The whole wind turbine game is a SCAM because a wind turbine could spin for years and it still wouldn’t replace the energy that was used to manufacture it.

The Expose News - com

<p>The claim that wind turbines are a scam because they do not replace the energy used to manufacture them has been circulating, particularly in an article by Godfrey Bloom on The Expose. This claim suggests that the energy required to manufacture and transport wind turbines exceeds the energy they produce over their lifespan. However, a thorough examination of scientific studies and data reveals a different story.</p>
<p>Wind turbines are a key component of renewable energy strategies aimed at reducing carbon emissions and combating climate change. The energy payback time (EPBT) is a crucial metric used to evaluate the energy efficiency of wind turbines. EPBT refers to the time it takes for a wind turbine to generate the amount of energy equivalent to the energy used in its production and installation.</p>
<p>A study published in the journal <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261917308763">Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews</a> found that the EPBT for modern wind turbines is typically between 3 to 7 months. This means that within a few months of operation, a wind turbine generates enough energy to offset the energy used in its manufacture and installation. Over their typical lifespan of 20-25 years, wind turbines produce a significant net energy gain.</p>
<p>Another study by the <a href="https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy12osti/54509.pdf">National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)</a> in the United States concluded that wind turbines have one of the highest energy return on investment (EROI) ratios among various energy sources. The EROI for wind turbines is estimated to be around 20-30, meaning that for every unit of energy invested in their production, they produce 20-30 units of energy over their lifespan.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the environmental impact of wind turbines is significantly lower compared to fossil fuel-based power generation. Wind energy does not produce greenhouse gas emissions during operation, making it a cleaner and more sustainable option. The manufacturing process of wind turbines does involve the use of fossil fuels, but the overall carbon footprint is much lower than that of coal or natural gas power plants.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that wind turbines are a scam because they do not replace the energy used to manufacture them is largely false. Scientific studies and data show that wind turbines generate more energy than they consume over their lifecycle, making them a viable and environmentally friendly source of renewable energy.</p>

Claim Review: Are Wind Turbines a Scam?

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The claim that PCR tests can kill you and could be used to vaccinate people has been circulating, causing concern among the public. This article aims to review the evidence and provide a thorough analysis of these claims.</p>
<h2>Understanding PCR Tests</h2>
<p>PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) tests are widely used to detect the presence of viral genetic material, including SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. The test involves taking a sample from the nasal or oral cavity and analyzing it for viral RNA.</p>
<h2>Claim Analysis</h2>
<h3>PCR Tests Can Kill You</h3>
<p>The claim that PCR tests can kill you is based on reports of adverse events such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage and even death. However, these incidents are rare and often result from improper administration of the test. For example, a case reported in the <a href="https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaotolaryngology/fullarticle/2772795">JAMA Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery</a> described a woman who experienced cerebrospinal fluid leakage after a PCR test. Similarly, a case reported in <a href="https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2021/214/1/case-cerebrospinal-fluid-leak-following-nasal-swab-covid-19">The Medical Journal of Australia</a> involved a woman who developed symptoms of meningitis after a PCR test.</p>
<p>While these cases are concerning, they are isolated incidents and do not represent the norm. Properly administered PCR tests are generally safe and effective. The risk of adverse events can be minimized by following established guidelines for test administration.</p>
<h3>PCR Tests Could Be Used to Vaccinate You</h3>
<p>The claim that PCR tests could be used to vaccinate people is based on speculation about the potential use of nasal or anal swabs to deliver vaccines. While nasal vaccinations are not new and have been used for conditions like the flu, there is no evidence to suggest that PCR tests are being used for this purpose. The idea that PCR tests could be used to deliver vaccines without the knowledge or consent of the individual is unfounded and lacks scientific support.</p>
<p>Researchers at Johns Hopkins University have developed a device capable of delivering drugs, but this technology is not currently being used in PCR tests. The suggestion that PCR tests could be used to vaccinate people is purely speculative and not supported by evidence.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that PCR tests can kill you and could be used to vaccinate people is largely unfounded. While there are risks associated with improper administration of PCR tests, the overall safety and efficacy of these tests are well-established. The idea that PCR tests could be used to deliver vaccines is speculative and lacks scientific support. It is important to rely on credible sources of information and to follow established guidelines for the administration of PCR tests.</p>
<h2>Claim Rating</h2>
<p>The claim rating is 2 out of 5, indicating that the claim is largely false but contains some elements of truth regarding the risks of improper administration.</p>

Claim Review: The PCR Test Can Kill You and Could Be Used to Vaccinate You

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The claim that AI could cause human extinction has been a topic of intense debate among experts, futurists, and ethicists. This article aims to evaluate the validity of this claim by examining the potential risks and benefits of AI, as well as the factors that influence its development and integration into society.</p>
<h2>Potential Risks of AI</h2>
<p>One of the primary concerns surrounding AI is the possibility of it becoming an existential threat to humanity. This could occur if AI is developed and controlled by individuals or groups with malicious intentions, or if the technology is not properly governed and regulated.</p>
<p>Stephen Hawking, a renowned physicist, once stated, "Success in creating AI would be the biggest event in human history. Unfortunately, it might also be the last, unless we learn how to avoid the risks." This highlights the need for responsible innovation and ethical reflection in the development of AI.</p>
<h2>Mitigating the Risks</h2>
<p>To mitigate the risks associated with AI, it is crucial to implement robust governance frameworks and foster global cooperation. This includes establishing ethical guidelines, promoting transparency, and ensuring that AI technologies are developed and used in a manner that benefits society as a whole.</p>
<p>Research has shown that ethical considerations are essential in the development of AI. A study published in the journal <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2631-2">Nature</a> emphasizes the importance of integrating ethical principles into AI design and deployment to minimize potential harms.</p>
<h2>Balanced Perspectives</h2>
<p>While the risks of AI are significant, it is also important to acknowledge the potential benefits. AI has the capacity to revolutionize various sectors, including healthcare, finance, and education. By enhancing efficiency, improving decision-making, and enabling personalized services, AI can contribute to societal progress and well-being.</p>
<p>A report by the <a href="https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/artificial-intelligence/where-machines-could-replace-humans-and-where-they-cant-yet">McKinsey Global Institute</a> highlights the economic and social benefits of AI, emphasizing its potential to create new jobs, increase productivity, and drive innovation.</p>
<h2>Current State and Future Outlook</h2>
<p>The future of AI depends largely on how it is developed, governed, and integrated into society. Responsible innovators, global cooperation, and continued ethical reflection are key to ensuring a positive outcome. Individuals can also play a role by being proactive and informed, seeking alternative options, and advocating for ethical AI practices.</p>
<p>In conclusion, while AI does have the potential to pose existential risks under certain scenarios, these risks can be mitigated through responsible development, robust governance, and ethical considerations. It is essential to strike a balance between harnessing the benefits of AI and addressing its potential risks to ensure a positive future for humanity.</p>

Claim Review: AI and Human Extinction

<h2>Claim Review: Hospitals Harvest Organs From Donors Who Are STILL ALIVE</h2>
<p>Infowars recently claimed that hospitals harvest organs from donors who are still alive. Dr. Heidi Klessig, M.D., appeared on Children’s Health Defense (CHD) TV to warn people that registering to be an organ donor puts them in danger of having their organs harvested from their bodies while they are still alive.</p>
<p>Dr. Klessig argues that when people register to be organ donors, they are not informed that brain death does not mean biological death. She cites cases where individuals declared braindead have delivered healthy babies and suggests that organ donors may recover if not taken advantage of by the organ transplant industry.</p>
<h3>Understanding Brain Death</h3>
<p>Brain death is a medically recognized state of death. According to the <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3565687/">National Institutes of Health</a>, brain death occurs when all functions of the brain, including the brainstem, have permanently and irreversibly ceased. This is determined through a series of rigorous tests and evaluations.</p>
<p>While it is true that a person declared braindead may still have a beating heart and functioning organs, this is due to the use of mechanical ventilation and other life support measures. The person is considered legally and medically dead because the brain, which controls all bodily functions, has ceased to function.</p>
<h3>Organ Donation Procedures</h3>
<p>Organ donation procedures are strictly regulated to ensure ethical practices. The <a href="https://www.organdonor.gov/about/donation-process.html">U.S. Department of Health and Human Services</a> outlines the process, which includes obtaining consent from the donor or their family, conducting medical evaluations, and ensuring that the donor is medically suitable for donation.</p>
<p>Organ procurement organizations (OPOs) work closely with hospitals to facilitate the donation process. The decision to declare brain death and the process of organ donation are separate and independent, ensuring that the best interests of the patient are always prioritized.</p>
<h3>Addressing Specific Cases</h3>
<p>Dr. Klessig mentions two cases where individuals declared braindead may have been able to recover. However, these cases are not representative of the standard medical practice. In rare instances, there may be controversies or misunderstandings, but these do not negate the established medical criteria for brain death.</p>
<p>The case of Terrance Howard, a 19-year-old athlete, and Amber Ebanks, a 23-year-old business student, are cited as examples. While these cases are tragic, they do not provide evidence that organ donation procedures are routinely unethical or that hospitals harvest organs from living donors.</p>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>The claim that hospitals harvest organs from donors who are still alive is misleading and not supported by scientific evidence. Brain death is a medically recognized state of death, and organ donation procedures are strictly regulated to ensure ethical practices. While there may be rare cases of controversy, the overall system is designed to prioritize the best interests of the patient and the ethical procurement of organs.</p>
<p>For more information on organ donation and brain death, please refer to reliable sources such as the <a href="https://www.organdonor.gov/">U.S. Department of Health and Human Services</a> and the <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/">National Institutes of Health</a>.</p>

Claim Review: Hospitals Harvest Organs From Donors Who Are STILL ALIVE

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "The whole wind turbine game is a SCAM because a wind turbine could spin for years and it still wouldn’t replace the energy that was used to manufacture it." is Mostly False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: