A study from Argentina claims that COVID-19 vaccines contain 55 undeclared chemical elements, including heavy metals and rare earth minerals, which are potentially harmful.

Natural News

Claim Review: Study on 55 Undeclared Chemical Elements in COVID Vaccines is a Hoax

Claim Review: Argentine Study on COVID Vaccines Containing 55 Undeclared Chemical Elements

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>A recent study from Argentina published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research claims that COVID-19 vaccines from Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, CanSino, Sinopharm, and Sputnik contain 55 undeclared chemical elements. The study suggests that these elements, including heavy metals and rare earth minerals, are potentially harmful. However, the Health Ranger, a prominent figure in the alternative health community, has critiqued the study, highlighting several errors and misleading information.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The Argentine study claims that the presence of these undeclared elements in COVID-19 vaccines poses a significant health risk. The study identified 11 heavy metals, such as chromium, arsenic, nickel, aluminum, cobalt, and copper, which are known to be systemic toxicants. Additionally, the study found several rare earth minerals, including lanthanum, cerium, and gadolinium.</p>
<h2>Critique of the Study</h2>
<p>The Health Ranger, in a video response, argues that the study is flawed and misleading. He points out that not all elements are inherently dangerous and that the combination of elements can produce different chemicals with varying levels of toxicity. The Health Ranger also criticizes the study's methodology, stating that the math is off and that incorrect dilution factors were used, rendering the results unreliable.</p>
<h2>Scientific Context</h2>
<p>It is essential to understand that elements and chemicals are not the same. Elements are the basic building blocks of matter, while chemicals are compounds formed by combining elements. The toxicity of an element depends on its form and concentration. For example, hydrogen, carbon, and oxygen can combine to form vitamin C, which is beneficial, or they can form other compounds that are toxic.</p>
<p>The presence of elements in vaccines does not automatically mean they are harmful. Many elements are naturally occurring and can be found in trace amounts in various substances, including food and water. The key factor is the concentration and form of these elements.</p>
<h2>Previous Studies and Regulatory Oversight</h2>
<p>The Argentine study is not the first to claim the presence of undeclared elements in vaccines. Previous studies from Germany, England, Canada, and Romania have also identified undeclared elements in COVID-19 vaccines. However, these studies have been criticized for their methodology and interpretation of data.</p>
<p>Regulatory agencies, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), require vaccine manufacturers to list excipients, which are additives used as preservatives, adjuvants, or stabilizers. However, the CDC has been criticized for making vaccine excipient information difficult to find.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that COVID-19 vaccines contain 55 undeclared chemical elements is misleading and based on a flawed study. While the presence of undeclared elements in vaccines is concerning, the study's methodology and interpretation of data are questionable. Not all elements are inherently dangerous, and their toxicity depends on their form and concentration. Further research is needed to determine the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines.</p>
<h2>References</h2>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.brighteon.com/5d735827-39cf-489a-9a78-3a8d809b6351">Widely-touted '55 undeclared chemical elements' VACCINE study is a clown show of incompetence and errors - Brighteon.com</a></li>
  <li><a href="http://vaccines.news/">Vaccines News | Vaccines News Health Related News</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/undeclared-chemicals-heavy-metals-covid-vaccines/">55 Undeclared Chemical Elements — Including Heavy Metals — Found in COVID Vaccines • Children's Health Defense</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://support.naturalnews.com/Feedback.html">Contact Natural News Support</a></li>
</ul>

<h2>Claim Review: Study on 55 Undeclared Chemical Elements in COVID Vaccines is a Hoax</h2>
<p>The alternative media has been buzzing with claims that 55 undeclared chemical elements were found in COVID vaccines, according to a pre-print research paper that claims to have conducted ICP-MS analysis of vaccines. Children's Health Defense covered this paper in an article on their website. However, the paper is a hoax.</p>
<h3>Understanding ICP-MS Instruments</h3>
<p>ICP-MS instruments do not detect chemicals. They detect elements such as Pb, Zn, Cd, Hg, U, Ca, As, etc., but are incapable of detecting chemicals. Chemicals are made of atomic elements, and when combined, they form molecules like H2O (water) or CO2 (carbon dioxide). The ICP-MS instrument destroys all chemicals and molecules during the analysis process, counting only atomic elements.</p>
<h3>Flaws in the Study</h3>
<p>The study has several critical flaws:</p>
<ul>
  <li>The study authors imply that the atomic elements found are extremely toxic at the concentrations detected, but this is not true. Many of the concentrations were found in low parts per trillion, which is essentially zero.</li>
  <li>The sample prep process described in the paper is riddled with errors. For example, it claims that 5 microliters of a liquid cannot possibly weigh between 0.22 and 0.33 grams, which is absurd.</li>
  <li>The dilution factor calculations are incorrect. The paper describes a dilution of 1 to 10, but in fact, it achieved a dilution of 1 to 2000.</li>
  <li>The instrument used in the study is not capable of achieving the sensitivities claimed in the paper's results.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>The study is a hoax. The ICP-MS instrument cannot detect chemicals, and the reported numbers for many elements are far beyond the sensitivity capabilities of the instrument. The sample prep procedure is bizarre, and the dilution calculations are wrong. The scary-sounding language of 'undeclared elements' is not scientific or rooted in any regulatory requirements.</p>

<p>A recent study published in the journal Scientific Reports examined global cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) between 1967 and 2023. The study found that out of 19 vaccines examined, 17 were potentially associated with GBS, including COVID-19 and influenza vaccines. The findings also showed that reports of vaccine-related GBS surged following the introduction of the swine flu vaccine in 2009 and the COVID-19 vaccine in 2020.</p>
<p>GBS is a rare condition that attacks the peripheral nervous system, causing sudden numbness and muscle weakness. The study reported 117 deaths among the 15,377 cases of vaccine-associated GBS, with most deaths occurring in people aged 65 and over.</p>
<p>The researchers noted that studies have consistently shown a higher risk of GBS from COVID-19 and flu infections compared to vaccination. They cited a four- to seven-times increase in GBS following influenza infection.</p>
<p>Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., senior research scientist at <a href="https://remedia.social/claim-author/childrens-health-defense-org-b3c2e48c34df">Children’s Health Defense (CHD)</a> , praised the study’s scope but questioned its methodology. Brian Hooker, Ph.D., chief scientific officer for CHD, also questioned the study’s conclusion that infection poses a greater risk of GBS compared to vaccination.</p>
<p>The study used data from VigiBase, the WHO’s global database of adverse event reports. The researchers concluded that Ad5-vectored COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a higher incidence of GBS, especially when compared to the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.</p>
<p>The study’s findings did not indicate sex-specific risks of GBS but found an increased association with advancing age. The average time of GBS onset was 5.5 days, with a high standard deviation, suggesting variability in onset times.</p>
<p>The study’s authors acknowledged the scarcity of data connecting GBS to vaccination and the need for more research to elucidate the underlying mechanisms linking vaccines and GBS.</p>
<p>In conclusion, while the study found associations between several vaccines and GBS, it also noted that the risk of GBS from infections like COVID-19 and influenza is higher than from vaccinations. The claim that most vaccines are associated with GBS and that reports of vaccine-associated GBS have been increasing steadily over time is partially true.&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>References:</strong></p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-74729-2">Global burden of vaccine-associated Guillain-Barré syndrome over 170 countries from 1967 to 202</a>3 - Scientific Reports&nbsp;</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanwpc/article/PIIS2666-6065(21)00211-X/fulltext">Mortality rate for GBS in countries with limited resources</a> &nbsp;- The Lancet</li>
  <li><a href="https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/15838-guillain-barre-syndrome">Guillain-Barré syndrome</a> &nbsp;- Cleveland Clinic</li>
</ul>

Claim Review: Guillain-Barré Syndrome Associated with 17 Vaccines, Including Covid and Flu Shots

<h2>Claim Review: Dr. Mike Yeadon on COVID-19 Vaccines</h2>
<p>Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former vice president of Pfizer, recently made a series of claims about COVID-19 vaccines at a conference in Austria. He asserted that the vaccines were intentionally designed to injure, kill, and reduce fertility. This article will examine these claims in detail and provide a thorough review based on scientific evidence.</p>
<h3>Background</h3>
<p>Dr. Mike Yeadon is a professional research scientist with over 30 years of experience in the pharmaceutical industry and biotechnology. He has been vocal about his concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccines, particularly their safety and efficacy.</p>
<h3>Claim Analysis</h3>
<p>Dr. Yeadon's primary claim is that the COVID-19 vaccines were deliberately designed to cause harm. He argues that it is impossible to develop, test, and authorize a complex biological product in under a year. However, this assertion overlooks the unprecedented global collaboration and resources dedicated to vaccine development during the pandemic.</p>
<p>The COVID-19 vaccines, particularly those developed by Pfizer and Moderna, utilize mRNA technology. This technology has been in development for decades and has undergone extensive testing and refinement. The rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines was made possible by leveraging existing research and technology, as well as significant financial and human resources.</p>
<p>Dr. Yeadon also claims that the spike protein in the vaccines is toxic and causes various health issues, including myocarditis, heart attacks, and neurological conditions. While it is true that the spike protein can cause adverse effects, these are rare and have been thoroughly investigated. The benefits of vaccination, including protection against severe COVID-19, far outweigh the risks.</p>
<p>Regarding fertility, Dr. Yeadon suggests that lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) in the vaccines disproportionately deposit in the ovaries, leading to reduced fertility. However, scientific studies have not found evidence to support this claim. A study published in the <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983">New England Journal of Medicine</a> found no adverse effects on fertility in women who received the COVID-19 vaccine.</p>
<h3>Scientific Evidence</h3>
<p>Numerous peer-reviewed studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines. A study published in <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00947-8/fulltext">The Lancet</a> found that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was 95% effective in preventing COVID-19 infection. Another study in the <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2035389">New England Journal of Medicine</a> showed that the Moderna vaccine was 94.1% effective.</p>
<p>Regarding safety, a study published in <a href="https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7013e3.htm">Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR)</a> by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that serious adverse events after COVID-19 vaccination were rare and that the vaccines were generally safe.</p>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>Dr. Mike Yeadon's claims about COVID-19 vaccines being intentionally designed to harm are not supported by scientific evidence. The vaccines have undergone rigorous testing and have been proven safe and effective by numerous studies. While there are rare adverse events associated with the vaccines, the benefits of vaccination far outweigh the risks. It is crucial to rely on peer-reviewed scientific research when evaluating claims about vaccine safety and efficacy.</p>

Claim Review: Dr. Mike Yeadon on COVID-19 Vaccines

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "A study from Argentina claims that COVID-19 vaccines contain 55 undeclared chemical elements, including heavy metals and rare earth minerals, which are potentially harmful." is Mostly False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: