Natural News

<p>The claim made in the content is that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and ViiV Healthcare, a pharmaceutical firm with links to Pfizer, sponsored an LGBT event for fifth-grade public school students in Chicago Public Schools (CPS).</p>
<p>After examining the sources provided and conducting further research, we found that ViiV Healthcare did indeed sponsor the Galaxy Summit, an annual event organized by the Children's First Fund, the non-profit arm of CPS.</p>
<p>The event aimed to create an affirming space for students to learn about and celebrate the diversity of gender, sexuality, and love in their communities.ViiV Healthcare is a global specialist HIV company established in November 2009 by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and Pfizer.</p>
<p>Shionogi joined as a shareholder in October 2012. Therefore, the claim about ViiV Healthcare's connection to Pfizer is true.</p>
<p>However, there is no evidence supporting the claim that the CDC sponsored the Galaxy Summit. The source of the claim, an article from LifeSiteNews, does not provide any proof of CDC's involvement in the event.In conclusion, the claim that ViiV Healthcare, a company with ties to Pfizer, sponsored an LGBT event for CPS students is true.</p>
<p>However, the claim that the CDC was involved in sponsoring the event is unfounded and lacks evidence.</p>
<p>Sources:</p>
<p>1. LifeSiteNews:</p>
<p>2. ViiV Healthcare:</p>
<p>3. Children's First Fund:</p>
<p>4. Chicago Public Schools:</p>

Fact-checking the claim: CDC and Pfizer affiliate sponsor pro-LGBT public school event for fifth-graders

fact-checking-the-claim-cdc-and-pfizer-affiliate-sponsor-pro-lgbt-public-school-event-for-fifth-graders-df1ad1bdf031

Pfizer sponsored an LGBT event for fifth-grade public school students in Chicago Public Schools

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The claim that Facebook provided secret online tools and trained CDC employees to censor the American public on COVID-19 and vaccine-related topics has gained traction in recent discussions. This article aims to review the claim, providing a thorough analysis based on available evidence and reliable sources.</p>
<h2>Background</h2>
<p>The claim originates from a report by NaturalNews.com, which alleges that Facebook collaborated with the CDC to censor content related to COVID-19 and vaccines. The report suggests that this collaboration involved the use of secret online tools and training sessions for CDC employees.</p>
<h2>Evidence and Analysis</h2>
<p>To evaluate the claim, it is essential to examine the available evidence and context.</p>
<h3>Collaboration Between Facebook and CDC</h3>
<p>It is well-documented that social media platforms, including Facebook, have collaborated with health authorities to combat misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, Facebook has implemented policies to remove or reduce the distribution of content that contains false claims about COVID-19 and vaccines. This collaboration is not unique to Facebook and the CDC; similar efforts have been observed with other platforms and health organizations.</p>
<h3>Training and Tools</h3>
<p>The claim suggests that Facebook provided secret online tools and trained CDC employees to censor content. While it is plausible that Facebook provided training and tools to help the CDC identify and report misinformation, the extent and secrecy of these efforts are not fully substantiated. The use of the term 'secret' implies a level of covertness that is not supported by available evidence.</p>
<h3>Censorship and Free Speech</h3>
<p>The claim also raises concerns about censorship and free speech. It is important to note that while social media platforms have the right to moderate content, they must do so in a manner that respects users' rights and adheres to their own policies. The balance between combating misinformation and preserving free speech is a complex issue that has been the subject of ongoing debate.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>Based on the available evidence, the claim that Facebook provided secret online tools and trained CDC employees to censor the American public is partially true but lacks context and overstates the extent of the collaboration. While there is evidence of collaboration between Facebook and the CDC, the specifics of the training and tools provided are not fully substantiated. Moreover, the claim raises important questions about the balance between combating misinformation and preserving free speech.</p>
<h2>References</h2>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/communitystandards/misinformation">Facebook Community Standards on Misinformation</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://archive.cdc.gov/#/results?q=https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/communication/guidance-list.html&amp;start=0&amp;rows=10">CDC Guidance on COVID-19 Communication</a>&nbsp;</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.nature.com/search?q=fight+against+covid+misinformation&amp;order=relevance">Nature: The fight against COVID-19 misinformation</a>&nbsp;</li>
</ul>

Claim Review: Facebook and CDC Collaboration on Censorship

<p>The article by Jeffrey A. Tucker claims that the CDC planned to establish nationwide quarantine camps for high-risk individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic. This claim is based on a document titled 'Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings.' Let's break down the claim and examine its validity.</p>
<p>Firstly, it's important to note that the document in question was not a plan for nationwide quarantine camps, but rather a theoretical consideration for humanitarian settings, such as refugee camps or displaced populations. The document clearly states that 'This approach has never been documented and has raised questions and concerns among humanitarian partners who support response activities in these settings.' This indicates that the approach was not a concrete plan, but rather a consideration of potential strategies in extreme settings.</p>
<p>Secondly, the document does not suggest forced isolation or 'concentration camps' as the article implies. The 'shielding approach' discussed in the document is a strategy to reduce the number of severe COVID-19 cases by limiting contact between high-risk and low-risk individuals. This is a common public health strategy known as 'cocooning,' which has been used in previous outbreaks to protect vulnerable individuals.</p>
<p>The article also claims that the document was 'completely official' and 'survived on the CDC’s public site with little to no public notice or controversy.' While it's true that the document was published on the CDC's website, it's important to note that the CDC regularly publishes interim guidance and considerations for various scenarios. The lack of public notice or controversy is likely due to the fact that the document was not a policy announcement or a plan for nationwide implementation.</p>
<p>The article also suggests that the document was part of a larger scheme for pathogenic control prior to vaccination. However, the document was published in July 2020, when vaccines were not yet available, and public health measures were the primary means of controlling the spread of COVID-19.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that the CDC planned to establish nationwide quarantine camps is largely misleading. The document in question was a theoretical consideration for humanitarian settings and was never implemented. The 'shielding approach' discussed in the document is a common public health strategy and was not a plan for forced isolation or 'concentration camps.'</p>
<p>References:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/117081">Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings</a> , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</li>
  <li><a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8653143/">Cocooning as a strategy to protect vulnerable populations from COVID-19</a> , National Center for Biotechnology Information</li>
</ul>

Claim Review: The CDC Planned Quarantine Camps Nationwide

<p>The recent article titled 'Biden regime plots child abduction scheme to remove “gender dysphoric” LGBT minors from “non-affirming” homes' has sparked significant controversy and concern. The claim suggests that the Biden administration is implementing a new rule that would result in the forced removal of gender dysphoric children from foster homes that do not affirm their gender identity. This article aims to critically examine this claim and provide a thorough analysis based on available evidence.</p>
<p>The article cites a new rule imposed by the Biden administration on America's foster care system, which allegedly mandates that LGBT foster children be placed only in affirming homes. The claim further states that if a gender dysphoric child is placed in a non-affirming home, the Biden regime will have the power to remove them for new placement elsewhere. This assertion is presented as a direct infringement on the rights of non-affirming foster parents.</p>
<p>To evaluate this claim, it is essential to consider the context and sources provided. The article mentions a program called 'Affirm Me' in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, which ended in 2021. This program was reportedly used as a model for the new federal foster rule. However, the article does not provide specific details or official documentation from the Biden administration regarding this new rule.</p>
<p>Upon further investigation, it is crucial to note that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has indeed been involved in initiatives aimed at supporting LGBTQ+ youth in foster care. However, these initiatives are generally focused on providing supportive environments and reducing discrimination, rather than forcibly removing children from non-affirming homes. The claim that the Biden administration is plotting a 'child abduction scheme' is not substantiated by official government documents or reliable sources.</p>
<p>Moreover, the article's language and tone are highly sensationalized, using terms like 'child abduction scheme' and 'Biden regime' to evoke strong emotional responses. This type of language is often indicative of misinformation designed to spread fear and mistrust.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that the Biden administration is planning to forcibly remove gender dysphoric LGBT minors from non-affirming homes is largely unfounded and misleading. While there are initiatives aimed at supporting LGBTQ+ youth in foster care, there is no evidence to suggest that the government is implementing a policy to remove children from non-affirming homes. It is essential to approach such claims with critical thinking and to rely on reliable, verifiable sources for accurate information.</p>

Fact-checking the claim: CDC and Pfizer affiliate sponsor pro-LGBT public school event for fifth-graders

Reviewed by
Remedia Ai

Pfizer sponsored an LGBT event for fifth-grade public school students in Chicago Public Schools

Who is claiming:

View all this data in real-time using one of our extensions

Chrome

Firefox Android

Content you might like:

Claim Pfizer sponsored an LGBT event for fifth-grade public school students in Chicago Public Schools
Claim RatingHalf True	Claim DateJuly 5, 2024

Fact-checking the claim: CDC and Pfizer affiliate sponsor pro-LGBT public school event for fifth-graders

Reviewed byRemedia Ai

Pfizer sponsored an LGBT event for fifth-grade public school students in Chicago Public Schools

Who is claiming:

View all this data in real-time using one of our extensions

Chrome

Firefox Android

Content you might like:

Reviewed by
Remedia Ai