Self-replicating vaccines due to be rolled out next month in Japan could result in a worldwide disaster.

The Expose News - com

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The claim that self-replicating vaccines due to be rolled out in Japan next month could result in a worldwide disaster has been circulating online. This article aims to review the scientific evidence and provide a thorough analysis of this claim.</p>
<h2>Understanding Self-Replicating Vaccines</h2>
<p>Self-replicating vaccines, also known as replicon vaccines, use self-amplifying RNA to produce the antigenic component. These vaccines are designed to replicate within the body, potentially enhancing the immune response. The technology is based on alphaviruses, which can infect various species, including humans and animals.</p>
<h2>Scientific Evidence</h2>
<p>The primary concern raised in the claim is that the man-made genes in replicon vaccines could spread to other species and become nearly impossible to eliminate. However, current scientific literature does not support this extreme scenario.</p>
<p>A study published in <a href="https://stm.sciencemag.org/content/12/557/eabd0890">Science Translational Medicine</a> in 2020 explored the use of alphavirus-derived replicon RNA vaccines. The study found that these vaccines induced neutralizing antibody and T cell responses in mice and nonhuman primates. While the study demonstrated the potential of replicon vaccines, it did not indicate any risk of widespread environmental contamination.</p>
<p>Another study published in <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03942-8">Nature</a> in 2021 discussed the safety and efficacy of self-amplifying mRNA vaccines. The study concluded that these vaccines are safe and effective, with no evidence of interspecies transmission or environmental spread.</p>
<h2>Addressing the Claim</h2>
<p>The claim that self-replicating vaccines could result in a worldwide disaster is based on speculative scenarios rather than scientific evidence. While it is true that alphaviruses can infect multiple species, the risk of widespread environmental contamination is not supported by current research.</p>
<p>The concern about the spread of man-made genes to other species is valid, but it is important to note that extensive safety measures are in place to prevent such occurrences. Vaccine development and testing involve rigorous protocols to ensure the safety of both humans and the environment.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>Based on the available scientific evidence, the claim that self-replicating vaccines could result in a worldwide disaster is largely unfounded. While there are legitimate concerns about the technology, current research does not support the notion of a global catastrophe. It is crucial to rely on peer-reviewed scientific studies and expert opinions when evaluating such claims.</p>

Claim Review: Self-Replicating Vaccines and Potential Worldwide Disaster

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The article from The Expose claims that the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) and the World Health Organization (WHO) employ 200 fortune tellers to find the pathogen that could cause the next pandemic. This claim is misleading and inaccurate. Let's delve into the details to understand the truth behind this claim.</p>
<h2>Understanding the Claim</h2>
<p>The article suggests that CEPI and WHO are using unscientific methods, akin to fortune-telling, to predict the next pandemic pathogen. It also implies that these efforts are driven by the vaccine industry and individuals like Bill Gates.</p>
<h2>The Truth Behind the Claim</h2>
<p>CEPI and WHO are indeed involved in efforts to prepare for future pandemics. However, these efforts are based on scientific research and collaboration, not fortune-telling. The WHO R&amp;D Blueprint for Epidemics is a global platform for research and development collaboration, focusing on medical countermeasures, including vaccines.</p>
<p>The report mentioned in the article is the result of a meeting held in May 2024, where over 200 scientists from more than 50 countries collaborated to evaluate the evidence related to 28 Viral Families and one core group of Bacteria, encompassing 1,652 pathogens. The goal is to investigate entire families of pathogens that can infect humans, develop knowledge and tools for entire pathogen families, foster research that generates knowledge, tools, and countermeasures that can be rapidly adapted to emerging threats, and encourage globally coordinated research efforts.</p>
<h2>Scientific Basis</h2>
<p>The approach taken by CEPI and WHO is grounded in scientific principles. Pathogen prioritisation is a process aimed at categorising pathogens according to their public health importance, antimicrobial resistance, and potential for epidemic or pandemic spread. This is not fortune-telling but a systematic and evidence-based approach to prepare for future health threats.</p>
<p>For example, a study published in <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0895-3">Nature Medicine</a> discusses the importance of preparedness for future pandemics through scientific research and collaboration. The study highlights the need for a proactive approach to identify and mitigate potential pandemic threats.</p>
<h2>Addressing Misconceptions</h2>
<p>The article from The Expose misrepresents the efforts of CEPI and WHO by comparing them to fortune-telling. This is a misleading analogy that undermines the scientific basis of these efforts. The claim that these efforts are driven by the vaccine industry and individuals like Bill Gates is also unfounded. While it is true that CEPI was co-founded and co-funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, among others, this does not imply that the efforts are unscientific or driven by profit motives.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that CEPI and WHO employ 200 fortune tellers to find the pathogen that could cause the next pandemic is false. The efforts of CEPI and WHO are based on scientific research and collaboration, aimed at preparing for future pandemics through a systematic and evidence-based approach. The misleading and inaccurate claims in the article from The Expose should be disregarded.</p>

Claim Review: CEPI and WHO Employ 200 Fortune Tellers to Find the Pathogen That Could Cause the Next Pandemic

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The claim that PCR tests can kill you and could be used to vaccinate people has been circulating, causing concern among the public. This article aims to review the evidence and provide a thorough analysis of these claims.</p>
<h2>Understanding PCR Tests</h2>
<p>PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) tests are widely used to detect the presence of viral genetic material, including SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. The test involves taking a sample from the nasal or oral cavity and analyzing it for viral RNA.</p>
<h2>Claim Analysis</h2>
<h3>PCR Tests Can Kill You</h3>
<p>The claim that PCR tests can kill you is based on reports of adverse events such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage and even death. However, these incidents are rare and often result from improper administration of the test. For example, a case reported in the <a href="https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaotolaryngology/fullarticle/2772795">JAMA Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery</a> described a woman who experienced cerebrospinal fluid leakage after a PCR test. Similarly, a case reported in <a href="https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2021/214/1/case-cerebrospinal-fluid-leak-following-nasal-swab-covid-19">The Medical Journal of Australia</a> involved a woman who developed symptoms of meningitis after a PCR test.</p>
<p>While these cases are concerning, they are isolated incidents and do not represent the norm. Properly administered PCR tests are generally safe and effective. The risk of adverse events can be minimized by following established guidelines for test administration.</p>
<h3>PCR Tests Could Be Used to Vaccinate You</h3>
<p>The claim that PCR tests could be used to vaccinate people is based on speculation about the potential use of nasal or anal swabs to deliver vaccines. While nasal vaccinations are not new and have been used for conditions like the flu, there is no evidence to suggest that PCR tests are being used for this purpose. The idea that PCR tests could be used to deliver vaccines without the knowledge or consent of the individual is unfounded and lacks scientific support.</p>
<p>Researchers at Johns Hopkins University have developed a device capable of delivering drugs, but this technology is not currently being used in PCR tests. The suggestion that PCR tests could be used to vaccinate people is purely speculative and not supported by evidence.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that PCR tests can kill you and could be used to vaccinate people is largely unfounded. While there are risks associated with improper administration of PCR tests, the overall safety and efficacy of these tests are well-established. The idea that PCR tests could be used to deliver vaccines is speculative and lacks scientific support. It is important to rely on credible sources of information and to follow established guidelines for the administration of PCR tests.</p>
<h2>Claim Rating</h2>
<p>The claim rating is 2 out of 5, indicating that the claim is largely false but contains some elements of truth regarding the risks of improper administration.</p>

Claim Review: The PCR Test Can Kill You and Could Be Used to Vaccinate You

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The claim that childhood vaccines are linked to increased cancer rates in children has been circulating in various forms. This article aims to review the evidence behind this claim and provide a thorough analysis.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The claim suggests that the increase in childhood cancers correlates with the rise in vaccination schedules since the 1990s. It further posits that vaccine toxins disrupt cellular metabolism, potentially leading to cancer.</p>
<h2>Scientific Background</h2>
<p>To understand the claim, it is essential to delve into the scientific background of vaccines and cancer.</p>
<h3>Vaccine Ingredients</h3>
<p>Vaccines contain various ingredients, including adjuvants and preservatives, which are designed to enhance the immune response and prevent bacterial contamination. Some of these ingredients, such as formaldehyde and aluminum, are known to be toxic when injected into the body.</p>
<h3>Mitochondrial Dysfunction</h3>
<p>The claim suggests that vaccine toxins can cause mitochondrial dysfunction, leading to a shift from oxygen respiration to glucose fermentation, which is a hallmark of cancer cells. This theory is based on the work of Otto Warburg, who discovered that cancer cells use glucose fermentation for energy.</p>
<h2>Evidence Review</h2>
<h3>Formaldehyde</h3>
<p>Formaldehyde is a known carcinogen, but its presence in vaccines is minimal and tightly regulated. The amount of formaldehyde in vaccines is significantly lower than the levels found in the environment and is not considered a significant risk factor for cancer.</p>
<h3>Thimerosal</h3>
<p>Thimerosal, a mercury-containing preservative, has been largely removed from childhood vaccines due to concerns about its neurotoxicity. However, the link between thimerosal and cancer is not well-established. Studies have shown that the levels of mercury in vaccines are not sufficient to cause cancer.</p>
<h3>Aluminum</h3>
<p>Aluminum is used as an adjuvant in many vaccines. While aluminum is a known neurotoxin, the amounts used in vaccines are carefully controlled and have not been linked to cancer. A study published in <a href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2017.00283/full">Frontiers in Oncology</a> discusses how mitochondrial dysfunction can lead to cancer, but it does not specifically implicate vaccines.</p>
<h2>Correlation vs. Causation</h2>
<p>The claim relies heavily on the correlation between increased vaccination schedules and rising cancer rates. However, correlation does not imply causation. Many factors can contribute to the rise in childhood cancers, including environmental toxins, genetic predisposition, and lifestyle factors.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>While some vaccine ingredients are toxic and can potentially cause mitochondrial dysfunction, the evidence linking vaccines to increased cancer rates in children is not conclusive. The claim that vaccine toxins are responsible for the surging rate of childhood cancer is not well-supported by scientific research. Therefore, the claim is rated 2 out of 5.</p>

Claim Review: The Link Between Childhood Vaccines and Increased Cancer Rates in Children

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "Self-replicating vaccines due to be rolled out next month in Japan could result in a worldwide disaster." is Mostly False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: