Claim Review: Argentine Study on COVID Vaccines Containing 55 Undeclared Chemical Elements

Introduction

A recent study from Argentina published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research claims that COVID-19 vaccines from Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, CanSino, Sinopharm, and Sputnik contain 55 undeclared chemical elements. The study suggests that these elements, including heavy metals and rare earth minerals, are potentially harmful. However, the Health Ranger, a prominent figure in the alternative health community, has critiqued the study, highlighting several errors and misleading information.

The Claim

The Argentine study claims that the presence of these undeclared elements in COVID-19 vaccines poses a significant health risk. The study identified 11 heavy metals, such as chromium, arsenic, nickel, aluminum, cobalt, and copper, which are known to be systemic toxicants. Additionally, the study found several rare earth minerals, including lanthanum, cerium, and gadolinium.

Critique of the Study

The Health Ranger, in a video response, argues that the study is flawed and misleading. He points out that not all elements are inherently dangerous and that the combination of elements can produce different chemicals with varying levels of toxicity. The Health Ranger also criticizes the study's methodology, stating that the math is off and that incorrect dilution factors were used, rendering the results unreliable.

Scientific Context

It is essential to understand that elements and chemicals are not the same. Elements are the basic building blocks of matter, while chemicals are compounds formed by combining elements. The toxicity of an element depends on its form and concentration. For example, hydrogen, carbon, and oxygen can combine to form vitamin C, which is beneficial, or they can form other compounds that are toxic.

The presence of elements in vaccines does not automatically mean they are harmful. Many elements are naturally occurring and can be found in trace amounts in various substances, including food and water. The key factor is the concentration and form of these elements.

Previous Studies and Regulatory Oversight

The Argentine study is not the first to claim the presence of undeclared elements in vaccines. Previous studies from Germany, England, Canada, and Romania have also identified undeclared elements in COVID-19 vaccines. However, these studies have been criticized for their methodology and interpretation of data.

Regulatory agencies, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), require vaccine manufacturers to list excipients, which are additives used as preservatives, adjuvants, or stabilizers. However, the CDC has been criticized for making vaccine excipient information difficult to find.

Conclusion

The claim that COVID-19 vaccines contain 55 undeclared chemical elements is misleading and based on a flawed study. While the presence of undeclared elements in vaccines is concerning, the study's methodology and interpretation of data are questionable. Not all elements are inherently dangerous, and their toxicity depends on their form and concentration. Further research is needed to determine the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines.

References

• Widely-touted '55 undeclared chemical elements' VACCINE study is a clown show of incompetence and errors - Brighteon.com
• Vaccines News | Vaccines News Health Related News
• 55 Undeclared Chemical Elements — Including Heavy Metals — Found in COVID Vaccines • Children's Health Defense
• Contact Natural News Support