The CDC planned to establish nationwide quarantine camps for high-risk individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Jeffrey A. Tucker

Brownstone Institute - org

Infowars - com

<p>The article by Jeffrey A. Tucker claims that the CDC planned to establish nationwide quarantine camps for high-risk individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic. This claim is based on a document titled 'Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings.' Let's break down the claim and examine its validity.</p>
<p>Firstly, it's important to note that the document in question was not a plan for nationwide quarantine camps, but rather a theoretical consideration for humanitarian settings, such as refugee camps or displaced populations. The document clearly states that 'This approach has never been documented and has raised questions and concerns among humanitarian partners who support response activities in these settings.' This indicates that the approach was not a concrete plan, but rather a consideration of potential strategies in extreme settings.</p>
<p>Secondly, the document does not suggest forced isolation or 'concentration camps' as the article implies. The 'shielding approach' discussed in the document is a strategy to reduce the number of severe COVID-19 cases by limiting contact between high-risk and low-risk individuals. This is a common public health strategy known as 'cocooning,' which has been used in previous outbreaks to protect vulnerable individuals.</p>
<p>The article also claims that the document was 'completely official' and 'survived on the CDC’s public site with little to no public notice or controversy.' While it's true that the document was published on the CDC's website, it's important to note that the CDC regularly publishes interim guidance and considerations for various scenarios. The lack of public notice or controversy is likely due to the fact that the document was not a policy announcement or a plan for nationwide implementation.</p>
<p>The article also suggests that the document was part of a larger scheme for pathogenic control prior to vaccination. However, the document was published in July 2020, when vaccines were not yet available, and public health measures were the primary means of controlling the spread of COVID-19.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that the CDC planned to establish nationwide quarantine camps is largely misleading. The document in question was a theoretical consideration for humanitarian settings and was never implemented. The 'shielding approach' discussed in the document is a common public health strategy and was not a plan for forced isolation or 'concentration camps.'</p>
<p>References:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/117081">Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings</a> , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</li>
  <li><a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8653143/">Cocooning as a strategy to protect vulnerable populations from COVID-19</a> , National Center for Biotechnology Information</li>
</ul>

Claim Review: The CDC Planned Quarantine Camps Nationwide

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>A recent article published by The Exposé titled 'Shocking Government Reports: Are the C-19 Vaccinated at Risk of Developing AIDS?' claims that COVID-19 vaccines are causing a progressive decline in the immune system of vaccinated individuals, potentially leading to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). This claim is based on data from the UK Public Health England (PHE) Vaccine Surveillance Report. However, a thorough examination of the data and consultation with reliable scientific sources reveal that the claim is misleading and unfounded.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The article claims that doubly vaccinated 40-70 year olds have lost 40% of their immune system capability compared to unvaccinated people, with a progressive decline of 5% per week. The author suggests that this trend will lead to full immune system degradation within 6 months, effectively causing vaccinated individuals to develop AIDS.</p>
<h2>The Evidence</h2>
<p>The article presents data from the UK PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report, showing an increase in COVID-19 cases among vaccinated individuals over time. However, the author misinterprets this data as evidence of immune system degradation. Several factors must be considered when analyzing this data:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Vaccine effectiveness: COVID-19 vaccines are designed to prevent severe illness and death, not necessarily infection. Breakthrough infections are expected, especially with the emergence of new variants.</li>
  <li>Waning immunity: Immunity derived from vaccines may wane over time, but this does not indicate immune system degradation. Booster shots are recommended to maintain a high level of protection.</li>
  <li>Population differences: The vaccinated and unvaccinated populations may have inherent differences that affect their susceptibility to infection, such as age, underlying health conditions, and health-seeking behaviors.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Scientific Consensus</h2>
<p>The claim that COVID-19 vaccines cause immune system degradation is not supported by the scientific community. Numerous studies have demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines. For instance, a study published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine found that COVID-19 vaccines are highly effective in preventing severe illness, hospitalization, and death (<a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanwpc/article/PIIS2666-6065(23)00246-8/fulltext">source</a> ).</p>
<p>Furthermore, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has stated that COVID-19 vaccines do not cause immune system degradation or increase the risk of developing AIDS (<a href="https://www.cdc.gov/covid/vaccines/myths-facts.html?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/facts.html">source</a> ).</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that COVID-19 vaccinated individuals are at risk of developing AIDS due to immune system degradation is not supported by scientific evidence. The data presented in the article is misinterpreted and lacks context. It is essential to rely on credible scientific sources and consult healthcare professionals for accurate information regarding COVID-19 vaccines.</p>

Claim Review: Are C-19 Vaccinated Individuals at Risk of Developing AIDS?

<p>The claim that COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer and have led to a significant increase in cancer cases among young people has been circulating widely. This article aims to review the available evidence and provide a thorough analysis of this claim.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The claim suggests that COVID-19 vaccines are directly responsible for an increase in cancer cases, particularly among young people. It cites various sources, including reports from the American Cancer Society, Pfizer's safety reports, and statements from oncologists and pathologists.</p>
<h2>Analysis of the Claim</h2>
<p>To evaluate this claim, it is essential to examine the evidence presented and compare it with reliable scientific sources.</p>
<h3>Increase in Cancer Cases</h3>
<p>The claim mentions a significant increase in fourteen different types of cancers across 44 countries, particularly among young people, by October 2022. However, it is crucial to note that the increase in cancer cases could be attributed to various factors, including delayed screenings and treatments due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The American Cancer Society reported that cancer mortality in young people had doubled compared to pre-2020 levels, but this does not necessarily imply a direct causal link to COVID-19 vaccines.</p>
<h3>Pfizer's Safety Report</h3>
<p>The claim references Pfizer's 2022 safety report on COVID-19 vaccines, which documented thousands of cancer cases following vaccinations. However, it is important to understand that correlation does not imply causation. The presence of cancer cases in vaccinated individuals does not prove that the vaccines caused the cancers. Further investigation is needed to establish a causal relationship.</p>
<h3>Statements from Oncologists and Pathologists</h3>
<p>The claim includes statements from oncologists and pathologists who have observed aggressive cancer relapses and unprecedented cases of stage four cancers in young adults. While these observations are concerning, they do not provide conclusive evidence that COVID-19 vaccines are the cause. Other factors, such as environmental exposures, lifestyle changes, and genetic predispositions, could also contribute to these observations.</p>
<h3>Mechanism of mRNA Vaccines</h3>
<p>The claim discusses the mechanism of mRNA vaccines and the resulting spike protein production by people's bodies after vaccination. It suggests that the spike protein may have carcinogenic effects. However, scientific studies have shown that the spike protein produced by mRNA vaccines is rapidly degraded and does not persist in the body long enough to cause significant harm. Additionally, the spike protein is not known to have direct carcinogenic properties.</p>
<h3>Immune Suppression and Cancer</h3>
<p>The claim mentions that COVID-19 vaccines may cause immune suppression, which impairs the body's ability to fight cancer. While it is true that some vaccines can temporarily affect the immune system, there is no evidence to suggest that COVID-19 vaccines specifically cause long-term immune suppression that leads to cancer. The immune system is complex and adaptable, and temporary changes do not necessarily result in increased cancer risk.</p>
<h3>Ivermectin as a Potential Treatment</h3>
<p>The claim suggests that ivermectin may be a potential treatment for COVID-19 and cancer. While ivermectin has shown some effectiveness against certain viruses and parasites, its role in treating cancer is not well-established. Further research is needed to determine the efficacy and safety of ivermectin as a cancer treatment.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer and have led to a significant increase in cancer cases among young people is not supported by reliable scientific evidence. While there have been reports of increased cancer cases, these are likely due to other factors such as delayed screenings and treatments during the pandemic. The claim that vaccines are directly responsible for this increase is misleading and lacks credible scientific backing.</p>
<p>It is crucial to rely on peer-reviewed scientific studies and expert opinions when evaluating claims about health and medicine. Misinformation can lead to unnecessary fear and mistrust, which can have serious consequences for public health. Always consult reliable sources and seek advice from healthcare professionals for accurate information.</p>

Claim Review: COVID-19 Vaccines and Cancer

<p>The article by Frank Wright on LifeSiteNews presents a claim by Dr. David A. Hughes that the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent lockdowns were part of a deliberate act of total war on civilization, aimed at establishing worldwide totalitarianism. This claim is part of a broader narrative that Hughes refers to as the 'omniwar.'</p>
<p>To evaluate this claim, it is essential to examine the evidence and the broader context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic has undoubtedly had profound impacts on societies worldwide, including economic disruptions, social isolation, and mental health issues. However, the assertion that these impacts were part of a deliberate act of war to establish totalitarianism is largely unfounded.</p>
<p>Firstly, the COVID-19 pandemic is a global health crisis caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The virus has been extensively studied by scientists worldwide, and its origins and spread have been well-documented. The World Health Organization (WHO) and numerous scientific studies have confirmed that the virus is of natural origin and not a result of deliberate human intervention (WHO Report on the Origins of the Virus).</p>
<p>Secondly, the measures taken to control the spread of the virus, such as lockdowns and vaccination campaigns, were implemented by governments based on scientific advice and public health guidelines. While these measures have been controversial and have had significant impacts on civil liberties, they were not part of a coordinated global conspiracy to establish totalitarianism. Instead, they were responses to an unprecedented public health crisis.</p>
<p>Hughes also claims that the COVID-19 measures changed his mind about the system that governs us and opened his eyes to the fact that the war is not only temporal but spiritual. While personal beliefs and interpretations are valid, it is important to distinguish between subjective experiences and objective evidence. The claim that the pandemic is part of a spiritual war lacks empirical support and is not backed by scientific or historical evidence.</p>
<p>Furthermore, Hughes' assertion that the ruling elites are using psychological warfare to traumatize the population and condition them into accepting a technocratic control system is not supported by credible evidence. While it is true that the pandemic has had psychological impacts and has exacerbated social divisions, these are consequences of the crisis rather than deliberate acts of war.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdowns were part of a deliberate act of total war on civilization aimed at establishing worldwide totalitarianism is largely unfounded. While the pandemic has had significant impacts, there is no credible evidence to support the idea of a coordinated global conspiracy. It is essential to rely on scientific evidence and public health guidelines to understand and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>
<p><strong>References:</strong></p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/the-origins-of-the-virus-scientific-insight">WHO Report on the Origins of the Virus</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9">Nature: The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30183-5/fulltext">The Lancet: COVID-19 is not a laboratory construct</a></li>
</ul>

Claim Review: COVID-19 as a Deliberate Act of Total War on Civilization

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "The CDC planned to establish nationwide quarantine camps for high-risk individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic." is Mostly False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: