A 23-year-old Florida woman developed blindness and autoimmune red blood cell wasting disease after being forced to get three vaccine injections.

Natural News

<p>The recent article from NaturalNews.com claims that a 23-year-old Florida woman, Alexis Lorenze, developed blindness and an autoimmune red blood cell wasting disease after being forced to receive three vaccine injections. This claim raises significant concerns about the safety of vaccines and the ethical practices of healthcare providers. However, a thorough examination of the available information reveals several issues that cast doubt on the validity of this claim.</p>
<p>Firstly, the article relies heavily on anecdotal evidence and lacks peer-reviewed scientific studies to support its claims. While anecdotal evidence can be compelling, it is not sufficient to establish a causal relationship between vaccines and the reported health issues. The article mentions that Lorenze had a rare autoimmune disorder called Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH), which affects approximately one in a million people. This condition causes the immune system to attack and destroy red blood cells. It is possible that Lorenze's underlying condition contributed to her health issues, rather than the vaccines.</p>
<p>Secondly, the article does not provide any medical records or expert opinions to support the claim that the vaccines caused Lorenze's health problems. The only medical professional quoted in the article is Dr. Raj. Dasgupta, who comments that administering multiple vaccine injections at once to someone with a serious autoimmune disease could be a recipe for health disaster. However, Dr. Dasgupta does not explicitly state that the vaccines caused Lorenze's health issues.</p>
<p>Thirdly, the article fails to consider alternative explanations for Lorenze's health problems. For example, it is possible that Lorenze's underlying autoimmune disorder worsened due to other factors, such as stress or environmental triggers. The article also does not mention whether Lorenze received any medical treatment or interventions that could have contributed to her health issues.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that a 23-year-old Florida woman developed blindness and autoimmune disease after receiving three vaccine injections is largely unsubstantiated and lacks credible scientific evidence. While anecdotal evidence can be compelling, it is not sufficient to establish a causal relationship between vaccines and the reported health issues. Further research and peer-reviewed scientific studies are needed to determine the safety and efficacy of vaccines.</p>

Claim Review: Florida Woman Develops Blindness and Autoimmune Disease After Vaccine Injections

<p>The claim that ultraviolet blood irradiation (UVBI) treats a wide range of conditions and reactivates the body’s innate ability to heal itself has been circulating in various articles and publications. This claim review aims to evaluate the scientific evidence behind this assertion.</p>
<h2>Historical Context of UVBI</h2>
<p>Ultraviolet blood irradiation (UVBI) emerged in the 1930s as a treatment for various medical conditions. Initially, hospitals across America adopted UVBI, reporting successful outcomes for conditions such as infections, autoimmunity, cardiovascular disease, and pregnancy issues. However, the American Medical Association (AMA) published a flawed study that discredited UVBI, leading to its decline in the US. Despite this, Russia and Germany continued to research and use UVBI, finding it effective for various medical conditions.</p>
<h2>Scientific Evidence</h2>
<p>Several studies have explored the potential benefits of UVBI. A 20-year study of 29,518 Swedish women found that those who avoided sunlight were 130% more likely to die and had a higher risk of developing significant medical conditions, including cancer (<a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4051701/">Lindqvist et al., 2014</a>). This study highlights the importance of sunlight, including its ultraviolet component, for overall health.</p>
<p>UVBI has been shown to have various physiologic effects, such as improving blood circulation, reducing inflammation, and enhancing immune function. These effects may explain why UVBI is effective against both infections and autoimmune conditions. However, the exact mechanisms by which UVBI reactivates the body’s innate ability to heal itself are not fully understood.</p>
<h2>Current Use and Controversies</h2>
<p>In America, UVBI is primarily used by integrative practitioners to treat complex illnesses that do not respond to other therapies, such as Lyme disease, chronic fatigue syndrome, and chronic migraines. However, the use of UVBI remains controversial due to the lack of large-scale, randomized controlled trials and the historical suppression of this therapy by the medical establishment.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>While there is some scientific evidence supporting the use of UVBI for various medical conditions, the claim that it reactivates the body’s innate ability to heal itself requires further validation. The historical context and current use of UVBI suggest that it may have therapeutic potential, but more research is needed to fully understand its mechanisms and efficacy. It is essential to approach this claim with caution and consult healthcare professionals for evidence-based medical advice.</p>

Claim Review: Ultraviolet Blood Irradiation as a Miracle Cure

<h1>Claim Review: Repeated COVID-19 mRNA Vaccinations and Immune System Functionality in Older Adults</h1>
<p>Infowars claims that a study published in September indicated that repeated inoculation with mRNA Covid vaccinations reduce the functionality of the immune systems of old people. The study in question, titled 'Repeated COVID-19 mRNA vaccination results in IgG4 class switching and decreased NK cell activation by S1-specific antibodies in older adults,' was published in Immunity &amp; Ageing. The study found that older adults produce antibodies with reduced functional capacity upon repeated COVID-19 mRNA vaccination, similar to younger individuals.</p>
<p>The specific mechanism of immune system reduction is increased levels of IgG4, a subclass of immunoglobulin which can result in a reduction of immune system function. The researchers analyzed patients aged 65 to 83-years-old for one month after their fifth Covid injection and compared their immune system effects with a younger group aged 18 to 47-years-old for one month after their third Covid injection. The researchers assessed the development of SARS-CoV-2 spike S1-specific IgG subclass levels in the older adults vs the younger adults.</p>
<p>The study concluded that older adults, like younger individuals, are inclined to develop IgG4 responses upon repeated COVID-19 mRNA vaccination and that increased IgG4 levels associate with a relative reduction in Fc-mediated effector functionality. However, the study does not conclusively prove that this leads to a significant reduction in overall immune system functionality. The study's authors emphasize the need for additional research to better understand the mechanisms underlying these responses and their potential implications for vaccine effectiveness.</p>
<p>It is important to note that the study does not suggest that the vaccines are ineffective or that older adults should not receive them. Instead, it highlights the complex nature of the immune response to vaccination and the need for continued research to optimize vaccination strategies.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that repeated COVID-19 mRNA vaccinations reduce the functionality of the immune systems of older adults is not fully supported by the study. While the study shows an increase in IgG4 levels, which are associated with reduced Fc-mediated effector functionality, it does not conclusively prove that this leads to a significant reduction in overall immune system functionality. Further research is needed to understand the implications of these findings on vaccine effectiveness.</p>
<p>For more information, you can read the study <a href="https://immunityageing.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12979-024-00263-y">here</a>.</p>

Claim Review: Repeated COVID-19 mRNA Vaccinations and Immune System Functionality in Older Adults

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The claim that PCR tests can kill you and could be used to vaccinate people has been circulating, causing concern among the public. This article aims to review the evidence and provide a thorough analysis of these claims.</p>
<h2>Understanding PCR Tests</h2>
<p>PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) tests are widely used to detect the presence of viral genetic material, including SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. The test involves taking a sample from the nasal or oral cavity and analyzing it for viral RNA.</p>
<h2>Claim Analysis</h2>
<h3>PCR Tests Can Kill You</h3>
<p>The claim that PCR tests can kill you is based on reports of adverse events such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage and even death. However, these incidents are rare and often result from improper administration of the test. For example, a case reported in the <a href="https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaotolaryngology/fullarticle/2772795">JAMA Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery</a> described a woman who experienced cerebrospinal fluid leakage after a PCR test. Similarly, a case reported in <a href="https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2021/214/1/case-cerebrospinal-fluid-leak-following-nasal-swab-covid-19">The Medical Journal of Australia</a> involved a woman who developed symptoms of meningitis after a PCR test.</p>
<p>While these cases are concerning, they are isolated incidents and do not represent the norm. Properly administered PCR tests are generally safe and effective. The risk of adverse events can be minimized by following established guidelines for test administration.</p>
<h3>PCR Tests Could Be Used to Vaccinate You</h3>
<p>The claim that PCR tests could be used to vaccinate people is based on speculation about the potential use of nasal or anal swabs to deliver vaccines. While nasal vaccinations are not new and have been used for conditions like the flu, there is no evidence to suggest that PCR tests are being used for this purpose. The idea that PCR tests could be used to deliver vaccines without the knowledge or consent of the individual is unfounded and lacks scientific support.</p>
<p>Researchers at Johns Hopkins University have developed a device capable of delivering drugs, but this technology is not currently being used in PCR tests. The suggestion that PCR tests could be used to vaccinate people is purely speculative and not supported by evidence.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that PCR tests can kill you and could be used to vaccinate people is largely unfounded. While there are risks associated with improper administration of PCR tests, the overall safety and efficacy of these tests are well-established. The idea that PCR tests could be used to deliver vaccines is speculative and lacks scientific support. It is important to rely on credible sources of information and to follow established guidelines for the administration of PCR tests.</p>
<h2>Claim Rating</h2>
<p>The claim rating is 2 out of 5, indicating that the claim is largely false but contains some elements of truth regarding the risks of improper administration.</p>

Claim Review: The PCR Test Can Kill You and Could Be Used to Vaccinate You

If you want to replace an existing title on a portal and you want the replaced title to be visible to you and your followers.

Move the mouse over the title and make a right click.

Select Remedia -> Alternate Title from the menu

In the pop-up window, enter a new title that you like.

The blue icon copies the existing title into the input field, so you don't have to type everything...

By pressing Submit, the title will be replaced, which will be visible to you and others who visit the pages.

(There is a possibility that you will have to reload the page for the changes to be visible)

You can contact one of the fact-checking organizations.

Claim rated as -> Choose from false to true

Add claimer -> Opens a pop-up window that allows you to search for existing people already registered in the system or to create a new profile of that person.

Claimed At -> Enter the link to the page where the claim was found. You can add more places and link more claim authors

Short description -> short content that is seen when sharing articles on social networks

Field for entering the content of the article.

After the article is published, it will be visible on the Remedia social network and to everyone who has the Remedia Chrome extension installed

And you can engage in debunking yourself.

CAUTION! Abusing the platform is not allowed, entering unverified, misleading or untrue content will result in the deletion of the entire account with all content

Canonical -> If you enter content that already exists somewhere (your property), you can enter a link and Remedia will try to enter the content in the provided fields.

Featured image -> Image that is displayed when you share an article on other social networks.

Write your title -> Enter the title of the article

The claim being reviewed -> Enter the claim here, but BEWARE! An assertion is not the entire statement someone has made, but something concise and unambiguous. Check the claim entry multiple times as each change will create a new claim in the system.

Claim made on -> date when someone published the claim.

After installing the Chrome extension, you can log in and use advanced functionalities. One of them is 'Dislike'.

By right-clicking on an article, the options provided by the Remedia extension are opened, by selecting Dislike, the article will become more transparent and less visible.

Your action will be visible to you and all people who follow you!

Alternate Title

1. Log in to the Remedia social network with a Google or Facebook account (link above right).

2. Install the Chrome extension (if you didn't)

4. Enter the email you used to open your Google or Facebook account. Submit.

5. After the input field appears, rewrite the code. Accept.

That's it! Now you can use the advanced functions of the Remedia Chrome extension.

Alternate Titles

Remedia's work so far:

Remedia, the best thing that happened to media!

On the Feed page, you can enter Status, Opinion and Claim Review

It is enough to enter the title, short description and content.

Below the fields for entering content, you will find fields for entering links. By entering page links in these fields, you 'show' the Chrome extension on which pages to display your content

Press Publish to publish your opinion. (It may be necessary to wait a moment while all links are generated)

Claim: "A 23-year-old Florida woman developed blindness and autoimmune red blood cell wasting disease after being forced to get three vaccine injections." is Mostly False

Has beed claimed by:

Articles reviewing this claim:

Content you might like: