Cellphone radiation may cause brain cancer

Childrens Health Defense - org

Infowars - com

<h1>Claim Review: Cellphone Radiation and Brain Cancer</h1>
<p>The claim that cellphone radiation may cause brain cancer has been a topic of debate for many years. Several peer-reviewed studies have been conducted to investigate this claim, but the evidence is not conclusive. While some studies show a link between cellphone radiation and brain cancer, others do not.</p>
<p>A recent study published in Environmental Health analyzed 24 studies and found significantly higher risks for malignant brain tumors, meningioma, and glioma on the side of the head where cellphones were held. The study also found that heavy, long-term cellphone use was linked to an increased risk of glioma. This study brings the number of meta-analyses published since 2016 linking cellphone radiation to an increased risk of brain cancer to seven.</p>
<p>However, a recent WHO-led study claimed there’s no evidence of a link between cellphone radiation and brain cancer. Some experts have suggested that the WHO picked industry-biased researchers to conduct its review. Lennart Hardell, a leading scientist who found a link between cellphone use and gliomas, agreed that the WHO study authors should be responsible for their fraudulent behavior violating human health and the environment.</p>
<p>Brain tumor rates are on the rise in Denmark, which is known for its high-quality tracking of cancer cases. This data contradicts the notion that the rate of brain tumors isn’t on the rise, which has been used to claim that cellphone use is not linked to an increased risk of brain tumors or cancers in general. A 2023 study on brain cancer rates worldwide from 1990-2019 found a significant rise in brain cancer among both men and women in nearly all parts of the world.</p>
<p>The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) claims there’s not enough scientific evidence to link cellphone use to health problems, including brain cancer. However, the FDA rejected the findings of a $30 million study it commissioned on the topic, which concluded there was 'clear evidence' that male rats exposed to high levels of wireless radiation like that used in 2G and 3G cellphones developed cancerous heart tumors, and 'some evidence' of tumors in the brain and adrenal gland of exposed male rats.</p>
<p>In conclusion, while some studies suggest a link between cellphone radiation and brain cancer, the evidence is not conclusive. The World Health Organization and other health agencies have not found sufficient evidence to support this claim. More research is needed to fully understand the potential risks.</p>
<h2>References</h2>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12940-024-01117-8">Relationship between radiofrequency-electromagnetic radiation from cellular phones and brain tumor: meta-analyses using various proxies for RF-EMR exposure-outcome assessment</a> - Jinyoung Moon, Jungmin Kwon &amp; Yongseok Mun, Environmental Health volume 23, Article number: 82 (2024)&nbsp;</li>
</ul>

Claim Review: Cellphone Radiation and Brain Cancer

<p>The claim that COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer and have led to a significant increase in cancer cases among young people has been circulating widely. This article aims to review the available evidence and provide a thorough analysis of this claim.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The claim suggests that COVID-19 vaccines are directly responsible for an increase in cancer cases, particularly among young people. It cites various sources, including reports from the American Cancer Society, Pfizer's safety reports, and statements from oncologists and pathologists.</p>
<h2>Analysis of the Claim</h2>
<p>To evaluate this claim, it is essential to examine the evidence presented and compare it with reliable scientific sources.</p>
<h3>Increase in Cancer Cases</h3>
<p>The claim mentions a significant increase in fourteen different types of cancers across 44 countries, particularly among young people, by October 2022. However, it is crucial to note that the increase in cancer cases could be attributed to various factors, including delayed screenings and treatments due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The American Cancer Society reported that cancer mortality in young people had doubled compared to pre-2020 levels, but this does not necessarily imply a direct causal link to COVID-19 vaccines.</p>
<h3>Pfizer's Safety Report</h3>
<p>The claim references Pfizer's 2022 safety report on COVID-19 vaccines, which documented thousands of cancer cases following vaccinations. However, it is important to understand that correlation does not imply causation. The presence of cancer cases in vaccinated individuals does not prove that the vaccines caused the cancers. Further investigation is needed to establish a causal relationship.</p>
<h3>Statements from Oncologists and Pathologists</h3>
<p>The claim includes statements from oncologists and pathologists who have observed aggressive cancer relapses and unprecedented cases of stage four cancers in young adults. While these observations are concerning, they do not provide conclusive evidence that COVID-19 vaccines are the cause. Other factors, such as environmental exposures, lifestyle changes, and genetic predispositions, could also contribute to these observations.</p>
<h3>Mechanism of mRNA Vaccines</h3>
<p>The claim discusses the mechanism of mRNA vaccines and the resulting spike protein production by people's bodies after vaccination. It suggests that the spike protein may have carcinogenic effects. However, scientific studies have shown that the spike protein produced by mRNA vaccines is rapidly degraded and does not persist in the body long enough to cause significant harm. Additionally, the spike protein is not known to have direct carcinogenic properties.</p>
<h3>Immune Suppression and Cancer</h3>
<p>The claim mentions that COVID-19 vaccines may cause immune suppression, which impairs the body's ability to fight cancer. While it is true that some vaccines can temporarily affect the immune system, there is no evidence to suggest that COVID-19 vaccines specifically cause long-term immune suppression that leads to cancer. The immune system is complex and adaptable, and temporary changes do not necessarily result in increased cancer risk.</p>
<h3>Ivermectin as a Potential Treatment</h3>
<p>The claim suggests that ivermectin may be a potential treatment for COVID-19 and cancer. While ivermectin has shown some effectiveness against certain viruses and parasites, its role in treating cancer is not well-established. Further research is needed to determine the efficacy and safety of ivermectin as a cancer treatment.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer and have led to a significant increase in cancer cases among young people is not supported by reliable scientific evidence. While there have been reports of increased cancer cases, these are likely due to other factors such as delayed screenings and treatments during the pandemic. The claim that vaccines are directly responsible for this increase is misleading and lacks credible scientific backing.</p>
<p>It is crucial to rely on peer-reviewed scientific studies and expert opinions when evaluating claims about health and medicine. Misinformation can lead to unnecessary fear and mistrust, which can have serious consequences for public health. Always consult reliable sources and seek advice from healthcare professionals for accurate information.</p>

Claim Review: COVID-19 Vaccines and Cancer

<h1>Examining RFK Jr.'s Claims on 5G Health Risks: A Comprehensive Review</h1>
<p>Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has publicly stated that 5G technology presents serious health risks, including the disruption of the blood-brain barrier and an increase in glioblastomas and other cancers. This claim review aims to scrutinize these assertions by examining the available scientific evidence.</p>
<h2>Understanding 5G Technology</h2>
<p>5G is the fifth generation of wireless technology, designed to increase bandwidth, allowing faster download speeds and more reliable connections. It operates on different frequency bands, including low-band (below 1 GHz), mid-band (1-6 GHz), and high-band (mmWave, above 24 GHz).</p>
<h2>Health Concerns and Scientific Consensus</h2>
<p>Kennedy cites 'thousands of studies' supporting his claims. However, the mainstream scientific community and major health organizations disagree with his interpretation. The World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) have both concluded that exposure to 5G frequencies within international guidelines does not cause adverse health effects.</p>
<p>A comprehensive review by the <a href='https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/radiation-electromagnetic-fields'>WHO</a> on electromagnetic fields and public health states that 'no adverse health effects have been causally linked with exposure to wireless technologies' within the given limits.</p>
<h2>Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption and Cancer</h2>
<p>Kennedy's claim that 5G radiation disrupts the blood-brain barrier and causes cancer is not supported by the majority of scientific studies. A study by the <a href='https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935118300167'>Swedish Radiation Safety Authority</a> found no consistent evidence that RF fields, including 5G frequencies, cause such effects.</p>
<p>Regarding cancer, the <a href='https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/radiation/electromagnetic-fields-fact-sheet'>National Cancer Institute</a> states that 'studies have not shown clear evidence of a association between cell phone use and cancer.' Moreover, the incidence of glioblastomas has not increased in correlation with the rise of wireless technologies, according to the <a href='https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/brain.html'>Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program</a>.</p>
<h2>International Standards and Safety Guidelines</h2>
<p>Kennedy's plan includes aligning U.S. policies with stricter international standards. However, the <a href='https://www.icnirp.org/cms/upload/publications/ICNIRPrfg-emf.pdf'>ICNIRP guidelines</a>, which are followed by many countries, are already designed to protect against all established health effects.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>Based on the current scientific consensus and reviews by major health organizations, RFK Jr.'s claims about 5G health risks are largely unfounded. While continuous research is essential to monitor potential long-term effects, the available evidence indicates that 5G technology is safe when within international guidelines.</p>

Examining RFK Jr.'s Claims on 5G Health Risks: A Comprehensive Review

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>A recent article published on October 16, 2024, claims that a peer-reviewed study in the International Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine shows that ivermectin, mebendazole, and fenbendazole are effective treatments for cancer. This claim has garnered significant attention, particularly in the context of alternative medicine and the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The article asserts that Drs. William Makis, Paul Marik, Ilyes Baghli, and other scientists from the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) have conducted a study demonstrating the anticancer benefits of these three deworming drugs. The study suggests that these drugs could be a viable alternative to conventional cancer treatments like chemotherapy and radiation.</p>
<h2>Analysis of the Claim</h2>
<p>The study published in the International Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine is indeed peer-reviewed, which lends some credibility to the claim. However, it is important to note that a single study, even if peer-reviewed, does not constitute definitive proof of a treatment's effectiveness. Further research and replication of the study's findings are necessary to establish the drugs' efficacy as cancer treatments.</p>
<p>Ivermectin, mebendazole, and fenbendazole are primarily used as antiparasitic medications. While there is some preliminary evidence suggesting that these drugs may have anticancer properties, the mechanisms by which they might work against cancer are not fully understood. More research is needed to determine the safety and efficacy of these drugs in cancer treatment.</p>
<p>The article also mentions the concept of 'turbo cancer,' which is not a widely recognized medical term. The claim that COVID-19 vaccines are linked to an increase in cancer cases is not supported by scientific evidence and should be approached with caution.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>While the study published in the International Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine is a promising development, it is too early to conclude that ivermectin, mebendazole, and fenbendazole are effective cancer treatments. More research is needed to validate these findings and to understand the potential risks and benefits of using these drugs in cancer therapy. Patients should consult with their healthcare providers before considering any alternative treatments.</p>
<h2>References</h2>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32942671/">Ivermectin as a Broad-Spectrum Host-Directed Antiviral: The Real Deal?</a>&nbsp;</li>
  <li><a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6769799/">Mebendazole as a Repurposed Agent in Cancer Therapy</a>&nbsp;</li>
  <li><a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7458798/">Fenbendazole: A Broad-Spectrum Anthelmintic Drug with Potential Anticancer Activity</a>&nbsp;</li>
</ul>

Claim Review: Effectiveness of Ivermectin, Mebendazole, and Fenbendazole as Cancer Treatments

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "Cellphone radiation may cause brain cancer" is Half True

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: