Pastorka Mojmirćič

The Expose News - com

<p>ijijdwaijawjidwadjwaidjiwaijijdwaijawjidwadjwaidjiwaijijdwaijawjidwadjwaidjiwaijijdwaijawjidwadjwaidjiwaijijdwaijawjidwadjwaidjiwaijijdwaijawjidwadjwaidjiwaijijdwaijawjidwadjwaidjiwaijijdwaijawjidwadjwaidjiwaijijdwaijawjidwadjwaidjiwaj</p>

Content checker Thomas

<p>In today’s interconnected world, wireless internet access has become ubiquitous, found in nearly every coffee shop, office, and home. However, the claim that Wi-Fi signals are not benign and can influence brainwaves, leading to hypnotic effects and social engineering, requires a thorough examination.</p>
<p>The content suggests that radio-frequency (RF) radiation from Wi-Fi can interfere with brain waves, particularly extremely low frequency (ELF) waves, which can make a person unknowingly enter a suggestive state of mind. This claim is attributed to Keith Cutter, a critic of modern wireless technology.</p>
<p>To evaluate this claim, it is essential to understand the scientific basis behind the effects of RF and ELF waves on the human brain. Wi-Fi operates using radio-frequency electromagnetic fields, transmitting data via pulse-modulated RF radiation. While it is true that Wi-Fi devices emit low levels of RF radiation, the cumulative impact of this exposure over time is a subject of ongoing research.</p>
<p>The content highlights the effect of ELF waves, which range from approximately 3 to 30 Hz, overlapping with the natural oscillation frequencies of the human brain. The brain’s electrical activity is divided into different frequency bands, each associated with different states of consciousness and mental function. The concern is that the 10Hz ELF pulses emitted by Wi-Fi beacons can induce brainwave entrainment, synchronizing brainwaves to an external frequency.</p>
<p>Brainwave entrainment refers to the synchronization of brainwaves to an external frequency. When the brain is exposed to a consistent external stimulus at a particular frequency, such as the 10Hz signal emitted by Wi-Fi, it can shift its own natural brainwave patterns to match. At 10Hz, the brain enters a more relaxed state, akin to alpha waves, which corresponds to reduced cortical activity.</p>
<p>However, the claim that prolonged exposure to the 10Hz ELF signal can create a “suggestible state,” making the brain more susceptible to external influences, is not supported by scientific evidence. While brainwave entrainment is a recognized phenomenon, its potential for mind control or social engineering is speculative and lacks empirical support.</p>
<p>Another concern raised is the potential for Wi-Fi to have a “memory effect” on body tissues, leading to long-term physical changes or health conditions. This claim is also not supported by reliable scientific studies. The concept of “trauma memory” in the body is a psychological concept, and its application to electromagnetic radiation is not backed by evidence.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the claim that Wi-Fi can influence brainwaves and has potential for hypnotic effects and social engineering is largely unsupported by scientific evidence. While there are legitimate concerns about the effects of electromagnetic radiation, the specific claims made in the content are not backed by reliable studies.</p>
<p>References:</p>
<p>1. <a href="https://www.who.int/india/health-topics/electromagnetic-fields">Electromagnetic fields and public health: mobile phones</a> - World Health Organization</p>
<p>2. <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504984/">Health effects of electromagnetic fields: EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses</a> - Belpomme D, Hardell L, Belyaev I, Burgio E, Carpenter DO</p>
<p>3. <a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10198548/">Brainwave entrainment: a review and quantitative analysis</a> &nbsp;- Huang TL, Charyton C</p>

Claim Review: Wi-Fi Can Influence Brainwaves and Has Potential for Hypnotic Effects and Social Engineering

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The myth of overpopulation has been a persistent concern for many, suggesting that the world's growing population will strip the Earth of its usable resources, leading to diminishing standards of living, poverty, hunger, and environmental catastrophes. This article aims to debunk this myth by examining historical data, current trends, and expert opinions.</p>

<h2>Historical Context</h2>
<p>The myth of overpopulation can be traced back to the late 18th century when Thomas Malthus published his essay on the principle of population. Malthus theorized that population growth would outpace food production, leading to widespread famine and poverty. However, his predictions have not come to pass due to advancements in agriculture and technology.</p>

<h2>Current Trends</h2>
<p>Today, the world produces enough food to feed 10 billion people, yet hunger remains a problem in some regions due to political failures and distribution issues rather than overpopulation. According to the World Education Service, the world currently produces 17% more calories per person than it did 30 years ago. This indicates that food production has kept pace with population growth.</p>

<p>Water scarcity is another concern often linked to overpopulation. However, the Earth is awash in water, with oceans covering 70% of the planet's surface. The challenge lies in making freshwater accessible to those who need it. Since 1900, freshwater withdrawals have increased sevenfold, while the world population has increased only fourfold. This suggests that our ability to access usable water is increasing faster than population growth.</p>

<h2>Population Growth Rate</h2>
<p>Contrary to popular belief, the world population is not growing exponentially. The global population growth rate has been declining since its peak in the early 1960s. Between 1950 and 2000, the world population grew at a rate of 1.76%. Between 2000 and 2050, it is expected to grow by 0.77 percent. This decline in growth rate is due to factors such as increased life expectancy, urbanization, and education, which lead to lower fertility rates.</p>

<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>The myth of overpopulation is largely unfounded. Historical data and current trends show that innovation and resource management can sustain a growing population. While challenges such as hunger and water scarcity persist, they are not caused by overpopulation but by political failures and distribution issues. It is crucial to address these challenges through effective policies and technological advancements rather than perpetuating the myth of overpopulation.</p>

<h2>References</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href='https://www.pop.org/overpopulation-myth/'>What is the myth of overpopulation? - Population Research Institute</a></li>
<li><a href='https://www.pop.org/debunking-the-myth-of-overpopulation/'>Debunking the Myth of Overpopulation - Population Research Institute</a></li>
<li><a href='https://www.usccb.org/committees/pro-life-activities/myth-overpopulation-and-folks-who-brought-it-you'>The Myth of Overpopulation and the Folks Who Brought it to You | USCCB</a></li>
</ul>

Debunking the Myth of Overpopulation: A Comprehensive Review

<p>Dezinformacija o grafen oksidu ponovno je oživjela zahvaljujući pogrešnoj interpretaciji dokumentacije koju je Pfizer poslao američkoj Upravi za hranu i lijekove.</p>
<p><img src="https://faktograf.hr/site/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/grafenoksid-ilutracijadalle-1053x675.jpg"/></p>
<p>Ilustracija: DALL-E</p>
<p>“Povjerljivi dokumenti Pfizera potvrđuju da se grafen oksid nalazi u cjepivima protiv Covida”, naslov je članka (arhivirano <a href="https://archive.li/NKUuL" rel="noopener" target="_blank">ovdje</a>) objavljenog na portalu Epoha za koji je Faktograf u <a href="https://faktograf.hr/tag/epoha/" rel="noopener" target="_blank">više navrata</a> utvrdio da širi dezinformacije.</p>
<blockquote>“Više od dvije godine spekuliralo se da “cjepiva” protiv Covid-19 sadrže grafen oksid, otrovnu tvar koja može izazvati čudne krvne ugruške i uništiti crvena krvna zrnca”, navodi autor na početku teksta.</blockquote>
<p>Radi se o staroj dezinformaciji koja se često pojavljuje, a o kojoj je Faktograf pisao više puta. Velik doprinos širenju ove lažne informacija u Hrvatskoj je dao nekadašnji zviždač iz Imunološkog zavoda, a danas jedan od vodećih hrvatskih promotora antivakserskih dezinformacija <strong>Srećko Sladoljev</strong>. On je otišao toliko daleko da je tvrdio da <a href="https://faktograf.hr/2021/07/16/grafenov-oksid-nije-uzrocnik-covida-ne-nalazi-se-cjepivima-i-ne-cini-od-nas-mobilne-uredaje/" rel="noopener" target="_blank">unosom cjepiva postajemo (rijetki) mobilni uređaji</a>, što je dokazivao pregledom raspoloživih Bluetooth veza. Potom se dezinformacija širila rubnim portalima, o čemu smo također pisali (<a href="https://faktograf.hr/2022/02/24/hidre-nisu-strpane-u-cjepiva-i-ne-zive-vjecno/" rel="noopener" target="_blank">ovdje</a>, <a href="https://faktograf.hr/2022/04/29/grafen-i-dalje-nije-sastojak-cjepiva-protiv-covida-19/" rel="noopener" target="_blank">ovdje</a> i <a href="https://faktograf.hr/2022/10/27/nije-tocno-da-mrna-cjepiva-uzrokuju-talozenje-ugljika-u-organizmu/" rel="noopener" target="_blank">ovdje</a>).</p>
<p>Epoha tako tvrdi da je “američka Uprava za hranu i lijekove (FDA) sada potvrdila da se grafen oksid nalazi u mRNA Covid cjepivima nakon što je bila prisiljena objaviti povjerljive Pfizerove dokumente prema nalogu američkog Saveznog suda”.</p>
<figure><img src="https://faktograf.hr/site/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/pfizer-grafen-oksid-539x450.jpg"/>Screenshot/Facebook</figure>
<p>Prema podacima platforme CrowdTangle, članak je podijeljen na dvije stranice na Facebooku, a prikupio je 51 dijeljenje, pet komentara i 1 ostalu reakciju.</p>
<p>Identičnu dezinformaciju ranije je kao netočnu razotkrilo više <em>fact-checkerskih</em> organizacija s engleskog govornog područja – <a href="https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-fda-pfizer-document-vaccine-graphene-oxide-988165173107" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Associated Press</a>, <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-graphene-document-idUSL1N367204" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Reuters</a>, <a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2023/03/28/fact-check-document-shows-graphene-used-test-covid-19-vaccine-not-make/11556190002/" rel="noopener" target="_blank">USA Today</a> i <a href="https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2023/03/fact-check-pfizer-documents-do-not-prove-covid-vaccines-contain-graphene-oxide.html" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Lead Stories</a>.</p>
<p>Sastav Pfizerova cjepiva <a href="https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/comirnaty-epar-product-information_en.pdf" rel="noopener" target="_blank">javno je dostupan</a> i na popisu nema grafen oksida, materijala nastalog oksidacijom grafita, potvrdilo je više stručnjaka za <a href="https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-430816913228" rel="noopener" target="_blank">AP</a>.</p>
<p>Autor teksta na Epohi za svoje se navode poziva na Pfizerovu studiju koju je objavila Američka agencija za hranu i lijekove (FDA) pod nazivom <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20230323140023/https:/phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/125742_S1_M4_4.2.1-vr-vtr-10741.pdf" rel="noopener" target="_blank">“Strukturalna i biofizička karakterizacija šiljastog glikoproteina SARS-CoV-2 (P2 S) kao antigena cjepiva”</a> (eng. <em>Structural and Biophysical Characterization of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein (P2 S) as a Vaccine Antigen</em>) i tvrdi da studija dokazuje da je grafen oksid sastojak Pfizerova cjepiva, ali to nije točno.</p>
<h4>Grafen oksid koristi se za proučavanje strukture cjepiva, ne za proizvodnju</h4>
<blockquote>“Laički rečeno, studija se provodi kako bi se utvrdilo kako cjepivo djeluje. Studija je otkrila da je cjepivo koristilo mRNA kako bi uputilo vaše stanice da proizvode protein (nazvan P2 S), koji je šiljasti protein navodnog virusa Covid-19. Milijuni šiljastih proteina zatim se vežu za receptor zvan ACE2 na površini vaših stanica, pokrećući odgovor imunološkog sustava. Ali ono što je najzanimljivije u studiji je da na stranici 7 potvrđuje da proizvodnja Pfizerovog cjepiva protiv Covid-19 zahtijeva reducirani grafen oksid jer je on potreban kao baza za lipidne nanočestice”, navodi se dalje u tekstu.</blockquote>
<p>Kako navodi <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-graphene-document-idUSL1N367204" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Reuters</a>, sinopsis prikazan na 3. stranici dokumenta objašnjava da je studija bila namijenjena karakterizaciji fizičkih svojstava verzije koronavirusnog proteina šiljka koji se koristi u Pfizer/BioNTech cjepivu protiv Covida-19. Autor teksta i korisnici interneta referiraju se na odjeljak “3.4 Cryo-EM od P2 S” na stranici 7 (snimka zaslona <a href="https://ibb.co/5KtzQXJ" rel="noopener" target="_blank">ovdje</a>), koja opisuje metodu korištenu za vizualizaciju proteina pomoću vrste elektronske mikroskopije.</p>
<p>Referenca na grafen oksid može se pronaći u prvoj rečenici odjeljka i navodi sljedeće: „Za P2 S s oznakom TwinStrep, 4 μL pročišćenog proteina u koncentraciji od 0,5 mg/mL naneseno je na zlatnu Quantifoil R1.2/1.3 mrežicu od 300 mreža svježe prekriven grafen oksidom.”</p>
<p>Britansko Kraljevsko društvo za biologiju za Reuters je pojasnilo da je kriogeno-elektronska mikroskopija (cryo-EM) tehnika za proučavanje “strukturnog rasporeda bioloških uzoraka” smrzavanjem uzoraka na vrlo niskim temperaturama. Kombiniranjem različitih pogleda na molekularni uzorak, njegova se struktura može prevesti u 3D model.</p>
<h4>Proces validacije cjepiva potpuno odvojen od proizvodnje cjepiva</h4>
<p>Da je grafen oksid samo sastojak koji se koristi da bi se proučavala struktura cjepiva potvrdio je doktor <strong>Matthew Laurens</strong>, pedijatrijski specijalist za zarazne bolesti i istraživač u Centru za razvoj cjepiva Medicinskog fakulteta Sveučilišta Maryland. “Grafen oksid nije sastojak cjepiva”, naglasio je Laurens za <a href="https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-fda-pfizer-document-vaccine-graphene-oxide-988165173107" rel="noopener" target="_blank">AP</a>.</p>
<p>Pfizerova studija odnosno dokument opisuje proces validacije cjepiva u laboratoriju, ističe liječnik <strong>Thomas Russo</strong>, ravnatelj Odsjeka za zarazne bolesti na Medicinskom fakultetu Sveučilišta u Buffalu za <a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2023/03/28/fact-check-document-shows-graphene-used-test-covid-19-vaccine-not-make/11556190002/" rel="noopener" target="_blank">USA Today</a>. “To pokazuje proces evaluacije, a ne kako je cjepivo napravljeno”, rekao je o dokumentu.</p>
<p>Na 7. stranici, dokument opisuje proces testiranja odnosno može li mRNA u cjepivu dovesti do proizvodnje proteina šiljka, ističe Russo. Opisani proces koristi rešetke od zlatne mreže prekrivene grafen oksidom kako bi se protein vizualizirao pod mikroskopom, a taj proces validacije potpuno je odvojen od proizvodnje cjepiva, napominje liječnik.</p>
<p>Glasnogovornica Pfizera je za Reuters, Lead Stories i USA Today također potvrdila da njihovo cjepivo ne sadrži grafen oksid.</p>
<p>“Potvrđujemo da se grafen oksid ne koristi u proizvodnji Pfizer-BioNTech cjepiva protiv Covida-19”, kratko su poručili iz Pfizera.</p>
<p>Zaključno, nije točno da su Pfizerovi dokumenti potvrdili da se grafen oksid nalazi u cjepivima protiv Covida. Ono što dokumenti koje je Pfizer ustupio Američkoj agenciji za hranu i lijekove pokazuju jest da se grafen oksid koristio u proučavanju strukture cjepiva, a to je proces koji je potpuno odvojen od proizvodnje cjepiva, što su potvrdili i stručnjaci. Također, na stranicama <a href="https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/comirnaty-epar-product-information_en.pdf" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Europske agencije za lijekove</a> kao i <a href="https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccines#additional" rel="noopener" target="_blank">FDA-a</a> može se pronaći sastav Pfizerova cjepiva i grafen oksid se ne nalazi na popisu. Stoga ovu objavu na portalu Epoha ocjenjujemo netočnom.</p>

Ne, dokumenti Pfizera nisu otkrili da je grafen oksid ipak sastojak cjepiva - Faktograf.hr

<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p>The claim that Facebook provided secret online tools and trained CDC employees to censor the American public on COVID-19 and vaccine-related topics has gained traction in recent discussions. This article aims to review the claim, providing a thorough analysis based on available evidence and reliable sources.</p>
<h2>Background</h2>
<p>The claim originates from a report by NaturalNews.com, which alleges that Facebook collaborated with the CDC to censor content related to COVID-19 and vaccines. The report suggests that this collaboration involved the use of secret online tools and training sessions for CDC employees.</p>
<h2>Evidence and Analysis</h2>
<p>To evaluate the claim, it is essential to examine the available evidence and context.</p>
<h3>Collaboration Between Facebook and CDC</h3>
<p>It is well-documented that social media platforms, including Facebook, have collaborated with health authorities to combat misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, Facebook has implemented policies to remove or reduce the distribution of content that contains false claims about COVID-19 and vaccines. This collaboration is not unique to Facebook and the CDC; similar efforts have been observed with other platforms and health organizations.</p>
<h3>Training and Tools</h3>
<p>The claim suggests that Facebook provided secret online tools and trained CDC employees to censor content. While it is plausible that Facebook provided training and tools to help the CDC identify and report misinformation, the extent and secrecy of these efforts are not fully substantiated. The use of the term 'secret' implies a level of covertness that is not supported by available evidence.</p>
<h3>Censorship and Free Speech</h3>
<p>The claim also raises concerns about censorship and free speech. It is important to note that while social media platforms have the right to moderate content, they must do so in a manner that respects users' rights and adheres to their own policies. The balance between combating misinformation and preserving free speech is a complex issue that has been the subject of ongoing debate.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>Based on the available evidence, the claim that Facebook provided secret online tools and trained CDC employees to censor the American public is partially true but lacks context and overstates the extent of the collaboration. While there is evidence of collaboration between Facebook and the CDC, the specifics of the training and tools provided are not fully substantiated. Moreover, the claim raises important questions about the balance between combating misinformation and preserving free speech.</p>
<h2>References</h2>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://www.facebook.com/communitystandards/misinformation">Facebook Community Standards on Misinformation</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://archive.cdc.gov/#/results?q=https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/communication/guidance-list.html&amp;start=0&amp;rows=10">CDC Guidance on COVID-19 Communication</a>&nbsp;</li>
  <li><a href="https://www.nature.com/search?q=fight+against+covid+misinformation&amp;order=relevance">Nature: The fight against COVID-19 misinformation</a>&nbsp;</li>
</ul>

Content checker Thomas

Reviewed by
pajosko

Drug research has not significantly advanced in the past half-century, with most new drugs being variations of existing ones.

Who is claiming:

View all this data in real-time using one of our extensions

Chrome

Firefox Android

Content you might like:

Claim Drug research has not significantly advanced in the past half-century, with most new drugs being variations of existing ones.
Claim RatingFalse	Claim DateJanuary 6, 2025

Content checker Thomas

Reviewed bypajosko

Drug research has not significantly advanced in the past half-century, with most new drugs being variations of existing ones.

Who is claiming:

View all this data in real-time using one of our extensions

Chrome

Firefox Android

Content you might like:

Reviewed by
pajosko