McDonald's insists on using russet burbank potatoes with no blemishes, requiring the use of a toxic pesticide called Monitor.

<p>The claim that McDonald's insists on using russet burbank potatoes with no blemishes, requiring the use of a toxic pesticide called Monitor, has been circulating widely. Let's break down this claim and examine its validity.</p>
<p>Firstly, it is true that McDonald's has specific standards for the potatoes used in their french fries. The russet burbank potato is indeed a preferred variety due to its long shape and suitability for frying. McDonald's does have strict quality control measures to ensure consistency in their products, which includes avoiding potatoes with blemishes.</p>
<p>Net necrosis is a common defect in russet burbank potatoes, often caused by aphids. To control aphids, farmers may use various pesticides, including Monitor (active ingredient: methamidophos). Monitor is an organophosphate insecticide that has been used in agriculture for decades.</p>
<p>The claim that Monitor is so toxic that farmers won't venture into their fields for five days after spraying is where the claim becomes more complex. While it is true that organophosphate pesticides can be toxic and require careful handling, the specific toxicity and safety protocols can vary. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has guidelines for the safe use of pesticides, including re-entry intervals for workers. These intervals are designed to protect workers from exposure to harmful levels of pesticides.</p>
<p>However, the claim that farmers won't venture into their fields for five days specifically due to Monitor's toxicity lacks direct evidence. The re-entry intervals for pesticides are based on scientific studies and regulatory guidelines, and they can vary depending on the specific pesticide and application method.</p>
<p>In conclusion, while it is true that McDonald's has strict quality standards for their potatoes and that pesticides like Monitor are used to control aphids, the claim about the extreme toxicity of Monitor and the specific re-entry interval of five days is not fully supported by available evidence. More research and specific data are needed to fully validate this part of the claim.</p>
<p><strong>References:</strong></p>
<p>1. <a href="https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-worker-safety/pesticide-worker-protection-standard-how-comply-manual">EPA Pesticide Worker Protection Standard</a></p>
<p>2. <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK222858/">Organophosphate Pesticides: A Review of Human Exposures</a>&nbsp;</p>
<p>3. <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969703002373">Toxicity of Organophosphate Pesticides</a>&nbsp;</p>

Claim Review: McDonald's Potatoes and Pesticide Use

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The article titled 'When did the Globalists’ plan to enslave the world using chronic illness begin?' by Rhoda Wilson on The Expose presents a theory that global monopoly capitalism is attempting to enslave the developed world through chronic illness. This claim review will examine the validity of this assertion.</p>
<h2>Claim Analysis</h2>
<p>The article suggests that the origins of this plan can be traced back to various historical events, including the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, the CIA's influence post-JFK assassination, the import of Nazi and Japanese bioweapons scientists after World War II, and even the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913. The author also links this plan to the Seven Deadly Sins, arguing that the COVID-19 crisis is an extreme example of these sins.</p>
<h2>Evaluation of Evidence</h2>
<p>The article lacks credible scientific evidence to support its claims. It relies heavily on speculative theories and historical events that are not directly linked to the current health crisis. For instance, the claim that the COVID-19 pandemic is a result of a deliberate plan to enslave the world through chronic illness is not supported by any peer-reviewed studies or reliable scientific sources.</p>
<p>The author's assertion that the Seven Deadly Sins are manifested in the COVID-19 crisis is also highly subjective and lacks empirical evidence. While it is true that the pandemic has led to various forms of suffering, attributing this to a deliberate plan by globalists is unfounded.</p>
<h2>Scientific Perspective</h2>
<p>The COVID-19 pandemic is a complex global health issue that has been extensively studied by scientists worldwide. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the pandemic is caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is believed to have originated from animals and spread to humans. The WHO and other reputable scientific organizations have not found any evidence to support the claim that the pandemic is part of a deliberate plan to enslave the world through chronic illness.</p>
<p>A study published in the journal <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9">Nature Medicine</a> suggests that the SARS-CoV-2 virus likely originated from a natural source, such as bats or pangolins, and was not engineered in a laboratory. This finding contradicts the theory that the virus was deliberately created to cause chronic illness and enslave the world.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that globalists are using chronic illness to enslave the world is largely unfounded and lacks credible evidence. The article mixes historical events with speculative theories, making it unreliable. The claim rating is 1 out of 5.</p>
<p>It is important to rely on credible scientific sources and peer-reviewed studies when evaluating claims about global health issues. Misinformation can lead to confusion and mistrust, which can hinder efforts to address real health challenges.</p>

Claim Review: Globalists' Plan to Enslave the World Using Chronic Illness

<p>The article titled 'The truth about DIRTY VACCINES and the news about them that is scrubbed and censored from internet searches' makes several claims about the dangers of vaccines, particularly mRNA vaccines. The author asserts that vaccines are 'dirty' and contain toxic ingredients that cause severe health issues. Additionally, the article suggests that the vaccine industry has a history of contamination and cover-ups.</p>
<p>To evaluate these claims, it is essential to examine the scientific evidence and the context provided by reliable sources.</p>
<h2>Claim: Vaccines are Dangerous and Contain Toxic Ingredients</h2>
<p>The article lists several ingredients found in vaccines, such as monosodium glutamate, mercury (thimerosal), human serum albumin, cells from human abortions (MRC-5), various forms of aluminum, formaldehyde, squalene, polysorbate 80, deathly pig virus strains called circovirus, and infected kidney cells from dogs, eagles, and monkeys. While it is true that some vaccines contain these substances, the amounts are typically very small and have been deemed safe by regulatory authorities.</p>
<p>For example, thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative, has been largely phased out of vaccines in the United States due to concerns about its potential toxicity. However, the small amounts that were previously used in vaccines were not found to cause harm. Similarly, aluminum is used as an adjuvant in some vaccines to enhance the immune response, but the amounts are carefully controlled and have been shown to be safe in numerous studies.</p>
<p>A study published in the journal <a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6373706/">Vaccine</a> &nbsp;found that the use of aluminum adjuvants in vaccines is safe and effective. Another study published in the journal <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK223724/">Pediatrics</a> &nbsp;concluded that thimerosal-containing vaccines do not cause autism or other neurodevelopmental disorders.</p>
<h2>Claim: The Vaccine Industry Has a History of Contamination and Cover-ups</h2>
<p>The article also claims that the vaccine industry has a history of contamination and cover-ups. While it is true that there have been instances of contamination in the past, these are rare and have been addressed by regulatory authorities. For example, in 2021, millions of batches of AstraZeneca and Johnson &amp; Johnson COVID-19 vaccines had to be destroyed due to microbial contamination. However, this was an isolated incident and does not reflect a widespread problem with vaccine safety.</p>
<p>The claim that the vaccine industry has engaged in cover-ups is also unfounded. Vaccine safety is closely monitored by regulatory authorities such as the FDA and the CDC, and any adverse events are reported and investigated. The article cites a House report on HHS Covid propaganda as evidence of a cover-up, but this report actually highlights the need for greater transparency and accountability in public health messaging.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that vaccines are dangerous and contain toxic ingredients is largely unfounded. While some vaccines may contain trace amounts of certain substances, they are generally safe and effective. The claim that the vaccine industry has a history of contamination and cover-ups is also exaggerated. While there have been isolated incidents of contamination, these are rare and have been addressed by regulatory authorities. The vaccine industry is closely monitored for safety, and any adverse events are reported and investigated.</p>
<p>Overall, the evidence does not support the claims made in the article. Vaccines are an essential tool for preventing infectious diseases and have been shown to be safe and effective in numerous studies.</p>

Claim Review: Are Vaccines Dangerous and Contaminated?

<p>The claim that the modern food system is heavily influenced by the pursuit of profit, leading to issues such as land loss, food insecurity, illness, and environmental degradation, is a complex one that requires a thorough examination.</p>
<p>The modern food system is indeed shaped by capitalist imperatives, as highlighted in the book 'Sickening Profits: The Global Food System’s Poisoned Food and Toxic Wealth' by Colin Todhunter. Large investment firms and agribusinesses do profit from this system, and their influence on policy-making through lobbying is well-documented.</p>
<p>For instance, a study published in the <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5793246/">Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry</a> discusses the impact of agrochemicals on human health and the environment. The study notes that the extensive use of pesticides and herbicides can lead to various health issues, including cancer, neurological disorders, and reproductive problems.</p>
<p>Moreover, the <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919218300013">Journal of Environmental Management</a> has published research indicating that the current food system contributes to environmental degradation through practices such as monocropping and the use of synthetic fertilizers. These practices can lead to soil depletion, water pollution, and loss of biodiversity.</p>
<p>The claim also mentions the impact on food security and land loss. A report by the <a href="https://www.fao.org/3/i9553en/I9553EN.pdf">Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)</a> of the United Nations highlights that smallholder farmers, who are crucial for global food security, often face challenges such as land grabbing and lack of access to resources. This can indeed lead to food insecurity and displacement.</p>
<p>However, it is important to note that the food system is not monolithic, and there are efforts to promote sustainable and equitable practices. For example, the <a href="https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/hunger/">United Nations Sustainable Development Goals</a> include targets to end hunger, achieve food security, and promote sustainable agriculture.</p>
<p>In conclusion, while the claim that the modern food system is driven by profit and leads to various negative consequences is largely accurate, it is essential to recognize the nuances and the ongoing efforts to address these issues. The claim is supported by scientific studies and reports from reputable organizations, but it also requires a balanced perspective that acknowledges the complexity of the global food system.</p>

Claim Review: The Global Food System’s Poisoned Food and Toxic Wealth

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "McDonald's insists on using russet burbank potatoes with no blemishes, requiring the use of a toxic pesticide called Monitor." is Half True

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: