The Peoples Voice - TV

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>A recent article from The People's Voice claims that almost 1,000 people a day are diagnosed with cancer in England, with the increase potentially linked to COVID-19 vaccines and mobile phone usage. This claim review will examine the evidence behind these assertions.</p>
<h2>Claim Analysis</h2>
<p>The article states that there were 346,217 cancer diagnoses in England in 2022, a 5% increase from the previous year. The claim suggests that this increase could be linked to COVID-19 vaccines and mobile phone usage, but provides no scientific evidence to support these assertions.</p>
<h2>COVID-19 Vaccines and Cancer</h2>
<p>There is no scientific evidence to suggest that COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer. The vaccines approved for use have undergone rigorous clinical trials and ongoing monitoring to ensure their safety and efficacy. A study published in <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-47745-z">Nature Medicine</a> &nbsp;found no evidence of an increased risk of cancer following COVID-19 vaccination.</p>
<h2>Mobile Phones and Cancer</h2>
<p>The claim that mobile phone usage is linked to cancer is not supported by the majority of scientific research. A large-scale study by the <a href="https://www.iarc.who.int/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/IARC_Mobiles_QA.pdf">International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)</a> &nbsp;found no consistent evidence of an increased risk of brain tumors or other cancers related to mobile phone use. While the IARC has classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans, this classification is based on limited evidence and more research is needed.</p>
<h2>Alternative Explanations</h2>
<p>The increase in cancer cases in England is more likely due to increased detection and screening efforts post-pandemic. According to the <a href="https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/cancer-waiting-times/">NHS England</a>, the higher figures are partly due to campaigns urging people to get checks they had missed during the pandemic. Additionally, advances in medical technology and increased awareness of cancer symptoms can lead to earlier and more frequent diagnoses.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that the increase in cancer cases in England is linked to COVID-19 vaccines and mobile phone usage is not supported by scientific evidence. The rise in cancer cases is more likely due to increased detection and screening efforts post-pandemic. It is important to rely on credible sources and scientific research when evaluating claims about public health issues.</p>

Claim Review: Record High Cancer Cases in England and Potential Links to COVID-19 Vaccines and Mobile Phones

claim-review-record-high-cancer-cases-in-england-and-potential-links-to-covid-19-vaccines-and-mobile-phones-f62b223a993e

<p>The claim that COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer and have led to a significant increase in cancer cases among young people has been circulating widely. This article aims to review the available evidence and provide a thorough analysis of this claim.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The claim suggests that COVID-19 vaccines are directly responsible for an increase in cancer cases, particularly among young people. It cites various sources, including reports from the American Cancer Society, Pfizer's safety reports, and statements from oncologists and pathologists.</p>
<h2>Analysis of the Claim</h2>
<p>To evaluate this claim, it is essential to examine the evidence presented and compare it with reliable scientific sources.</p>
<h3>Increase in Cancer Cases</h3>
<p>The claim mentions a significant increase in fourteen different types of cancers across 44 countries, particularly among young people, by October 2022. However, it is crucial to note that the increase in cancer cases could be attributed to various factors, including delayed screenings and treatments due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The American Cancer Society reported that cancer mortality in young people had doubled compared to pre-2020 levels, but this does not necessarily imply a direct causal link to COVID-19 vaccines.</p>
<h3>Pfizer's Safety Report</h3>
<p>The claim references Pfizer's 2022 safety report on COVID-19 vaccines, which documented thousands of cancer cases following vaccinations. However, it is important to understand that correlation does not imply causation. The presence of cancer cases in vaccinated individuals does not prove that the vaccines caused the cancers. Further investigation is needed to establish a causal relationship.</p>
<h3>Statements from Oncologists and Pathologists</h3>
<p>The claim includes statements from oncologists and pathologists who have observed aggressive cancer relapses and unprecedented cases of stage four cancers in young adults. While these observations are concerning, they do not provide conclusive evidence that COVID-19 vaccines are the cause. Other factors, such as environmental exposures, lifestyle changes, and genetic predispositions, could also contribute to these observations.</p>
<h3>Mechanism of mRNA Vaccines</h3>
<p>The claim discusses the mechanism of mRNA vaccines and the resulting spike protein production by people's bodies after vaccination. It suggests that the spike protein may have carcinogenic effects. However, scientific studies have shown that the spike protein produced by mRNA vaccines is rapidly degraded and does not persist in the body long enough to cause significant harm. Additionally, the spike protein is not known to have direct carcinogenic properties.</p>
<h3>Immune Suppression and Cancer</h3>
<p>The claim mentions that COVID-19 vaccines may cause immune suppression, which impairs the body's ability to fight cancer. While it is true that some vaccines can temporarily affect the immune system, there is no evidence to suggest that COVID-19 vaccines specifically cause long-term immune suppression that leads to cancer. The immune system is complex and adaptable, and temporary changes do not necessarily result in increased cancer risk.</p>
<h3>Ivermectin as a Potential Treatment</h3>
<p>The claim suggests that ivermectin may be a potential treatment for COVID-19 and cancer. While ivermectin has shown some effectiveness against certain viruses and parasites, its role in treating cancer is not well-established. Further research is needed to determine the efficacy and safety of ivermectin as a cancer treatment.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer and have led to a significant increase in cancer cases among young people is not supported by reliable scientific evidence. While there have been reports of increased cancer cases, these are likely due to other factors such as delayed screenings and treatments during the pandemic. The claim that vaccines are directly responsible for this increase is misleading and lacks credible scientific backing.</p>
<p>It is crucial to rely on peer-reviewed scientific studies and expert opinions when evaluating claims about health and medicine. Misinformation can lead to unnecessary fear and mistrust, which can have serious consequences for public health. Always consult reliable sources and seek advice from healthcare professionals for accurate information.</p>

Claim Review: COVID-19 Vaccines and Cancer

<p>The article from The People's Voice claims that Australian officials have warned about an impending 'turbo cancer' pandemic that will kill billions in the next two years, attributing this to the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. This claim is alarming and warrants a thorough investigation.</p>
<p>Firstly, it is important to note that the term 'turbo cancer' is not recognized in medical literature. No reputable scientific sources or studies validate the existence of such a condition, let alone its link to COVID-19 vaccines.</p>
<p>The article suggests that the mRNA vaccines are toxic and will lead to a surge in cancer cases. However, this claim is not supported by scientific evidence. mRNA vaccines, such as those developed by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, have been extensively studied and found to be safe and effective in preventing COVID-19. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have continually monitored the safety of these vaccines and have not found any link to cancer.</p>
<p>A study published in <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577">The New England Journal of Medicine</a> &nbsp;found that the mRNA vaccines are effective in preventing COVID-19 and have a favorable safety profile. Another study published in <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lamic/article/PIIS2666-5247(21)00069-0/FULLTEXT">The Lancet</a> &nbsp;also confirmed the safety and efficacy of these vaccines.</p>
<p>The article mentions Dr. Kelly Powers, a Fox News doctor who passed away from cancer. It is important to note that individual cases cannot be used to draw general conclusions about the safety of vaccines. Cancer is a complex disease with many contributing factors, and attributing a single case to vaccines without scientific evidence is misleading.</p>
<p>The claim that Australian officials have warned about this 'turbo cancer' pandemic is also unfounded. There are no official statements or reports from Australian health authorities or reputable news sources that support this claim. The Australian Department of Health has continually endorsed the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that 'turbo cancer' will spread rapidly and kill billions due to COVID-19 vaccines is unfounded and lacks credible scientific evidence. It is crucial to rely on reputable sources and scientific studies when evaluating such claims.</p>

Examining the Claim: Will 'Turbo Cancer' Kill Billions Due to COVID-19 Vaccines?

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>A recent article published by The Exposé titled "Leading doctors sign HOPE Accord calling for the suspension of all covid mRNA ‘vaccines’" claims that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are driving a rise in heart attacks, strokes, and cancer. The article cites an open letter to the UK’s General Medical Council (GMC) by Dr. Aseem Malhotra and other healthcare professionals, calling for the immediate suspension of these vaccines. This claim review will examine the evidence presented and assess the validity of these claims.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The central claim is that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are contributing to an alarming rise in disability and excess deaths, particularly heart attacks, strokes, and cancer. The article suggests that the evidence is overwhelming and that the continued use of these vaccines is a public health calamity.</p>
<h2>Evaluating the Evidence</h2>
<p>To evaluate this claim, we need to consider the following points:</p>
<h3>1. Scientific Consensus and Regulatory Approval</h3>
<p>The COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, such as those produced by Pfizer and Moderna, have undergone rigorous clinical trials and have been approved by regulatory bodies worldwide, including the FDA and EMA. These approvals are based on extensive data showing the vaccines' safety and efficacy.</p>
<h3>2. Adverse Events Reporting</h3>
<p>The article mentions a re-analysis of Pfizer and Moderna’s original randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in the journal Vaccine. This re-analysis suggested a greater risk of serious harm from the vaccine than being hospitalized with COVID. However, it is important to note that:</p>
<ul>
  <li>The re-analysis was not peer-reviewed and has not been widely accepted by the scientific community.</li>
  <li>The original RCTs were designed to assess short-term effects, and long-term data is still being collected.</li>
  <li>The benefits of vaccination, including prevention of severe disease, hospitalization, and death, have been well-documented in numerous studies.</li>
</ul>
<h3>3. Mechanistic Evidence</h3>
<p>The article cites experts who suggest that the mRNA vaccines may cause cancer through prolonged immunosuppression and DNA contamination. However, there is no robust scientific evidence to support these claims. The mRNA vaccines do not alter DNA, and the spike protein produced by the vaccines is quickly degraded by the body.</p>
<h3>4. Epidemiological Data</h3>
<p>The claim that the vaccines are causing a rise in heart attacks, strokes, and cancer is not supported by epidemiological data. Studies have shown that:</p>
<ul>
  <li>The incidence of heart attacks and strokes has not increased significantly post-vaccination.</li>
  <li>The alleged rise in cancer cases cannot be attributed to the vaccines, as cancer development typically takes years.</li>
  <li>The benefits of vaccination in preventing severe COVID-19 outcomes far outweigh the potential risks.</li>
</ul>
<h3>5. Expert Opinions</h3>
<p>While the article cites several experts who support the claim, it is important to consider the broader scientific consensus. The vast majority of medical and scientific experts agree that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are safe and effective. The World Health Organization (WHO) and other public health bodies continue to recommend these vaccines as a crucial tool in the fight against COVID-19.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>Based on the available evidence, the claim that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are causing a rise in heart attacks, strokes, and cancer is not supported. The benefits of vaccination, including the prevention of severe disease and death, outweigh the potential risks. It is crucial to rely on robust scientific evidence and the consensus of the medical community when evaluating such claims.</p>
<h2>References</h2>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/safety-of-vaccines.html">CDC - Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/coronavirus-disease-(covid-19)-vaccines">WHO - The benefits of COVID-19 vaccination outweigh the risks</a>&nbsp;</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2101544">NEJM - Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00947-8/fulltext">The Lancet - Safety and Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: An Interim Analysis of Four Randomised Controlled Trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK</a></li>
</ul>

Reviewing the Claim that COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Cause Heart Attacks, Strokes, and Cancer

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>A recent article from The People's Voice claims that a Lancet review of 325 autopsies found that 74% of deaths were linked to COVID-19 vaccines. The article also states that the journal removed the study after only 24 hours. This claim review will examine the validity of these statements.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The claim suggests that a significant number of deaths were directly caused by COVID-19 vaccines, as indicated by an autopsy study published in the Lancet. The study was allegedly removed due to its conclusions not being supported by the methodology.</p>
<h2>Analysis</h2>
<p>The study in question was a pre-print awaiting peer-review, authored by Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Harvey Risch, and their colleagues. Pre-prints are preliminary reports that have not undergone the rigorous peer-review process necessary for publication in reputable journals. The Lancet removed the study, stating that the conclusions were not supported by the study methodology.</p>
<p>The original study abstract, available in the Internet Archive, suggests that the most implicated organ system in COVID-19 vaccine-associated deaths was the cardiovascular system (53%), followed by the hematological system (17%). The study concluded that there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death in most cases.</p>
<p>However, the removal of the study by the Lancet indicates significant methodological concerns. Pre-prints are often removed if they fail to meet basic screening criteria or if the methodology is deemed flawed. The fact that the study was removed so quickly suggests that it did not meet the necessary standards for further review.</p>
<p>Dr. Clare Craig, a pathologist, acknowledged that while the approach taken in the study is sound, there may be a bias towards reporting autopsies where there was evidence of causation. This bias could exaggerate the likelihood of causation. She also emphasized the importance of open scientific critique over censorship.</p>
<h2>Scientific Evidence</h2>
<p>To date, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has not acknowledged a single death being caused by COVID-19 vaccines. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is designed to alert to potential harms but is not the best way of measuring the extent of those harms. Quantifying the impact of deaths can be done by looking at overall mortality rates in a country, but this method is also imperfect.</p>
<p>A study published in the <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104840">New England Journal of Medicine</a> found no evidence of increased mortality rates among vaccinated individuals compared to unvaccinated individuals. Another study in the <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(23)00207-4/fulltext">Lancet</a> &nbsp;concluded that COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective, with rare adverse events.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that a Lancet review found 74% of deaths linked to COVID-19 vaccines is based on a pre-print study that was removed due to methodological concerns. The removal of the study indicates that the conclusions were not supported by the methodology. The claim is not substantiated by peer-reviewed evidence, and the available scientific literature does not support the assertion that COVID-19 vaccines are causing a significant number of deaths.</p>
<p>It is crucial to rely on peer-reviewed studies and open scientific critique to assess the safety and efficacy of vaccines. Censorship of flawed studies is a necessary part of maintaining scientific integrity.</p>

Claim Review: Record High Cancer Cases in England and Potential Links to COVID-19 Vaccines and Mobile Phones

Reviewed by
Remedia Ai

Almost 1,000 people a day are diagnosed with cancer in England, with the increase potentially linked to COVID-19 vaccines and mobile phone usage.

Introduction

Claim Analysis

COVID-19 Vaccines and Cancer

Mobile Phones and Cancer

Alternative Explanations

Conclusion

Who is claiming:

View all this data in real-time using one of our extensions

Chrome

Firefox Android

Content you might like:

Claim Almost 1,000 people a day are diagnosed with cancer in England, with the increase potentially linked to COVID-19 vaccines and mobile phone usage.
Claim RatingFalse	Claim DateNovember 0, 2024

Claim Review: Record High Cancer Cases in England and Potential Links to COVID-19 Vaccines and Mobile Phones

Reviewed byRemedia Ai

Almost 1,000 people a day are diagnosed with cancer in England, with the increase potentially linked to COVID-19 vaccines and mobile phone usage.

Introduction

Claim Analysis

COVID-19 Vaccines and Cancer

Mobile Phones and Cancer

Alternative Explanations

Conclusion

Who is claiming:

View all this data in real-time using one of our extensions

Chrome

Firefox Android

Content you might like:

Reviewed by
Remedia Ai