Data shows a 66% surge in heart attacks among slim, young Americans since 2020, with experts blaming a sharp rise in myocarditis during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Slay News - com

Examining the Claim of a 66% Surge in Heart Attacks Among Young Americans Since 2020

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>A recent article from The People's Voice Headlines claims that there has been a 66% surge in heart attacks among slim, young Americans since 2020, attributing this increase to a rise in myocarditis during the COVID-19 pandemic. This claim review will examine the evidence supporting this assertion and provide a critical analysis of the data presented.</p>
<h2>Claim Analysis</h2>
<p>The article states that around 0.3% of fit and slim Americans between the ages of 18-44 had a heart attack in 2019, which rose to 0.5% in 2023. This represents a 66% increase in cases over four years. The article suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic played a significant role in this increase, citing factors such as inflammation, blood clots, depression, anxiety, stress, and the COVID-19 vaccines.</p>
<h2>Scientific Evidence</h2>
<p>While it is true that COVID-19 can cause myocarditis and other cardiovascular complications, the claim of a 66% surge in heart attacks among young Americans lacks robust scientific evidence. A study published in the <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2109730">New England Journal of Medicine</a> found that the risk of myocarditis after COVID-19 vaccination was rare and much lower than the risk of myocarditis from COVID-19 infection itself.</p>
<p>Furthermore, a systematic review and meta-analysis published in the <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-7762(23)00022-4/fulltext">Lancet</a> &nbsp;found that the overall risk of cardiovascular events, including heart attacks, was higher in individuals with COVID-19 compared to those without the infection. However, the review did not support a 66% increase in heart attacks among young Americans.</p>
<h2>Other Factors</h2>
<p>The article also mentions other factors such as drug use, obesity, sedentary lifestyles, and bad diets. While these factors can contribute to an increased risk of heart attacks, the article does not provide specific data or studies to support the claim that these factors have led to a 66% surge in heart attacks among young Americans since 2020.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>Based on the available scientific evidence, the claim of a 66% surge in heart attacks among slim, young Americans since 2020 is likely exaggerated. While the COVID-19 pandemic and other factors may contribute to an increased risk of cardiovascular events, the data presented in the article is insufficient to support such a dramatic increase. Further research is needed to accurately assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on heart attack rates among young Americans.</p>

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>A recent article published by The Exposé titled "Leading doctors sign HOPE Accord calling for the suspension of all covid mRNA ‘vaccines’" claims that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are driving a rise in heart attacks, strokes, and cancer. The article cites an open letter to the UK’s General Medical Council (GMC) by Dr. Aseem Malhotra and other healthcare professionals, calling for the immediate suspension of these vaccines. This claim review will examine the evidence presented and assess the validity of these claims.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The central claim is that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are contributing to an alarming rise in disability and excess deaths, particularly heart attacks, strokes, and cancer. The article suggests that the evidence is overwhelming and that the continued use of these vaccines is a public health calamity.</p>
<h2>Evaluating the Evidence</h2>
<p>To evaluate this claim, we need to consider the following points:</p>
<h3>1. Scientific Consensus and Regulatory Approval</h3>
<p>The COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, such as those produced by Pfizer and Moderna, have undergone rigorous clinical trials and have been approved by regulatory bodies worldwide, including the FDA and EMA. These approvals are based on extensive data showing the vaccines' safety and efficacy.</p>
<h3>2. Adverse Events Reporting</h3>
<p>The article mentions a re-analysis of Pfizer and Moderna’s original randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in the journal Vaccine. This re-analysis suggested a greater risk of serious harm from the vaccine than being hospitalized with COVID. However, it is important to note that:</p>
<ul>
  <li>The re-analysis was not peer-reviewed and has not been widely accepted by the scientific community.</li>
  <li>The original RCTs were designed to assess short-term effects, and long-term data is still being collected.</li>
  <li>The benefits of vaccination, including prevention of severe disease, hospitalization, and death, have been well-documented in numerous studies.</li>
</ul>
<h3>3. Mechanistic Evidence</h3>
<p>The article cites experts who suggest that the mRNA vaccines may cause cancer through prolonged immunosuppression and DNA contamination. However, there is no robust scientific evidence to support these claims. The mRNA vaccines do not alter DNA, and the spike protein produced by the vaccines is quickly degraded by the body.</p>
<h3>4. Epidemiological Data</h3>
<p>The claim that the vaccines are causing a rise in heart attacks, strokes, and cancer is not supported by epidemiological data. Studies have shown that:</p>
<ul>
  <li>The incidence of heart attacks and strokes has not increased significantly post-vaccination.</li>
  <li>The alleged rise in cancer cases cannot be attributed to the vaccines, as cancer development typically takes years.</li>
  <li>The benefits of vaccination in preventing severe COVID-19 outcomes far outweigh the potential risks.</li>
</ul>
<h3>5. Expert Opinions</h3>
<p>While the article cites several experts who support the claim, it is important to consider the broader scientific consensus. The vast majority of medical and scientific experts agree that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are safe and effective. The World Health Organization (WHO) and other public health bodies continue to recommend these vaccines as a crucial tool in the fight against COVID-19.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>Based on the available evidence, the claim that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are causing a rise in heart attacks, strokes, and cancer is not supported. The benefits of vaccination, including the prevention of severe disease and death, outweigh the potential risks. It is crucial to rely on robust scientific evidence and the consensus of the medical community when evaluating such claims.</p>
<h2>References</h2>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/safety-of-vaccines.html">CDC - Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/coronavirus-disease-(covid-19)-vaccines">WHO - The benefits of COVID-19 vaccination outweigh the risks</a>&nbsp;</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2101544">NEJM - Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00947-8/fulltext">The Lancet - Safety and Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: An Interim Analysis of Four Randomised Controlled Trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK</a></li>
</ul>

Reviewing the Claim that COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Cause Heart Attacks, Strokes, and Cancer

<h2>IntroductiFactCheck.orgon</h2>
<p>A recent article from The People's Voice claims that health insurance data shows a significant increase in people receiving cancer treatment since 2020, coinciding with the start of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign. This claim review aims to investigate the validity of this assertion.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The article states that according to Helsana, a major Swiss health insurance company, there was a 73% increase in cancer treatments in 2021 and a 74% increase in 2022 compared to 2020. The article suggests a potential link between this increase and the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, which began in Switzerland on December 23, 2020.</p>
<h2>Investigation</h2>
<p>The claim is based on data from the Helsana Drug Report, which has been published annually for the past 10 years. However, the article does not provide a direct link to the report or specific data to verify the claim. Additionally, the article mentions a health survey conducted by the Swiss Federal Statistical Office (BfS), but the data from this survey was reportedly removed a few days later.</p>
<p>To evaluate the claim, we need to consider several factors:</p>
<h3>Context of Cancer Treatment Data</h3>
<p>Cancer treatment data can fluctuate due to various reasons, including changes in screening practices, diagnostic methods, and healthcare access. The COVID-19 pandemic itself may have led to delays in cancer screenings and treatments, which could result in a subsequent increase in reported cases.</p>
<h3>Scientific Evidence</h3>
<p>There is no established scientific evidence linking COVID-19 vaccines to an increase in cancer rates. Extensive clinical trials and ongoing monitoring have not identified such a correlation. For example, an article published in <a href="https://www.factcheck.org/2024/05/still-no-evidence-covid-19-vaccination-increases-cancer-risk-despite-posts/">FactCheck.org</a> &nbsp;found no evidence of increased cancer risk associated with COVID-19 vaccines.</p>
<h3>Expert Opinions</h3>
<p>Health experts and regulatory bodies, such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), have consistently affirmed the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines. Any claims suggesting a link between vaccines and increased cancer rates should be scrutinized with caution.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that there has been a dramatic increase in cancer treatments since 2020, coinciding with the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, is not substantiated by reliable scientific evidence. The article lacks context and does not provide sufficient data to support the assertion. While the Helsana Drug Report may show an increase in cancer treatments, this could be due to various factors unrelated to vaccines. Therefore, the claim is rated as <strong>1 out of 5</strong>, indicating it is likely false.</p>

Claim Review: Increase in Cancer Treatments Post-2020

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>A recent article from The People's Voice claims that a leaked Pfizer report reveals that the hearts of vaccinated people are 'rapidly decaying,' leading to various serious heart conditions. The article cites a leaked MHRA report obtained by journalist Nick Hunt, which allegedly shows that vaccinated individuals are at a significantly higher risk of dying from heart problems than their unvaccinated peers. This claim review will examine the evidence and context surrounding this claim.</p>
<h2>Understanding the Claim</h2>
<p>The claim is based on a supposed Post Authorisation Safety Study (PASS) of Pfizer’s Covid vaccine, which allegedly shows increased risks of heart conditions among vaccinated individuals. The article presents cumulative incidence graphs from Pfizer’s 'Interim Report 5,' suggesting that the incidence of heart conditions is significantly higher in vaccinated individuals and worsens over time.</p>
<h2>Analyzing the Evidence</h2>
<p>The article references specific heart conditions such as acute cardiovascular injury, arrhythmia, heart failure, stress cardiomyopathy, coronary artery disease, and myocarditis. However, the data presented in the article is not accompanied by peer-reviewed studies or official statements from regulatory bodies.</p>
<p>It is crucial to note that the interpretation of the data in the article is not supported by the broader scientific community. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have consistently maintained that the benefits of COVID-19 vaccines outweigh the risks. A study published in the <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2109730">New England Journal of Medicine</a> found that the risk of myocarditis after mRNA vaccination is rare and typically mild.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the article's claim that the MHRA is 'sitting on the report' is speculative and lacks evidence. Regulatory bodies like the MHRA and FDA continuously monitor the safety of vaccines and would issue warnings if significant risks were identified.</p>
<h2>Misinterpretation of Data</h2>
<p>The article misinterprets the data by suggesting that the curves diverge over time, indicating an increasing risk. However, without access to the full report and methodology, it is impossible to verify these claims. The article also fails to consider confounding factors that could influence the results, such as underlying health conditions or lifestyle factors.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that a leaked Pfizer report shows vaccinated hearts are 'rapidly decaying' is misleading and not supported by credible evidence. The data presented is misinterpreted, and the article lacks context and peer-reviewed studies. The scientific consensus remains that COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective, with benefits outweighing the risks.</p>

Fact-Check: Does a Leaked Pfizer Report Show Vaccinated Hearts Are 'Rapidly Decaying'?

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "Data shows a 66% surge in heart attacks among slim, young Americans since 2020, with experts blaming a sharp rise in myocarditis during the COVID-19 pandemic." is Mostly False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: