A U.S. Supreme Court ruling about President-elect Donald Trump's immunity in his business fraud case has prompted Judge Juan Merchan to indefinitely postpone Trump's sentencing for 34 counts of business records fraud.

Natural News

The claim that Judge Juan Merchan indefinitely postponed Donald Trump's sentencing due to a U.S. Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity requires careful examination.
Origin of the Claim: The claim originated from an article published on a website known for conservative and often provocative content. The article alleges that the Supreme Court's ruling on presidential immunity led Judge Juan Merchan to indefinitely postpone Trump's sentencing for 34 counts of business records fraud.
Context and Background: Donald Trump was convicted in May 2024 on 34 counts of falsifying business records, a case stemming from payments made to porn star Stormy Daniels. The Manhattan District Attorney, Alvin Bragg, led the prosecution. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in July 2024 that presidents are to be afforded presumptive immunity from criminal prosecutions for most actions taken while in office.
Analysis of the Claim:
1. Supreme Court Ruling: The Supreme Court's ruling indeed complicates the prosecution of a sitting president. However, the ruling does not explicitly state that Trump's sentencing must be indefinitely postponed. The court's decision focuses on the scope of presidential immunity, not on the scheduling of sentencing hearings.
2. Judge Merchan's Decision: According to a Fox News article, the Manhattan District Attorney's office clarified that the sentencing had not been adjourned. Instead, a court email from the previous week stated that all future dates had been stayed. This stay was granted to allow prosecutors to evaluate the impact of Trump's election as president.
3. Legal Proceedings: The case is complex and involves multiple legal considerations. The stay on sentencing does not mean the case is dismissed or that Trump will never face sentencing. It simply pauses the proceedings until further legal clarifications are made.
4. Political Context: The article suggests that the postponement is politically motivated, aimed at undermining Trump's presidency. However, the legal complexities and the Supreme Court's ruling add layers of uncertainty that go beyond political motivations.
Conclusion: The claim that Trump's sentencing was indefinitely postponed due to the Supreme Court ruling is misleading. The sentencing was stayed, not adjourned, and the future of the case remains uncertain. The Supreme Court's ruling adds complexity to the prosecution of a sitting president but does not directly mandate an indefinite postponement of sentencing.

Fact-Check: Did the Supreme Court Ruling Prompt Indefinite Postponement of Trump's Sentencing?

In an exclusive interview with Breitbart News, former President Donald Trump claimed that he would solve the Ukraine-Russia war before his inauguration if elected. This claim has raised eyebrows and sparked debate among political analysts and the general public. This article aims to review the claim and provide a thorough analysis based on available evidence and expert opinions.
The Claim: Trump stated that he intends to negotiate peace between Russia and Ukraine as President-elect before he is sworn in as the next president of the United States. He believes that his personal relationships with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky will enable him to achieve this goal.
Analysis:
1. Feasibility of Negotiations: Negotiating peace between two warring nations is a complex and time-consuming process. It involves multiple stakeholders, intricate diplomatic maneuvers, and often requires the involvement of international organizations. The idea that a single individual, even a President-elect, could resolve such a conflict in a short period is highly speculative. Historical examples, such as the negotiations that ended the Bosnian War, demonstrate that peace agreements can take years to materialize.
2. Personal Relationships: Trump's claim that his personal relationships with Putin and Zelensky will facilitate peace negotiations is questionable. While personal diplomacy can play a role, it is not the sole determinant of successful negotiations. The conflict in Ukraine involves deep-seated geopolitical, historical, and economic factors that go beyond personal relationships. For instance, the Minsk agreements, which aimed to resolve the conflict in Eastern Ukraine, involved extensive diplomatic efforts by multiple countries and international organizations.
3. Timeline: The timeframe between the election and inauguration is approximately two and a half months. This is an extremely short period to achieve a comprehensive peace agreement, especially considering the complexity of the Ukraine-Russia conflict. Even if Trump were to initiate negotiations, it is unlikely that a sustainable peace agreement could be reached within this timeframe.
4. Expert Opinions: Political analysts and experts in international relations have expressed skepticism about Trump's claim. They point out that the Ukraine-Russia conflict is deeply entrenched and involves multiple layers of complexity that cannot be resolved through quick negotiations. For example, a study by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace highlights the multifaceted nature of the conflict and the need for a comprehensive approach that addresses both short-term and long-term issues.
Conclusion:
Based on the available evidence and expert opinions, Trump's claim that he will solve the Ukraine-Russia war before his inauguration is highly speculative and lacks concrete evidence. While personal diplomacy can play a role in conflict resolution, the complexity of the Ukraine-Russia conflict and the short timeframe make it unlikely that a sustainable peace agreement could be achieved within the proposed timeline. Therefore, this claim should be approached with caution and a healthy dose of skepticism.
References:
- Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: <a href="https://carnegieendowment.org/2021/03/18/ukraine-conflict-complex-and-multifaceted-pub-84112">Ukraine Conflict: Complex and Multifaceted</a>
- United Nations: <a href="https://www.un.org/peacekeeping/en/peacekeeping-operations">Peacekeeping Operations</a>
- Council on Foreign Relations: <a href="https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/ukraine-crisis">Ukraine Crisis</a>

Claim Review: Trump's Assertion to Solve Ukraine-Russia War Before Inauguration

The claim that the deep state is plotting a second assassination attempt on Donald Trump via Iran is unfounded and lacks credible evidence.&nbsp;
The article cites unnamed senior U.S. intelligence officials who claim that there is evidence pointing to Iran planning to assassinate Trump.&nbsp;
However, the Iranian government has denied these allegations, calling them 'unsubstantiated and malicious.' &nbsp;It is important to note that the deep state is not an official term and is often used to refer to a supposed group of powerful individuals who secretly control the government.&nbsp;
There is no concrete evidence to support the existence of such a group, and the use of this term in the article is misleading.&nbsp;
&nbsp;The article also suggests that the deep state may try to assassinate Trump and then blame Iran as a scapegoat.&nbsp;
However, this claim is speculative and not based on any evidence. It is also worth mentioning that the article cites a report from Politico, but the link provided does not lead to any information supporting the claim. &nbsp;
In conclusion, the claim that the deep state is planning a second assassination attempt on Donald Trump via Iran is unfounded and lacks credible evidence. It is essential to rely on reputable sources and fact-check claims before accepting them as true.

Fact-checking the claim of a deep state-planned second assassination attempt on Donald Trump via Iran

In a recent speech to the NAACP, President Biden called for an immediate ban on AR-15s and similar rifles, citing their use in the attempted assassination of Donald Trump and claiming that 'more children in America die of gunshot wounds than any other reason.'
While the call for stricter gun control laws is a political stance and subject to debate, the claim about child deaths is unverified and cannot be proven. &nbsp;According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the leading causes of child deaths include accidents, congenital anomalies, and various health issues.
Guns or bullets are not listed as the leading killer of children, contradicting Biden's claim. The source of this claim is unknown, and it first appeared in anti-gun speeches on June 2, 2022. &nbsp;It is important to note that the call for an AR-15 ban is a political stance and subject to ongoing debate.
The Federal Assault Weapons Ban of 1994, which prohibited certain semi-automatic firearms with large-capacity magazines, expired in 2004, and Democrats have been advocating for another 'assault weapons' ban to replace it. However, the claim about child deaths being primarily caused by gunshot wounds is unverified and should not be used to support political arguments.

Biden Calls for AR-15 Ban After Assassination Attempt on Trump: A Claim Review

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "A U.S. Supreme Court ruling about President-elect Donald Trump's immunity in his business fraud case has prompted Judge Juan Merchan to indefinitely postpone Trump's sentencing for 34 counts of business records fraud." is Mostly False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: