Gardasil, the HPV vaccine, is extremely dangerous and has caused unprecedented injuries, including autoimmunity, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), infertility, and death.

Infowars - com

<h1>Examining the Claims About Gardasil: A Comprehensive Review</h1>
<p>The article by Dr. Joseph Mercola titled 'How Merck Pushed Gardasil Vaccine to Pay for Vioxx Lawsuits — and Why the HPV Shot is So Dangerous' makes several claims about the HPV vaccine Gardasil. This review will examine these claims and provide a thorough analysis based on scientific evidence.</p>
<h2>Claims Made in the Article</h2>
<p>The article claims that Gardasil is extremely dangerous and has caused unprecedented injuries, including autoimmunity, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), infertility, and death. It also suggests that Merck pushed Gardasil to market to recover losses from Vioxx lawsuits and that the FDA and CDC ignored alarming data about the vaccine's safety.</p>
<h2>Examining the Evidence</h2>
<h3>Safety of Gardasil</h3>
<p>The safety of Gardasil has been extensively studied. A systematic review and meta-analysis published in the journal 'Vaccine' found that Gardasil is generally safe and well-tolerated. The most common adverse events were local reactions at the injection site, such as pain and swelling. Serious adverse events were rare and not significantly different from those observed in the placebo groups.</p>
<p>Reference: <a href="https://karger.com/acy/article/63/2/159/10137/HPV-Vaccine-Updates-and-Highlights">Safety of human papillomavirus vaccines: an updated review</a> &nbsp;by Luisa Lina Villa, et al.</p>
<h3>Efficacy of Gardasil</h3>
<p>Gardasil has been shown to be highly effective in preventing HPV-related infections and cancers. A study published in the 'New England Journal of Medicine' found that Gardasil was 98% effective in preventing HPV-related cervical, vulvar, and vaginal cancers.</p>
<p>Reference: <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa061741">Quadrivalent Vaccine against Human Papillomavirus to Prevent High-Grade Cervical Lesions</a> &nbsp;by Laura A. Koutsky, et al.</p>
<h3>Autoimmunity and POTS</h3>
<p>The article claims that Gardasil causes autoimmunity and POTS. However, a review of the literature shows that the evidence for these claims is limited and inconclusive. A study published in the journal 'Vaccine' found no association between Gardasil and autoimmune disorders or POTS.</p>
<p>Reference: <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X17308793">Safety of human papillomavirus vaccines: an updated review</a> by Luisa Lina Villa, et al.</p>
<h3>Infertility</h3>
<p>The article suggests that Gardasil may cause infertility. However, a study published in the 'American Journal of Epidemiology' found no association between Gardasil and infertility. The study followed over 199,000 women and found no difference in fertility rates between those who received Gardasil and those who did not.</p>
<p>Reference: <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327147760_Primary_Ovarian_Insufficiency_and_Adolescent_Vaccination">Human Papillomavirus Vaccination and Risk of Infertility</a> &nbsp;by Allison L. Naleway, et al.</p>
<h3>Deaths</h3>
<p>The article claims that Gardasil has caused deaths. However, a review of the literature shows that the number of deaths reported after Gardasil vaccination is very low and not significantly different from the background death rate in the general population. A study published in the journal 'Vaccine' found no evidence of an increased risk of death associated with Gardasil.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claims made in the article about Gardasil are not supported by the scientific evidence. While Gardasil has been associated with some adverse effects, the overall benefits of the vaccine in preventing HPV-related cancers outweigh the risks. The FDA and CDC have thoroughly reviewed the safety and efficacy of Gardasil and have concluded that it is a safe and effective vaccine.</p>
<p>It is important to rely on peer-reviewed scientific studies and evidence-based medicine when evaluating the safety and efficacy of vaccines. Misinformation and unfounded claims can lead to vaccine hesitancy and put public health at risk.</p>

Examining the Claims About Gardasil: A Comprehensive Review

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>A recent claim circulating online suggests that the alleged tragedies associated with the HPV vaccine were a 'test run' for the COVID-19 vaccines, implying that both are part of a coercive and harmful agenda. This claim review aims to examine the evidence and provide a thorough analysis of this assertion.</p>
<h2>Background on HPV and COVID-19 Vaccines</h2>
<p>The HPV (Human Papillomavirus) vaccine is designed to prevent infections that can lead to various types of cancer, including cervical cancer. It has been widely administered since its introduction in 2006. The COVID-19 vaccines, developed in response to the global pandemic, aim to protect individuals from severe illness and death caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.</p>
<h2>Safety and Efficacy of HPV Vaccines</h2>
<p>The safety and efficacy of HPV vaccines have been extensively studied. A systematic review published in the <a href="https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD009069.pub3/full">Cochrane Library</a> concluded that HPV vaccines are effective in preventing HPV infections and related diseases. The review also found no evidence of serious adverse effects linked to the vaccines.</p>
<h2>Safety and Efficacy of COVID-19 Vaccines</h2>
<p>Similarly, COVID-19 vaccines have undergone rigorous clinical trials and post-market surveillance. Studies published in reputable journals such as <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577">The New England Journal of Medicine</a> and <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)32661-1/fulltext">The Lancet</a> have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of these vaccines. Real-world data continues to support their effectiveness in reducing hospitalizations and deaths.</p>
<h2>Addressing the Claim</h2>
<p>The claim that the HPV vaccine tragedy was a test run for COVID-19 vaccines is not supported by scientific evidence. Both vaccines have been developed and administered based on robust scientific research and regulatory oversight. The suggestion of a coercive agenda lacks credible evidence and is often rooted in conspiracy theories rather than factual data.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that the HPV vaccine tragedy was a test run for COVID-19 vaccines is misleading and unfounded. Both vaccines have been extensively studied and are considered safe and effective by the scientific community. It is crucial to rely on evidence-based information when making decisions about vaccinations.</p>

Review of the Claim: HPV Vaccine Tragedy as a Test Run for COVID-19 Vaccines

<p>The claim that Covid mRNA vaccines caused a 112,000% surge in brain clots, as reported by Slay News, is based on a study published in the International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science (IJIRMS). The study alleges that Covid mRNA injections carry a risk of brain clots that is 1,119.6 times higher than the flu shot.</p>
<p>However, several issues need to be addressed to evaluate the credibility of this claim:</p>
<h3>Methodological Concerns</h3>
<p>The study analyzed reports of cerebral thromboembolism from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). While VAERS is a valuable tool for monitoring vaccine safety, it is important to note that VAERS data are subject to reporting biases and do not establish causality. The CDC itself acknowledges that VAERS reports are not verified and may include incomplete or inaccurate information.</p>
<h3>Scientific Consensus</h3>
<p>The scientific community has not widely accepted or verified the findings of the study cited in the Slay News article. Peer-reviewed studies published in reputable journals, such as the New England Journal of Medicine and The Lancet, have not reported such a dramatic increase in brain clots associated with Covid mRNA vaccines.</p>
<h3>Expert Opinions</h3>
<p>Leading medical experts and organizations, including the World Health Organization (WHO) and the CDC, have consistently maintained that the benefits of Covid mRNA vaccines far outweigh the risks. While rare adverse events, including blood clots, have been reported, these occurrences are extremely rare and do not support the claim of a 112,000% surge in brain clots.</p>
<h3>Reliable Sources</h3>
<p>For a more balanced perspective, it is essential to refer to reliable scientific sources. A study published in the journal Vaccine, which analyzed data from 99 million people across eight countries, observed significantly higher risks of myocarditis following mRNA-based Covid injections but did not report a dramatic increase in brain clots. The study also warned of potential safety signals that require further investigation.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that Covid mRNA vaccines caused a 112,000% surge in brain clots is misleading and lacks credible scientific support. The study cited has not been widely accepted or verified by the scientific community, and the methodological concerns associated with VAERS data further undermine the claim's credibility.</p>

Claim Review: Covid mRNA Vaccines Caused 112,000% Surge in Brain Clots

<p>A recent study published in the journal Scientific Reports examined global cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) between 1967 and 2023. The study found that out of 19 vaccines examined, 17 were potentially associated with GBS, including COVID-19 and influenza vaccines. The findings also showed that reports of vaccine-related GBS surged following the introduction of the swine flu vaccine in 2009 and the COVID-19 vaccine in 2020.</p>
<p>GBS is a rare condition that attacks the peripheral nervous system, causing sudden numbness and muscle weakness. The study reported 117 deaths among the 15,377 cases of vaccine-associated GBS, with most deaths occurring in people aged 65 and over.</p>
<p>The researchers noted that studies have consistently shown a higher risk of GBS from COVID-19 and flu infections compared to vaccination. They cited a four- to seven-times increase in GBS following influenza infection.</p>
<p>Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., senior research scientist at <a href="https://remedia.social/claim-author/childrens-health-defense-org-b3c2e48c34df">Children’s Health Defense (CHD)</a> , praised the study’s scope but questioned its methodology. Brian Hooker, Ph.D., chief scientific officer for CHD, also questioned the study’s conclusion that infection poses a greater risk of GBS compared to vaccination.</p>
<p>The study used data from VigiBase, the WHO’s global database of adverse event reports. The researchers concluded that Ad5-vectored COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a higher incidence of GBS, especially when compared to the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.</p>
<p>The study’s findings did not indicate sex-specific risks of GBS but found an increased association with advancing age. The average time of GBS onset was 5.5 days, with a high standard deviation, suggesting variability in onset times.</p>
<p>The study’s authors acknowledged the scarcity of data connecting GBS to vaccination and the need for more research to elucidate the underlying mechanisms linking vaccines and GBS.</p>
<p>In conclusion, while the study found associations between several vaccines and GBS, it also noted that the risk of GBS from infections like COVID-19 and influenza is higher than from vaccinations. The claim that most vaccines are associated with GBS and that reports of vaccine-associated GBS have been increasing steadily over time is partially true.&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>References:</strong></p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-74729-2">Global burden of vaccine-associated Guillain-Barré syndrome over 170 countries from 1967 to 202</a>3 - Scientific Reports&nbsp;</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanwpc/article/PIIS2666-6065(21)00211-X/fulltext">Mortality rate for GBS in countries with limited resources</a> &nbsp;- The Lancet</li>
  <li><a href="https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/15838-guillain-barre-syndrome">Guillain-Barré syndrome</a> &nbsp;- Cleveland Clinic</li>
</ul>

Claim Review: Guillain-Barré Syndrome Associated with 17 Vaccines, Including Covid and Flu Shots

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "Gardasil, the HPV vaccine, is extremely dangerous and has caused unprecedented injuries, including autoimmunity, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), infertility, and death." is Mostly False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: