Stanley Plotkin, known as the 'Godfather of Vaccines,' admitted that researchers experimented on mentally handicapped, orphans, and babies of mothers in prison to develop vaccines.

Natural News

<p>The claim that Stanley Plotkin, often referred to as the 'Godfather of Vaccines,' admitted to experimenting on mentally handicapped individuals, orphans, and babies of mothers in prison to develop vaccines has gained significant attention. This article aims to review the claim, providing context and verification from reliable sources.</p>
<p>Stanley Plotkin is a renowned physician and vaccine developer who has played a crucial role in the development of several vaccines. In a 2018 court case, Plotkin admitted to the use of vulnerable populations in vaccine research during the 1960s. This admission has been widely cited as evidence of unethical practices in vaccine development.</p>
<p>The article by Roman Bystrianyk, referenced in the content, highlights the historical context of vaccine development and the ethical concerns surrounding it. Bystrianyk discusses the use of the DTP (diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis) vaccine, which was linked to various adverse reactions, including brain damage and seizures. The 1985 Institute of Medicine (IOM) report estimated that the DTP vaccine caused significant adverse reactions and deaths annually.</p>
<p>Plotkin's admission in the 2018 court case is a matter of public record. He acknowledged that during the 1960s, it was not uncommon to use vulnerable populations, such as orphans and mentally handicapped individuals, for vaccine research. However, it is important to note that ethical standards in medical research have evolved significantly since the 1960s. The practices described by Plotkin are no longer considered acceptable by modern ethical standards.</p>
<p>The claim that Plotkin admitted to these practices is true, but it is essential to understand the historical context and the evolution of ethical guidelines in medical research. The use of vulnerable populations in medical experiments was not unique to vaccine research and was a widespread practice in various fields of medicine during that time.</p>
<p>In conclusion, while Stanley Plotkin did admit to the use of vulnerable populations in vaccine research during the 1960s, this admission must be viewed within the historical context of medical research practices at the time. The claim is partially true but requires context and verification to avoid misinterpretation.</p>
<p>For further reading on the evolution of ethical standards in medical research, refer to the following studies:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.researchvana.org/foundations-of-research/steps-in-research/ethical-considerations-in-medical-research">Ethical Considerations in Medical Research</a>&nbsp;</li>
  <li><a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5527717/">The Evolution of Ethical Guidelines in Medical Research</a>&nbsp;</li>
</ul>

Claim Review: Stanley Plotkin's Admission of Unethical Vaccine Experiments

<h2>Claim Review: Dr. Mike Yeadon on COVID-19 Vaccines</h2>
<p>Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former vice president of Pfizer, recently made a series of claims about COVID-19 vaccines at a conference in Austria. He asserted that the vaccines were intentionally designed to injure, kill, and reduce fertility. This article will examine these claims in detail and provide a thorough review based on scientific evidence.</p>
<h3>Background</h3>
<p>Dr. Mike Yeadon is a professional research scientist with over 30 years of experience in the pharmaceutical industry and biotechnology. He has been vocal about his concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccines, particularly their safety and efficacy.</p>
<h3>Claim Analysis</h3>
<p>Dr. Yeadon's primary claim is that the COVID-19 vaccines were deliberately designed to cause harm. He argues that it is impossible to develop, test, and authorize a complex biological product in under a year. However, this assertion overlooks the unprecedented global collaboration and resources dedicated to vaccine development during the pandemic.</p>
<p>The COVID-19 vaccines, particularly those developed by Pfizer and Moderna, utilize mRNA technology. This technology has been in development for decades and has undergone extensive testing and refinement. The rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines was made possible by leveraging existing research and technology, as well as significant financial and human resources.</p>
<p>Dr. Yeadon also claims that the spike protein in the vaccines is toxic and causes various health issues, including myocarditis, heart attacks, and neurological conditions. While it is true that the spike protein can cause adverse effects, these are rare and have been thoroughly investigated. The benefits of vaccination, including protection against severe COVID-19, far outweigh the risks.</p>
<p>Regarding fertility, Dr. Yeadon suggests that lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) in the vaccines disproportionately deposit in the ovaries, leading to reduced fertility. However, scientific studies have not found evidence to support this claim. A study published in the <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983">New England Journal of Medicine</a> found no adverse effects on fertility in women who received the COVID-19 vaccine.</p>
<h3>Scientific Evidence</h3>
<p>Numerous peer-reviewed studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines. A study published in <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00947-8/fulltext">The Lancet</a> found that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was 95% effective in preventing COVID-19 infection. Another study in the <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2035389">New England Journal of Medicine</a> showed that the Moderna vaccine was 94.1% effective.</p>
<p>Regarding safety, a study published in <a href="https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7013e3.htm">Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR)</a> by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that serious adverse events after COVID-19 vaccination were rare and that the vaccines were generally safe.</p>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>Dr. Mike Yeadon's claims about COVID-19 vaccines being intentionally designed to harm are not supported by scientific evidence. The vaccines have undergone rigorous testing and have been proven safe and effective by numerous studies. While there are rare adverse events associated with the vaccines, the benefits of vaccination far outweigh the risks. It is crucial to rely on peer-reviewed scientific research when evaluating claims about vaccine safety and efficacy.</p>

Claim Review: Dr. Mike Yeadon on COVID-19 Vaccines

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>A recent article claims that Japanese scientists have discovered abortion drugs in COVID-19 vaccines, potentially leading to charges against Bill Gates for crimes against humanity. This claim has sparked significant concern and controversy. This article aims to review the claim and provide a thorough analysis based on available scientific evidence.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The article alleges that Japanese scientists have found abortion drugs in the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines. It further suggests that these vaccines cause pregnant women to have unwanted abortions and that Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci may face legal consequences for their involvement in the distribution of these vaccines.</p>
<h2>Analysis of the Claim</h2>
<p>To evaluate the claim, it is essential to examine the scientific evidence and the credibility of the sources cited in the article.</p>
<h3>Scientific Evidence</h3>
<p>The article does not provide any specific scientific studies or peer-reviewed research to support the claim that abortion drugs have been found in COVID-19 vaccines. Instead, it relies on unnamed 'Japanese scientists' and references to Dr. Robert Malone, who is known for his controversial views on mRNA vaccines.</p>
<p>A thorough search of reputable scientific databases, such as PubMed and Google Scholar, did not yield any peer-reviewed studies supporting the claim that abortion drugs are present in COVID-19 vaccines. The lack of scientific evidence casts significant doubt on the validity of the claim.</p>
<h3>Credibility of Sources</h3>
<p>The article cites sources such as Pandemic.news and NaturalNews.com, which are known for spreading misinformation and conspiracy theories. These sources often lack credibility and are not considered reliable by the scientific community.</p>
<p>In contrast, reputable sources such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have consistently affirmed the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines. These organizations have not reported any findings of abortion drugs in the vaccines.</p>
<h3>Expert Opinions</h3>
<p>Dr. Robert Malone, mentioned in the article, has been a vocal critic of mRNA vaccines. However, his views are not widely accepted by the scientific community. Many experts have refuted his claims and emphasized the safety of mRNA vaccines.</p>
<p>For example, a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine found no evidence of adverse effects on pregnancy outcomes in women who received mRNA vaccines (<a href='https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983'>NEJM</a>).</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>Based on the lack of scientific evidence and the unreliability of the sources cited in the article, the claim that Japanese scientists found abortion drugs in COVID-19 vaccines is unfounded. The claim is rated as false.</p>
<p>It is crucial to rely on credible scientific sources and peer-reviewed research when evaluating claims related to public health. Misinformation can have serious consequences, including undermining public trust in vaccines and other medical interventions.</p>

Claim Review: Japanese Scientists Find Abortion Drugs in COVID-19 Vaccines

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The claim that childhood vaccines are linked to increased cancer rates in children has been circulating in various forms. This article aims to review the evidence behind this claim and provide a thorough analysis.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The claim suggests that the increase in childhood cancers correlates with the rise in vaccination schedules since the 1990s. It further posits that vaccine toxins disrupt cellular metabolism, potentially leading to cancer.</p>
<h2>Scientific Background</h2>
<p>To understand the claim, it is essential to delve into the scientific background of vaccines and cancer.</p>
<h3>Vaccine Ingredients</h3>
<p>Vaccines contain various ingredients, including adjuvants and preservatives, which are designed to enhance the immune response and prevent bacterial contamination. Some of these ingredients, such as formaldehyde and aluminum, are known to be toxic when injected into the body.</p>
<h3>Mitochondrial Dysfunction</h3>
<p>The claim suggests that vaccine toxins can cause mitochondrial dysfunction, leading to a shift from oxygen respiration to glucose fermentation, which is a hallmark of cancer cells. This theory is based on the work of Otto Warburg, who discovered that cancer cells use glucose fermentation for energy.</p>
<h2>Evidence Review</h2>
<h3>Formaldehyde</h3>
<p>Formaldehyde is a known carcinogen, but its presence in vaccines is minimal and tightly regulated. The amount of formaldehyde in vaccines is significantly lower than the levels found in the environment and is not considered a significant risk factor for cancer.</p>
<h3>Thimerosal</h3>
<p>Thimerosal, a mercury-containing preservative, has been largely removed from childhood vaccines due to concerns about its neurotoxicity. However, the link between thimerosal and cancer is not well-established. Studies have shown that the levels of mercury in vaccines are not sufficient to cause cancer.</p>
<h3>Aluminum</h3>
<p>Aluminum is used as an adjuvant in many vaccines. While aluminum is a known neurotoxin, the amounts used in vaccines are carefully controlled and have not been linked to cancer. A study published in <a href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2017.00283/full">Frontiers in Oncology</a> discusses how mitochondrial dysfunction can lead to cancer, but it does not specifically implicate vaccines.</p>
<h2>Correlation vs. Causation</h2>
<p>The claim relies heavily on the correlation between increased vaccination schedules and rising cancer rates. However, correlation does not imply causation. Many factors can contribute to the rise in childhood cancers, including environmental toxins, genetic predisposition, and lifestyle factors.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>While some vaccine ingredients are toxic and can potentially cause mitochondrial dysfunction, the evidence linking vaccines to increased cancer rates in children is not conclusive. The claim that vaccine toxins are responsible for the surging rate of childhood cancer is not well-supported by scientific research. Therefore, the claim is rated 2 out of 5.</p>

Claim Review: The Link Between Childhood Vaccines and Increased Cancer Rates in Children

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "Stanley Plotkin, known as the 'Godfather of Vaccines,' admitted that researchers experimented on mentally handicapped, orphans, and babies of mothers in prison to develop vaccines." is Half True

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: