Chemtrails are not a conspiracy theory but a fact, and there are widespread attempts to keep chemtrail operations hidden from the public.

The Expose News - com

<p>The term 'chemtrails' refers to the belief that certain aircraft trails are not merely condensation trails (contrails) but are instead deliberate releases of chemicals or biological agents into the atmosphere for various purposes, such as weather modification or population control. This belief has gained traction in some circles, but it is often dismissed as a conspiracy theory by mainstream media and scientific communities.</p>
<p>In the content provided, the claim is made that chemtrails are a fact and that there are widespread attempts to keep these operations hidden from the public. The article also mentions the release of an AI model by Andrew Ng, a prominent figure in artificial intelligence, which allows users to explore the effects of chemtrails. This model, called Planet Parasol, is designed to simulate the impacts of stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), a form of solar geoengineering.</p>
<p>To evaluate this claim, it is important to understand the scientific context surrounding chemtrails and geoengineering. Geoengineering refers to deliberate large-scale interventions in the Earth's natural systems to counteract climate change. One proposed method of geoengineering is SAI, which involves injecting reflective particles into the stratosphere to reflect sunlight and cool the planet. While SAI is a theoretical concept that has been studied by scientists, it is not currently being implemented on a large scale.</p>
<p>The claim that chemtrails are a fact and that they are being used for widespread and hidden operations is not supported by scientific consensus. The trails left by aircraft are typically condensation trails, which are formed when water vapor in the exhaust of aircraft engines condenses and freezes in the cold air at high altitudes. These contrails can persist and spread out, forming cirrus clouds, but they are not the result of deliberate chemical releases.</p>
<p>The article also mentions that Andrew Ng's model, Planet Parasol, is based on real-world data. However, it is important to note that models and simulations are often based on theoretical data and assumptions, rather than direct observations of ongoing geoengineering activities. The purpose of such models is to explore potential scenarios and their impacts, not to confirm the existence of widespread chemtrail operations.</p>
<p>In conclusion, while geoengineering and SAI are areas of scientific research, the claim that chemtrails are a fact and that there are widespread attempts to keep these operations hidden from the public is not supported by scientific evidence. The trails left by aircraft are typically condensation trails, and there is no consensus among scientists that chemtrails are being used for large-scale geoengineering or other purposes.</p>
<p>For further reading on the scientific consensus regarding chemtrails and geoengineering, please refer to the following peer-reviewed studies:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo2716">Contrail cirrus radiative forcing for future air traffic</a> - Nature Climate Change</li>
  <li><a href="https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2019EF001418">Stratospheric aerosol injection research: From climate model experiments to integrated assessment</a> - Earth's Future</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378016300946">Geoengineering the climate: Science, governance and uncertainty</a> - Global Environmental Change</li>
</ul>
<p>These studies provide a comprehensive overview of the scientific understanding of contrails, geoengineering, and the potential impacts of SAI. They highlight the need for further research and the importance of considering the ethical, social, and environmental implications of geoengineering proposals.</p>

Claim Review: Chemtrails - Conspiracy Theory or Scientific Reality?

<p>The claim made in the content is that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and ViiV Healthcare, a pharmaceutical firm with links to Pfizer, sponsored an LGBT event for fifth-grade public school students in Chicago Public Schools (CPS).</p>
<p>After examining the sources provided and conducting further research, we found that ViiV Healthcare did indeed sponsor the Galaxy Summit, an annual event organized by the Children's First Fund, the non-profit arm of CPS.</p>
<p>The event aimed to create an affirming space for students to learn about and celebrate the diversity of gender, sexuality, and love in their communities.ViiV Healthcare is a global specialist HIV company established in November 2009 by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and Pfizer.</p>
<p>Shionogi joined as a shareholder in October 2012. Therefore, the claim about ViiV Healthcare's connection to Pfizer is true.</p>
<p>However, there is no evidence supporting the claim that the CDC sponsored the Galaxy Summit. The source of the claim, an article from LifeSiteNews, does not provide any proof of CDC's involvement in the event.In conclusion, the claim that ViiV Healthcare, a company with ties to Pfizer, sponsored an LGBT event for CPS students is true.</p>
<p>However, the claim that the CDC was involved in sponsoring the event is unfounded and lacks evidence.</p>
<p>Sources:</p>
<p>1. LifeSiteNews:</p>
<p>2. ViiV Healthcare:</p>
<p>3. Children's First Fund:</p>
<p>4. Chicago Public Schools:</p>

Fact-checking the claim: CDC and Pfizer affiliate sponsor pro-LGBT public school event for fifth-graders

<p>Financial Times je nedavno objavio članak u kojem se tvrdi da chemtrails nisu teorija zavjere, već dio borbe protiv klimatskih promjena. Ova tvrdnja je izazvala veliko zanimanje i kontroverze. U ovom članku ćemo detaljno analizirati tvrdnju i utvrditi je li ona istinita.</p>
<p>Chemtrails su pojam koji se koristi za opisivanje tragova kondenzacije koji se vide iza aviona. Teorija zavjere tvrdi da ovi tragovi sadrže kemikalije koje se namjerno raspršuju u atmosferu s različitim ciljevima, uključujući kontrolu vremena, biološko ratovanje ili manipulaciju klimom.</p>
<p>U članku Financial Timesa se govori o geoinženjeringu, posebno o modifikaciji sunčevog zračenja (SRM), kao metodi za smanjenje globalnog zatopljenja. SRM uključuje tehnike kao što su ubrizgavanje aerosola u stratosferu ili posvjetljivanje morskih oblaka. Međutim, članak ne spominje chemtrails kao dio ovih tehnika.</p>
<p>Naučna zajednica je istraživala geoinženjering kao moguću metodu za borbu protiv klimatskih promjena, ali s velikom opreznošću. Studije pokazuju da SRM može imati ozbiljne štetne posljedice, uključujući poremećaje regionalnih vremenskih prilika, oštećenje ozonskog omotača i kisele kiše. Također, SRM ne rješava temeljni problem emisije stakleničkih plinova i može dovesti do „prekidnog šoka“ ako se iznenada prekine.</p>
<p>Prema studiji objavljenoj u časopisu <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-019-0594-0">Nature Climate Change</a>, geoinženjering može imati nepredvidive posljedice i treba ga pažljivo istraživati i regulirati. Članak također naglašava potrebu za globalnim upravljanjem i moratorijem na implementaciju SRM-a dok se ne uspostavi dovoljno znanstvenog razumijevanja.</p>
<p>Zaključno, tvrdnja da chemtrails nisu teorija zavjere već dio borbe protiv klimatskih promjena je netočna. Članak Financial Timesa govori o geoinženjeringu, ali ne povezuje ga direktno s chemtrailsima. Naučna zajednica je oprezna prema geoinženjeringu i naglašava potrebu za daljnjim istraživanjima i regulacijama.</p>

Provjera tvrdnje: Chemtrails i borba protiv klimatskih promjena

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The claim that four organizations of the pandemic-vaccine industry are seeking to raise $123 billion and that the money will be coming from the public has been circulating. This article aims to review this claim, providing a thorough analysis and context to help readers understand the truth behind it.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The claim states that the World Health Organisation (WHO), GAVI, the International Development Association (IDA), and the Pandemic Fund are seeking to raise a total of $123 billion. The money is expected to come from various sources, including national governments and private funders, ultimately impacting taxpayers.</p>
<h2>Breakdown of the Claim</h2>
<p>The claim is based on the following breakdown:</p>
<ul>
  <li>WHO wants to raise $11.1 billion.</li>
  <li>GAVI seeks $11.9 billion.</li>
  <li>IDA aims to raise $100 billion.</li>
  <li>The Pandemic Fund wants $2 billion.</li>
</ul>
<p>These figures add up to $123 billion.</p>
<h2>Analysis of the Claim</h2>
<p>To evaluate the claim, we need to consider the sources of funding and the transparency of these organizations.</p>
<h3>World Health Organisation (WHO)</h3>
<p>WHO is seeking $11.1 billion for its work over the next four years. According to Devex, WHO expects $4 billion in membership dues, leaving $7.1 billion to be fundraised from governments and the private sector. WHO's funding sources include national governments, private foundations like the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation, and other non-state actors.</p>
<p>WHO's financial transparency has been a concern. The most recent audited financial statements published relate to the year ended December 2021. This lack of up-to-date financial reporting raises questions about accountability and transparency.</p>
<h3>GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance</h3>
<p>GAVI is asking for $9 billion in new pledges for the period 2026-2030, out of a total need of $11.9 billion. GAVI's funding comes from a mix of public and private sources, with the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation being a significant contributor.</p>
<p>GAVI's impact on global vaccine distribution is substantial, but its financial operations and profit margins are not fully transparent. The organization's spending on fundraising and management expenses raises questions about its efficiency and accountability.</p>
<h3>International Development Association (IDA)</h3>
<p>IDA hopes to raise $100 billion through a new cycle of funding. IDA's funds are primarily used for poverty alleviation and climate change mitigation. The organization's strategic directions for the latest funding round emphasize resilience, human capital, and climate adaptation.</p>
<p>IDA's funding comes from contributions from member countries, with top funders including Japan, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The organization's focus on global agendas under the auspices of poverty alleviation raises concerns about the effectiveness and transparency of its spending.</p>
<h3>The Pandemic Fund</h3>
<p>The Pandemic Fund wants to raise $2 billion for its work. The fund is a World Bank partnership with a consortium of donor countries, foundations, and civil society organizations. Its founding financial contributors include various countries and private foundations like the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation.</p>
<p>The Pandemic Fund's focus on strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response is crucial, but the lack of transparency in its financial operations and the involvement of private foundations raise questions about accountability and the potential for conflicts of interest.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that four organizations are seeking $123 billion for pandemic-vaccine schemes is partially true. However, the claim lacks context and transparency regarding the sources of funding and the specific uses of the money. The involvement of private foundations and the lack of up-to-date financial reporting by some organizations raise concerns about accountability and potential conflicts of interest.</p>
<p>While it is true that the money will ultimately come from taxpayers, the claim exaggerates the direct impact on individual taxpayers. The funding for these organizations comes from a mix of public and private sources, and the specific allocation of funds is not fully disclosed.</p>
<p>It is essential for these organizations to provide more transparency and accountability in their financial operations to build public trust and ensure that the money is used effectively and efficiently.</p>
<p>For further reading on the involvement of private foundations in global health, see the following study:</p>
<p><a href="https://doi.org/10.17104/1611-8944_2014_3_323">The Rockefeller Foundation and the Transition from the League of Nations to the UN (1939–1946)</a> by Ludovic Tournès, published in the Journal of Modern European History.</p>

Claim Review: Four Organizations Seeking $123 Billion for Pandemic-Vaccine Industry

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "Chemtrails are not a conspiracy theory but a fact, and there are widespread attempts to keep chemtrail operations hidden from the public." is Mostly False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: