Governments everywhere want to destroy their economies to push up inflation and interest rates, impoverish the middle classes, and kill off the elderly as part of a plan for Net Zero and the Great Reset.

The Expose News - com

<p>The claim that governments are deliberately destroying their economies to push up inflation and interest rates, impoverish the middle classes, and kill off the elderly as part of a plan for Net Zero and the Great Reset has been circulating in various forms. This claim is made in an article by Dr. Vernon Coleman on The Exposé, published on August 30, 2024.</p>
<p>To evaluate this claim, it is essential to examine the underlying arguments and evidence presented. The article suggests that governments are intentionally causing economic turmoil to achieve specific goals related to Net Zero and the Great Reset. However, the evidence provided is largely speculative and lacks concrete data or expert analysis.</p>
<p>Firstly, the claim that governments are deliberately pushing up inflation and interest rates to impoverish the middle classes is not supported by economic data or policy analysis. Inflation and interest rates are influenced by a variety of factors, including monetary policy, global economic conditions, and supply chain disruptions. Governments and central banks typically aim to stabilize the economy and control inflation, not exacerbate it. For example, the Federal Reserve and other central banks have implemented policies to combat inflation, as seen in their <a href="https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomcminutes20230322.htm">meeting minutes</a>.</p>
<p>Secondly, the assertion that governments are intentionally impoverishing the middle classes and killing off the elderly lacks credible evidence. Governments worldwide have implemented various social welfare programs and healthcare initiatives aimed at supporting the middle classes and the elderly. For instance, the United States has programs like Social Security and Medicare, which provide financial and healthcare support to the elderly. Similarly, many European countries have robust social safety nets. These programs contradict the claim that governments are deliberately harming these groups.</p>
<p>The article also references Net Zero and the Great Reset as part of a broader conspiracy. While Net Zero is a legitimate goal aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions to combat climate change, the claim that it is part of a sinister plan to impoverish people is unfounded. The Great Reset, proposed by the World Economic Forum, is a concept aimed at rebuilding the economy in a more sustainable and equitable manner post-COVID-19. However, it is not a secretive plan to destroy economies or harm specific groups. For more information on the Great Reset, you can refer to the <a href="https://www.weforum.org/great-reset">World Economic Forum's website</a>.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that governments are deliberately destroying their economies to push up inflation and interest rates, impoverish the middle classes, and kill off the elderly as part of a plan for Net Zero and the Great Reset is largely unfounded. The evidence provided is speculative and lacks credible data or expert analysis. It is essential to rely on verified sources and expert opinions when evaluating such claims.</p>

Claim Review: Governments Deliberately Destroying Economies for Net Zero and Great Reset

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>In a recent article published on The Exposé, Dr. Vernon Coleman makes several claims about the impact of Net Zero policies and the definition of 'far right'. This claim review will examine these claims and provide a thorough analysis based on reliable scientific sources.</p>
<h2>Claim 1: Net Zero Policies Will Lead to No Holidays, No Television, No Football, No Heating, No Hot Food, and Nothing Much of Anything Else</h2>
<p>The claim that Net Zero policies will lead to a complete shutdown of modern conveniences is exaggerated and misleading. Net Zero policies aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to net zero by 2050, not to eliminate all modern conveniences. According to the <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-climate-action-towards-net-zero/uk-climate-action-towards-net-zero">UK Government's Net Zero Strategy</a>, the goal is to transition to cleaner energy sources and improve energy efficiency, not to eliminate all energy use.</p>
<p>A study published in <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-020-0796-5">Nature Climate Change</a> found that achieving Net Zero is possible without sacrificing modern conveniences, but it will require significant changes in energy production and consumption. The study also found that the benefits of achieving Net Zero, such as improved air quality and reduced health costs, outweigh the costs of transitioning to cleaner energy sources.</p>
<h2>Claim 2: The 'Far Right' Includes Anyone Who Isn't a Supporter of the Current Left-Wing Government or the Democrats in the US</h2>
<p>The claim that the 'far right' includes anyone who isn't a supporter of the current left-wing government or the Democrats in the US is misleading and oversimplified. The term 'far right' is typically used to describe political ideologies that are further to the right on the political spectrum than mainstream conservatism. According to the <a href="https://www.britannica.com/topic/far-right">Encyclopedia Britannica</a>, far-right ideologies are characterized by extreme nationalism, authoritarianism, and opposition to immigration and multiculturalism.</p>
<p>A study published in the <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1354068818780078">European Journal of Political Research</a> found that support for far-right parties is driven by a combination of economic insecurity, cultural backlash, and political disillusionment. The study also found that far-right parties tend to attract voters who are dissatisfied with mainstream politics and feel marginalized by globalization and multiculturalism.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claims made in the article about the impact of Net Zero policies and the definition of 'far right' are exaggerated and misleading. While Net Zero policies will require significant changes in energy production and consumption, they will not lead to a complete shutdown of modern conveniences. Additionally, the definition of 'far right' is more complex and nuanced than simply including anyone who isn't a supporter of the current left-wing government or the Democrats in the US.</p>
<p>Based on the evidence presented, the claim rating for this article is 2 out of 5.</p>

Claim Review: The Impact of Net Zero Policies and the Definition of 'Far Right'

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The claim that the Rockefeller Foundation is responsible for the destruction of global agriculture and is now pushing for a radical change in the food system under the guise of sustainability has been circulating in various media outlets. This claim review will examine the evidence and provide a thorough analysis of the situation.</p>
<h2>The Role of the Rockefeller Foundation in Agriculture</h2>
<p>The Rockefeller Foundation has indeed played a significant role in shaping modern agriculture. In the 1950s, the foundation funded the development of vertical integration, leading to the creation of agribusiness. This model prioritized corporate interests over those of farmers, contributing to the decline of family farms.</p>
<p>The foundation also supported the Green Revolution in Mexico and India in the 1960s, which introduced high-yielding varieties of seeds, synthetic fertilizers, and pesticides. While this increased agricultural productivity, it also led to environmental degradation and the displacement of traditional farming practices.</p>
<h2>The Push for Sustainability</h2>
<p>The Rockefeller Foundation's recent report, 'True Cost of Food: Measuring What Matters to Transform the US Food System', advocates for a radical change in the food system to make it more sustainable. The report argues that the current system has hidden costs, such as environmental degradation and health impacts, that need to be addressed.</p>
<p>However, the report has been criticized for its vague language and the lack of farmer representation in its creation. Some have interpreted this as an attempt to blame farmers for the problems in the food system, rather than the corporate interests that have driven its development.</p>
<h2>The Role of Other Actors</h2>
<p>It is important to note that the Rockefeller Foundation is not the only actor involved in the push for sustainability in agriculture. The World Economic Forum, the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation, and the United Nations have all been involved in initiatives aimed at transforming the food system.</p>
<p>For example, the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA), a project funded by the Rockefeller and Gates Foundations, has been criticized for promoting GMO seeds and pesticides at the expense of traditional farming practices. However, the failure of AGRA cannot be attributed solely to the Rockefeller Foundation.</p>
<h2>The Complexity of the Food System</h2>
<p>The food system is complex and influenced by a multitude of factors, including economic policies, trade agreements, and consumer demand. Blaming a single actor, such as the Rockefeller Foundation, for its problems is an oversimplification.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the push for sustainability is not inherently malicious. While there are valid concerns about the implementation of certain policies, the goal of creating a more sustainable and equitable food system is a worthy one.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that the Rockefeller Foundation is responsible for the destruction of global agriculture and is now pushing for a radical change in the food system under the guise of sustainability is exaggerated and misleading. While the foundation has played a significant role in shaping modern agriculture, the blame for its negative impacts is shared among multiple actors. The push for sustainability, while potentially problematic in its implementation, is not inherently malicious.</p>
<h2>References</h2>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5795250/">The Green Revolution and its impact on agriculture, food production and security</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030691921830154X">The role of the Rockefeller Foundation in the Green Revolution</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/01/the-great-reset-food-systems-summit/">The Great Reset and the Food Systems Summit</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/jul/30/bill-gates-agra-africa-green-revolution">Bill Gates and the push for a new Green Revolution in Africa</a></li>
</ul>

Claim Review: The Rockefeller Foundation and the Destruction of Global Agriculture

<p>A recent article published on NaturalNews claims that autism diagnosis rates have tripled in the last decade and that prenatal exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) is linked to autism. This claim is based on a study published in the journal JAMA Network Open and an Australian study published in Nature Communications.</p>
<p>The JAMA Network Open study analyzed electronic health records and insurance claims data from over 12.2 million patients enrolled in major U.S. healthcare systems from 2011 to 2022. The study found that autism diagnoses among children ages five to eight rose significantly from 2.3 per 1,000 in 2011 to 6.3 in 2022. The largest increase in diagnoses was reported among young adults, women, and girls. New autism diagnoses in girls rose by 305 percent, while diagnoses for boys only rose by 185 percent. In adult women, there was a 315 percent increase, compared to a 215 percent rise in men. The increase was notable in adults ages 26 to 34, with a 450 percent increase in diagnoses.</p>
<p>The Australian study found that high levels of exposure to BPA during pregnancy were linked to a substantial increase in autism symptoms among boys. The study examined nearly 1,800 children and focused on two cohorts of mothers and children, one from Geelong, Australia, and the other from New York. In the Australian cohort, researchers identified that boys born to mothers with higher BPA levels in their urine were over three times more likely to show autism symptoms by age two and six times more likely to be diagnosed by age 11 compared to those with lower BPA exposure.</p>
<p>While the studies suggest a correlation between BPA exposure and autism, it is important to note that autism is a multifactorial condition. A 2021 review found that individuals born prematurely had a 3.3 times higher likelihood of having autism compared to those born at full term. Premature babies face increased risks of birth complications and inflammation, factors that have been linked to autism.</p>
<p>The claim that autism diagnosis rates have tripled in the last decade is supported by the JAMA Network Open study. However, the claim that prenatal exposure to BPA is linked to autism is not conclusive. While the Australian study suggests a correlation, further research is needed to establish a causal relationship. The increase in autism diagnosis rates is likely due to a combination of factors, including improved screening processes, greater awareness, broadened diagnostic criteria, and environmental and biological factors.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that autism diagnosis rates have tripled in the last decade is true, but the claim that prenatal exposure to BPA is linked to autism is not fully supported by the available evidence. Further research is needed to determine the exact causes of the increase in autism diagnosis rates.</p>

Claim Review: Autism Diagnosis Rates and BPA Exposure

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "Governments everywhere want to destroy their economies to push up inflation and interest rates, impoverish the middle classes, and kill off the elderly as part of a plan for Net Zero and the Great Reset." is False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: