The HPV vaccine tragedy was a test run for COVID-19 vaccines, implying that both are harmful and part of a larger coercive agenda.

The Forgotten Side of Medicine - midwesterndoctor.com

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>A recent claim circulating online suggests that the alleged tragedies associated with the HPV vaccine were a 'test run' for the COVID-19 vaccines, implying that both are part of a coercive and harmful agenda. This claim review aims to examine the evidence and provide a thorough analysis of this assertion.</p>
<h2>Background on HPV and COVID-19 Vaccines</h2>
<p>The HPV (Human Papillomavirus) vaccine is designed to prevent infections that can lead to various types of cancer, including cervical cancer. It has been widely administered since its introduction in 2006. The COVID-19 vaccines, developed in response to the global pandemic, aim to protect individuals from severe illness and death caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.</p>
<h2>Safety and Efficacy of HPV Vaccines</h2>
<p>The safety and efficacy of HPV vaccines have been extensively studied. A systematic review published in the <a href="https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD009069.pub3/full">Cochrane Library</a> concluded that HPV vaccines are effective in preventing HPV infections and related diseases. The review also found no evidence of serious adverse effects linked to the vaccines.</p>
<h2>Safety and Efficacy of COVID-19 Vaccines</h2>
<p>Similarly, COVID-19 vaccines have undergone rigorous clinical trials and post-market surveillance. Studies published in reputable journals such as <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577">The New England Journal of Medicine</a> and <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)32661-1/fulltext">The Lancet</a> have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of these vaccines. Real-world data continues to support their effectiveness in reducing hospitalizations and deaths.</p>
<h2>Addressing the Claim</h2>
<p>The claim that the HPV vaccine tragedy was a test run for COVID-19 vaccines is not supported by scientific evidence. Both vaccines have been developed and administered based on robust scientific research and regulatory oversight. The suggestion of a coercive agenda lacks credible evidence and is often rooted in conspiracy theories rather than factual data.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that the HPV vaccine tragedy was a test run for COVID-19 vaccines is misleading and unfounded. Both vaccines have been extensively studied and are considered safe and effective by the scientific community. It is crucial to rely on evidence-based information when making decisions about vaccinations.</p>

Review of the Claim: HPV Vaccine Tragedy as a Test Run for COVID-19 Vaccines

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>A recent article from The Exposé claims that an investigation of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data has revealed extremely high numbers of adverse reactions and deaths associated with specific lot numbers of COVID-19 vaccines. This article aims to review this claim and provide a thorough analysis based on reliable scientific sources.</p>
<h2>Understanding VAERS</h2>
<p>VAERS is a passive surveillance system that collects reports of adverse events following vaccination. It is important to note that VAERS reports are not verified and do not necessarily indicate a causal relationship between the vaccine and the adverse event. Anyone can submit a report to VAERS, and the system is designed to detect potential safety signals that warrant further investigation.</p>
<h2>Variability in Adverse Events</h2>
<p>The claim suggests that there is excessive variability in the number of adverse events reported for different lots of COVID-19 vaccines compared to flu vaccines. However, several factors can contribute to this variability:</p>
<ul>
  <li><strong>Reporting biases:</strong> The media attention and public concern surrounding COVID-19 vaccines may lead to increased reporting of adverse events compared to other vaccines.</li>
  <li><strong>Vaccine rollout:</strong> The rapid and widespread rollout of COVID-19 vaccines means that a larger number of people have been vaccinated in a shorter period, which could lead to a higher number of reported adverse events.</li>
  <li><strong>Data quality:</strong> VAERS data is subject to limitations, including incomplete reports, inconsistencies, and errors.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Scientific Evidence</h2>
<p>A study published in <a href="https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7037e2.htm">the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR)</a> analyzed VAERS data for COVID-19 vaccines and found that the majority of adverse events were non-serious. The study also noted that the reporting rates for serious adverse events were consistent with those observed in clinical trials and did not identify any new safety concerns.</p>
<p>Another study published in <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(21)00228-3/fulltext">The Lancet Infectious Diseases</a> analyzed data from multiple countries and found that the benefits of COVID-19 vaccines far outweigh the risks. The study did not find evidence of excessive adverse reactions associated with specific vaccine lots.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>Based on the available scientific evidence, the claim that specific batches of COVID-19 vaccines are causing excessive adverse reactions and deaths is not supported. The variability in adverse events is likely due to reporting biases and other factors, not the vaccines themselves. It is essential to rely on reliable scientific sources and peer-reviewed studies when evaluating claims related to vaccine safety.</p>
<h2>References</h2>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7037e2.htm">MMWR: Monitoring the Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(21)00228-3/fulltext">The Lancet Infectious Diseases: COVID-19 vaccine safety</a></li>
</ul>

Claim Review: COVID-19 Vaccine Batch Variability and Adverse Reactions

<p>The recent article titled 'Bill Gates’ “days are numbered,” say Japanese scientists after ABORTION DRUGS found in “vaccines”' makes a startling claim that Japanese scientists have found abortion-inducing drugs in vaccines and are calling for the prosecution of Bill Gates. This claim, however, is not supported by credible scientific evidence and appears to be part of a broader misinformation campaign.</p>
<p>The article cites Dr. Masanori Fukushima, a leading Japanese oncologist, as one of the scientists sounding the alarm. However, there is no verifiable evidence from reputable scientific journals or official statements from Dr. Fukushima or any other Japanese scientists to support these claims. The article also references a tweet from an account called TPV Sean (@tpvsean), which is not a reliable source of scientific information.</p>
<p>The claim that vaccines contain abortion drugs is a common conspiracy theory that has been debunked by numerous scientific studies. For instance, a study published in the <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577">New England Journal of Medicine</a> found no evidence of abortion-inducing substances in COVID-19 vaccines. Similarly, the World Health Organization (WHO) has repeatedly affirmed the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, stating that they do not contain any substances that could induce abortions.</p>
<p>The article also mentions that the Japanese government's Covid Task Force has uncovered damning evidence against Bill Gates. However, there is no official statement or report from the Japanese government or any credible international organization to corroborate these allegations. The lack of verifiable sources and the reliance on unsubstantiated claims from questionable sources raise serious doubts about the credibility of the article.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the article attempts to link Bill Gates to a genocidal agenda, which is a baseless and inflammatory accusation. Bill Gates, through the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation, has been a prominent figure in global health initiatives, including vaccine development and distribution. While his philanthropic efforts have been subject to criticism and scrutiny, there is no evidence to support the claim that he is intentionally harming the global population.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that Japanese scientists have found abortion drugs in vaccines and are calling for the prosecution of Bill Gates is unfounded and lacks credible scientific evidence. This claim is likely part of a broader misinformation campaign aimed at undermining public trust in vaccines and global health initiatives. It is crucial to rely on reputable scientific sources and official statements when evaluating such claims.</p>

Claim Review: Japanese Scientists Accuse Bill Gates of Lacing Vaccines with Abortion Drugs

<h2>Claim Review: Dr. Mike Yeadon on COVID-19 Vaccines</h2>
<p>Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former vice president of Pfizer, recently made a series of claims about COVID-19 vaccines at a conference in Austria. He asserted that the vaccines were intentionally designed to injure, kill, and reduce fertility. This article will examine these claims in detail and provide a thorough review based on scientific evidence.</p>
<h3>Background</h3>
<p>Dr. Mike Yeadon is a professional research scientist with over 30 years of experience in the pharmaceutical industry and biotechnology. He has been vocal about his concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccines, particularly their safety and efficacy.</p>
<h3>Claim Analysis</h3>
<p>Dr. Yeadon's primary claim is that the COVID-19 vaccines were deliberately designed to cause harm. He argues that it is impossible to develop, test, and authorize a complex biological product in under a year. However, this assertion overlooks the unprecedented global collaboration and resources dedicated to vaccine development during the pandemic.</p>
<p>The COVID-19 vaccines, particularly those developed by Pfizer and Moderna, utilize mRNA technology. This technology has been in development for decades and has undergone extensive testing and refinement. The rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines was made possible by leveraging existing research and technology, as well as significant financial and human resources.</p>
<p>Dr. Yeadon also claims that the spike protein in the vaccines is toxic and causes various health issues, including myocarditis, heart attacks, and neurological conditions. While it is true that the spike protein can cause adverse effects, these are rare and have been thoroughly investigated. The benefits of vaccination, including protection against severe COVID-19, far outweigh the risks.</p>
<p>Regarding fertility, Dr. Yeadon suggests that lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) in the vaccines disproportionately deposit in the ovaries, leading to reduced fertility. However, scientific studies have not found evidence to support this claim. A study published in the <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983">New England Journal of Medicine</a> found no adverse effects on fertility in women who received the COVID-19 vaccine.</p>
<h3>Scientific Evidence</h3>
<p>Numerous peer-reviewed studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines. A study published in <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00947-8/fulltext">The Lancet</a> found that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was 95% effective in preventing COVID-19 infection. Another study in the <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2035389">New England Journal of Medicine</a> showed that the Moderna vaccine was 94.1% effective.</p>
<p>Regarding safety, a study published in <a href="https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7013e3.htm">Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR)</a> by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that serious adverse events after COVID-19 vaccination were rare and that the vaccines were generally safe.</p>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>Dr. Mike Yeadon's claims about COVID-19 vaccines being intentionally designed to harm are not supported by scientific evidence. The vaccines have undergone rigorous testing and have been proven safe and effective by numerous studies. While there are rare adverse events associated with the vaccines, the benefits of vaccination far outweigh the risks. It is crucial to rely on peer-reviewed scientific research when evaluating claims about vaccine safety and efficacy.</p>

Claim Review: Dr. Mike Yeadon on COVID-19 Vaccines

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "The HPV vaccine tragedy was a test run for COVID-19 vaccines, implying that both are harmful and part of a larger coercive agenda." is False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: