The U.S. military, through DARPA, knew since 2016 that Ivermectin was the best product to use in the event of a pandemic.

Natural News

Claim Review: U.S. Military Knew Ivermectin Was Best for Pandemics Since 2016

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The claim that the U.S. military, specifically through DARPA, knew since 2016 that Ivermectin was the best product to use in the event of a pandemic has been circulating in various forms. This article aims to review this claim and provide a thorough analysis based on available scientific evidence and reliable sources.</p>
<h2>Background</h2>
<p>Ivermectin is an antiparasitic medication that has been used for decades to treat various parasitic infections. During the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been significant interest in its potential as a treatment for COVID-19. However, the scientific community has been divided on its efficacy and safety for this purpose.</p>
<h2>Analysis of the Claim</h2>
<p>The claim suggests that DARPA, the research arm of the U.S. military, had identified Ivermectin as the best product for a pandemic as early as 2016. This claim is attributed to Dr. Christopher Shoemaker, an emergency and general hospital medicine doctor in Canada.</p>
<p>To evaluate this claim, it is essential to examine the available scientific literature and statements from reputable organizations.</p>
<h3>Scientific Evidence</h3>
<p>A study published in the journal <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41429-020-0336-z">Antiviral Research</a> in April 2020 suggested that Ivermectin could inhibit the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. However, subsequent studies and meta-analyses have yielded mixed results. A systematic review and meta-analysis published in the <a href="https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD015017.pub2/full">Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews</a> concluded that the evidence for Ivermectin's efficacy in treating COVID-19 is uncertain.</p>
<h3>Statements from Reputable Organizations</h3>
<p>The World Health Organization (WHO) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have both issued statements cautioning against the use of Ivermectin for COVID-19 outside of clinical trials. The FDA has explicitly warned against using Ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID-19, citing a lack of sufficient evidence and potential safety concerns.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that the U.S. military knew Ivermectin was the best product for a pandemic since 2016 is largely unsubstantiated. While there is some preliminary evidence suggesting Ivermectin's potential antiviral properties, the scientific consensus remains uncertain. Reputable organizations such as the WHO and FDA have cautioned against its use for COVID-19 due to insufficient evidence and potential safety concerns. Therefore, this claim should be approached with skepticism.</p>
<p>It is crucial to rely on peer-reviewed scientific studies and statements from reputable organizations when evaluating claims related to medical treatments, especially during a global health crisis.</p>

<p>In recent years, the drugs Ivermectin, Mebendazole, and Fenbendazole have gained significant attention, particularly among conspiracy theorists. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of these drugs, their intended uses, and the controversies surrounding them.</p>
<h2>Understanding the Drugs</h2>
<h3>Ivermectin</h3>
<p>Ivermectin is an anti-parasitic medication commonly used to treat various parasitic infections, including river blindness and strongyloidiasis. It has been approved by the FDA for specific uses and has a well-established safety profile when used appropriately. However, its use has become a subject of debate due to claims about its efficacy against viral infections, particularly COVID-19.</p>
<h3>Mebendazole</h3>
<p>Mebendazole is another anti-parasitic drug used to treat infections caused by worms, such as pinworms, roundworms, and hookworms. It is widely used in veterinary medicine and has been approved for human use in certain cases. Like Ivermectin, Mebendazole has been the subject of unproven claims regarding its effectiveness against various diseases.</p>
<h3>Fenbendazole</h3>
<p>Fenbendazole is primarily used in veterinary medicine to treat parasitic infections in animals. It is not approved for human use, but it has gained attention due to anecdotal reports and unverified claims about its potential benefits for humans. The lack of clinical trials and regulatory approval makes its use in humans highly controversial.</p>
<h2>The Rise of Misinformation</h2>
<p>The surge in interest in these drugs can be attributed to several factors, including the spread of misinformation on social media and the internet. Conspiracy theorists often promote these drugs as miracle cures for various ailments, despite the lack of scientific evidence supporting these claims. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated this trend, with many people desperate for treatments and willing to try unproven remedies.</p>
<h2>Scientific Evidence and Regulatory Stance</h2>
<p>The scientific community and regulatory bodies have been vocal about the lack of evidence supporting the use of these drugs for unapproved indications. The FDA and other health organizations have issued warnings against the use of Ivermectin, Mebendazole, and Fenbendazole for treating COVID-19 or other viral infections. Clinical trials and meta-analyses have failed to provide conclusive evidence of their efficacy in these contexts.</p>
<h2>The Importance of Evidence-Based Medicine</h2>
<p>The controversy surrounding these drugs highlights the importance of evidence-based medicine. Relying on scientific research and clinical trials ensures that treatments are safe and effective. Patients should consult healthcare professionals before starting any new medication, especially those not approved for human use or for unapproved indications.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The recent interest in Ivermectin, Mebendazole, and Fenbendazole among conspiracy theorists underscores the need for accurate information and evidence-based medicine. While these drugs have approved uses, their promotion for unproven indications can be dangerous. It is crucial for individuals to seek reliable sources of information and consult healthcare professionals before making decisions about their health.</p>
<h2>References</h2>
<ol>
  <li>FDA. (2021). Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19. Retrieved from <a href="https://www.fda.gov/consumers/health-fraud-scams/fraudulent-coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19-products">FDA Website</a>&nbsp;</li>
  <li>World Health Organization. (2021). WHO advises that ivermectin only be used to treat COVID-19 within clinical trials. Retrieved from <a href="https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/who-advises-that-ivermectin-only-be-used-to-treat-covid-19-within-clinical-trials">WHO Website</a></li>
  <li>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). Parasites - Mebendazole. Retrieved from <a href="https://www.cdc.gov/sth/about/index.html">CDC Website</a>&nbsp;</li>
</ol>

The Controversy Surrounding Ivermectin, Mebendazole, and Fenbendazole

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The article from The Expose claims that the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) and the World Health Organization (WHO) employ 200 fortune tellers to find the pathogen that could cause the next pandemic. This claim is misleading and inaccurate. Let's delve into the details to understand the truth behind this claim.</p>
<h2>Understanding the Claim</h2>
<p>The article suggests that CEPI and WHO are using unscientific methods, akin to fortune-telling, to predict the next pandemic pathogen. It also implies that these efforts are driven by the vaccine industry and individuals like Bill Gates.</p>
<h2>The Truth Behind the Claim</h2>
<p>CEPI and WHO are indeed involved in efforts to prepare for future pandemics. However, these efforts are based on scientific research and collaboration, not fortune-telling. The WHO R&amp;D Blueprint for Epidemics is a global platform for research and development collaboration, focusing on medical countermeasures, including vaccines.</p>
<p>The report mentioned in the article is the result of a meeting held in May 2024, where over 200 scientists from more than 50 countries collaborated to evaluate the evidence related to 28 Viral Families and one core group of Bacteria, encompassing 1,652 pathogens. The goal is to investigate entire families of pathogens that can infect humans, develop knowledge and tools for entire pathogen families, foster research that generates knowledge, tools, and countermeasures that can be rapidly adapted to emerging threats, and encourage globally coordinated research efforts.</p>
<h2>Scientific Basis</h2>
<p>The approach taken by CEPI and WHO is grounded in scientific principles. Pathogen prioritisation is a process aimed at categorising pathogens according to their public health importance, antimicrobial resistance, and potential for epidemic or pandemic spread. This is not fortune-telling but a systematic and evidence-based approach to prepare for future health threats.</p>
<p>For example, a study published in <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0895-3">Nature Medicine</a> discusses the importance of preparedness for future pandemics through scientific research and collaboration. The study highlights the need for a proactive approach to identify and mitigate potential pandemic threats.</p>
<h2>Addressing Misconceptions</h2>
<p>The article from The Expose misrepresents the efforts of CEPI and WHO by comparing them to fortune-telling. This is a misleading analogy that undermines the scientific basis of these efforts. The claim that these efforts are driven by the vaccine industry and individuals like Bill Gates is also unfounded. While it is true that CEPI was co-founded and co-funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, among others, this does not imply that the efforts are unscientific or driven by profit motives.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that CEPI and WHO employ 200 fortune tellers to find the pathogen that could cause the next pandemic is false. The efforts of CEPI and WHO are based on scientific research and collaboration, aimed at preparing for future pandemics through a systematic and evidence-based approach. The misleading and inaccurate claims in the article from The Expose should be disregarded.</p>

Claim Review: CEPI and WHO Employ 200 Fortune Tellers to Find the Pathogen That Could Cause the Next Pandemic

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>A recent article published on a website known for spreading misinformation claims that remdesivir, a drug promoted by Dr. Anthony Fauci for treating COVID-19, caused the deaths of U.S. military servicemen during clinical trials. The article cites a military whistleblower and a set of documents referred to as the 'Remdesivir Papers.' This claim review aims to evaluate the veracity of these allegations.</p>
<h2>Background on Remdesivir</h2>
<p>Remdesivir is an antiviral medication developed by Gilead Sciences Inc. It was initially tested as a treatment for Ebola and later repurposed for COVID-19. The drug received emergency use authorization (EUA) from the FDA in May 2020 and full approval in October 2020 for treating hospitalized COVID-19 patients.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The article alleges that hundreds of people became seriously injured or died as a result of taking remdesivir in clinical trials. It also claims that participants were not provided with proper informed consent and that the methodologies used to test the drug were skewed. The whistleblower, using the pseudonym Daniel LeMay, is said to have worked with J.M. Phelps to compile this information.</p>
<h2>Evaluation of the Claim</h2>
<p>To evaluate the claim, it is essential to examine the available scientific evidence and the credibility of the sources cited in the article.</p>
<h3>Scientific Evidence</h3>
<p>Several peer-reviewed studies have been conducted on remdesivir's efficacy and safety. A study published in the <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2007764">New England Journal of Medicine</a> found that remdesivir was superior to placebo in shortening the time to recovery in adults hospitalized with COVID-19. Another study published in <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(22)00528-8/fulltext">The Lancet Respiratory Medicine</a> &nbsp;reported that remdesivir did not significantly improve clinical outcomes or reduce mortality in severe COVID-19 patients.</p>
<p>While these studies indicate that remdesivir may not be a highly effective treatment for COVID-19, they do not support the claim that the drug caused widespread deaths among military servicemen during clinical trials.</p>
<h3>Credibility of Sources</h3>
<p>The article cites a military whistleblower and a set of documents referred to as the 'Remdesivir Papers.' However, the credibility of these sources is questionable. The article does not provide verifiable evidence to support the whistleblower's claims, and the 'Remdesivir Papers' are not publicly available for independent review.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the article is published on a website known for spreading misinformation and conspiracy theories. The website has a history of publishing false and misleading content, which undermines the credibility of the claims made in the article.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>Based on the available scientific evidence and the lack of credible sources to support the claims made in the article, the allegation that remdesivir caused the deaths of U.S. military servicemen during clinical trials is largely unsubstantiated. While remdesivir may not be a highly effective treatment for COVID-19, there is no credible evidence to suggest that it caused widespread deaths among military servicemen during clinical trials.</p>
<p>It is crucial to rely on credible scientific sources and peer-reviewed studies when evaluating claims about medical treatments. Misinformation and conspiracy theories can undermine public trust in healthcare and hinder efforts to combat diseases like COVID-19.</p>

Claim Review: Remdesivir Caused Deaths Among U.S. Military Servicemen

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "The U.S. military, through DARPA, knew since 2016 that Ivermectin was the best product to use in the event of a pandemic." is Mostly False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: