Net Zero policies will lead to no holidays, no television, no football, no heating, no hot food, and nothing much of anything else. The 'far right' includes anyone who isn't a supporter of the current left-wing government or the Democrats in the US.

The Expose News - com

<h2>Introduction</h2>
In a recent article published on The Exposé, Dr. Vernon Coleman makes several claims about the impact of Net Zero policies and the definition of 'far right'. This claim review will examine these claims and provide a thorough analysis based on reliable scientific sources.
<h2>Claim 1: Net Zero Policies Will Lead to No Holidays, No Television, No Football, No Heating, No Hot Food, and Nothing Much of Anything Else</h2>
The claim that Net Zero policies will lead to a complete shutdown of modern conveniences is exaggerated and misleading. Net Zero policies aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to net zero by 2050, not to eliminate all modern conveniences. According to the <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-climate-action-towards-net-zero/uk-climate-action-towards-net-zero">UK Government's Net Zero Strategy</a>, the goal is to transition to cleaner energy sources and improve energy efficiency, not to eliminate all energy use.
A study published in <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-020-0796-5">Nature Climate Change</a> found that achieving Net Zero is possible without sacrificing modern conveniences, but it will require significant changes in energy production and consumption. The study also found that the benefits of achieving Net Zero, such as improved air quality and reduced health costs, outweigh the costs of transitioning to cleaner energy sources.
<h2>Claim 2: The 'Far Right' Includes Anyone Who Isn't a Supporter of the Current Left-Wing Government or the Democrats in the US</h2>
The claim that the 'far right' includes anyone who isn't a supporter of the current left-wing government or the Democrats in the US is misleading and oversimplified. The term 'far right' is typically used to describe political ideologies that are further to the right on the political spectrum than mainstream conservatism. According to the <a href="https://www.britannica.com/topic/far-right">Encyclopedia Britannica</a>, far-right ideologies are characterized by extreme nationalism, authoritarianism, and opposition to immigration and multiculturalism.
A study published in the <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1354068818780078">European Journal of Political Research</a> found that support for far-right parties is driven by a combination of economic insecurity, cultural backlash, and political disillusionment. The study also found that far-right parties tend to attract voters who are dissatisfied with mainstream politics and feel marginalized by globalization and multiculturalism.
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
The claims made in the article about the impact of Net Zero policies and the definition of 'far right' are exaggerated and misleading. While Net Zero policies will require significant changes in energy production and consumption, they will not lead to a complete shutdown of modern conveniences. Additionally, the definition of 'far right' is more complex and nuanced than simply including anyone who isn't a supporter of the current left-wing government or the Democrats in the US.
Based on the evidence presented, the claim rating for this article is 2 out of 5.

Claim Review: The Impact of Net Zero Policies and the Definition of 'Far Right'

The claim that governments are deliberately destroying their economies to push up inflation and interest rates, impoverish the middle classes, and kill off the elderly as part of a plan for Net Zero and the Great Reset has been circulating in various forms. This claim is made in an article by Dr. Vernon Coleman on The Exposé, published on August 30, 2024.
To evaluate this claim, it is essential to examine the underlying arguments and evidence presented. The article suggests that governments are intentionally causing economic turmoil to achieve specific goals related to Net Zero and the Great Reset. However, the evidence provided is largely speculative and lacks concrete data or expert analysis.
Firstly, the claim that governments are deliberately pushing up inflation and interest rates to impoverish the middle classes is not supported by economic data or policy analysis. Inflation and interest rates are influenced by a variety of factors, including monetary policy, global economic conditions, and supply chain disruptions. Governments and central banks typically aim to stabilize the economy and control inflation, not exacerbate it. For example, the Federal Reserve and other central banks have implemented policies to combat inflation, as seen in their <a href="https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomcminutes20230322.htm">meeting minutes</a>.
Secondly, the assertion that governments are intentionally impoverishing the middle classes and killing off the elderly lacks credible evidence. Governments worldwide have implemented various social welfare programs and healthcare initiatives aimed at supporting the middle classes and the elderly. For instance, the United States has programs like Social Security and Medicare, which provide financial and healthcare support to the elderly. Similarly, many European countries have robust social safety nets. These programs contradict the claim that governments are deliberately harming these groups.
The article also references Net Zero and the Great Reset as part of a broader conspiracy. While Net Zero is a legitimate goal aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions to combat climate change, the claim that it is part of a sinister plan to impoverish people is unfounded. The Great Reset, proposed by the World Economic Forum, is a concept aimed at rebuilding the economy in a more sustainable and equitable manner post-COVID-19. However, it is not a secretive plan to destroy economies or harm specific groups. For more information on the Great Reset, you can refer to the <a href="https://www.weforum.org/great-reset">World Economic Forum's website</a>.
In conclusion, the claim that governments are deliberately destroying their economies to push up inflation and interest rates, impoverish the middle classes, and kill off the elderly as part of a plan for Net Zero and the Great Reset is largely unfounded. The evidence provided is speculative and lacks credible data or expert analysis. It is essential to rely on verified sources and expert opinions when evaluating such claims.

Claim Review: Governments Deliberately Destroying Economies for Net Zero and Great Reset

The claim that the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) report confirms fluoride exposure is associated with lower IQ in children has been circulating widely. This claim is based on a report by the National Toxicology Program (NTP), which was delayed and finally released in August 2024. The report presents a comprehensive evaluation of the scientific evidence associating fluoride exposure with cognitive and neurodevelopmental health effects.
The NTP report found that 72 studies examined the association between fluoride exposure and IQ in children, with 64 showing an inverse relationship. This means that higher fluoride exposure was linked to lower IQ scores. Even at lower concentrations, fluoride exposure was associated with lower IQ. However, the report includes several caveats that are important to consider.
Firstly, the report mentions 'higher estimated fluoride exposures,' which are at drinking water fluoride concentrations that exceed the World Health Organization Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality of 1.5 mg/L of fluoride. The NTP scientists call for more studies to fully understand the potential for lower fluoride exposure to affect children's IQ. These caveats have been used by some media outlets to downplay the significance of the report's conclusions.
Despite these caveats, the NTP scientists make it clear that their conclusions apply to the US population. They state that because people receive fluoride from multiple sources (not just drinking water), individuals living in areas with optimally fluoridated water can have total fluoride exposures higher than the concentration of their drinking water. Additionally, there are people living in the United States who live in areas with naturally occurring fluoride in drinking water that is higher than 1.5 mg/L.
The release of the NTP report coincides with an ongoing legal battle between the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Fluoride Action Network (FAN). The lawsuit began following the EPA's 2016 decision to deny the plaintiff's petition under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). FAN is attempting to prove that fluoride is a neurotoxin and should be regulated or banned under the TSCA.
Emails released as part of the lawsuit reveal that various elements of the US government appear to have been involved in a concerted effort to block the release of the NTP draft report. The emails show that NTP scientists believed their work was completed and set a date for May 2022 for publication. However, leadership at the top levels of the Department of Health and Human Services intervened to stop the report from being released.
In conclusion, the claim that the US Department of Health and Human Services report confirms fluoride exposure is associated with lower IQ in children is partially true. While the report does suggest a link, it also includes caveats that need to be considered. The report calls for more studies to fully understand the potential for lower fluoride exposure to affect children's IQ. Additionally, the report's release has been surrounded by controversy, with evidence suggesting that government officials attempted to block its publication.
For more information, you can refer to the following studies:
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6478697/">Fluoride exposure and neurodevelopmental outcomes in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis</a></li>
 <li><a href="https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2748634">Association Between Maternal Fluoride Exposure During Pregnancy and IQ Scores in Offspring in Canada</a></li>
</ul>
These studies provide a more detailed analysis of the association between fluoride exposure and neurodevelopmental outcomes in children.

Claim Review: US Department of Health and Human Services Report on Fluoride and IQ

The claim that the modern food system is heavily influenced by the pursuit of profit, leading to issues such as land loss, food insecurity, illness, and environmental degradation, is a complex one that requires a thorough examination.
The modern food system is indeed shaped by capitalist imperatives, as highlighted in the book 'Sickening Profits: The Global Food System’s Poisoned Food and Toxic Wealth' by Colin Todhunter. Large investment firms and agribusinesses do profit from this system, and their influence on policy-making through lobbying is well-documented.
For instance, a study published in the <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5793246/">Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry</a> discusses the impact of agrochemicals on human health and the environment. The study notes that the extensive use of pesticides and herbicides can lead to various health issues, including cancer, neurological disorders, and reproductive problems.
Moreover, the <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919218300013">Journal of Environmental Management</a> has published research indicating that the current food system contributes to environmental degradation through practices such as monocropping and the use of synthetic fertilizers. These practices can lead to soil depletion, water pollution, and loss of biodiversity.
The claim also mentions the impact on food security and land loss. A report by the <a href="https://www.fao.org/3/i9553en/I9553EN.pdf">Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)</a> of the United Nations highlights that smallholder farmers, who are crucial for global food security, often face challenges such as land grabbing and lack of access to resources. This can indeed lead to food insecurity and displacement.
However, it is important to note that the food system is not monolithic, and there are efforts to promote sustainable and equitable practices. For example, the <a href="https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/hunger/">United Nations Sustainable Development Goals</a> include targets to end hunger, achieve food security, and promote sustainable agriculture.
In conclusion, while the claim that the modern food system is driven by profit and leads to various negative consequences is largely accurate, it is essential to recognize the nuances and the ongoing efforts to address these issues. The claim is supported by scientific studies and reports from reputable organizations, but it also requires a balanced perspective that acknowledges the complexity of the global food system.

Claim Review: The Global Food System’s Poisoned Food and Toxic Wealth

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "Net Zero policies will lead to no holidays, no television, no football, no heating, no hot food, and nothing much of anything else. The 'far right' includes anyone who isn't a supporter of the current left-wing government or the Democrats in the US." is Mostly False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: