Reviewing the Claim that COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Cause Heart Attacks, Strokes, and Cancer

Introduction

A recent article published by The Exposé titled "Leading doctors sign HOPE Accord calling for the suspension of all covid mRNA ‘vaccines’" claims that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are driving a rise in heart attacks, strokes, and cancer. The article cites an open letter to the UK’s General Medical Council (GMC) by Dr. Aseem Malhotra and other healthcare professionals, calling for the immediate suspension of these vaccines. This claim review will examine the evidence presented and assess the validity of these claims.

The Claim

The central claim is that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are contributing to an alarming rise in disability and excess deaths, particularly heart attacks, strokes, and cancer. The article suggests that the evidence is overwhelming and that the continued use of these vaccines is a public health calamity.

Evaluating the Evidence

To evaluate this claim, we need to consider the following points:

1. Scientific Consensus and Regulatory Approval

The COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, such as those produced by Pfizer and Moderna, have undergone rigorous clinical trials and have been approved by regulatory bodies worldwide, including the FDA and EMA. These approvals are based on extensive data showing the vaccines' safety and efficacy.

2. Adverse Events Reporting

The article mentions a re-analysis of Pfizer and Moderna’s original randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in the journal Vaccine. This re-analysis suggested a greater risk of serious harm from the vaccine than being hospitalized with COVID. However, it is important to note that:

• The re-analysis was not peer-reviewed and has not been widely accepted by the scientific community.
• The original RCTs were designed to assess short-term effects, and long-term data is still being collected.
• The benefits of vaccination, including prevention of severe disease, hospitalization, and death, have been well-documented in numerous studies.

3. Mechanistic Evidence

The article cites experts who suggest that the mRNA vaccines may cause cancer through prolonged immunosuppression and DNA contamination. However, there is no robust scientific evidence to support these claims. The mRNA vaccines do not alter DNA, and the spike protein produced by the vaccines is quickly degraded by the body.

4. Epidemiological Data

The claim that the vaccines are causing a rise in heart attacks, strokes, and cancer is not supported by epidemiological data. Studies have shown that:

• The incidence of heart attacks and strokes has not increased significantly post-vaccination.
• The alleged rise in cancer cases cannot be attributed to the vaccines, as cancer development typically takes years.
• The benefits of vaccination in preventing severe COVID-19 outcomes far outweigh the potential risks.

5. Expert Opinions

While the article cites several experts who support the claim, it is important to consider the broader scientific consensus. The vast majority of medical and scientific experts agree that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are safe and effective. The World Health Organization (WHO) and other public health bodies continue to recommend these vaccines as a crucial tool in the fight against COVID-19.

Conclusion

Based on the available evidence, the claim that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are causing a rise in heart attacks, strokes, and cancer is not supported. The benefits of vaccination, including the prevention of severe disease and death, outweigh the potential risks. It is crucial to rely on robust scientific evidence and the consensus of the medical community when evaluating such claims.

References

• CDC - Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines
• WHO - The benefits of COVID-19 vaccination outweigh the risks 
• NEJM - Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine
• The Lancet - Safety and Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: An Interim Analysis of Four Randomised Controlled Trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK