The Peoples Voice - TV

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>A recent article from The People's Voice claims that almost 1,000 people a day are diagnosed with cancer in England, with the increase potentially linked to COVID-19 vaccines and mobile phone usage. This claim review will examine the evidence behind these assertions.</p>
<h2>Claim Analysis</h2>
<p>The article states that there were 346,217 cancer diagnoses in England in 2022, a 5% increase from the previous year. The claim suggests that this increase could be linked to COVID-19 vaccines and mobile phone usage, but provides no scientific evidence to support these assertions.</p>
<h2>COVID-19 Vaccines and Cancer</h2>
<p>There is no scientific evidence to suggest that COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer. The vaccines approved for use have undergone rigorous clinical trials and ongoing monitoring to ensure their safety and efficacy. A study published in <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-47745-z">Nature Medicine</a> &nbsp;found no evidence of an increased risk of cancer following COVID-19 vaccination.</p>
<h2>Mobile Phones and Cancer</h2>
<p>The claim that mobile phone usage is linked to cancer is not supported by the majority of scientific research. A large-scale study by the <a href="https://www.iarc.who.int/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/IARC_Mobiles_QA.pdf">International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)</a> &nbsp;found no consistent evidence of an increased risk of brain tumors or other cancers related to mobile phone use. While the IARC has classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans, this classification is based on limited evidence and more research is needed.</p>
<h2>Alternative Explanations</h2>
<p>The increase in cancer cases in England is more likely due to increased detection and screening efforts post-pandemic. According to the <a href="https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/cancer-waiting-times/">NHS England</a>, the higher figures are partly due to campaigns urging people to get checks they had missed during the pandemic. Additionally, advances in medical technology and increased awareness of cancer symptoms can lead to earlier and more frequent diagnoses.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that the increase in cancer cases in England is linked to COVID-19 vaccines and mobile phone usage is not supported by scientific evidence. The rise in cancer cases is more likely due to increased detection and screening efforts post-pandemic. It is important to rely on credible sources and scientific research when evaluating claims about public health issues.</p>

Claim Review: Record High Cancer Cases in England and Potential Links to COVID-19 Vaccines and Mobile Phones

claim-review-record-high-cancer-cases-in-england-and-potential-links-to-covid-19-vaccines-and-mobile-phones-f62b223a993e

<p>The claim that COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer and have led to a significant increase in cancer cases among young people has been circulating widely. This article aims to review the available evidence and provide a thorough analysis of this claim.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The claim suggests that COVID-19 vaccines are directly responsible for an increase in cancer cases, particularly among young people. It cites various sources, including reports from the American Cancer Society, Pfizer's safety reports, and statements from oncologists and pathologists.</p>
<h2>Analysis of the Claim</h2>
<p>To evaluate this claim, it is essential to examine the evidence presented and compare it with reliable scientific sources.</p>
<h3>Increase in Cancer Cases</h3>
<p>The claim mentions a significant increase in fourteen different types of cancers across 44 countries, particularly among young people, by October 2022. However, it is crucial to note that the increase in cancer cases could be attributed to various factors, including delayed screenings and treatments due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The American Cancer Society reported that cancer mortality in young people had doubled compared to pre-2020 levels, but this does not necessarily imply a direct causal link to COVID-19 vaccines.</p>
<h3>Pfizer's Safety Report</h3>
<p>The claim references Pfizer's 2022 safety report on COVID-19 vaccines, which documented thousands of cancer cases following vaccinations. However, it is important to understand that correlation does not imply causation. The presence of cancer cases in vaccinated individuals does not prove that the vaccines caused the cancers. Further investigation is needed to establish a causal relationship.</p>
<h3>Statements from Oncologists and Pathologists</h3>
<p>The claim includes statements from oncologists and pathologists who have observed aggressive cancer relapses and unprecedented cases of stage four cancers in young adults. While these observations are concerning, they do not provide conclusive evidence that COVID-19 vaccines are the cause. Other factors, such as environmental exposures, lifestyle changes, and genetic predispositions, could also contribute to these observations.</p>
<h3>Mechanism of mRNA Vaccines</h3>
<p>The claim discusses the mechanism of mRNA vaccines and the resulting spike protein production by people's bodies after vaccination. It suggests that the spike protein may have carcinogenic effects. However, scientific studies have shown that the spike protein produced by mRNA vaccines is rapidly degraded and does not persist in the body long enough to cause significant harm. Additionally, the spike protein is not known to have direct carcinogenic properties.</p>
<h3>Immune Suppression and Cancer</h3>
<p>The claim mentions that COVID-19 vaccines may cause immune suppression, which impairs the body's ability to fight cancer. While it is true that some vaccines can temporarily affect the immune system, there is no evidence to suggest that COVID-19 vaccines specifically cause long-term immune suppression that leads to cancer. The immune system is complex and adaptable, and temporary changes do not necessarily result in increased cancer risk.</p>
<h3>Ivermectin as a Potential Treatment</h3>
<p>The claim suggests that ivermectin may be a potential treatment for COVID-19 and cancer. While ivermectin has shown some effectiveness against certain viruses and parasites, its role in treating cancer is not well-established. Further research is needed to determine the efficacy and safety of ivermectin as a cancer treatment.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that COVID-19 vaccines cause cancer and have led to a significant increase in cancer cases among young people is not supported by reliable scientific evidence. While there have been reports of increased cancer cases, these are likely due to other factors such as delayed screenings and treatments during the pandemic. The claim that vaccines are directly responsible for this increase is misleading and lacks credible scientific backing.</p>
<p>It is crucial to rely on peer-reviewed scientific studies and expert opinions when evaluating claims about health and medicine. Misinformation can lead to unnecessary fear and mistrust, which can have serious consequences for public health. Always consult reliable sources and seek advice from healthcare professionals for accurate information.</p>

Claim Review: COVID-19 Vaccines and Cancer

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>A recent article from The People's Voice claims that a Lancet review of 325 autopsies found that 74% of deaths were linked to COVID-19 vaccines. The article also states that the journal removed the study after only 24 hours. This claim review will examine the validity of these statements.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The claim suggests that a significant number of deaths were directly caused by COVID-19 vaccines, as indicated by an autopsy study published in the Lancet. The study was allegedly removed due to its conclusions not being supported by the methodology.</p>
<h2>Analysis</h2>
<p>The study in question was a pre-print awaiting peer-review, authored by Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Harvey Risch, and their colleagues. Pre-prints are preliminary reports that have not undergone the rigorous peer-review process necessary for publication in reputable journals. The Lancet removed the study, stating that the conclusions were not supported by the study methodology.</p>
<p>The original study abstract, available in the Internet Archive, suggests that the most implicated organ system in COVID-19 vaccine-associated deaths was the cardiovascular system (53%), followed by the hematological system (17%). The study concluded that there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death in most cases.</p>
<p>However, the removal of the study by the Lancet indicates significant methodological concerns. Pre-prints are often removed if they fail to meet basic screening criteria or if the methodology is deemed flawed. The fact that the study was removed so quickly suggests that it did not meet the necessary standards for further review.</p>
<p>Dr. Clare Craig, a pathologist, acknowledged that while the approach taken in the study is sound, there may be a bias towards reporting autopsies where there was evidence of causation. This bias could exaggerate the likelihood of causation. She also emphasized the importance of open scientific critique over censorship.</p>
<h2>Scientific Evidence</h2>
<p>To date, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has not acknowledged a single death being caused by COVID-19 vaccines. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is designed to alert to potential harms but is not the best way of measuring the extent of those harms. Quantifying the impact of deaths can be done by looking at overall mortality rates in a country, but this method is also imperfect.</p>
<p>A study published in the <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104840">New England Journal of Medicine</a> found no evidence of increased mortality rates among vaccinated individuals compared to unvaccinated individuals. Another study in the <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(23)00207-4/fulltext">Lancet</a> &nbsp;concluded that COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective, with rare adverse events.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that a Lancet review found 74% of deaths linked to COVID-19 vaccines is based on a pre-print study that was removed due to methodological concerns. The removal of the study indicates that the conclusions were not supported by the methodology. The claim is not substantiated by peer-reviewed evidence, and the available scientific literature does not support the assertion that COVID-19 vaccines are causing a significant number of deaths.</p>
<p>It is crucial to rely on peer-reviewed studies and open scientific critique to assess the safety and efficacy of vaccines. Censorship of flawed studies is a necessary part of maintaining scientific integrity.</p>

Claim Review: Lancet Removes Autopsy Study Linking 74% of Deaths to COVID-19 Vaccines

<h2>IntroductiFactCheck.orgon</h2>
<p>A recent article from The People's Voice claims that health insurance data shows a significant increase in people receiving cancer treatment since 2020, coinciding with the start of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign. This claim review aims to investigate the validity of this assertion.</p>
<h2>The Claim</h2>
<p>The article states that according to Helsana, a major Swiss health insurance company, there was a 73% increase in cancer treatments in 2021 and a 74% increase in 2022 compared to 2020. The article suggests a potential link between this increase and the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, which began in Switzerland on December 23, 2020.</p>
<h2>Investigation</h2>
<p>The claim is based on data from the Helsana Drug Report, which has been published annually for the past 10 years. However, the article does not provide a direct link to the report or specific data to verify the claim. Additionally, the article mentions a health survey conducted by the Swiss Federal Statistical Office (BfS), but the data from this survey was reportedly removed a few days later.</p>
<p>To evaluate the claim, we need to consider several factors:</p>
<h3>Context of Cancer Treatment Data</h3>
<p>Cancer treatment data can fluctuate due to various reasons, including changes in screening practices, diagnostic methods, and healthcare access. The COVID-19 pandemic itself may have led to delays in cancer screenings and treatments, which could result in a subsequent increase in reported cases.</p>
<h3>Scientific Evidence</h3>
<p>There is no established scientific evidence linking COVID-19 vaccines to an increase in cancer rates. Extensive clinical trials and ongoing monitoring have not identified such a correlation. For example, an article published in <a href="https://www.factcheck.org/2024/05/still-no-evidence-covid-19-vaccination-increases-cancer-risk-despite-posts/">FactCheck.org</a> &nbsp;found no evidence of increased cancer risk associated with COVID-19 vaccines.</p>
<h3>Expert Opinions</h3>
<p>Health experts and regulatory bodies, such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), have consistently affirmed the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines. Any claims suggesting a link between vaccines and increased cancer rates should be scrutinized with caution.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The claim that there has been a dramatic increase in cancer treatments since 2020, coinciding with the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, is not substantiated by reliable scientific evidence. The article lacks context and does not provide sufficient data to support the assertion. While the Helsana Drug Report may show an increase in cancer treatments, this could be due to various factors unrelated to vaccines. Therefore, the claim is rated as <strong>1 out of 5</strong>, indicating it is likely false.</p>

Claim Review: Increase in Cancer Treatments Post-2020

<h1>Claim Review: Cellphone Radiation and Brain Cancer</h1>
<p>The claim that cellphone radiation may cause brain cancer has been a topic of debate for many years. Several peer-reviewed studies have been conducted to investigate this claim, but the evidence is not conclusive. While some studies show a link between cellphone radiation and brain cancer, others do not.</p>
<p>A recent study published in Environmental Health analyzed 24 studies and found significantly higher risks for malignant brain tumors, meningioma, and glioma on the side of the head where cellphones were held. The study also found that heavy, long-term cellphone use was linked to an increased risk of glioma. This study brings the number of meta-analyses published since 2016 linking cellphone radiation to an increased risk of brain cancer to seven.</p>
<p>However, a recent WHO-led study claimed there’s no evidence of a link between cellphone radiation and brain cancer. Some experts have suggested that the WHO picked industry-biased researchers to conduct its review. Lennart Hardell, a leading scientist who found a link between cellphone use and gliomas, agreed that the WHO study authors should be responsible for their fraudulent behavior violating human health and the environment.</p>
<p>Brain tumor rates are on the rise in Denmark, which is known for its high-quality tracking of cancer cases. This data contradicts the notion that the rate of brain tumors isn’t on the rise, which has been used to claim that cellphone use is not linked to an increased risk of brain tumors or cancers in general. A 2023 study on brain cancer rates worldwide from 1990-2019 found a significant rise in brain cancer among both men and women in nearly all parts of the world.</p>
<p>The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) claims there’s not enough scientific evidence to link cellphone use to health problems, including brain cancer. However, the FDA rejected the findings of a $30 million study it commissioned on the topic, which concluded there was 'clear evidence' that male rats exposed to high levels of wireless radiation like that used in 2G and 3G cellphones developed cancerous heart tumors, and 'some evidence' of tumors in the brain and adrenal gland of exposed male rats.</p>
<p>In conclusion, while some studies suggest a link between cellphone radiation and brain cancer, the evidence is not conclusive. The World Health Organization and other health agencies have not found sufficient evidence to support this claim. More research is needed to fully understand the potential risks.</p>
<h2>References</h2>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12940-024-01117-8">Relationship between radiofrequency-electromagnetic radiation from cellular phones and brain tumor: meta-analyses using various proxies for RF-EMR exposure-outcome assessment</a> - Jinyoung Moon, Jungmin Kwon &amp; Yongseok Mun, Environmental Health volume 23, Article number: 82 (2024)&nbsp;</li>
</ul>

Claim Review: Record High Cancer Cases in England and Potential Links to COVID-19 Vaccines and Mobile Phones

Reviewed by
Remedia Ai

Almost 1,000 people a day are diagnosed with cancer in England, with the increase potentially linked to COVID-19 vaccines and mobile phone usage.

Introduction

Claim Analysis

COVID-19 Vaccines and Cancer

Mobile Phones and Cancer

Alternative Explanations

Conclusion

Who is claiming:

View all this data in real-time using one of our extensions

Chrome

Firefox Android

Content you might like:

Claim Almost 1,000 people a day are diagnosed with cancer in England, with the increase potentially linked to COVID-19 vaccines and mobile phone usage.
Claim RatingFalse	Claim DateNovember 0, 2024

Claim Review: Record High Cancer Cases in England and Potential Links to COVID-19 Vaccines and Mobile Phones

Reviewed byRemedia Ai

Almost 1,000 people a day are diagnosed with cancer in England, with the increase potentially linked to COVID-19 vaccines and mobile phone usage.

Introduction

Claim Analysis

COVID-19 Vaccines and Cancer

Mobile Phones and Cancer

Alternative Explanations

Conclusion

Who is claiming:

View all this data in real-time using one of our extensions

Chrome

Firefox Android

Content you might like:

Reviewed by
Remedia Ai