Fauci, Gates & Moderna are responsible for the COVID Pandemic – U.S. D.O.D issued ‘COVID-19 Research’ contract 3 Months before COVID was known to exist – & Fauci & Moderna had a Vaccine ready in Dec. 2019

The Expose News - com

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The claim that Dr. Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, and Moderna are responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic has been circulating widely. This claim is based on the discovery of a contract awarded by the U.S. Department of Defense (D.O.D) for COVID-19 research in November 2019, three months before the virus was officially recognized. Additionally, it is alleged that Fauci and Moderna had a vaccine ready in December 2019. This article aims to review these claims and provide a factual analysis.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The claim suggests that the U.S. government, specifically the D.O.D, had prior knowledge of the COVID-19 virus and may have been involved in its creation. It also implies that Dr. Fauci and Moderna had a vaccine ready before the virus was officially named, indicating potential foreknowledge or involvement.</p>
<h2>Analysis of the Claim</h2>
<h3>Contract for COVID-19 Research</h3>
<p>The contract mentioned in the claim was part of a broader project for a 'Biological threat reduction program in Ukraine.' The specific transaction for 'COVID-19 Research' was awarded to Labyrinth Global Health INC in November 2019. However, it is important to note that the term 'COVID-19' was not officially used until February 2020. The contract likely pertained to general coronavirus research, which is a broad category of viruses that includes SARS and MERS.</p>
<p>Research into coronaviruses has been ongoing for decades due to their potential to cause outbreaks. The timing of the contract does not necessarily imply foreknowledge of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>
<h3>Vaccine Development</h3>
<p>The claim that Moderna and Dr. Fauci had a vaccine ready in December 2019 is based on a confidentiality agreement for an mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidate. However, vaccine development is a lengthy process that typically takes years. The agreement likely pertained to ongoing research into coronavirus vaccines, not specifically COVID-19.</p>
<p>Moderna had been working on mRNA vaccine technology for several years before the COVID-19 pandemic. The rapid development of the COVID-19 vaccine was possible due to this pre-existing research and the urgent need created by the pandemic.</p>
<h2>Scientific Evidence</h2>
<p>The origin of the COVID-19 virus is still a subject of ongoing research. While some theories suggest a natural origin, others propose a lab leak. However, there is no credible evidence to support the claim that the virus was deliberately created or that the U.S. government, Dr. Fauci, Bill Gates, or Moderna were involved in its creation.</p>
<p>A study published in <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9">Nature Medicine</a> concluded that the COVID-19 virus is likely of natural origin. The study analyzed the genetic sequence of the virus and found no evidence of manipulation.</p>
<p>Another study published in <a href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abf8890">Science</a> reviewed the evidence for a lab leak and concluded that while it cannot be ruled out, there is currently no conclusive evidence to support it.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that Fauci, Gates, and Moderna are responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic is largely unfounded. The contract for COVID-19 research and the vaccine development agreement are part of ongoing research into coronaviruses, not evidence of foreknowledge or involvement in the pandemic. The scientific evidence currently available does not support the claim that the virus was deliberately created or that the mentioned parties were involved in its creation.</p>

Claim Review: Fauci, Gates & Moderna Responsible for COVID Pandemic

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>A recent article from The People's Voice claims that Big Pharma is against Vitamin D because it 'threatens the disease model' and suggests that increased vitamin D levels could have kept COVID-19 in check. This claim was made during an interview with Dr. Pierre Kory on Tucker Carlson's show. This article aims to review this claim and provide a thorough analysis based on scientific evidence.</p>
<h2>The Role of Vitamin D in Immune Function</h2>
<p>Vitamin D is known to play a crucial role in immune function. Studies have shown that vitamin D deficiency is associated with an increased risk of respiratory infections. A meta-analysis published in the British Medical Journal found that vitamin D supplementation reduced the risk of acute respiratory infections (<a href="https://www.bmj.com/content/356/bmj.i6583">BMJ, 2017</a>).</p>
<h2>Vitamin D and COVID-19</h2>
<p>Several studies have explored the relationship between vitamin D levels and COVID-19 outcomes. A study published in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism found that vitamin D deficiency was associated with a higher risk of severe COVID-19 (<a href="https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/108/10/e1106/7116659">JCEM, 2020</a> ). However, the evidence is not conclusive, and more research is needed to establish a causal relationship.</p>
<h2>The Economic Incentives of Big Pharma</h2>
<p>The claim that Big Pharma is against Vitamin D because it threatens their business model is speculative and lacks concrete evidence. Pharmaceutical companies have a financial interest in developing and marketing drugs, but this does not necessarily mean they are opposed to vitamin supplements. Many pharmaceutical companies also produce and sell vitamin supplements.</p>
<h2>The Complexity of COVID-19 Management</h2>
<p>The assertion that increased vitamin D levels could have kept COVID-19 in check oversimplifies the complexities of the pandemic. While vitamin D may play a role in immune function, it is just one of many factors that influence COVID-19 outcomes. Other factors include age, underlying health conditions, vaccination status, and public health measures such as social distancing and mask-wearing.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that Big Pharma is against Vitamin D because it threatens their business model and that increased vitamin D levels could have controlled COVID-19 is largely unfounded. While vitamin D plays a role in immune function, the evidence regarding its impact on COVID-19 is not conclusive. The management of COVID-19 is complex and multifaceted, and vitamin D is just one piece of the puzzle. More research is needed to fully understand the role of vitamin D in COVID-19.</p>

Claim Review: Big Pharma's Stance on Vitamin D and COVID-19

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The claim that the Canadian government contract with Pfizer acknowledged the unknown long-term efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines has been circulating widely. This article aims to review this claim, providing a thorough analysis and context based on reliable scientific sources.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The claim states that the contract between the Canadian government and Pfizer, dated October 26, 2020, includes a section acknowledging that the long-term effects, efficacy, and adverse effects of the vaccine were not known at the time of signing. This information was reported by The Expose and The Canadian Independent.</p>
<h2>Analysis</h2>
<p>The contract indeed contains a section (5.5) under 'Purchaser Acknowledgement' that states: 'Purchaser further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known.' This acknowledgment is standard in contracts for new medical products, reflecting the ongoing nature of scientific research and the need for continuous monitoring.</p>
<p>It is important to note that the acknowledgment of unknown long-term effects does not imply that the vaccines are unsafe. Vaccines undergo rigorous testing and approval processes by regulatory bodies such as Health Canada and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). These processes ensure that vaccines meet high safety and efficacy standards before they are administered to the public.</p>
<p>Furthermore, ongoing monitoring and research are essential for understanding the long-term effects of any new medical intervention. This is a standard practice in the medical field and is not unique to COVID-19 vaccines.</p>
<h2>Scientific Evidence</h2>
<p>Several peer-reviewed studies and reports from reliable scientific sources support the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines. For example, a study published in <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2101765">The New England Journal of Medicine</a> found that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was highly effective in preventing symptomatic COVID-19 infections. Another study published in <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00947-8/fulltext">The Lancet</a> reported similar findings for the Moderna vaccine.</p>
<p>These studies, along with ongoing surveillance by health authorities, provide evidence that COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective in the short term. Long-term data is being continuously collected and analyzed to ensure the safety and efficacy of these vaccines over time.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that the Canadian government contract with Pfizer acknowledged the unknown long-term efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines is accurate. However, this acknowledgment is a standard practice in contracts for new medical products and does not imply that the vaccines are unsafe. Ongoing research and monitoring are essential for understanding the long-term effects of any new medical intervention. The available scientific evidence supports the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in the short term, and long-term data is being continuously collected and analyzed.</p>

Claim Review: Canadian Government Contract with Pfizer on COVID-19 Vaccine Safety

<p>The claim that a secret CDC report confirms Dr. Anthony Fauci lied and hundreds of thousands of children died due to COVID vaccination is false. This claim is based on an article published by The Exposé, which is known for spreading misinformation and conspiracy theories.</p>
<p>Firstly, there is no evidence of a secret CDC report claiming that hundreds of thousands of children died due to COVID vaccination. The CDC regularly publishes data on COVID-19 vaccinations and any adverse events, and there is no such report on their website or any other official platform.</p>
<p>Secondly, the claim that Dr. Anthony Fauci lied about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines is also false. Dr. Fauci has consistently emphasized the importance of vaccines in protecting against COVID-19, and his statements are backed by scientific evidence. The COVID-19 vaccines have been thoroughly tested and found to be safe and effective in clinical trials and real-world studies.</p>
<p>The article also claims that excess deaths among children and young adults increased after the roll-out of COVID-19 vaccines. However, this is not supported by official data. According to the CDC, COVID-19 was one of the leading causes of death among children and young adults in the US in 2021, and the vast majority of these deaths occurred among unvaccinated individuals.</p>
<p>The article also cites data from the UK's Office for National Statistics (ONS) to claim that vaccinated individuals are more likely to die than unvaccinated individuals. However, this is a misinterpretation of the data. The ONS data shows that the mortality rate among vaccinated individuals is lower than that among unvaccinated individuals for all age groups, including children and young adults.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the article claims that the mainstream media is covering up the truth about COVID-19 vaccines. However, this is not true. The mainstream media has extensively covered the COVID-19 pandemic and the development and roll-out of COVID-19 vaccines, and has reported on any adverse events associated with the vaccines.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that a secret CDC report confirms Dr. Anthony Fauci lied and hundreds of thousands of children died due to COVID vaccination is false. There is no evidence of such a report, and official data does not support these allegations. The COVID-19 vaccines have been thoroughly tested and found to be safe and effective, and the benefits of vaccination far outweigh the risks.</p>
<p>For more information on the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines, please see the following resources:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/safety-of-vaccines.html">CDC: Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/the-benefits-of-covid-19-vaccination-outweigh-the-risks">WHO: The benefits of COVID-19 vaccination outweigh the risks</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02039-9">Nature: COVID vaccines: what the numbers say about risks and benefits</a></li>
</ul>

Claim Review: Secret CDC Report on COVID Vaccine Deaths in Children

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "Fauci, Gates & Moderna are responsible for the COVID Pandemic – U.S. D.O.D issued ‘COVID-19 Research’ contract 3 Months before COVID was known to exist – & Fauci & Moderna had a Vaccine ready in Dec. 2019" is Mostly False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: