedience to a rapidly forming new world order. This claim has gained traction among conspiracy theorists and those skeptical of global institutions. However, a thorough examination of the evidence reveals that this claim is misleading and lacks credible support.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The article suggests that the WEF used the COVID-19 pandemic as a beta test for a technocratic new world order. It cites a statement from the WEF's 'My Carbon' page, which discusses the adoption of restrictions for public health during the pandemic. The article interprets this statement as an admission that the pandemic was a test of social responsibility and compliance.</p>
<h2>Analysis</h2>
<p>The WEF's statement on its 'My Carbon' page does not explicitly state that COVID-19 was a test of obedience. Instead, it highlights the global response to the pandemic as an example of social responsibility. The statement reads:</p>
<blockquote>COVID-19 was the test of social responsibility – A huge number of unimaginable restrictions for public health were adopted by billions of citizens across the world. There were numerous examples globally of maintaining social distancing, wearing masks, mass vaccinations and acceptance of contact-tracing applications for public health, which demonstrated the core of individual social responsibility.</blockquote>
<p>This statement does not imply that the pandemic was orchestrated as a test. Rather, it acknowledges the widespread compliance with public health measures during the pandemic.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the article's reference to the Milgram Experiment is a misleading comparison. The Milgram Experiment was a study on obedience to authority, not a test of compliance with public health measures during a global pandemic.</p>
<p>The claim that the WEF admitted COVID-19 was a test of obedience is not supported by credible evidence. The WEF's statements have been misinterpreted and taken out of context.</p>
<h2>Scientific Consensus</h2>
<p>The scientific consensus is that COVID-19 is a naturally occurring virus that originated in animals and spread to humans. There is no credible evidence to suggest that the pandemic was orchestrated as a test of obedience. For more information on the origins of COVID-19, see the following studies:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9">The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2</a> (Nature Medicine)</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.science.org/action/doSearch?AllField=SARS-CoV-2+and+the+COVID-19+pandemic%3A+A+comprehensive+review+">SARS-CoV-2 and the COVID-19 pandemic: A comprehensive review </a>(Science)&nbsp;</li>
</ul>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that the WEF admitted COVID-19 was a test of obedience is misleading and lacks credible evidence. The WEF's statements have been misinterpreted and taken out of context. The scientific consensus is that COVID-19 is a naturally occurring virus, and there is no credible evidence to suggest that the pandemic was orchestrated as a test of obedience.</p>

Claim Review: Did the WEF Admit COVID-19 Was a Test of Obedience?

<p>Tvrdnja da je Covid bio samo test za ograničenja koja će se uvesti zbog klimatskih promjena je netočna. Nema dokaza da je Svjetski ekonomski forum (WEF) izjavio da je pandemija Covid-19 bila test za buduća ograničenja.</p>
<p>Svjetski ekonomski forum je organizacija koja se bavi pitanjima globalne ekonomije i društvenih promjena. Međutim, tvrdnja da je WEF izjavio da je pandemija Covid-19 bila test za ograničenja zbog klimatskih promjena nije potvrđena. Nema službenih izjava ili dokumenata koji bi potvrdili ovu tvrdnju.</p>
<p>U članku se navodi da je WEF hvalio spremnost ljudi da se pridržavaju ograničenja tijekom pandemije i da bi se ista taktika mogla koristiti za nametanje daljnjih ograničenja. Međutim, ovo je interpretacija i ne postoji konkretna izjava WEF-a koja bi potvrdila da je pandemija bila test za buduća ograničenja.</p>
<p>Dodatno, članak spominje da bi se tehnologija mogla koristiti za praćenje i nadzor, što bi pomoglo u prevladavanju političkog otpora takvim programima. Ovo je također interpretacija i ne postoji konkretna izjava WEF-a koja bi potvrdila da se tehnologija koristi za nametanje ograničenja zbog klimatskih promjena.</p>
<p>U kontekstu klimatskih promjena, WEF je promovirao ideju održivog razvoja i smanjenja emisija ugljika. Međutim, ovo ne znači da je pandemija Covid-19 bila test za buduća ograničenja. WEF je, na primjer, promovirao inicijative poput 'Velikog resetiranja' koje se fokusiraju na održivost i ekonomsku obnovu nakon pandemije.</p>
<p>Zaključno, tvrdnja da je Covid bio samo test za ograničenja zbog klimatskih promjena je netočna. Nema dokaza da je WEF izjavio da je pandemija bila test za buduća ograničenja. Važno je kritički razmišljati o informacijama i provjeravati izvore prije nego što se prihvate tvrdnje.</p>

Provjera tvrdnje: Da li je Covid bio samo test za ograničenja zbog klimatskih promjena?

<p>The claim that Bill Gates has called for humanity to embrace a 'one world religion' has been circulating online, particularly in an article published by The People's Voice. This article suggests that Gates, along with other global figures like Klaus Schwab and Pope Francis, is advocating for a unified religious creed to address global issues such as disease, food, and climate change.</p>
<p>To evaluate this claim, it is essential to examine the context and sources of the statements attributed to Bill Gates. The article from The People's Voice lacks direct quotes or specific references to speeches or interviews where Gates allegedly made these statements. Instead, it presents a narrative that aligns with conspiracy theories about global elites and the New World Order.</p>
<p>Bill Gates is known for his philanthropic efforts and his work on global health, education, and climate change through the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation. However, there is no evidence from reliable sources that he has called for a 'one world religion.' Gates has spoken extensively about the challenges and opportunities presented by artificial intelligence (AI), but his focus has been on ethical considerations, technological advancements, and the potential impact on society, not on religious unification.</p>
<p>For instance, in a 2019 interview with <a href="https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/03/01/137646/bill-gates-the-rollout-of-ai-needs-to-be-managed-with-care/">MIT Technology Review</a>, Gates discussed the need for careful management of AI to ensure it benefits humanity. He did not mention or advocate for a 'one world religion' in this context.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the article from The People's Voice references Pope Francis's calls for religious pluralism and global unity. While Pope Francis has indeed advocated for interfaith dialogue and cooperation, his statements are often taken out of context to support conspiracy theories. The Catholic News Agency reported on the interreligious congress in Kazakhstan, where Pope Francis participated, but this does not equate to a call for a 'one world religion' as the article suggests.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that Bill Gates has called for humanity to embrace a 'one world religion' is misleading and lacks credible evidence. The article from The People's Voice distorts Gates's statements on AI and global challenges to fit a narrative that aligns with conspiracy theories. There is no reliable evidence to support the claim that Gates or other global figures are advocating for a unified religious creed.</p>

Fact Check: Did Bill Gates Call for a 'One World Religion'?

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The article titled 'When did the Globalists’ plan to enslave the world using chronic illness begin?' by Rhoda Wilson on The Expose presents a theory that global monopoly capitalism is attempting to enslave the developed world through chronic illness. This claim review will examine the validity of this assertion.</p>
<h2>Claim Analysis</h2>
<p>The article suggests that the origins of this plan can be traced back to various historical events, including the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, the CIA's influence post-JFK assassination, the import of Nazi and Japanese bioweapons scientists after World War II, and even the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913. The author also links this plan to the Seven Deadly Sins, arguing that the COVID-19 crisis is an extreme example of these sins.</p>
<h2>Evaluation of Evidence</h2>
<p>The article lacks credible scientific evidence to support its claims. It relies heavily on speculative theories and historical events that are not directly linked to the current health crisis. For instance, the claim that the COVID-19 pandemic is a result of a deliberate plan to enslave the world through chronic illness is not supported by any peer-reviewed studies or reliable scientific sources.</p>
<p>The author's assertion that the Seven Deadly Sins are manifested in the COVID-19 crisis is also highly subjective and lacks empirical evidence. While it is true that the pandemic has led to various forms of suffering, attributing this to a deliberate plan by globalists is unfounded.</p>
<h2>Scientific Perspective</h2>
<p>The COVID-19 pandemic is a complex global health issue that has been extensively studied by scientists worldwide. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the pandemic is caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is believed to have originated from animals and spread to humans. The WHO and other reputable scientific organizations have not found any evidence to support the claim that the pandemic is part of a deliberate plan to enslave the world through chronic illness.</p>
<p>A study published in the journal <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9">Nature Medicine</a> suggests that the SARS-CoV-2 virus likely originated from a natural source, such as bats or pangolins, and was not engineered in a laboratory. This finding contradicts the theory that the virus was deliberately created to cause chronic illness and enslave the world.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that globalists are using chronic illness to enslave the world is largely unfounded and lacks credible evidence. The article mixes historical events with speculative theories, making it unreliable. The claim rating is 1 out of 5.</p>
<p>It is important to rely on credible scientific sources and peer-reviewed studies when evaluating claims about global health issues. Misinformation can lead to confusion and mistrust, which can hinder efforts to address real health challenges.</p>

Claim Review: Globalists' Plan to Enslave the World Using Chronic Illness

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "The World Economic Forum (WEF) admitted that COVID-19 was a 'test' of our obedience to a rapidly forming new world order." is Mostly False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: