FEMA claims that its employees cannot provide relief to Hurricane Helene victims in western North Carolina because they are being chased out by armed militias.

Natural News

<p>The recent claim that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is unable to provide relief to victims of Hurricane Helene in western North Carolina due to armed militias has sparked controversy and confusion. This claim, reported by Newsweek and The Washington Post, cites an email from the U.S. Forest Service advising federal responders to evacuate Rutherford County immediately due to an alleged militia threat.</p>
<p>According to the reports, the National Guard encountered two trucks full of armed militia members who claimed to be hunting FEMA employees. This incident led to the evacuation of federal personnel, putting relief work on hold. However, the seriousness of the threat remains unclear, and several federal employees were redeployed days later.</p>
<p>The claim highlights a clash between local and federal relief efforts, with local communities expressing distrust towards FEMA and the federal government. This distrust is not new, as Appalachia has historically been skeptical of federal intervention. The region's tendency towards poverty and recent influx of retirees and city dwellers add complexity to the situation.</p>
<p>On the other hand, the federal government has a history of misinformation and politicization of relief efforts. President Biden has denounced what he describes as disinformation causing many in Appalachia to reject federal assistance. This politicization has led to a tense environment where local relief efforts are often at odds with federal initiatives.</p>
<p>To evaluate the claim, it is essential to consider the context and sources. The Washington Post's Brianna Sacks reported that a firefighting crew was advised to avoid certain areas due to armed militias. However, the authenticity and extent of the threat remain uncertain. Eyewitness accounts and video evidence on social media suggest that the federal government's narrative may not align with the reality on the ground.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that FEMA is unable to provide relief due to armed militias is largely unsubstantiated. While there may be isolated incidents of tension between locals and federal workers, the overall narrative appears to be a mix of misinformation and political tension. The lack of concrete evidence and the politicization of relief efforts make it difficult to verify the claim fully.</p>

Claim Review: FEMA's Alleged Withdrawal Due to Armed Militias in Western North Carolina

<p>The claim that deaths in Western Australia increased sevenfold after the COVID-19 vaccine rollout has been circulating, particularly in the context of a Port Hedland Town Council meeting. According to Councilor Adrian McRae, the town has gone from one funeral a week to more than one funeral a day since the COVID-19 injections were rolled out. This claim is based on anecdotal evidence and lacks robust scientific data to support it.</p>
<p>McRae also mentioned the construction of a new cold body storage facility in Port Hedland, attributing the need for this facility to the increase in deaths. However, the correlation between the vaccine rollout and the increase in deaths is not established through any peer-reviewed studies or official health data.</p>
<p>The claim further suggests that the COVID-19 injections are contaminated with synthetic DNA, specifically the cancer-causing simian virus 40 (SV40). This assertion is based on a report by Canadian molecular virologist and epidemiologist Dr. David Speicher, who allegedly identified SV40 DNA sequences in the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 injections. While SV40 contamination in vaccines has been a historical concern, particularly with polio vaccines in the 1950s and 1960s, there is no current evidence to support the presence of SV40 in COVID-19 vaccines.</p>
<p>The Port Hedland Council passed a motion to suspend the use of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna, citing the findings of Dr. Speicher. However, the scientific community has not widely accepted these findings, and they have not been corroborated by other independent studies.</p>
<p>Western Australia Premier Roger Cook responded to the council's motion by stating that it was based on an unverified claim. This response underscores the lack of credible evidence supporting the claim of increased deaths due to the vaccine rollout.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that deaths in Western Australia increased sevenfold after the COVID-19 vaccine rollout is not supported by reliable scientific evidence. The assertion of SV40 contamination in COVID-19 vaccines also lacks credible backing. It is crucial to rely on peer-reviewed studies and official health data when evaluating such claims.</p>

Claim Review: Deaths in Western Australia Increased Sevenfold After COVID-19 Vaccine Rollout

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>In a recent episode of the Triggernometry podcast, comedian Rob Schneider made several claims about the COVID-19 pandemic, referring to it as a 'scamdemic'. This article will review these claims and provide a fact-based analysis.</p>
<h2>Claim: COVID-19 Death Rate Similar to Flu</h2>
<p>Schneider asserted that the COVID-19 death rate was similar to that of a typical flu virus. However, this claim is not supported by scientific data. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the mortality rate for COVID-19 is significantly higher than that of the seasonal flu. A study published in the <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(20)30243-7/fulltext">Lancet Infectious Diseases</a> by Hauser et al. (2020) found that the case fatality rate for COVID-19 was much higher than that of the flu.</p>
<h2>Claim: Masks Don't Work</h2>
<p>Schneider also claimed that masks do not work in preventing the spread of COVID-19. This claim is contradicted by numerous scientific studies. A meta-analysis published in the <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31142-9/fulltext">Lancet</a> by Chu et al. (2020) found that face masks significantly reduce the risk of infection. The CDC also recommends the use of masks as an effective measure to slow the spread of the virus.</p>
<h2>Claim: Six-Foot Social Distancing Based on Fake Science</h2>
<p>Schneider argued that the six-foot social distancing policy was based on fake science. However, this policy is grounded in scientific research. A study published in the <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349049698_Social_distancing_decreases_an_individual's_likelihood_of_contracting_COVID-19">Nature</a> &nbsp;by Jones et al. (2020) supports the effectiveness of social distancing in reducing the transmission of COVID-19.</p>
<h2>Claim: Lockdowns More Detrimental to Children</h2>
<p>Schneider stated that locking down schools was more detrimental to children than the virus itself. While it is true that school closures have had significant impacts on children's mental health and education, the decision to close schools was based on the need to control the spread of the virus. A study published in the <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanchi/article/PIIS2352-46422030095-X/fulltext">Lancet Child &amp; Adolescent Health</a> &nbsp;by Viner et al. (2020) discusses the complex trade-offs involved in school closures.</p>
<h2>Claim: Vaccines Not Safe and Effective</h2>
<p>Schneider questioned the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines. This claim is not supported by the overwhelming body of scientific evidence. Clinical trials and real-world data have shown that COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective. A study published in the <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577">New England Journal of Medicine</a> by Polack et al. (2020) demonstrates the efficacy of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>Rob Schneider's claims about COVID-19 being a 'scamdemic' are largely unfounded. The evidence shows that COVID-19 is a serious health threat, and the measures taken were based on scientific evidence. It is crucial to rely on credible sources and scientific data when evaluating claims about public health issues.</p>

Claim Review: Rob Schneider's Assertions About COVID-19 Being a 'Scamdemic'

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "FEMA claims that its employees cannot provide relief to Hurricane Helene victims in western North Carolina because they are being chased out by armed militias." is Mostly False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: