A recent attack on Trump rally attendees in Arizona was carried out using a handheld UV laser device, causing symptoms such as temporary loss of vision, sunburns, and skin peeling.

Natural News

<h2>Claim Review: UV Laser Attack on Trump Rally Attendees</h2>
<p>The claim that a recent attack on Trump rally attendees in Arizona was carried out using a handheld UV laser device, causing symptoms such as temporary loss of vision, sunburns, and skin peeling, has been circulating online. This article aims to review the scientific validity of this claim.</p>
<h3>Understanding UV Lasers</h3>
<p>UV lasers in the wavelengths of 280nm - 315nm are considered UV-B and are extremely dangerous to the human eye. High-intensity UV light can cause permanent retinal damage or blindness. However, the symptoms described in the claim, such as temporary loss of vision and skin peeling, are not consistent with the effects of UV-B exposure.</p>
<h3>Scientific Evidence</h3>
<p>According to scientific studies, UV-B exposure primarily causes sunburns and skin cancer, but the immediate effects are typically redness and pain, not skin peeling. Temporary loss of vision is more commonly associated with visible light lasers, not UV lasers. Additionally, UV lasers are not visible to the naked eye or night vision optics, making them difficult to detect, but their effects would be immediate and noticeable.</p>
<h3>Technical Feasibility</h3>
<p>The claim suggests that a handheld UV laser device could cause blindness from 500 yards or farther. While high-powered lasers can cause damage at long distances, the energy required to cause blindness from such a distance is not feasible with handheld devices. Moreover, aiming an invisible beam accurately over long distances is extremely challenging.</p>
<h3>Protective Measures</h3>
<p>The claim also mentions protective glasses and sunblock as effective measures against UV lasers. While sunglasses and sunblock can protect against general UV exposure, they are not designed to protect against high-intensity laser beams. Specialized protective glasses are available for specific wavelengths, but their effectiveness against a directed energy attack is limited.</p>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>Based on the available scientific evidence, the claim that a UV laser attack caused the described symptoms at a Trump rally is largely unfounded. The symptoms and technical details provided in the claim do not align with the known effects and capabilities of UV lasers. It is crucial to rely on scientifically verified information when assessing such claims.</p>
<p>For further reading on the effects of UV radiation, refer to studies from reliable sources such as the <a href="https://www.who.int/health-topics/ultraviolet-radiation#tab=tab_1">World Health Organization</a> &nbsp;and the <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/search/all/?term=ultraviolet">National Center for Biotechnology Information</a> .</p>

Claim Review: UV Laser Attack on Trump Rally Attendees

<p>The Washington Post recently reported on dozens of 'electrosensitive' people who moved to a remote West Virginia town with no cell service to avoid symptoms they attribute to electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure. This article aims to review the claim that electromagnetic sensitivity (EMS) is a federally recognized condition causing various health symptoms.</p>
<p>Electromagnetic sensitivity, also known as electromagnetic hypersensitivity or microwave syndrome, is a condition where individuals report adverse health effects from exposure to EMF. Symptoms can include heart arrhythmia, headaches, eye problems, burning skin, brain fog, memory issues, and fatigue. The article mentions that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) created a protected area in West Virginia, dubbed the National Radio Quiet Zone, to shield the Green Bank Telescope from RF-EMF interference.</p>
<p>The claim that EMS is a federally recognized condition is not entirely accurate. While some studies suggest a prevalence of perceived EMS, the scientific community generally agrees that more research is needed to establish a causal link between EMF exposure and these symptoms. A 2020 peer-reviewed study reported a 'high prevalence of perceived EMF sensitivity' in various countries, but this does not equate to a recognized medical condition.</p>
<p>The International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF) has called electrosensitivity a 'humanitarian crisis,' emphasizing that symptoms can vary and affect multiple body systems. However, the scientific consensus remains that the evidence is insufficient to conclusively link EMF exposure to these symptoms.</p>
<p>The article also mentions that many people and organizations are mobilizing for change to accommodate those with EMS. Children's Health Defense (CHD) and a coalition of nonprofits have submitted comments to the FCC, advocating for the recognition of EMS as a disability and prioritizing fiber internet over wireless when feasible.</p>
<p>In conclusion, while there is some evidence of perceived EMS, the scientific community does not fully recognize it as a condition caused by EMF exposure. More research is needed to establish a definitive link between EMF and the reported symptoms. The claim that EMS is a federally recognized condition is not supported by current scientific consensus.</p>
<p><strong>References:</strong></p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412024001983">2020 Study on EMF Sensitivity</a>&nbsp;</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.icbe-emf.org/">International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF)</a></li>
</ul>

Claim Review: Electromagnetic Sensitivity and Its Impact on Modern Life

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The article titled 'When did the Globalists’ plan to enslave the world using chronic illness begin?' by Rhoda Wilson on The Expose presents a theory that global monopoly capitalism is attempting to enslave the developed world through chronic illness. This claim review will examine the validity of this assertion.</p>
<h2>Claim Analysis</h2>
<p>The article suggests that the origins of this plan can be traced back to various historical events, including the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, the CIA's influence post-JFK assassination, the import of Nazi and Japanese bioweapons scientists after World War II, and even the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913. The author also links this plan to the Seven Deadly Sins, arguing that the COVID-19 crisis is an extreme example of these sins.</p>
<h2>Evaluation of Evidence</h2>
<p>The article lacks credible scientific evidence to support its claims. It relies heavily on speculative theories and historical events that are not directly linked to the current health crisis. For instance, the claim that the COVID-19 pandemic is a result of a deliberate plan to enslave the world through chronic illness is not supported by any peer-reviewed studies or reliable scientific sources.</p>
<p>The author's assertion that the Seven Deadly Sins are manifested in the COVID-19 crisis is also highly subjective and lacks empirical evidence. While it is true that the pandemic has led to various forms of suffering, attributing this to a deliberate plan by globalists is unfounded.</p>
<h2>Scientific Perspective</h2>
<p>The COVID-19 pandemic is a complex global health issue that has been extensively studied by scientists worldwide. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the pandemic is caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is believed to have originated from animals and spread to humans. The WHO and other reputable scientific organizations have not found any evidence to support the claim that the pandemic is part of a deliberate plan to enslave the world through chronic illness.</p>
<p>A study published in the journal <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9">Nature Medicine</a> suggests that the SARS-CoV-2 virus likely originated from a natural source, such as bats or pangolins, and was not engineered in a laboratory. This finding contradicts the theory that the virus was deliberately created to cause chronic illness and enslave the world.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that globalists are using chronic illness to enslave the world is largely unfounded and lacks credible evidence. The article mixes historical events with speculative theories, making it unreliable. The claim rating is 1 out of 5.</p>
<p>It is important to rely on credible scientific sources and peer-reviewed studies when evaluating claims about global health issues. Misinformation can lead to confusion and mistrust, which can hinder efforts to address real health challenges.</p>

Claim Review: Globalists' Plan to Enslave the World Using Chronic Illness

Electromagnetic sensitivity (EMS) is a federally recognized condition in which people experience adverse health effects due to electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, causing symptoms such as heart arrhythmia, headaches, eye problems, burning skin, brain fog, memory issues, and fatigue.

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "A recent attack on Trump rally attendees in Arizona was carried out using a handheld UV laser device, causing symptoms such as temporary loss of vision, sunburns, and skin peeling." is Mostly False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: