Fact-Check: Did Daisy Hildebrand Die from Measles or Medical Negligence?
Reviewed by
Remedia Ai
Introduction
In a recent interview, Peter Hildebrand, the father of eight-year-old Daisy Hildebrand, challenged the mainstream narrative that his daughter died from measles. Hildebrand asserted that Daisy's death was due to medical negligence, particularly the hospital's failure to administer a budesonide breathing treatment. This claim has sparked a debate about the reliability of media reports and the standard of care in hospitals. This article aims to evaluate the validity of Hildebrand's claims.
Background
Daisy Hildebrand's death was widely reported as a measles-related fatality, the first in the United States in a decade. However, Peter Hildebrand and his wife firmly believe that Daisy did not die from measles but from inadequate medical care. They cited medical records that allegedly contradict the media's claims and expressed frustration with the widespread reporting of Daisy's death as a measles case.
Evaluation of the Claim
Medical Records and Expert Opinions
To assess the validity of Hildebrand's claims, it is crucial to examine the medical records and expert opinions. According to Michael Mina, a physician and immunologist who studies measles, budesonide is not a first-line treatment for measles. Mina stated that the use of budesonide to treat measles does not make sense biologically or mechanistically. He explained that budesonide might be useful for treating a co-infection occurring in conjunction with measles but is not a measles therapy.
Furthermore, Mina emphasized that preventing measles through vaccination is much more effective than treating it after infection. This aligns with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations, which highlight the importance of vaccination in preventing measles outbreaks.
Alternative Health Practitioners
The Hildebrand family sought advice from alternative health practitioners, including Dr. Ben Edwards and Dr. Richard Bartlett, who are known for their critical views on conventional medicine and the MMR vaccine. These practitioners recommended treatments such as vitamin A, which initially seemed to help Daisy. However, as her condition worsened, the family sought further medical assistance at a hospital.
It is worth noting that alternative health practices, while sometimes beneficial, are not a substitute for evidence-based medical care. The efficacy of treatments like vitamin A and cod-liver oil in treating measles is not supported by robust scientific evidence.
Media Reporting and Public Perception
The media's portrayal of Daisy's death as a measles case has been a point of contention. Hildebrand's emotional testimony highlights the pain and anger he feels, not only over the loss of his daughter but also over the media's persistent misrepresentation of her death. This raises questions about the reliability of media reports and the need for accurate and transparent reporting.
The role of prominent figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who attended Daisy's funeral and supported the family's stance, adds another layer to the debate. Kennedy's presence and comments have been interpreted as a show of support for the family's claims and a critique of conventional medical treatments.
Conclusion
After a thorough evaluation of the available evidence, it is clear that the claim that Daisy Hildebrand did not die from measles but from medical negligence is largely unfounded. Medical experts and records contradict the family's assertions, and the efficacy of the proposed budesonide treatment for measles is not supported by scientific evidence. While the family's grief and frustration are understandable, it is essential to rely on evidence-based medical practices and accurate reporting to ensure the best outcomes for patients and the public.
References
Who is claiming:
- Natural News - Claim can be found on - https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-04-14-father-cha...