Facebook provided secret online tools and trained CDC employees how to censor the American public on COVID-19 and vaccine-related topics.

Natural News

Claim Review: Facebook and CDC Collaboration on Censorship

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The claim that Facebook provided secret online tools and trained CDC employees to censor the American public on COVID-19 and vaccine-related topics has gained traction in recent discussions. This article aims to review the claim, providing a thorough analysis based on available evidence and reliable sources.</p>
<h2>Background</h2>
<p>The claim originates from a report by NaturalNews.com, which alleges that Facebook collaborated with the CDC to censor content related to COVID-19 and vaccines. The report suggests that this collaboration involved the use of secret online tools and training sessions for CDC employees.</p>
<h2>Evidence and Analysis</h2>
<p>To evaluate the claim, it is essential to examine the available evidence and context.</p>
<h3>Collaboration Between Facebook and CDC</h3>
<p>It is well-documented that social media platforms, including Facebook, have collaborated with health authorities to combat misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, Facebook has implemented policies to remove or reduce the distribution of content that contains false claims about COVID-19 and vaccines. This collaboration is not unique to Facebook and the CDC; similar efforts have been observed with other platforms and health organizations.</p>
<h3>Training and Tools</h3>
<p>The claim suggests that Facebook provided secret online tools and trained CDC employees to censor content. While it is plausible that Facebook provided training and tools to help the CDC identify and report misinformation, the extent and secrecy of these efforts are not fully substantiated. The use of the term 'secret' implies a level of covertness that is not supported by available evidence.</p>
<h3>Censorship and Free Speech</h3>
<p>The claim also raises concerns about censorship and free speech. It is important to note that while social media platforms have the right to moderate content, they must do so in a manner that respects users' rights and adheres to their own policies. The balance between combating misinformation and preserving free speech is a complex issue that has been the subject of ongoing debate.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>Based on the available evidence, the claim that Facebook provided secret online tools and trained CDC employees to censor the American public is partially true but lacks context and overstates the extent of the collaboration. While there is evidence of collaboration between Facebook and the CDC, the specifics of the training and tools provided are not fully substantiated. Moreover, the claim raises important questions about the balance between combating misinformation and preserving free speech.</p>
<h2>References</h2>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/communitystandards/misinformation">Facebook Community Standards on Misinformation</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://archive.cdc.gov/#/results?q=https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/communication/guidance-list.html&amp;start=0&amp;rows=10">CDC Guidance on COVID-19 Communication</a>&nbsp;</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.nature.com/search?q=fight+against+covid+misinformation&amp;order=relevance">Nature: The fight against COVID-19 misinformation</a>&nbsp;</li>
</ul>

<p>The claim that a secret CDC report confirms Dr. Anthony Fauci lied and hundreds of thousands of children died due to COVID vaccination is false. This claim is based on an article published by The Exposé, which is known for spreading misinformation and conspiracy theories.</p>
<p>Firstly, there is no evidence of a secret CDC report claiming that hundreds of thousands of children died due to COVID vaccination. The CDC regularly publishes data on COVID-19 vaccinations and any adverse events, and there is no such report on their website or any other official platform.</p>
<p>Secondly, the claim that Dr. Anthony Fauci lied about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines is also false. Dr. Fauci has consistently emphasized the importance of vaccines in protecting against COVID-19, and his statements are backed by scientific evidence. The COVID-19 vaccines have been thoroughly tested and found to be safe and effective in clinical trials and real-world studies.</p>
<p>The article also claims that excess deaths among children and young adults increased after the roll-out of COVID-19 vaccines. However, this is not supported by official data. According to the CDC, COVID-19 was one of the leading causes of death among children and young adults in the US in 2021, and the vast majority of these deaths occurred among unvaccinated individuals.</p>
<p>The article also cites data from the UK's Office for National Statistics (ONS) to claim that vaccinated individuals are more likely to die than unvaccinated individuals. However, this is a misinterpretation of the data. The ONS data shows that the mortality rate among vaccinated individuals is lower than that among unvaccinated individuals for all age groups, including children and young adults.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the article claims that the mainstream media is covering up the truth about COVID-19 vaccines. However, this is not true. The mainstream media has extensively covered the COVID-19 pandemic and the development and roll-out of COVID-19 vaccines, and has reported on any adverse events associated with the vaccines.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that a secret CDC report confirms Dr. Anthony Fauci lied and hundreds of thousands of children died due to COVID vaccination is false. There is no evidence of such a report, and official data does not support these allegations. The COVID-19 vaccines have been thoroughly tested and found to be safe and effective, and the benefits of vaccination far outweigh the risks.</p>
<p>For more information on the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines, please see the following resources:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/safety-of-vaccines.html">CDC: Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/the-benefits-of-covid-19-vaccination-outweigh-the-risks">WHO: The benefits of COVID-19 vaccination outweigh the risks</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02039-9">Nature: COVID vaccines: what the numbers say about risks and benefits</a></li>
</ul>

Claim Review: Secret CDC Report on COVID Vaccine Deaths in Children

<p>The recent announcement of the North American Preparedness for Animal and Human Pandemics Initiative (NAPAHPI) has sparked concerns about potential global control measures, including vaccine passports and policies targeting the 'infodemic'. Critics, such as epidemiologist Nicholas Hulscher, have expressed deep concerns about the initiative, suggesting it may empower the World Health Organization (WHO) to impose such measures.</p>
<p>The initiative, launched by the U.S., Canada, and Mexico, aims to unite the countries’ public health agencies around a 'One Health' approach to addressing future pandemics. The One Health approach considers the relationships between the health of humans, animals, and the environment. This holistic strategy is designed to better prepare for and respond to future health threats, including zoonotic diseases that can cross from animals to humans.</p>
<p>Hulscher's claim that the initiative may lead to vaccine passports and global control measures is largely speculative. The official documents from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and other participating agencies do not explicitly mention vaccine passports or global control measures. Instead, they focus on strengthening regional health security through a coordinated approach to various health threats.</p>
<p>The HHS report does mention 'border health measures', which could include screening of passengers, vaccination requirements, quarantine, and entry restrictions. However, these measures are described as 'evidence-based' and aimed at slowing the spread of pathogens. There is no indication that these measures will be implemented in the form of vaccine passports or that they will be used to impose global control.</p>
<p>Hulscher also raises concerns about the 'infodemic', referring to the spread of misinformation and disinformation on health-related topics. The WHO defines the infodemic as 'too much information including false or misleading information in digital and physical environments during a disease outbreak'. While the initiative does aim to tackle the infodemic, it is not clear that this will involve abolishing free speech or imposing draconian measures.</p>
<p>It is important to note that the initiative is based on a long-standing trilateral collaboration and builds on lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic and other health security events. The focus is on strengthening regional capacities for prevention, preparedness, and response to a broad range of health security threats.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that the North American Preparedness for Animal and Human Pandemics Initiative will lead to vaccine passports and global control measures is not supported by the available evidence. While the initiative does aim to strengthen regional health security and may involve border health measures, there is no explicit mention of vaccine passports or global control measures in the official documents.</p>
<p><strong>References:</strong></p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/one-health">WHO: One Health</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://ipac-canada.org/one-health">Public Health Canada: One Health</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2024/10/23/united-states-canada-mexico-unveil-efforts-strengthen-regional-health-security.html">HHS: U.S., Canada, Mexico Launch Pandemic Preparedness Initiative</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://openwho.org/channels/infodemic-management">WHO: Infodemic Management</a></li>
</ul>

Claim Review: Are Vaccine Passports Just Around the Corner?

<p>The article titled 'Bill Gates to Stand Trial in Netherlands in Covid Vaccine Injury Lawsuit' by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D., published on The Defender, claims that a Netherlands court ruled that Bill Gates can stand trial in a case involving seven people injured by COVID-19 vaccines. This claim is misleading and lacks sufficient evidence.</p>
<p>Firstly, the article cites Dutch newspaper De Telegraaf and independent news outlet Zebra Inspiratie as sources. However, these sources are not widely recognized for their reliability in international news. The article also mentions that the lawsuit was filed in the District Court of Leeuwarden, but there is no official confirmation from the court itself.</p>
<p>The article states that the plaintiffs allege that Gates, through his representatives, deliberately misled them about the safety of the COVID-19 shots. However, there is no evidence provided to support this allegation. The article also mentions that one of the plaintiffs has since died, but this information is not verified by any official sources.</p>
<p>The article further claims that the court ruled that it has jurisdiction over Gates because the claims against him and the other defendants are 'connected' and based on the same 'complex of facts.' However, this ruling is not supported by any official court documents or statements from the court.</p>
<p>The article also mentions the World Economic Forum's 'Great Reset' project and the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation's affiliation with 'Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance.' However, these mentions are not directly related to the lawsuit and seem to be included to create a narrative that is not supported by evidence.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that Bill Gates will stand trial in the Netherlands for COVID-19 vaccine injuries is misleading and lacks sufficient evidence. The article contains several inaccuracies and misrepresentations. It is important to rely on official sources and verified information when reporting on legal proceedings and public health issues.</p>
<p><strong>References:</strong></p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/coronavirus-disease-(covid-19)-vaccines">World Health Organization: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccines</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/adverse-events.html">Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: COVID-19 Vaccine Safety</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-17430-6">Nature: The biggest COVID-19 vaccine myths, debunked</a></li>
</ul>

Claim Review: Bill Gates to Stand Trial in Netherlands in Covid Vaccine Injury Lawsuit

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "Facebook provided secret online tools and trained CDC employees how to censor the American public on COVID-19 and vaccine-related topics." is Half True

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: