Natural News

<p>The claim made in the content is that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and ViiV Healthcare, a pharmaceutical firm with links to Pfizer, sponsored an LGBT event for fifth-grade public school students in Chicago Public Schools (CPS).</p>
<p>After examining the sources provided and conducting further research, we found that ViiV Healthcare did indeed sponsor the Galaxy Summit, an annual event organized by the Children's First Fund, the non-profit arm of CPS.</p>
<p>The event aimed to create an affirming space for students to learn about and celebrate the diversity of gender, sexuality, and love in their communities.ViiV Healthcare is a global specialist HIV company established in November 2009 by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and Pfizer.</p>
<p>Shionogi joined as a shareholder in October 2012. Therefore, the claim about ViiV Healthcare's connection to Pfizer is true.</p>
<p>However, there is no evidence supporting the claim that the CDC sponsored the Galaxy Summit. The source of the claim, an article from LifeSiteNews, does not provide any proof of CDC's involvement in the event.In conclusion, the claim that ViiV Healthcare, a company with ties to Pfizer, sponsored an LGBT event for CPS students is true.</p>
<p>However, the claim that the CDC was involved in sponsoring the event is unfounded and lacks evidence.</p>
<p>Sources:</p>
<p>1. LifeSiteNews:</p>
<p>2. ViiV Healthcare:</p>
<p>3. Children's First Fund:</p>
<p>4. Chicago Public Schools:</p>

Fact-checking the claim: CDC and Pfizer affiliate sponsor pro-LGBT public school event for fifth-graders

fact-checking-the-claim-cdc-and-pfizer-affiliate-sponsor-pro-lgbt-public-school-event-for-fifth-graders-df1ad1bdf031

Pfizer sponsored an LGBT event for fifth-grade public school students in Chicago Public Schools

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The claim that Facebook provided secret online tools and trained CDC employees to censor the American public on COVID-19 and vaccine-related topics has gained traction in recent discussions. This article aims to review the claim, providing a thorough analysis based on available evidence and reliable sources.</p>
<h2>Background</h2>
<p>The claim originates from a report by NaturalNews.com, which alleges that Facebook collaborated with the CDC to censor content related to COVID-19 and vaccines. The report suggests that this collaboration involved the use of secret online tools and training sessions for CDC employees.</p>
<h2>Evidence and Analysis</h2>
<p>To evaluate the claim, it is essential to examine the available evidence and context.</p>
<h3>Collaboration Between Facebook and CDC</h3>
<p>It is well-documented that social media platforms, including Facebook, have collaborated with health authorities to combat misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, Facebook has implemented policies to remove or reduce the distribution of content that contains false claims about COVID-19 and vaccines. This collaboration is not unique to Facebook and the CDC; similar efforts have been observed with other platforms and health organizations.</p>
<h3>Training and Tools</h3>
<p>The claim suggests that Facebook provided secret online tools and trained CDC employees to censor content. While it is plausible that Facebook provided training and tools to help the CDC identify and report misinformation, the extent and secrecy of these efforts are not fully substantiated. The use of the term 'secret' implies a level of covertness that is not supported by available evidence.</p>
<h3>Censorship and Free Speech</h3>
<p>The claim also raises concerns about censorship and free speech. It is important to note that while social media platforms have the right to moderate content, they must do so in a manner that respects users' rights and adheres to their own policies. The balance between combating misinformation and preserving free speech is a complex issue that has been the subject of ongoing debate.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>Based on the available evidence, the claim that Facebook provided secret online tools and trained CDC employees to censor the American public is partially true but lacks context and overstates the extent of the collaboration. While there is evidence of collaboration between Facebook and the CDC, the specifics of the training and tools provided are not fully substantiated. Moreover, the claim raises important questions about the balance between combating misinformation and preserving free speech.</p>
<h2>References</h2>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/communitystandards/misinformation">Facebook Community Standards on Misinformation</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://archive.cdc.gov/#/results?q=https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/communication/guidance-list.html&amp;start=0&amp;rows=10">CDC Guidance on COVID-19 Communication</a>&nbsp;</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.nature.com/search?q=fight+against+covid+misinformation&amp;order=relevance">Nature: The fight against COVID-19 misinformation</a>&nbsp;</li>
</ul>

Claim Review: Facebook and CDC Collaboration on Censorship

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The claim that the Canadian government contract with Pfizer acknowledged the unknown long-term efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines has been circulating widely. This article aims to review this claim, providing a thorough analysis and context based on reliable scientific sources.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The claim states that the contract between the Canadian government and Pfizer, dated October 26, 2020, includes a section acknowledging that the long-term effects, efficacy, and adverse effects of the vaccine were not known at the time of signing. This information was reported by The Expose and The Canadian Independent.</p>
<h2>Analysis</h2>
<p>The contract indeed contains a section (5.5) under 'Purchaser Acknowledgement' that states: 'Purchaser further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known.' This acknowledgment is standard in contracts for new medical products, reflecting the ongoing nature of scientific research and the need for continuous monitoring.</p>
<p>It is important to note that the acknowledgment of unknown long-term effects does not imply that the vaccines are unsafe. Vaccines undergo rigorous testing and approval processes by regulatory bodies such as Health Canada and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). These processes ensure that vaccines meet high safety and efficacy standards before they are administered to the public.</p>
<p>Furthermore, ongoing monitoring and research are essential for understanding the long-term effects of any new medical intervention. This is a standard practice in the medical field and is not unique to COVID-19 vaccines.</p>
<h2>Scientific Evidence</h2>
<p>Several peer-reviewed studies and reports from reliable scientific sources support the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines. For example, a study published in <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2101765">The New England Journal of Medicine</a> found that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was highly effective in preventing symptomatic COVID-19 infections. Another study published in <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00947-8/fulltext">The Lancet</a> reported similar findings for the Moderna vaccine.</p>
<p>These studies, along with ongoing surveillance by health authorities, provide evidence that COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective in the short term. Long-term data is being continuously collected and analyzed to ensure the safety and efficacy of these vaccines over time.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that the Canadian government contract with Pfizer acknowledged the unknown long-term efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines is accurate. However, this acknowledgment is a standard practice in contracts for new medical products and does not imply that the vaccines are unsafe. Ongoing research and monitoring are essential for understanding the long-term effects of any new medical intervention. The available scientific evidence supports the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in the short term, and long-term data is being continuously collected and analyzed.</p>

Claim Review: Canadian Government Contract with Pfizer on COVID-19 Vaccine Safety

<p>The term 'chemtrails' refers to the belief that certain aircraft trails are not merely condensation trails (contrails) but are instead deliberate releases of chemicals or biological agents into the atmosphere for various purposes, such as weather modification or population control. This belief has gained traction in some circles, but it is often dismissed as a conspiracy theory by mainstream media and scientific communities.</p>
<p>In the content provided, the claim is made that chemtrails are a fact and that there are widespread attempts to keep these operations hidden from the public. The article also mentions the release of an AI model by Andrew Ng, a prominent figure in artificial intelligence, which allows users to explore the effects of chemtrails. This model, called Planet Parasol, is designed to simulate the impacts of stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), a form of solar geoengineering.</p>
<p>To evaluate this claim, it is important to understand the scientific context surrounding chemtrails and geoengineering. Geoengineering refers to deliberate large-scale interventions in the Earth's natural systems to counteract climate change. One proposed method of geoengineering is SAI, which involves injecting reflective particles into the stratosphere to reflect sunlight and cool the planet. While SAI is a theoretical concept that has been studied by scientists, it is not currently being implemented on a large scale.</p>
<p>The claim that chemtrails are a fact and that they are being used for widespread and hidden operations is not supported by scientific consensus. The trails left by aircraft are typically condensation trails, which are formed when water vapor in the exhaust of aircraft engines condenses and freezes in the cold air at high altitudes. These contrails can persist and spread out, forming cirrus clouds, but they are not the result of deliberate chemical releases.</p>
<p>The article also mentions that Andrew Ng's model, Planet Parasol, is based on real-world data. However, it is important to note that models and simulations are often based on theoretical data and assumptions, rather than direct observations of ongoing geoengineering activities. The purpose of such models is to explore potential scenarios and their impacts, not to confirm the existence of widespread chemtrail operations.</p>
<p>In conclusion, while geoengineering and SAI are areas of scientific research, the claim that chemtrails are a fact and that there are widespread attempts to keep these operations hidden from the public is not supported by scientific evidence. The trails left by aircraft are typically condensation trails, and there is no consensus among scientists that chemtrails are being used for large-scale geoengineering or other purposes.</p>
<p>For further reading on the scientific consensus regarding chemtrails and geoengineering, please refer to the following peer-reviewed studies:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo2716">Contrail cirrus radiative forcing for future air traffic</a> - Nature Climate Change</li>
  <li><a href="https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2019EF001418">Stratospheric aerosol injection research: From climate model experiments to integrated assessment</a> - Earth's Future</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378016300946">Geoengineering the climate: Science, governance and uncertainty</a> - Global Environmental Change</li>
</ul>
<p>These studies provide a comprehensive overview of the scientific understanding of contrails, geoengineering, and the potential impacts of SAI. They highlight the need for further research and the importance of considering the ethical, social, and environmental implications of geoengineering proposals.</p>

Fact-checking the claim: CDC and Pfizer affiliate sponsor pro-LGBT public school event for fifth-graders

Reviewed by
Remedia Ai

Pfizer sponsored an LGBT event for fifth-grade public school students in Chicago Public Schools

Who is claiming:

View all this data in real-time using one of our extensions

Chrome

Firefox Android

Content you might like:

Claim Pfizer sponsored an LGBT event for fifth-grade public school students in Chicago Public Schools
Claim RatingHalf True	Claim DateJuly 5, 2024

Fact-checking the claim: CDC and Pfizer affiliate sponsor pro-LGBT public school event for fifth-graders

Reviewed byRemedia Ai

Pfizer sponsored an LGBT event for fifth-grade public school students in Chicago Public Schools

Who is claiming:

View all this data in real-time using one of our extensions

Chrome

Firefox Android

Content you might like:

Reviewed by
Remedia Ai