Michelle Obama is divorcing Barack Obama because his history of pedophilia is about to be exposed.

The Peoples Voice - TV

Fact-Check: Is Michelle Obama Divorcing Barack Obama Due to Alleged Pedophilia?

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>A recent article from The People's Voice titled "Michelle Obama Divorcing Barack Because History of Pedophilia is About to Be Exposed" has gained attention for its sensational claims. This article aims to fact-check the assertion that Michelle Obama is divorcing Barack Obama due to his alleged involvement in pedophilia.</p>
<h2>Background</h2>
<p>The article suggests that Michelle Obama is preparing to announce her divorce from Barack Obama as his "darkest secrets" are about to be revealed. The claim is part of a broader narrative that includes allegations against other high-profile figures such as Bill Gates and Justin Trudeau.</p>
<h2>Analysis of the Claim</h2>
<h3>Lack of Credible Sources</h3>
<p>The article from The People's Voice does not provide any credible sources or evidence to support the claim that Barack Obama is involved in pedophilia. The allegations are based on unverified statements and speculation.</p>
<h3>Contradictory Information</h3>
<p>There is no official statement from Michelle or Barack Obama regarding a divorce or any allegations of pedophilia. The Obamas have been known for their public displays of affection and support for each other, which contradicts the narrative presented in the article.</p>
<h3>Scientific and Legal Perspectives</h3>
<p>The claim that Barack Obama is involved in pedophilia is not supported by any scientific studies or legal investigations. Pedophilia is a serious crime, and such allegations should be backed by substantial evidence. The lack of any formal charges or investigations against Barack Obama further undermines the credibility of the claim.</p>
<h3>Media Coverage</h3>
<p>Mainstream media outlets have not reported on any allegations of pedophilia against Barack Obama. The absence of coverage from reputable sources suggests that the claim lacks credibility.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>Based on the available information, the claim that Michelle Obama is divorcing Barack Obama due to his alleged history of pedophilia is unfounded. The article from The People's Voice relies on speculation and unverified statements, lacking any credible evidence to support the allegations. It is essential to approach such claims with skepticism and rely on verified sources for accurate information.</p>

<p>Na Facebook profilu korisnika Živčana Žirafa 4. travnja podijeljen je video u kojem tadašnji predsjednik Sjedinjenih Američkih Država <strong>Barack Obama</strong> obične ljude navodno naziva maloumnima, a poziva ih i da “predaju svoja prava moćnom suverenu”. Međutim, njegove su riječi prezentirane u sasvim krivom kontekstu, a izmijenjen je i poredak rečenica.</p>
<p>“<em>Za međunarodni poredak radili smo generacijama na izgradnji. Obični muškarci i žene su previše maloumni da upravljaju svojim poslovima. Red i napredak može doći samo kad pojedinci predaju svoja prava svemoćnom suverenu</em>“, kaže Obama u snimci koja je objavljena <a href="https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=pfbid0jTNXYbb4ZC8CTQ3dFJR9XAvkuWszkmyyPoW1sE2gsmZDWKq39bhAvUnciXS7FK1Bl&amp;id=100079968596875">u statusu</a>.</p>
<p><img src="https://faktograf.hr/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snimka-zaslona-2024-04-19-101735-800x315.png"/></p>
<p>Međutim, taj dio iz videa je namjerno izvučen iz konteksta i ne prenosi vjerno poruku koju je tadašnji američki predsjednik želio poslati.</p>
<h4>Što je Obama rekao 2014. godine u Bruxellesu?</h4>
<p>Obama je svoj govor iz statusa održao 26. ožujka 2014. godine u Bruxellesu. Riječi iz spomenutog videa doista je izgovorio, no u potpuno različitom kontekstu. To dokazuje puni <a href="https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/03/26/remarks-president-address-european-youth">transkript govora objavljen na službenoj stranici tada Obamine, Bijele kuće</a>. Osim transkripta, govor dug nešto više od 35 minuta se može pogledati i na službenom YouTube kanalu <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCxLTn6TNaA">bivšeg američkog predsjednika</a> te na američkom <a href="https://www.c-span.org/video/?318510-1/us-european-union-relations&amp;playEvent=">javnom servisu C-SPAN-u.</a></p>
<p>“Vođe i dostojanstvenici Europske unije, predstavnici našeg NATO saveza, poštovani gosti: Nalazimo se ovdje u trenutku iskušenja za Europu i Sjedinjene Države, <strong>i za međunarodni poredak na čijoj smo izgradnji radili generacijama</strong>.</p>
<p>Kroz ljudsku povijest, društva su se borila s temeljnim pitanjima kako se organizirati, koja je prava veza između pojedinca i države, najbolji način za rješavanje neizbježnih sukoba između država. I upravo ovdje u Europi, kroz stoljeća borbe – kroz rat i prosvjetiteljstvo, represiju i revoluciju – počeo je izranjati određeni skup ideala: vjerovanje da kroz savjest i slobodu volje svatko od nas ima pravo živjeti kako želi. Vjerovanje da vlast proizlazi iz pristanka vladanih, te da bi zakoni i institucije trebali biti uspostavljeni kako bi zaštitili to shvaćanje. Te ideje su na koncu nadahnule skupinu kolonijalista preko oceana i oni su ih utkali u osnivačke dokumente koji i danas vode Ameriku, uključujući jednostavnu istinu da su svi muškarci – i žene – stvoreni jednaki.</p>
<p>Ali ti ideali su također testirani – ovdje u Europi i diljem svijeta. Ti ideali su često bili ugroženi starijim, tradicionalnijim shvaćanjem moći. Ova alternativna vizija tvrdi da <strong>su obični muškarci i žene previše maloumni da bi upravljali vlastitim poslovima, da red i napredak mogu doći samo kada pojedinci predaju svoja prava svemoćnom suverenu</strong>. Često se ova alternativna vizija temelji na ideji da su neki, po svojoj rasi, vjeri ili etničkoj pripadnosti, inherentno nadmoćni nad drugima, i da se individualni identitet mora definirati kao ‘mi’ naspram ‘njih’, ili da nacionalna veličina mora proizlaziti ne iz onoga za što se ljudi zalažu, već iz onoga protiv čega se bore.</p>
<p>Na mnogo načina, povijest Europe u 20. stoljeću predstavljala je kontinuirani sukob ova dva skupa ideja, kako unutar nacija, tako i između njih. Napredak industrije i tehnologije nadmašio je našu sposobnost da mirno riješimo naše razlike, i čak među najciviliziranijim društvima, na površini smo vidjeli pad u barbarstvo”, kazao je Obama u govoru koji je u statusu i snimci izvučen iz konteksta.</p>
<p>Da je snimkom manipulirano svjedoči i neobični rez prilikom montaže. “Između prvog i drugog dijela kratke izjave, kamera se prebacila iznad publike prije nego što se ponovno usredotočila na Obamino lice, što ukazuje na to da su različiti dijelovi spojeni zajedno”, pisao je još 2014. godina u svojoj ocjeni točnosti <a href="https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/obama-surrender-world-order/">Snopes</a>. Stoga u obmanjujućem videu je izmijenjen i poredak rečenica kako bi se promijenio kontekst onoga što je Obama zaista rekao.</p>
<h4>Manipulirajuća snimka godinama se širi internetom</h4>
<p>Kao što se često događa, objavljena video manipulacija Obamina govora je među hrvatske korisnike društvenih mreža potekla s engleskog govornog područja. Objavljen je identičan video, dok je u donji dio snimke stavljen prijevod na hrvatski jezik.</p>
<p>Ista praksa manipulacija tim video dogodila se ranije i na španjolskom govornom području (<a href="https://www.facebook.com/virtu.pontessanchez/posts/pfbid034M1mPTWhSmSkuivSh1mAUY8nMAS7ogCTmHD8hGb8yKsY35A4Nnt7W7FqKgjde3gl">1</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/nishimha/status/1538357133963448322">2</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/kikerCG/status/1524863851988238354">3</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/Alex93799562/status/1518616775356653568">4</a>), a proširio se i na Njemačku gdje je video na YouTube postavila skupina ljudi koja se inače “bavi teorijama zavjere, uključujući usredotočenost na ‘novi svjetski poredak’ – pojam nove, svjetske, totalitarne vlade”, kao što je pisao <a href="https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2014/jun/23/chain-email/video-barack-obama-speech-circulating-internet-was/">PolitiFact</a>. Dodali su i kako nije sigurno je li skupina ljudi iz Njemačke video smatrala šalom ili ne, no snimka je u međuvremenu maknuta s te platforme.</p>
<p>Autentičnost Obaminog govora provjerilo je više stranih portala za provjeru istinitosti tvrdnji (<a href="https://www.factcheck.org/2014/11/no-new-world-order/">1</a>, <a href="https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/obama-surrender-world-order/">2</a>, <a href="https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2014/jun/23/chain-email/video-barack-obama-speech-circulating-internet-was/">3</a>) iste godine kada je i nastao. Međutim, obmanjujuće snimke kruže internetom i proteklih godina. Jedina je razlika u govornom području na kojem se snimke pojavljuju (<a href="https://www.fastcheck.cl/2022/07/12/video-barack-obama-dijo-que-un-orden-y-un-progreso-solo-pueden-llegar-cuando-los-individuos-renuncian-a-sus-derechos-a-un-soberano-todopoderoso-enganoso/?fbclid=IwAR03xauXOm_qwXZPWYRaBQW_EWnyC71hVZSVWDUPWaEPjZA6hRIVNdRAgSM_aem_AYiPQE_pch30EN-dTEiLvwJEHNtt2stwxX0_VJQDqTwET1ejpFx85hCK8mGe0WSNuwSPTnUdZN6d289CX6Oz4jFb">1</a>, <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN22U2AH/">2</a>, <a href="https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-936168772868">3</a>, <a href="https://checkyourfact.com/2020/06/22/fact-check-video-barack-obama-individuals-surrender-rights-powerful-sovereign/">4</a>).</p>
<p>Stoga je bitno još jednom naglasiti kako je ovdje riječ o manipulativno izrezanom videu. U njega su spojena dva odvojena dijela govora predsjednika Obame u kojima ne poriče demokratske ideale – upravo suprotno. Osuđuje viziju superiornosti jednih naspram drugih te ju smatra nepoželjnom za demokraciju.</p>

Obama nije rekao da se dolazi do napretka samo ako ljudi predaju prava moćnom suverenu - Faktograf.hr

<p>The claim that Bill Gates admitted to using India as a 'testing ground' for his chemical 'experiments' has recently gained traction, sparking outrage and calls for his arrest. This claim is based on a statement made by Gates in an interview, where he discussed the Gates Foundation's work in India. However, the claim is misleading and lacks context.</p>
<p>In the interview, Gates stated, 'And so, our biggest non-U.S. office for the [Gates Foundation] is in, is in India and the most number of pilot rollout things we're doing anywhere in the world are with partners in India. It's kind of a laboratory to try things.' This statement has been sensationalized to promote a conspiracy narrative that Gates is using India and its people as human guinea pigs for his experiments.</p>
<p>Firstly, it's important to understand the context of Gates' statement. He was discussing the Gates Foundation's work in India, which includes piloting and testing various programs and initiatives aimed at improving health, education, and poverty alleviation. The use of the term 'laboratory' is metaphorical, referring to the process of trying out and refining these programs before scaling them up.</p>
<p>Secondly, there's no evidence to support the claim that Gates is conducting chemical experiments on Indian people. The Gates Foundation's work in India is focused on areas such as health, sanitation, agriculture, and financial services for the poor. The foundation works with partners in India, including the government and non-profit organizations, to implement and scale up these programs.</p>
<p>The claim also suggests that Gates has a eugenics agenda, which is unfounded and baseless. Eugenics is a discredited and pseudoscientific theory that aims to improve the genetic quality of a human population. There's no evidence to support the claim that Gates or his foundation is involved in any such activities.</p>
<p>It's worth noting that the Gates Foundation's work in India has not been without controversy. Critics have raised concerns about the foundation's influence on public health policy and its approach to philanthropy. However, these criticisms do not support the claim that Gates is using India as a testing ground for his experiments.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that Bill Gates admitted to using India as a 'testing ground' for his chemical 'experiments' is misleading and lacks context. The statement has been sensationalized to promote a conspiracy narrative that is not supported by evidence. The Gates Foundation's work in India is focused on improving health, education, and poverty alleviation, not conducting experiments on people.</p>
<p>For more information, see:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.gatesfoundation.org/our-work/places/india#:~:text=Our%20efforts%20in%20India%20focus,equality%2C%20and%20digital%20financial%20inclusion">Gates Foundation's work in India</a>&nbsp;</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/human-rights-and-health">World Health Organization on human rights and health</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2947441/">National Center for Biotechnology Information on eugenics</a></li>
</ul>

Fact-Check: Did Bill Gates Admit to Using India as a 'Testing Ground' for His Experiments?

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft and prominent philanthropist, recently made controversial statements about vaccine hesitancy and the use of artificial intelligence (AI) for censorship. This claim review aims to analyze the validity of his statements and their potential impact on public health and free speech.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>Bill Gates stated that urging people to avoid vaccines is 'inciting violence' and proposed using AI to censor 'antivaxxers.' He suggested that speech boundaries should be imposed to prevent the spread of vaccine misinformation.</p>
<h2>Analysis</h2>
<p>Gates' comments were made during a CNBC interview, where he discussed the challenges of vaccine hesitancy. His proposal to use AI for real-time censorship has raised concerns about free speech and the potential for overreach.</p>
<p>The claim that urging people to avoid vaccines is 'inciting violence' is highly contentious. While vaccine hesitancy can have public health implications, equating it with violence is a significant leap. The term 'inciting violence' is typically used in legal contexts to describe speech that directly encourages imminent lawless action, which is not the case with vaccine hesitancy.</p>
<p>Gates' call for AI-driven censorship is also problematic. AI systems are not infallible and can be biased, leading to the suppression of legitimate debate and the erosion of informed consent in medicine. The use of AI for censorship could set a dangerous precedent, potentially leading to broader restrictions on free speech and the uncontested implementation of vaccine passports.</p>
<p>Gates' history with vaccines is not without controversy. His philanthropic organizations have been involved in vaccine programs that have resulted in mass injuries and the spread of vaccine-derived diseases. His proposals for climate change, such as blocking out the sun and releasing genetically modified mosquitoes, have also been met with skepticism.</p>
<h2>Scientific Perspective</h2>
<p>The scientific community generally agrees that vaccines are safe and effective, but there is also recognition of the need for informed consent and open dialogue about potential risks. A study published in <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/action/doSearch?type=quicksearch&amp;text1=vaccine+hesitancy+transparent&amp;field1=AllField">The Lancet</a> &nbsp;emphasizes the importance of addressing vaccine hesitancy through transparent communication and evidence-based information, rather than censorship.</p>
<p>Another study in <a href="https://www.nature.com/search?q=AI+in+healthcare+challenges&amp;order=relevance">Nature Medicine</a> &nbsp;highlights the challenges of AI in healthcare, including the potential for bias and the need for careful oversight to ensure fairness and accuracy.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>Bill Gates' claims about vaccine hesitancy and AI censorship are not supported by scientific consensus or legal definitions of inciting violence. His proposals raise serious concerns about free speech, informed consent, and the potential for misuse of AI. While addressing vaccine hesitancy is important, it should be done through open dialogue and evidence-based information, not censorship.</p>

Claim Review: Bill Gates on Vaccine Hesitancy and AI Censorship

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "Michelle Obama is divorcing Barack Obama because his history of pedophilia is about to be exposed." is False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: