A leaked Pfizer report allegedly reveals that the hearts of vaccinated people are 'rapidly decaying,' leading to various serious heart conditions, with vaccinated individuals at a significantly higher risk of dying from heart problems than their unvaccinated peers.

The Peoples Voice - TV

Fact-Check: Does a Leaked Pfizer Report Show Vaccinated Hearts Are 'Rapidly Decaying'?

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>A recent article from The People's Voice claims that a leaked Pfizer report reveals that the hearts of vaccinated people are 'rapidly decaying,' leading to various serious heart conditions. The article cites a leaked MHRA report obtained by journalist Nick Hunt, which allegedly shows that vaccinated individuals are at a significantly higher risk of dying from heart problems than their unvaccinated peers. This claim review will examine the evidence and context surrounding this claim.</p>
<h2>Understanding the Claim</h2>
<p>The claim is based on a supposed Post Authorisation Safety Study (PASS) of Pfizer’s Covid vaccine, which allegedly shows increased risks of heart conditions among vaccinated individuals. The article presents cumulative incidence graphs from Pfizer’s 'Interim Report 5,' suggesting that the incidence of heart conditions is significantly higher in vaccinated individuals and worsens over time.</p>
<h2>Analyzing the Evidence</h2>
<p>The article references specific heart conditions such as acute cardiovascular injury, arrhythmia, heart failure, stress cardiomyopathy, coronary artery disease, and myocarditis. However, the data presented in the article is not accompanied by peer-reviewed studies or official statements from regulatory bodies.</p>
<p>It is crucial to note that the interpretation of the data in the article is not supported by the broader scientific community. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have consistently maintained that the benefits of COVID-19 vaccines outweigh the risks. A study published in the <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2109730">New England Journal of Medicine</a> found that the risk of myocarditis after mRNA vaccination is rare and typically mild.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the article's claim that the MHRA is 'sitting on the report' is speculative and lacks evidence. Regulatory bodies like the MHRA and FDA continuously monitor the safety of vaccines and would issue warnings if significant risks were identified.</p>
<h2>Misinterpretation of Data</h2>
<p>The article misinterprets the data by suggesting that the curves diverge over time, indicating an increasing risk. However, without access to the full report and methodology, it is impossible to verify these claims. The article also fails to consider confounding factors that could influence the results, such as underlying health conditions or lifestyle factors.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that a leaked Pfizer report shows vaccinated hearts are 'rapidly decaying' is misleading and not supported by credible evidence. The data presented is misinterpreted, and the article lacks context and peer-reviewed studies. The scientific consensus remains that COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective, with benefits outweighing the risks.</p>

<p>The claim that COVID-19 vaccinated individuals are causing serious side effects, specifically menstrual abnormalities, in unvaccinated people through 'vaccine shedding' has been circulating in various media outlets. This claim is based on a study titled 'Menstrual Abnormalities Strongly Associated with Proximity to COVID-19 Vaccinated Individuals,' published in the <em>International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research</em>. However, a thorough investigation of this claim reveals several issues that undermine its credibility.</p>
<p>Firstly, the <em>International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research</em> is not a reputable or well-known journal in the scientific community. It is not indexed in major scientific databases like PubMed, and its editorial policies and peer-review processes are not transparent. This raises significant questions about the credibility of the study published in it.</p>
<p>Secondly, the study itself has several methodological flaws. It relies on self-reported data, which can be subject to bias and inaccuracies. The study does not establish a clear causal link between proximity to vaccinated individuals and menstrual abnormalities. Correlation does not imply causation, and the study does not control for other potential factors that could cause menstrual irregularities.</p>
<p>The concept of 'vaccine shedding' as described in the claim is also misleading. Vaccine shedding typically refers to the release of vaccine-strain viruses from a vaccinated individual, which can potentially infect others. However, the COVID-19 vaccines authorized for use do not contain live viruses and cannot cause shedding in this manner. The mRNA vaccines work by instructing cells to produce a harmless piece of the 'spike protein,' which the body then builds an immune response against. This process does not involve the production of infectious viruses.</p>
<p>The claim also references a 2015 FDA document titled 'Design and Analysis of Shedding Studies for Virus or Bacteria-Based Gene Therapy and Oncolytic Products.' However, this document does not support the claim as it pertains to gene therapy products that are fundamentally different from the mRNA vaccines used for COVID-19. The document does not provide evidence that mRNA vaccines can cause shedding that affects unvaccinated individuals.</p>
<p>Furthermore, reputable health organizations and scientific studies have not found evidence supporting the claim of vaccine shedding causing side effects in unvaccinated people. A study published in the <em>New England Journal of Medicine</em> found no significant difference in the incidence of menstrual changes between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals (<a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11246222/">source</a> ). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) also states that COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective, with no evidence of vaccine shedding causing harm to others (<a href="https://www.cdc.gov/covid/vaccines/myths-facts.html">source</a> ).</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that COVID-19 vaccinated individuals are causing serious side effects in unvaccinated people through 'vaccine shedding' is not supported by scientific evidence. The study cited has significant methodological flaws and is published in a non-reputable journal. Reputable health organizations and scientific studies do not support this claim. Therefore, it is crucial to rely on credible sources and scientific evidence when evaluating such claims.</p>

Investigating the Claim: Can COVID-19 Vaccinated Individuals Cause Side Effects in Unvaccinated People?

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>A recent article published by The Exposé titled 'Shocking Government Reports: Are the C-19 Vaccinated at Risk of Developing AIDS?' claims that COVID-19 vaccines are causing a progressive decline in the immune system of vaccinated individuals, potentially leading to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). This claim is based on data from the UK Public Health England (PHE) Vaccine Surveillance Report. However, a thorough examination of the data and consultation with reliable scientific sources reveal that the claim is misleading and unfounded.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The article claims that doubly vaccinated 40-70 year olds have lost 40% of their immune system capability compared to unvaccinated people, with a progressive decline of 5% per week. The author suggests that this trend will lead to full immune system degradation within 6 months, effectively causing vaccinated individuals to develop AIDS.</p>
<h2>The Evidence</h2>
<p>The article presents data from the UK PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report, showing an increase in COVID-19 cases among vaccinated individuals over time. However, the author misinterprets this data as evidence of immune system degradation. Several factors must be considered when analyzing this data:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Vaccine effectiveness: COVID-19 vaccines are designed to prevent severe illness and death, not necessarily infection. Breakthrough infections are expected, especially with the emergence of new variants.</li>
  <li>Waning immunity: Immunity derived from vaccines may wane over time, but this does not indicate immune system degradation. Booster shots are recommended to maintain a high level of protection.</li>
  <li>Population differences: The vaccinated and unvaccinated populations may have inherent differences that affect their susceptibility to infection, such as age, underlying health conditions, and health-seeking behaviors.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Scientific Consensus</h2>
<p>The claim that COVID-19 vaccines cause immune system degradation is not supported by the scientific community. Numerous studies have demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines. For instance, a study published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine found that COVID-19 vaccines are highly effective in preventing severe illness, hospitalization, and death (<a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanwpc/article/PIIS2666-6065(23)00246-8/fulltext">source</a> ).</p>
<p>Furthermore, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has stated that COVID-19 vaccines do not cause immune system degradation or increase the risk of developing AIDS (<a href="https://www.cdc.gov/covid/vaccines/myths-facts.html?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/facts.html">source</a> ).</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that COVID-19 vaccinated individuals are at risk of developing AIDS due to immune system degradation is not supported by scientific evidence. The data presented in the article is misinterpreted and lacks context. It is essential to rely on credible scientific sources and consult healthcare professionals for accurate information regarding COVID-19 vaccines.</p>

Claim Review: Are C-19 Vaccinated Individuals at Risk of Developing AIDS?

<h1>Claim Review: Covid-Vaccinated Kids Are Six-Times More Likely To Die Than Non-Vaccinated Kids — Study</h1>
<p>Infowars recently claimed that a study published earlier this year demonstrated a link between new-onset asthma in children and COVID-19 infection, with worse outcomes for infected children who received the COVID-19 vaccination. The claim further states that vaccinated kids are six times more likely to die than non-vaccinated kids.</p>
<p>The study in question, titled 'The association between COVID-19 vaccine/infection and new-onset asthma in children - based on the global TriNetX database,' was published in a peer-reviewed journal. The study found a significantly higher incidence of new-onset asthma in COVID-19 infected children compared to uninfected children, regardless of vaccination status. Specifically, 4.7% of COVID-19 infected unvaccinated children developed new-onset asthma, versus 2.0% in their non-COVID-19 counterparts within a year. For COVID-19 infected vaccinated children, the incidence was 8.3%, higher than the 3.1% observed in those not infected.</p>
<p>However, the claim that vaccinated kids are six times more likely to die than non-vaccinated kids is misleading. The study does not provide evidence for increased mortality rates. Instead, it focuses on the incidence of new-onset asthma. The study's conclusion states, 'The study highlights a strong link between COVID-19 infection and an increased risk of new-onset asthma in children, which is even more marked in those vaccinated.'</p>
<p>The study also mentions that COVID-19 infection is believed to influence the onset of asthma due to its inflammatory nature impacting the respiratory system. It should be noted that the COVID-19 vaccines have an inflammatory effect of their own, which could potentially contribute to the observed outcomes.</p>
<p>In summary, while the study does show a higher incidence of new-onset asthma in vaccinated children with COVID-19 infection compared to unvaccinated children with COVID-19 infection, it does not provide evidence for increased mortality rates. The claim that vaccinated kids are six times more likely to die than non-vaccinated kids is not supported by the study cited.</p>
<p>For further reading, you can access the study <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8709675/">here</a>.</p>
<p>Additionally, a study on the association between asthma and COVID-19 severity during the Omicron epidemic can be found <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8709675/">here</a>.</p>
<p>Another relevant study on previous BCG vaccination and its association with less severe clinical progression of COVID-19 can be found <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8709675/">here</a>.</p>

Claim Review: Covid-Vaccinated Kids Are Six-Times More Likely To Die Than Non-Vaccinated Kids — Study

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "A leaked Pfizer report allegedly reveals that the hearts of vaccinated people are 'rapidly decaying,' leading to various serious heart conditions, with vaccinated individuals at a significantly higher risk of dying from heart problems than their unvaccinated peers." is Mostly False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: