Nicole Shanahan warns that AI-developed mRNA 'vaccines' will trigger an 'extinction event' that will massively depopulate the human race and calls for a moratorium on mRNA technology.

Nicole Ann Shanahan

The Peoples Voice - TV

Fact-Check: Will AI-Developed mRNA 'Vaccines' Trigger an 'Extinction Event'?

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>A recent claim by Nicole Shanahan, former running mate of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has raised concerns about the use of AI in developing mRNA 'vaccines'. Shanahan warns that this technology could lead to an 'extinction event', massively depopulating the human race. This claim has sparked a debate about the safety and ethical implications of AI-developed mRNA technology. This article will provide a thorough review of the available evidence to assess the validity of Shanahan's claim.</p>
<h2>Understanding mRNA Technology</h2>
<p>Messenger RNA (mRNA) technology has been a significant breakthrough in the field of vaccinology. mRNA vaccines work by instructing cells to produce a protein that triggers an immune response. This technology has been used in the development of COVID-19 vaccines, which have been administered to millions of people worldwide.</p>
<p>The use of AI in mRNA vaccine development is still in its early stages. AI can help accelerate the design and testing of mRNA sequences, potentially leading to more effective and personalized vaccines. However, the technology is not yet fully understood, and more research is needed to ensure its safety and efficacy.</p>
<h2>The Claim: AI-Developed mRNA 'Vaccines' Will Trigger an 'Extinction Event'</h2>
<p>Shanahan's claim is based on the idea that AI-developed mRNA 'vaccines' are untested and could have unpredictable long-term effects on human health. She argues that the technology is not ready for human use and calls for a moratorium on mRNA technology until further research is conducted.</p>
<p>However, it is important to note that mRNA technology has been studied for decades, and the COVID-19 vaccines have undergone rigorous testing and clinical trials. The World Health Organization (WHO) and other health authorities have deemed the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines safe and effective for use in humans.</p>
<h2>Scientific Evidence</h2>
<p>There is currently no scientific evidence to support the claim that AI-developed mRNA 'vaccines' will trigger an 'extinction event'. In fact, a study published in the journal <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-41109-9">Nature</a> &nbsp;found that mRNA vaccines are safe and effective in preventing COVID-19 infection and transmission.</p>
<p>Furthermore, a review of the available literature on mRNA technology and AI in vaccine development did not find any evidence to suggest that the technology poses a risk of mass depopulation. A study published in the journal <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167701224001106">Cell</a> &nbsp;found that AI can help improve the design and testing of mRNA vaccines, potentially leading to more effective and personalized treatments.</p>
<h2>Expert Opinion</h2>
<p>Dr. Robert Malone, who pioneered mRNA technology decades ago, has also weighed in on the debate. In a recent interview, Malone stated that Ellison's proposal is 'marketing propaganda and hype' and that Ellison has 'no understanding of cancer immunology'. Malone's comments suggest that the use of AI in mRNA vaccine development is still in its early stages and requires further research.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>Based on the available evidence, the claim that AI-developed mRNA 'vaccines' will trigger an 'extinction event' is unfounded and lacks scientific evidence. While more research is needed to fully understand the long-term effects of mRNA technology and the use of AI in vaccine development, the current evidence suggests that the technology is safe and effective for use in humans.</p>
<p>It is important to approach new technologies with caution and to conduct thorough research to ensure their safety and efficacy. However, spreading misinformation and unfounded claims can have serious consequences for public health and trust in scientific research.</p>
<p>Therefore, the claim that AI-developed mRNA 'vaccines' will trigger an 'extinction event' is rated as follows:</p>

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The claim that AI could cause human extinction has been a topic of intense debate among experts, futurists, and ethicists. This article aims to evaluate the validity of this claim by examining the potential risks and benefits of AI, as well as the factors that influence its development and integration into society.</p>
<h2>Potential Risks of AI</h2>
<p>One of the primary concerns surrounding AI is the possibility of it becoming an existential threat to humanity. This could occur if AI is developed and controlled by individuals or groups with malicious intentions, or if the technology is not properly governed and regulated.</p>
<p>Stephen Hawking, a renowned physicist, once stated, "Success in creating AI would be the biggest event in human history. Unfortunately, it might also be the last, unless we learn how to avoid the risks." This highlights the need for responsible innovation and ethical reflection in the development of AI.</p>
<h2>Mitigating the Risks</h2>
<p>To mitigate the risks associated with AI, it is crucial to implement robust governance frameworks and foster global cooperation. This includes establishing ethical guidelines, promoting transparency, and ensuring that AI technologies are developed and used in a manner that benefits society as a whole.</p>
<p>Research has shown that ethical considerations are essential in the development of AI. A study published in the journal <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2631-2">Nature</a> emphasizes the importance of integrating ethical principles into AI design and deployment to minimize potential harms.</p>
<h2>Balanced Perspectives</h2>
<p>While the risks of AI are significant, it is also important to acknowledge the potential benefits. AI has the capacity to revolutionize various sectors, including healthcare, finance, and education. By enhancing efficiency, improving decision-making, and enabling personalized services, AI can contribute to societal progress and well-being.</p>
<p>A report by the <a href="https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/artificial-intelligence/where-machines-could-replace-humans-and-where-they-cant-yet">McKinsey Global Institute</a> highlights the economic and social benefits of AI, emphasizing its potential to create new jobs, increase productivity, and drive innovation.</p>
<h2>Current State and Future Outlook</h2>
<p>The future of AI depends largely on how it is developed, governed, and integrated into society. Responsible innovators, global cooperation, and continued ethical reflection are key to ensuring a positive outcome. Individuals can also play a role by being proactive and informed, seeking alternative options, and advocating for ethical AI practices.</p>
<p>In conclusion, while AI does have the potential to pose existential risks under certain scenarios, these risks can be mitigated through responsible development, robust governance, and ethical considerations. It is essential to strike a balance between harnessing the benefits of AI and addressing its potential risks to ensure a positive future for humanity.</p>

Claim Review: AI and Human Extinction

<p>The claim that Big Pharma chose to use mRNA technology for COVID-19 vaccines because their patents were nearing expiration has been circulating in various articles and discussions. This claim suggests that the pharmaceutical industry opted for a new and relatively untested technology to secure future profits rather than using established methods with known safety profiles.</p>
<p>To evaluate this claim, it's important to consider the context and the available evidence. The COVID-19 pandemic presented an urgent need for effective vaccines, and mRNA technology offered several advantages. mRNA vaccines can be developed and manufactured more quickly than traditional vaccines, which was crucial in the race against the pandemic. Additionally, mRNA technology allows for rapid adaptation to new variants of the virus.</p>
<p>The article by Jonathan Engler on The Exposé suggests that the choice of mRNA technology was driven by financial motives, specifically the need to replace blockbuster products with pending patent expirations. While it is true that the pharmaceutical industry faces challenges with patent expirations, this alone does not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that it was the primary reason for choosing mRNA technology.</p>
<p>Scientific advancements and the potential of mRNA technology also played a significant role. mRNA vaccines have been in development for decades, and the COVID-19 pandemic provided an opportunity to test and validate this technology on a large scale. The success of mRNA vaccines in clinical trials and their subsequent authorization by regulatory bodies indicate that the choice was based on scientific merit as well as practical considerations.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the claim that mRNA technology has 'zero safety profile' is misleading. While it is true that mRNA vaccines were new to the market, extensive clinical trials and ongoing monitoring have provided substantial data on their safety and efficacy. For example, a study published in <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577">The New England Journal of Medicine</a> demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that Big Pharma chose mRNA technology for COVID-19 vaccines due to expiring patents is speculative and lacks concrete evidence. The decision was likely influenced by multiple factors, including scientific advancements, the need for rapid vaccine development, and the potential of mRNA technology. The safety and efficacy of mRNA vaccines have been demonstrated through extensive clinical trials and ongoing monitoring.</p>

Claim Review: Did Big Pharma Choose mRNA Technology Due to Expiring Patents?

<p>An official report by a Slovak government commission investigating the COVID-19 pandemic recommended mRNA vaccines be banned after determining they are ‘dangerous.’ This claim has gained attention, especially as it was followed by a similar call from the town council of Port Hedland in Western Australia. However, a thorough examination of the available scientific evidence does not support this claim.</p>
<h3>Understanding mRNA Vaccines</h3>
<p>mRNA vaccines, such as those developed by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, work by instructing cells to produce a harmless piece of the ‘spike protein’ found on the surface of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This triggers an immune response, preparing the body to fight the virus if exposed in the future. This technology has been studied for decades and has shown promising results in various applications, including cancer treatments and other infectious diseases.</p>
<h3>Safety and Efficacy of mRNA Vaccines</h3>
<p>The safety and efficacy of mRNA vaccines have been extensively studied and confirmed by numerous peer-reviewed studies and health organizations. For example, a study published in <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577">The New England Journal of Medicine</a> found that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was 95% effective in preventing COVID-19. Similarly, a study published in <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2035389">The New England Journal of Medicine</a> found that the Moderna vaccine was 94.1% effective.</p>
<p>Regarding safety, a study published in <a href="https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7002e3.htm">Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR)</a> by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that serious adverse events after mRNA vaccination were rare. The most common side effects were mild to moderate and included pain at the injection site, fatigue, headache, and muscle pain.</p>
<h3>Addressing Concerns</h3>
<p>The Slovak government commission's report raises concerns about the safety of mRNA vaccines, but these concerns are not supported by the broader scientific community. The World Health Organization (WHO), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have all reviewed the data on mRNA vaccines and concluded that they are safe and effective.</p>
<p>It is important to note that any medical intervention, including vaccines, can have side effects. However, the benefits of mRNA vaccines in preventing severe COVID-19, hospitalization, and death far outweigh the risks. The rare cases of serious adverse events, such as myocarditis and anaphylaxis, have been closely monitored and studied, and the overall risk remains very low.</p>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>The claim that mRNA vaccines are dangerous and should be banned is not supported by scientific evidence. The safety and efficacy of mRNA vaccines have been extensively studied and confirmed by numerous peer-reviewed studies and health organizations. While it is important to continue monitoring the safety of these vaccines, the available data strongly support their use in preventing COVID-19.</p>
<p>For high school students and the general public, it is crucial to rely on credible sources of information and to critically evaluate claims made in the media. Misinformation can spread quickly and have serious consequences for public health. Always seek information from reliable scientific sources and consult with healthcare professionals for medical advice.</p>

Claim Review: Slovak Government Report Calls for Ban of ‘Dangerous’ mRNA Vaccines

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "Nicole Shanahan warns that AI-developed mRNA 'vaccines' will trigger an 'extinction event' that will massively depopulate the human race and calls for a moratorium on mRNA technology." is Mostly False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: