Lipid nanoparticles from mRNA COVID-19 vaccines circulate through the body and attack the heart and other vital organs, causing tissue and cellular changes that align with reports of myocarditis and pericarditis.

The Peoples Voice - TV

Reviewing the Claim: Do Lipid Nanoparticles from mRNA Vaccines Attack the Heart?

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>A recent article from The People's Voice claims that lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) from mRNA COVID-19 vaccines circulate through the body and attack the heart and other vital organs. This claim is based on a study published in Nature Biotechnology. Let's examine the evidence and the scientific consensus surrounding this topic.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The article asserts that LNPs from mRNA vaccines do not remain localized at the injection site, but instead travel through the body, causing damage to the heart and other organs. This claim is supported by a study that used a new technology to track nanoparticles in rodents.</p>
<h2>The Study</h2>
<p>The study in question developed an experimental technology called 'Single Cell Precision Nanocarrier Identification' to map and quantify where nanoparticles end up in the body of mice. The researchers found that even at low doses, LNPs reached internal organs, including the heart, and caused tissue and cellular changes.</p>
<h2>Scientific Consensus</h2>
<p>While the study presents interesting findings, it is important to note that it is a single study with several limitations:</p>
<ul>
  <li>The study was conducted on rodents, and its findings may not fully translate to humans.</li>
  <li>The technology used is new and not yet widely validated by the scientific community.</li>
  <li>The study does not provide direct evidence of vaccine-induced myocarditis or pericarditis in humans.</li>
</ul>
<p>Furthermore, a comprehensive review of COVID-19 vaccines and myocarditis published in the journal <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8831984/">Circulation</a> notes that the benefits of vaccination far outweigh the risks. The review acknowledges that myocarditis is a rare side effect, but it is typically mild and resolves quickly.</p>
<h2>VAERS Data</h2>
<p>The article also cites data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) to support its claim. However, VAERS data is notoriously prone to reporting biases and does not establish causality. A report from the <a href="https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/myocarditis.html">Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)</a> explains that the benefits of COVID-19 vaccines continue to outweigh the risks, including the rare side effects of myocarditis and pericarditis.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>Based on the available evidence, the claim that lipid nanoparticles from mRNA COVID-19 vaccines circulate through the body and attack the heart and other organs is not sufficiently supported. While the study cited in the article presents interesting findings, its limitations and the broader scientific consensus do not validate this claim. More research is needed to fully understand the distribution and effects of LNPs in mRNA vaccines.</p>

<p>The claim that the spike protein generated by the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines is a cardiotoxin, causing an epidemic of heart disease, especially among young patients, has been circulating in various articles and discussions. This claim was made at a meeting of cardiologists in Auckland, New Zealand, and has been reported by Dr. Guy Hatchard in his articles.</p>    <p>To evaluate this claim, it is essential to examine the scientific evidence available. The spike protein produced by mRNA vaccines is designed to mimic the spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, triggering an immune response. While there have been reports of myocarditis and pericarditis following vaccination, these cases are rare and typically mild. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and other health authorities have been monitoring these adverse events closely.</p>    <p>A study published in the journal <a href='https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01630-0'>Nature Medicine</a> found that the risk of myocarditis after vaccination is higher in adolescents and young adults, particularly after the second dose of mRNA vaccines. However, the overall incidence remains low, and most cases resolve with appropriate treatment. The study also noted that the benefits of vaccination in preventing severe COVID-19 outcomes outweigh the risks of these rare adverse events.</p>    <p>Furthermore, a systematic review and meta-analysis published in the <a href='https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(21)00648-4/fulltext'>Lancet Infectious Diseases</a> concluded that the risk of myocarditis is higher after COVID-19 infection than after vaccination. This suggests that the spike protein produced by the virus itself may be more harmful than the vaccine-induced spike protein.</p>    <p>In conclusion, while there is evidence of rare cases of myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA vaccination, the claim that the spike protein is a cardiotoxin causing an epidemic of heart disease is not supported by robust scientific evidence. The benefits of vaccination in preventing severe COVID-19 outcomes outweigh the risks of these rare adverse events. Therefore, the claim is rated as 2 out of 5.</p>

Claim Review: Spike Protein from mRNA Vaccines as a Cardiotoxin

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>A recent article published by The Exposé titled "Leading doctors sign HOPE Accord calling for the suspension of all covid mRNA ‘vaccines’" claims that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are driving a rise in heart attacks, strokes, and cancer. The article cites an open letter to the UK’s General Medical Council (GMC) by Dr. Aseem Malhotra and other healthcare professionals, calling for the immediate suspension of these vaccines. This claim review will examine the evidence presented and assess the validity of these claims.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The central claim is that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are contributing to an alarming rise in disability and excess deaths, particularly heart attacks, strokes, and cancer. The article suggests that the evidence is overwhelming and that the continued use of these vaccines is a public health calamity.</p>
<h2>Evaluating the Evidence</h2>
<p>To evaluate this claim, we need to consider the following points:</p>
<h3>1. Scientific Consensus and Regulatory Approval</h3>
<p>The COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, such as those produced by Pfizer and Moderna, have undergone rigorous clinical trials and have been approved by regulatory bodies worldwide, including the FDA and EMA. These approvals are based on extensive data showing the vaccines' safety and efficacy.</p>
<h3>2. Adverse Events Reporting</h3>
<p>The article mentions a re-analysis of Pfizer and Moderna’s original randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in the journal Vaccine. This re-analysis suggested a greater risk of serious harm from the vaccine than being hospitalized with COVID. However, it is important to note that:</p>
<ul>
  <li>The re-analysis was not peer-reviewed and has not been widely accepted by the scientific community.</li>
  <li>The original RCTs were designed to assess short-term effects, and long-term data is still being collected.</li>
  <li>The benefits of vaccination, including prevention of severe disease, hospitalization, and death, have been well-documented in numerous studies.</li>
</ul>
<h3>3. Mechanistic Evidence</h3>
<p>The article cites experts who suggest that the mRNA vaccines may cause cancer through prolonged immunosuppression and DNA contamination. However, there is no robust scientific evidence to support these claims. The mRNA vaccines do not alter DNA, and the spike protein produced by the vaccines is quickly degraded by the body.</p>
<h3>4. Epidemiological Data</h3>
<p>The claim that the vaccines are causing a rise in heart attacks, strokes, and cancer is not supported by epidemiological data. Studies have shown that:</p>
<ul>
  <li>The incidence of heart attacks and strokes has not increased significantly post-vaccination.</li>
  <li>The alleged rise in cancer cases cannot be attributed to the vaccines, as cancer development typically takes years.</li>
  <li>The benefits of vaccination in preventing severe COVID-19 outcomes far outweigh the potential risks.</li>
</ul>
<h3>5. Expert Opinions</h3>
<p>While the article cites several experts who support the claim, it is important to consider the broader scientific consensus. The vast majority of medical and scientific experts agree that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are safe and effective. The World Health Organization (WHO) and other public health bodies continue to recommend these vaccines as a crucial tool in the fight against COVID-19.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>Based on the available evidence, the claim that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are causing a rise in heart attacks, strokes, and cancer is not supported. The benefits of vaccination, including the prevention of severe disease and death, outweigh the potential risks. It is crucial to rely on robust scientific evidence and the consensus of the medical community when evaluating such claims.</p>
<h2>References</h2>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/safety-of-vaccines.html">CDC - Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/coronavirus-disease-(covid-19)-vaccines">WHO - The benefits of COVID-19 vaccination outweigh the risks</a>&nbsp;</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2101544">NEJM - Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00947-8/fulltext">The Lancet - Safety and Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: An Interim Analysis of Four Randomised Controlled Trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK</a></li>
</ul>

Reviewing the Claim that COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Cause Heart Attacks, Strokes, and Cancer

<p>The claim that COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer and have led to a significant increase in cancer cases among young people has been circulating widely. This article aims to review the available evidence and provide a thorough analysis of this claim.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The claim suggests that COVID-19 vaccines are directly responsible for an increase in cancer cases, particularly among young people. It cites various sources, including reports from the American Cancer Society, Pfizer's safety reports, and statements from oncologists and pathologists.</p>
<h2>Analysis of the Claim</h2>
<p>To evaluate this claim, it is essential to examine the evidence presented and compare it with reliable scientific sources.</p>
<h3>Increase in Cancer Cases</h3>
<p>The claim mentions a significant increase in fourteen different types of cancers across 44 countries, particularly among young people, by October 2022. However, it is crucial to note that the increase in cancer cases could be attributed to various factors, including delayed screenings and treatments due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The American Cancer Society reported that cancer mortality in young people had doubled compared to pre-2020 levels, but this does not necessarily imply a direct causal link to COVID-19 vaccines.</p>
<h3>Pfizer's Safety Report</h3>
<p>The claim references Pfizer's 2022 safety report on COVID-19 vaccines, which documented thousands of cancer cases following vaccinations. However, it is important to understand that correlation does not imply causation. The presence of cancer cases in vaccinated individuals does not prove that the vaccines caused the cancers. Further investigation is needed to establish a causal relationship.</p>
<h3>Statements from Oncologists and Pathologists</h3>
<p>The claim includes statements from oncologists and pathologists who have observed aggressive cancer relapses and unprecedented cases of stage four cancers in young adults. While these observations are concerning, they do not provide conclusive evidence that COVID-19 vaccines are the cause. Other factors, such as environmental exposures, lifestyle changes, and genetic predispositions, could also contribute to these observations.</p>
<h3>Mechanism of mRNA Vaccines</h3>
<p>The claim discusses the mechanism of mRNA vaccines and the resulting spike protein production by people's bodies after vaccination. It suggests that the spike protein may have carcinogenic effects. However, scientific studies have shown that the spike protein produced by mRNA vaccines is rapidly degraded and does not persist in the body long enough to cause significant harm. Additionally, the spike protein is not known to have direct carcinogenic properties.</p>
<h3>Immune Suppression and Cancer</h3>
<p>The claim mentions that COVID-19 vaccines may cause immune suppression, which impairs the body's ability to fight cancer. While it is true that some vaccines can temporarily affect the immune system, there is no evidence to suggest that COVID-19 vaccines specifically cause long-term immune suppression that leads to cancer. The immune system is complex and adaptable, and temporary changes do not necessarily result in increased cancer risk.</p>
<h3>Ivermectin as a Potential Treatment</h3>
<p>The claim suggests that ivermectin may be a potential treatment for COVID-19 and cancer. While ivermectin has shown some effectiveness against certain viruses and parasites, its role in treating cancer is not well-established. Further research is needed to determine the efficacy and safety of ivermectin as a cancer treatment.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer and have led to a significant increase in cancer cases among young people is not supported by reliable scientific evidence. While there have been reports of increased cancer cases, these are likely due to other factors such as delayed screenings and treatments during the pandemic. The claim that vaccines are directly responsible for this increase is misleading and lacks credible scientific backing.</p>
<p>It is crucial to rely on peer-reviewed scientific studies and expert opinions when evaluating claims about health and medicine. Misinformation can lead to unnecessary fear and mistrust, which can have serious consequences for public health. Always consult reliable sources and seek advice from healthcare professionals for accurate information.</p>

Claim Review: COVID-19 Vaccines and Cancer

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "Lipid nanoparticles from mRNA COVID-19 vaccines circulate through the body and attack the heart and other vital organs, causing tissue and cellular changes that align with reports of myocarditis and pericarditis." is Mostly False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: