The Expose News - com

Dr. Guy Hatchard

Rhoda Wilson

<p>The claim that the spike protein generated by the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines is a cardiotoxin, causing an epidemic of heart disease, especially among young patients, has been circulating in various articles and discussions. This claim was made at a meeting of cardiologists in Auckland, New Zealand, and has been reported by Dr. Guy Hatchard in his articles.</p>    <p>To evaluate this claim, it is essential to examine the scientific evidence available. The spike protein produced by mRNA vaccines is designed to mimic the spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, triggering an immune response. While there have been reports of myocarditis and pericarditis following vaccination, these cases are rare and typically mild. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and other health authorities have been monitoring these adverse events closely.</p>    <p>A study published in the journal <a href='https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01630-0'>Nature Medicine</a> found that the risk of myocarditis after vaccination is higher in adolescents and young adults, particularly after the second dose of mRNA vaccines. However, the overall incidence remains low, and most cases resolve with appropriate treatment. The study also noted that the benefits of vaccination in preventing severe COVID-19 outcomes outweigh the risks of these rare adverse events.</p>    <p>Furthermore, a systematic review and meta-analysis published in the <a href='https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(21)00648-4/fulltext'>Lancet Infectious Diseases</a> concluded that the risk of myocarditis is higher after COVID-19 infection than after vaccination. This suggests that the spike protein produced by the virus itself may be more harmful than the vaccine-induced spike protein.</p>    <p>In conclusion, while there is evidence of rare cases of myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA vaccination, the claim that the spike protein is a cardiotoxin causing an epidemic of heart disease is not supported by robust scientific evidence. The benefits of vaccination in preventing severe COVID-19 outcomes outweigh the risks of these rare adverse events. Therefore, the claim is rated as 2 out of 5.</p>

Claim Review: Spike Protein from mRNA Vaccines as a Cardiotoxin

claim-review-spike-protein-from-mrna-vaccines-as-a-cardiotoxin-c6489ea7271f

<p>The claim that COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer and have led to a significant increase in cancer cases among young people has been circulating widely. This article aims to review the available evidence and provide a thorough analysis of this claim.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The claim suggests that COVID-19 vaccines are directly responsible for an increase in cancer cases, particularly among young people. It cites various sources, including reports from the American Cancer Society, Pfizer's safety reports, and statements from oncologists and pathologists.</p>
<h2>Analysis of the Claim</h2>
<p>To evaluate this claim, it is essential to examine the evidence presented and compare it with reliable scientific sources.</p>
<h3>Increase in Cancer Cases</h3>
<p>The claim mentions a significant increase in fourteen different types of cancers across 44 countries, particularly among young people, by October 2022. However, it is crucial to note that the increase in cancer cases could be attributed to various factors, including delayed screenings and treatments due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The American Cancer Society reported that cancer mortality in young people had doubled compared to pre-2020 levels, but this does not necessarily imply a direct causal link to COVID-19 vaccines.</p>
<h3>Pfizer's Safety Report</h3>
<p>The claim references Pfizer's 2022 safety report on COVID-19 vaccines, which documented thousands of cancer cases following vaccinations. However, it is important to understand that correlation does not imply causation. The presence of cancer cases in vaccinated individuals does not prove that the vaccines caused the cancers. Further investigation is needed to establish a causal relationship.</p>
<h3>Statements from Oncologists and Pathologists</h3>
<p>The claim includes statements from oncologists and pathologists who have observed aggressive cancer relapses and unprecedented cases of stage four cancers in young adults. While these observations are concerning, they do not provide conclusive evidence that COVID-19 vaccines are the cause. Other factors, such as environmental exposures, lifestyle changes, and genetic predispositions, could also contribute to these observations.</p>
<h3>Mechanism of mRNA Vaccines</h3>
<p>The claim discusses the mechanism of mRNA vaccines and the resulting spike protein production by people's bodies after vaccination. It suggests that the spike protein may have carcinogenic effects. However, scientific studies have shown that the spike protein produced by mRNA vaccines is rapidly degraded and does not persist in the body long enough to cause significant harm. Additionally, the spike protein is not known to have direct carcinogenic properties.</p>
<h3>Immune Suppression and Cancer</h3>
<p>The claim mentions that COVID-19 vaccines may cause immune suppression, which impairs the body's ability to fight cancer. While it is true that some vaccines can temporarily affect the immune system, there is no evidence to suggest that COVID-19 vaccines specifically cause long-term immune suppression that leads to cancer. The immune system is complex and adaptable, and temporary changes do not necessarily result in increased cancer risk.</p>
<h3>Ivermectin as a Potential Treatment</h3>
<p>The claim suggests that ivermectin may be a potential treatment for COVID-19 and cancer. While ivermectin has shown some effectiveness against certain viruses and parasites, its role in treating cancer is not well-established. Further research is needed to determine the efficacy and safety of ivermectin as a cancer treatment.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer and have led to a significant increase in cancer cases among young people is not supported by reliable scientific evidence. While there have been reports of increased cancer cases, these are likely due to other factors such as delayed screenings and treatments during the pandemic. The claim that vaccines are directly responsible for this increase is misleading and lacks credible scientific backing.</p>
<p>It is crucial to rely on peer-reviewed scientific studies and expert opinions when evaluating claims about health and medicine. Misinformation can lead to unnecessary fear and mistrust, which can have serious consequences for public health. Always consult reliable sources and seek advice from healthcare professionals for accurate information.</p>

Claim Review: COVID-19 Vaccines and Cancer

<p>An official report by a Slovak government commission investigating the COVID-19 pandemic recommended mRNA vaccines be banned after determining they are ‘dangerous.’ This claim has gained attention, especially as it was followed by a similar call from the town council of Port Hedland in Western Australia. However, a thorough examination of the available scientific evidence does not support this claim.</p>
<h3>Understanding mRNA Vaccines</h3>
<p>mRNA vaccines, such as those developed by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, work by instructing cells to produce a harmless piece of the ‘spike protein’ found on the surface of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This triggers an immune response, preparing the body to fight the virus if exposed in the future. This technology has been studied for decades and has shown promising results in various applications, including cancer treatments and other infectious diseases.</p>
<h3>Safety and Efficacy of mRNA Vaccines</h3>
<p>The safety and efficacy of mRNA vaccines have been extensively studied and confirmed by numerous peer-reviewed studies and health organizations. For example, a study published in <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577">The New England Journal of Medicine</a> found that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was 95% effective in preventing COVID-19. Similarly, a study published in <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2035389">The New England Journal of Medicine</a> found that the Moderna vaccine was 94.1% effective.</p>
<p>Regarding safety, a study published in <a href="https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7002e3.htm">Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR)</a> by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that serious adverse events after mRNA vaccination were rare. The most common side effects were mild to moderate and included pain at the injection site, fatigue, headache, and muscle pain.</p>
<h3>Addressing Concerns</h3>
<p>The Slovak government commission's report raises concerns about the safety of mRNA vaccines, but these concerns are not supported by the broader scientific community. The World Health Organization (WHO), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have all reviewed the data on mRNA vaccines and concluded that they are safe and effective.</p>
<p>It is important to note that any medical intervention, including vaccines, can have side effects. However, the benefits of mRNA vaccines in preventing severe COVID-19, hospitalization, and death far outweigh the risks. The rare cases of serious adverse events, such as myocarditis and anaphylaxis, have been closely monitored and studied, and the overall risk remains very low.</p>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>The claim that mRNA vaccines are dangerous and should be banned is not supported by scientific evidence. The safety and efficacy of mRNA vaccines have been extensively studied and confirmed by numerous peer-reviewed studies and health organizations. While it is important to continue monitoring the safety of these vaccines, the available data strongly support their use in preventing COVID-19.</p>
<p>For high school students and the general public, it is crucial to rely on credible sources of information and to critically evaluate claims made in the media. Misinformation can spread quickly and have serious consequences for public health. Always seek information from reliable scientific sources and consult with healthcare professionals for medical advice.</p>

Claim Review: Slovak Government Report Calls for Ban of ‘Dangerous’ mRNA Vaccines

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>A recent article published by The Exposé titled "Leading doctors sign HOPE Accord calling for the suspension of all covid mRNA ‘vaccines’" claims that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are driving a rise in heart attacks, strokes, and cancer. The article cites an open letter to the UK’s General Medical Council (GMC) by Dr. Aseem Malhotra and other healthcare professionals, calling for the immediate suspension of these vaccines. This claim review will examine the evidence presented and assess the validity of these claims.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The central claim is that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are contributing to an alarming rise in disability and excess deaths, particularly heart attacks, strokes, and cancer. The article suggests that the evidence is overwhelming and that the continued use of these vaccines is a public health calamity.</p>
<h2>Evaluating the Evidence</h2>
<p>To evaluate this claim, we need to consider the following points:</p>
<h3>1. Scientific Consensus and Regulatory Approval</h3>
<p>The COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, such as those produced by Pfizer and Moderna, have undergone rigorous clinical trials and have been approved by regulatory bodies worldwide, including the FDA and EMA. These approvals are based on extensive data showing the vaccines' safety and efficacy.</p>
<h3>2. Adverse Events Reporting</h3>
<p>The article mentions a re-analysis of Pfizer and Moderna’s original randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in the journal Vaccine. This re-analysis suggested a greater risk of serious harm from the vaccine than being hospitalized with COVID. However, it is important to note that:</p>
<ul>
  <li>The re-analysis was not peer-reviewed and has not been widely accepted by the scientific community.</li>
  <li>The original RCTs were designed to assess short-term effects, and long-term data is still being collected.</li>
  <li>The benefits of vaccination, including prevention of severe disease, hospitalization, and death, have been well-documented in numerous studies.</li>
</ul>
<h3>3. Mechanistic Evidence</h3>
<p>The article cites experts who suggest that the mRNA vaccines may cause cancer through prolonged immunosuppression and DNA contamination. However, there is no robust scientific evidence to support these claims. The mRNA vaccines do not alter DNA, and the spike protein produced by the vaccines is quickly degraded by the body.</p>
<h3>4. Epidemiological Data</h3>
<p>The claim that the vaccines are causing a rise in heart attacks, strokes, and cancer is not supported by epidemiological data. Studies have shown that:</p>
<ul>
  <li>The incidence of heart attacks and strokes has not increased significantly post-vaccination.</li>
  <li>The alleged rise in cancer cases cannot be attributed to the vaccines, as cancer development typically takes years.</li>
  <li>The benefits of vaccination in preventing severe COVID-19 outcomes far outweigh the potential risks.</li>
</ul>
<h3>5. Expert Opinions</h3>
<p>While the article cites several experts who support the claim, it is important to consider the broader scientific consensus. The vast majority of medical and scientific experts agree that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are safe and effective. The World Health Organization (WHO) and other public health bodies continue to recommend these vaccines as a crucial tool in the fight against COVID-19.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>Based on the available evidence, the claim that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are causing a rise in heart attacks, strokes, and cancer is not supported. The benefits of vaccination, including the prevention of severe disease and death, outweigh the potential risks. It is crucial to rely on robust scientific evidence and the consensus of the medical community when evaluating such claims.</p>
<h2>References</h2>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/safety-of-vaccines.html">CDC - Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/coronavirus-disease-(covid-19)-vaccines">WHO - The benefits of COVID-19 vaccination outweigh the risks</a>&nbsp;</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2101544">NEJM - Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00947-8/fulltext">The Lancet - Safety and Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: An Interim Analysis of Four Randomised Controlled Trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK</a></li>
</ul>

Reviewing the Claim that COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Cause Heart Attacks, Strokes, and Cancer

<p>Na internetu se pojavila tvrdnja da Delta soj COVID-19 ne postoji i da oboljenje širi spike protein u cjepivu. Ova tvrdnja je izazvala zabrinutost i potrebu za detaljnom provjerom.</p>
<p>Delta varijanta COVID-19, poznata i kao B.1.617.2, prvi put je identificirana u Indiji u prosincu 2020. godine. Ova varijanta je brzo postala dominantna u mnogim dijelovima svijeta zbog svoje visoke zaraznosti. Znanstveni dokazi pokazuju da Delta varijanta ima mutacije koje povećavaju njenu sposobnost vezivanja za stanice domaćina, što rezultira većom zaraznošću.</p>
<p>Tvrdnja da oboljenje širi spike protein u cjepivu je također netočna. Cjepiva protiv COVID-19, posebno mRNA cjepiva kao što su Pfizer-BioNTech i Moderna, koriste mRNA kako bi instruirali stanice da proizvedu spike protein. Ovaj protein potiče imunološki odgovor koji pomaže tijelu da se zaštiti od infekcije. Međutim, spike protein proizveden cjepivom ne širi infekciju, već pomaže tijelu da razvije imunitet.</p>
<p>Studije su pokazale da cjepiva protiv COVID-19 su sigurna i učinkovita. Na primjer, studija objavljena u časopisu <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2101765">New England Journal of Medicine</a> pokazuje da mRNA cjepiva imaju visoku učinkovitost u prevenciji teških oblika bolesti i smrti.</p>
<p>Također, tvrdnja da anti-spike protutijela ne neutraliziraju virus je netočna. Protutijela proizvedena nakon cijepljenja su sposobna neutralizirati virus i spriječiti njegovo širenje. Studija objavljena u časopisu <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03696-9">Nature</a> pokazuje da protutijela proizvedena nakon cijepljenja imaju visoku neutralizacijsku sposobnost.</p>
<p>Zaključno, tvrdnja da Delta soj ne postoji i da oboljenje širi spike protein u cjepivu je netočna. Znanstveni dokazi pokazuju da Delta varijanta postoji i da cjepiva ne uzrokuju širenje infekcije. Važno je da se oslanjamo na pouzdane izvore informacija i znanstvene dokaze kako bismo donosili informirane odluke o našem zdravlju.</p>

Claim Review: Spike Protein from mRNA Vaccines as a Cardiotoxin

Reviewed by
Remedia Ai

The spike protein generated by the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines is a cardiotoxin, causing an epidemic of heart disease, especially among young patients.

Who is claiming:

View all this data in real-time using one of our extensions

Chrome

Firefox Android

Content you might like:

Claim The spike protein generated by the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines is a cardiotoxin, causing an epidemic of heart disease, especially among young patients.
Claim RatingMostly False	Claim DateNovember 4, 2024

Claim Review: Spike Protein from mRNA Vaccines as a Cardiotoxin

Reviewed byRemedia Ai

The spike protein generated by the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines is a cardiotoxin, causing an epidemic of heart disease, especially among young patients.

Who is claiming:

View all this data in real-time using one of our extensions

Chrome

Firefox Android

Content you might like:

Reviewed by
Remedia Ai