CNN political commentator Scott Jennings admitted that CNN misled the American public 'night after night' during their election coverage and focused on 'gimmicks' to elect Kamala Harris.

The Peoples Voice - TV

The claim that CNN political commentator Scott Jennings admitted the network misled the American public 'night after night' during their election coverage and focused on 'gimmicks' to elect Kamala Harris has been circulating widely. This claim originates from an article published by The People's Voice on November 6, 2024.
According to the article, Jennings stated during a segment following Trump's electoral victory that 'the story that we portrayed was not true.' He also mentioned several 'gimmicks' that CNN used to try to sway the election in favor of Kamala Harris, such as focusing on Puerto Rico, Liz Cheney, and Nikki Haley voters. Jennings further emphasized that CNN ignored the fundamentals of the election, such as inflation and economic struggles faced by many Americans.
To evaluate this claim, it is important to consider the context and the source of the information. The People's Voice is not a widely recognized or reputable news source, and its articles often lack the rigorous fact-checking and editorial standards of mainstream media outlets. Additionally, the article does not provide a direct quote or video evidence of Jennings making these statements, which raises questions about the accuracy of the claim.
Furthermore, it is worth noting that Jennings is a political commentator, not a journalist, and his opinions and analyses may not reflect the official stance of CNN. Political commentators are often hired to provide diverse viewpoints and may express personal opinions that do not align with the network's editorial policies.
In the absence of verifiable evidence, such as a direct quote or video footage, it is difficult to confirm the accuracy of the claim. While Jennings may have expressed dissatisfaction with CNN's election coverage, the extent to which he admitted to deliberate misinformation or 'gimmicks' is unclear.
In conclusion, the claim that CNN political commentator Scott Jennings admitted the network misled the public during the election campaign is partially true but lacks sufficient context and supporting evidence. The claim should be approached with caution, and further verification is needed to determine its accuracy.

Claim Review: CNN Journalist Admits Network Lied During Election Campaign

The claim that Bill Gates donated $50 million to Kamala Harris to avoid standing trial in the US for his crimes, as stated by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has been circulating widely. However, a thorough investigation reveals that this claim is unfounded and lacks credible evidence.
Firstly, there is no verifiable record of Bill Gates donating $50 million to any political action committee (PAC) backing Kamala Harris. Political donations, especially of such magnitude, are subject to public disclosure laws in the United States. The Federal Election Commission (FEC) maintains a database of all political contributions, and no such donation from Bill Gates is recorded.
Secondly, the assertion that Bill Gates has been indicted in the Netherlands for lying about the COVID vaccine is also unsubstantiated. There are no official records or credible news reports corroborating this claim. The Dutch judicial system is transparent, and any high-profile indictment would be widely reported by reputable news outlets.
Furthermore, the suggestion that Bill Gates is attempting to avoid trial in the US by making political donations is speculative and not supported by any concrete evidence. Bill Gates has been a prominent figure in philanthropy and has been involved in various global health initiatives, but there is no evidence to suggest that he has committed any crimes that would warrant a trial.
It is important to note that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has been a vocal critic of vaccines and has made several unfounded claims in the past. His statements should be approached with caution and verified against reliable sources.
In conclusion, the claim that Bill Gates donated $50 million to Kamala Harris to avoid standing trial in the US is false. There is no credible evidence to support this assertion, and it should be regarded as misinformation.
For further reading on the transparency of political donations, refer to the <a href="https://www.fec.gov/">Federal Election Commission</a>. For information on the Dutch judicial system, visit the <a href="https://www.rechtspraak.nl/">Official Website of the Judiciary of the Netherlands</a>.

Fact Check: Did Bill Gates Donate $50 Million to Democrats to Avoid Trial?

U posljednje vrijeme, na internetu se pojavila tvrdnja da poznati hollywoodski glumac Ben Stiller aktivno sudjeluje u kampanji Kamale Harris i da ima svoju vlastitu parolu koja glasi „volio bih da sam crnac“. Ova tvrdnja je izazvala veliko zanimanje i podijelila mišljenja među ljudima. Međutim, važno je provjeriti točnost ove tvrdnje i razjasniti stvarne činjenice.
Ben Stiller je poznati glumac i redatelj koji je sudjelovao u mnogim uspješnim filmovima i televizijskim serijama. On je također poznat po svojim političkim stavovima i aktivizmu, ali važno je provjeriti da li je ova tvrdnja o njegovoj podršci Kamali Harris i njegovoj navodnoj paroli istinita.
Prvo, treba napomenuti da nema službenih izvora koji potvrđuju da je Ben Stiller izjavio da „volio bih da sam crnac“. Ova tvrdnja se pojavila na nekoliko web stranica i društvenih mreža, ali nema konkretnih dokaza koji bi potvrdili da je Stiller ikada izjavio ovo. Uobičajeno je da se takve tvrdnje pojave u vrijeme izbora kako bi se manipuliralo javnim mnijenjem i stvorila kontroverza.
Drugo, važno je razumjeti kontekst u kojem se ova tvrdnja pojavila. Kamala Harris je bila kandidatkinja za potpredsjednicu SAD-a u izborima 2020. godine, i njena kampanja je privukla veliku pažnju medija i javnosti. Međutim, nema dokaza da je Ben Stiller aktivno sudjelovao u njenoj kampanji ili da je izjavio bilo kakvu parolu vezanu za nju.
Treće, važno je provjeriti izvore informacija. Mnogi lažni članci i dezinformacije se pojavljuju na internetu, posebno u vrijeme izbora. Važno je koristiti pouzdane izvore informacija i provjeravati točnost tvrdnji prije nego što ih se prihvati kao istinite. Na primjer, pouzdani mediji poput <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/">The New York Times</a> ili <a href="https://www.bbc.com/">BBC</a> mogu pružiti točne i provjerene informacije.
Zaključno, tvrdnja da Ben Stiller aktivno sudjeluje u kampanji Kamale Harris i da ima parolu „volio bih da sam crnac“ je netočna. Nema dokaza koji potvrđuju ovu tvrdnju, i važno je biti kritičan prema informacijama koje se pojavljuju na internetu. Uvijek je dobro provjeriti izvore i koristiti pouzdane medije kako bismo bili sigurni da smo dobili točne i provjerene informacije.

Provjera tvrdnje: Ben Stiller i njegova podrška Kamali Harris

<h2>Introduction</h2>
A recent article published on The Gateway Pundit claims that the World Economic Forum (WEF) admitted COVID-19 was a 'test' of our obedience to a rapidly forming new world order. This claim has gained traction among conspiracy theorists and those skeptical of global institutions. However, a thorough examination of the evidence reveals that this claim is misleading and lacks credible support.
<h2>The Claim</h2>
The article suggests that the WEF used the COVID-19 pandemic as a beta test for a technocratic new world order. It cites a statement from the WEF's 'My Carbon' page, which discusses the adoption of restrictions for public health during the pandemic. The article interprets this statement as an admission that the pandemic was a test of social responsibility and compliance.
<h2>Analysis</h2>
The WEF's statement on its 'My Carbon' page does not explicitly state that COVID-19 was a test of obedience. Instead, it highlights the global response to the pandemic as an example of social responsibility. The statement reads:
<blockquote>COVID-19 was the test of social responsibility – A huge number of unimaginable restrictions for public health were adopted by billions of citizens across the world. There were numerous examples globally of maintaining social distancing, wearing masks, mass vaccinations and acceptance of contact-tracing applications for public health, which demonstrated the core of individual social responsibility.</blockquote>
This statement does not imply that the pandemic was orchestrated as a test. Rather, it acknowledges the widespread compliance with public health measures during the pandemic.
Furthermore, the article's reference to the Milgram Experiment is a misleading comparison. The Milgram Experiment was a study on obedience to authority, not a test of compliance with public health measures during a global pandemic.
The claim that the WEF admitted COVID-19 was a test of obedience is not supported by credible evidence. The WEF's statements have been misinterpreted and taken out of context.
<h2>Scientific Consensus</h2>
The scientific consensus is that COVID-19 is a naturally occurring virus that originated in animals and spread to humans. There is no credible evidence to suggest that the pandemic was orchestrated as a test of obedience. For more information on the origins of COVID-19, see the following studies:
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9">The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2</a> (Nature Medicine)</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.science.org/action/doSearch?AllField=SARS-CoV-2+and+the+COVID-19+pandemic%3A+A+comprehensive+review+">SARS-CoV-2 and the COVID-19 pandemic: A comprehensive review </a>(Science)&nbsp;</li>
</ul>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
The claim that the WEF admitted COVID-19 was a test of obedience is misleading and lacks credible evidence. The WEF's statements have been misinterpreted and taken out of context. The scientific consensus is that COVID-19 is a naturally occurring virus, and there is no credible evidence to suggest that the pandemic was orchestrated as a test of obedience.

Claim Review: Did the WEF Admit COVID-19 Was a Test of Obedience?

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "CNN political commentator Scott Jennings admitted that CNN misled the American public 'night after night' during their election coverage and focused on 'gimmicks' to elect Kamala Harris." is Mostly False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: