Chemtrails are not a conspiracy theory but a fact, and there are widespread attempts to keep chemtrail operations hidden from the public.

The Expose News - com

The term 'chemtrails' refers to the belief that certain aircraft trails are not merely condensation trails (contrails) but are instead deliberate releases of chemicals or biological agents into the atmosphere for various purposes, such as weather modification or population control. This belief has gained traction in some circles, but it is often dismissed as a conspiracy theory by mainstream media and scientific communities.
In the content provided, the claim is made that chemtrails are a fact and that there are widespread attempts to keep these operations hidden from the public. The article also mentions the release of an AI model by Andrew Ng, a prominent figure in artificial intelligence, which allows users to explore the effects of chemtrails. This model, called Planet Parasol, is designed to simulate the impacts of stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), a form of solar geoengineering.
To evaluate this claim, it is important to understand the scientific context surrounding chemtrails and geoengineering. Geoengineering refers to deliberate large-scale interventions in the Earth's natural systems to counteract climate change. One proposed method of geoengineering is SAI, which involves injecting reflective particles into the stratosphere to reflect sunlight and cool the planet. While SAI is a theoretical concept that has been studied by scientists, it is not currently being implemented on a large scale.
The claim that chemtrails are a fact and that they are being used for widespread and hidden operations is not supported by scientific consensus. The trails left by aircraft are typically condensation trails, which are formed when water vapor in the exhaust of aircraft engines condenses and freezes in the cold air at high altitudes. These contrails can persist and spread out, forming cirrus clouds, but they are not the result of deliberate chemical releases.
The article also mentions that Andrew Ng's model, Planet Parasol, is based on real-world data. However, it is important to note that models and simulations are often based on theoretical data and assumptions, rather than direct observations of ongoing geoengineering activities. The purpose of such models is to explore potential scenarios and their impacts, not to confirm the existence of widespread chemtrail operations.
In conclusion, while geoengineering and SAI are areas of scientific research, the claim that chemtrails are a fact and that there are widespread attempts to keep these operations hidden from the public is not supported by scientific evidence. The trails left by aircraft are typically condensation trails, and there is no consensus among scientists that chemtrails are being used for large-scale geoengineering or other purposes.
For further reading on the scientific consensus regarding chemtrails and geoengineering, please refer to the following peer-reviewed studies:
<ul>
 <li><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo2716">Contrail cirrus radiative forcing for future air traffic</a> - Nature Climate Change</li>
 <li><a href="https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2019EF001418">Stratospheric aerosol injection research: From climate model experiments to integrated assessment</a> - Earth's Future</li>
 <li><a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378016300946">Geoengineering the climate: Science, governance and uncertainty</a> - Global Environmental Change</li>
</ul>
These studies provide a comprehensive overview of the scientific understanding of contrails, geoengineering, and the potential impacts of SAI. They highlight the need for further research and the importance of considering the ethical, social, and environmental implications of geoengineering proposals.

Claim Review: Chemtrails - Conspiracy Theory or Scientific Reality?

The claim that Dr. Anthony Fauci is facing 'life in prison' for creating COVID-19 as a bioweapon, as revealed by a CDC Director whistleblower, has been circulating in certain media outlets. This article aims to thoroughly examine this claim and provide a fact-based review. Firstly, it is important to note that the article from The People's Voice lacks credible sourcing and relies heavily on unverified statements and conspiratorial language. The article alleges that Dr. Fauci has been involved in various unethical practices, including gain-of-function research, which is a contentious area of scientific inquiry. However, there is no concrete evidence presented to support these claims. Gain-of-function research involves modifying viruses to enhance their transmissibility or virulence. While this type of research is controversial, it is conducted under strict regulations and ethical guidelines. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has funded such research in the past, but there is no evidence linking Dr. Fauci directly to the creation of COVID-19 as a bioweapon. The article also mentions a congressional hearing in May, where Dr. David Morens, a longtime Fauci aide, allegedly boasted about evading public records requests and deleting 'smoking guns.' However, no specific details or evidence from this hearing are provided to support the claim that Dr. Fauci is facing legal consequences. Furthermore, the article cites Dr. Robert Redfield, former CDC Director, as a whistleblower outlining the origins of the COVID-19 virus. However, Dr. Redfield's statements have been misinterpreted and taken out of context. In an interview with Dana Parish, Dr. Redfield discussed the possibility of the virus originating from a lab, but he did not accuse Dr. Fauci of creating the virus as a bioweapon. It is crucial to rely on peer-reviewed scientific studies and official statements from reputable organizations when evaluating such claims. The scientific consensus, as outlined by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), is that COVID-19 is a naturally occurring virus, with the most likely origin being zoonotic transmission from animals to humans. In conclusion, the claim that Dr. Anthony Fauci is facing 'life in prison' for creating COVID-19 as a bioweapon is unfounded and lacks credible evidence. This conspiracy theory is not supported by reliable scientific sources or legal proceedings. It is essential to approach such claims with skepticism and rely on verified information from reputable sources.

Fact Check: Is Dr. Anthony Fauci Facing 'Life in Prison' for Creating COVID-19 as a Bioweapon?

<h2>Introduction</h2>
The article titled 'Leaked UN Conference Footage Confirms Plans For Manufactured Global Famine in 2025' by Baxter Dmitry claims that the United Nations has been planning to release toxic, man-made clouds to trigger a global famine by 2025. This claim is based on alleged leaked footage from a UN assembly meeting in 2006. The article also mentions the use of chemtrails and other insidious methods to control populations and damage the agricultural industry.
<h2>Analysis of the Claim</h2>
The claim that the UN is planning a manufactured global famine is not supported by credible evidence. The article relies on unverified leaked footage and quotes from whistleblowers without providing concrete proof. The mention of chemtrails as bioweapons is a common conspiracy theory that has been debunked by numerous scientific studies.
A study published in the journal <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-017-0014-3">Nature</a> &nbsp;found no evidence to support the existence of a large-scale atmospheric spraying program. The study analyzed the chemical composition of contrails and found that they are primarily composed of water vapor and ice crystals, not toxic chemicals.
The article also mentions a 1996 Air Force report titled 'Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025.' However, this report is a theoretical exploration of future weather modification technologies and does not provide evidence of an ongoing conspiracy to control the weather or trigger a global famine.
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
The claim that leaked UN footage confirms plans for a manufactured global famine in 2025 is largely unfounded. The article relies on unverified sources and conspiracy theories, and lacks credible evidence to support its claims. The mention of chemtrails as bioweapons has been debunked by scientific studies, and the 1996 Air Force report does not provide evidence of an ongoing conspiracy.

Claim Review: Leaked UN Footage and Alleged Plans for Global Famine in 2025

The recent article titled 'Bill Gates’ “days are numbered,” say Japanese scientists after ABORTION DRUGS found in “vaccines”' makes a startling claim that Japanese scientists have found abortion-inducing drugs in vaccines and are calling for the prosecution of Bill Gates. This claim, however, is not supported by credible scientific evidence and appears to be part of a broader misinformation campaign.
The article cites Dr. Masanori Fukushima, a leading Japanese oncologist, as one of the scientists sounding the alarm. However, there is no verifiable evidence from reputable scientific journals or official statements from Dr. Fukushima or any other Japanese scientists to support these claims. The article also references a tweet from an account called TPV Sean (@tpvsean), which is not a reliable source of scientific information.
The claim that vaccines contain abortion drugs is a common conspiracy theory that has been debunked by numerous scientific studies. For instance, a study published in the <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577">New England Journal of Medicine</a> found no evidence of abortion-inducing substances in COVID-19 vaccines. Similarly, the World Health Organization (WHO) has repeatedly affirmed the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, stating that they do not contain any substances that could induce abortions.
The article also mentions that the Japanese government's Covid Task Force has uncovered damning evidence against Bill Gates. However, there is no official statement or report from the Japanese government or any credible international organization to corroborate these allegations. The lack of verifiable sources and the reliance on unsubstantiated claims from questionable sources raise serious doubts about the credibility of the article.
Furthermore, the article attempts to link Bill Gates to a genocidal agenda, which is a baseless and inflammatory accusation. Bill Gates, through the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation, has been a prominent figure in global health initiatives, including vaccine development and distribution. While his philanthropic efforts have been subject to criticism and scrutiny, there is no evidence to support the claim that he is intentionally harming the global population.
In conclusion, the claim that Japanese scientists have found abortion drugs in vaccines and are calling for the prosecution of Bill Gates is unfounded and lacks credible scientific evidence. This claim is likely part of a broader misinformation campaign aimed at undermining public trust in vaccines and global health initiatives. It is crucial to rely on reputable scientific sources and official statements when evaluating such claims.

Claim Review: Japanese Scientists Accuse Bill Gates of Lacing Vaccines with Abortion Drugs

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "Chemtrails are not a conspiracy theory but a fact, and there are widespread attempts to keep chemtrail operations hidden from the public." is Mostly False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: