Natural News

<p>The claim made in the content is that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and ViiV Healthcare, a pharmaceutical firm with links to Pfizer, sponsored an LGBT event for fifth-grade public school students in Chicago Public Schools (CPS).</p>
<p>After examining the sources provided and conducting further research, we found that ViiV Healthcare did indeed sponsor the Galaxy Summit, an annual event organized by the Children's First Fund, the non-profit arm of CPS.</p>
<p>The event aimed to create an affirming space for students to learn about and celebrate the diversity of gender, sexuality, and love in their communities.ViiV Healthcare is a global specialist HIV company established in November 2009 by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and Pfizer.</p>
<p>Shionogi joined as a shareholder in October 2012. Therefore, the claim about ViiV Healthcare's connection to Pfizer is true.</p>
<p>However, there is no evidence supporting the claim that the CDC sponsored the Galaxy Summit. The source of the claim, an article from LifeSiteNews, does not provide any proof of CDC's involvement in the event.In conclusion, the claim that ViiV Healthcare, a company with ties to Pfizer, sponsored an LGBT event for CPS students is true.</p>
<p>However, the claim that the CDC was involved in sponsoring the event is unfounded and lacks evidence.</p>
<p>Sources:</p>
<p>1. LifeSiteNews:</p>
<p>2. ViiV Healthcare:</p>
<p>3. Children's First Fund:</p>
<p>4. Chicago Public Schools:</p>

Fact-checking the claim: CDC and Pfizer affiliate sponsor pro-LGBT public school event for fifth-graders

fact-checking-the-claim-cdc-and-pfizer-affiliate-sponsor-pro-lgbt-public-school-event-for-fifth-graders-df1ad1bdf031

Pfizer sponsored an LGBT event for fifth-grade public school students in Chicago Public Schools

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The claim that Facebook provided secret online tools and trained CDC employees to censor the American public on COVID-19 and vaccine-related topics has gained traction in recent discussions. This article aims to review the claim, providing a thorough analysis based on available evidence and reliable sources.</p>
<h2>Background</h2>
<p>The claim originates from a report by NaturalNews.com, which alleges that Facebook collaborated with the CDC to censor content related to COVID-19 and vaccines. The report suggests that this collaboration involved the use of secret online tools and training sessions for CDC employees.</p>
<h2>Evidence and Analysis</h2>
<p>To evaluate the claim, it is essential to examine the available evidence and context.</p>
<h3>Collaboration Between Facebook and CDC</h3>
<p>It is well-documented that social media platforms, including Facebook, have collaborated with health authorities to combat misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, Facebook has implemented policies to remove or reduce the distribution of content that contains false claims about COVID-19 and vaccines. This collaboration is not unique to Facebook and the CDC; similar efforts have been observed with other platforms and health organizations.</p>
<h3>Training and Tools</h3>
<p>The claim suggests that Facebook provided secret online tools and trained CDC employees to censor content. While it is plausible that Facebook provided training and tools to help the CDC identify and report misinformation, the extent and secrecy of these efforts are not fully substantiated. The use of the term 'secret' implies a level of covertness that is not supported by available evidence.</p>
<h3>Censorship and Free Speech</h3>
<p>The claim also raises concerns about censorship and free speech. It is important to note that while social media platforms have the right to moderate content, they must do so in a manner that respects users' rights and adheres to their own policies. The balance between combating misinformation and preserving free speech is a complex issue that has been the subject of ongoing debate.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>Based on the available evidence, the claim that Facebook provided secret online tools and trained CDC employees to censor the American public is partially true but lacks context and overstates the extent of the collaboration. While there is evidence of collaboration between Facebook and the CDC, the specifics of the training and tools provided are not fully substantiated. Moreover, the claim raises important questions about the balance between combating misinformation and preserving free speech.</p>
<h2>References</h2>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/communitystandards/misinformation">Facebook Community Standards on Misinformation</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://archive.cdc.gov/#/results?q=https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/communication/guidance-list.html&amp;start=0&amp;rows=10">CDC Guidance on COVID-19 Communication</a>&nbsp;</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.nature.com/search?q=fight+against+covid+misinformation&amp;order=relevance">Nature: The fight against COVID-19 misinformation</a>&nbsp;</li>
</ul>

Claim Review: Facebook and CDC Collaboration on Censorship

<p>The article by Jeffrey A. Tucker claims that the CDC planned to establish nationwide quarantine camps for high-risk individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic. This claim is based on a document titled 'Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings.' Let's break down the claim and examine its validity.</p>
<p>Firstly, it's important to note that the document in question was not a plan for nationwide quarantine camps, but rather a theoretical consideration for humanitarian settings, such as refugee camps or displaced populations. The document clearly states that 'This approach has never been documented and has raised questions and concerns among humanitarian partners who support response activities in these settings.' This indicates that the approach was not a concrete plan, but rather a consideration of potential strategies in extreme settings.</p>
<p>Secondly, the document does not suggest forced isolation or 'concentration camps' as the article implies. The 'shielding approach' discussed in the document is a strategy to reduce the number of severe COVID-19 cases by limiting contact between high-risk and low-risk individuals. This is a common public health strategy known as 'cocooning,' which has been used in previous outbreaks to protect vulnerable individuals.</p>
<p>The article also claims that the document was 'completely official' and 'survived on the CDC’s public site with little to no public notice or controversy.' While it's true that the document was published on the CDC's website, it's important to note that the CDC regularly publishes interim guidance and considerations for various scenarios. The lack of public notice or controversy is likely due to the fact that the document was not a policy announcement or a plan for nationwide implementation.</p>
<p>The article also suggests that the document was part of a larger scheme for pathogenic control prior to vaccination. However, the document was published in July 2020, when vaccines were not yet available, and public health measures were the primary means of controlling the spread of COVID-19.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that the CDC planned to establish nationwide quarantine camps is largely misleading. The document in question was a theoretical consideration for humanitarian settings and was never implemented. The 'shielding approach' discussed in the document is a common public health strategy and was not a plan for forced isolation or 'concentration camps.'</p>
<p>References:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/117081">Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings</a> , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</li>
  <li><a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8653143/">Cocooning as a strategy to protect vulnerable populations from COVID-19</a> , National Center for Biotechnology Information</li>
</ul>

Claim Review: The CDC Planned Quarantine Camps Nationwide

<h2>Claim Review: Corruption Allegations Involving Ursula von der Leyen, McKinsey, and Pfizer</h2>
<p>The content provided alleges that Ursula von der Leyen, the President of the European Commission, is involved in a corruption scandal with McKinsey and Pfizer. The claim suggests that von der Leyen negotiated a 1.8 billion dose vaccine deal with Pfizer without competitive bidding, and that her son's employment at McKinsey and her husband's ties to Pfizer are evidence of corruption.</p>
<h3>Background</h3>
<p>Ursula von der Leyen has been the President of the European Commission since 2019. She has been criticized for her handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly her negotiations with Pfizer for vaccine procurement. McKinsey is a management consulting firm that has been involved in several controversies, including its work with authoritarian governments and the Pentagon. Pfizer is a pharmaceutical company that developed one of the COVID-19 vaccines.</p>
<h3>Investigation</h3>
<p>The claim that von der Leyen negotiated a vaccine deal with Pfizer without competitive bidding is based on text messages exchanged between von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla. However, the European Commission has stated that the texts were not preserved because they were considered 'short-lived, ephemeral documents.' The European Ombudsman criticized this approach as 'maladministration,' but did not find evidence of corruption.</p>
<p>The claim that von der Leyen's son's employment at McKinsey is evidence of corruption is based on the fact that he worked for the company for more than three years, including a period when von der Leyen was the German Minister of Defense. However, there is no evidence that von der Leyen's son was involved in any negotiations between McKinsey and the German government.</p>
<p>The claim that von der Leyen's husband's ties to Pfizer are evidence of corruption is based on the fact that he is the medical director of Orgenesis, a biotech company that has collaborated with Pfizer. However, there is no evidence that von der Leyen's husband has benefited financially from the vaccine deal.</p>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>While there are legitimate concerns about transparency and potential conflicts of interest in von der Leyen's negotiations with Pfizer, there is no concrete evidence to support the allegations of corruption. The claim that von der Leyen, McKinsey, and Pfizer are involved in a corruption scandal is largely unsubstantiated.</p>
<h3>References</h3>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://simonmercieca.com/2022/12/17/corruption-in-the-eu-stinks-to-the-core-the-ties-of-ursula-von-der-leyen-and-her-husband-heiko-with-big-pharma/">Corruption in the EU stinks to the core – the ties of Ursula Von der Leyen and her husband Heiko with Big Pharma</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.politico.eu/article/european-union-prosecutor-covid-vaccine-scandal-ursula-von-der-leyen/">Will EU prosecutor’s COVID vaccine probe ensnare von der Leyen?</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://responsiblestatecraft.org/2023/02/03/do-mckinseys-defense-contracts-clash-with-foreign-clients/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CMcKinsey%20had%20long%20profited%20from,from%20questions%20about%20those%20contracts">The McKinsey consulting scandal you might not have heard about</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/christine-lagarde-convicted-imf-head-found-guilty-of-criminal-charges-over-massive-government-payout-a7484586.html">Christine Lagarde convicted: IMF head found guilty of criminal charges over massive government payout</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Peter_Koenig">Peter Koenig - Wikispooks</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>Rating</h3>
<p>Based on the available evidence, the claim that Ursula von der Leyen, McKinsey, and Pfizer are involved in a corruption scandal is rated <strong>2 out of 5</strong>. While there are legitimate concerns about transparency and potential conflicts of interest, there is no concrete evidence to support the allegations of corruption.</p>

Fact-checking the claim: CDC and Pfizer affiliate sponsor pro-LGBT public school event for fifth-graders

Reviewed by
Remedia Ai

Pfizer sponsored an LGBT event for fifth-grade public school students in Chicago Public Schools

Who is claiming:

View all this data in real-time using one of our extensions

Chrome

Firefox Android

Content you might like:

Claim Pfizer sponsored an LGBT event for fifth-grade public school students in Chicago Public Schools
Claim RatingHalf True	Claim DateJuly 5, 2024

Fact-checking the claim: CDC and Pfizer affiliate sponsor pro-LGBT public school event for fifth-graders

Reviewed byRemedia Ai

Pfizer sponsored an LGBT event for fifth-grade public school students in Chicago Public Schools

Who is claiming:

View all this data in real-time using one of our extensions

Chrome

Firefox Android

Content you might like:

Reviewed by
Remedia Ai